# pdgfootnote

pdgid: S032S25
text:
FRABETTI 1996B uses both e and mu events, and makes a small correction to the mu events to make them effectively e events. This result gives |V(c d)/V(c s).f(+)**pi(0)/f(+)**K(0)|**2 = 0.050+-0.011+-0.002.


pdgid: S032S25
text:
BUTLER 1995 has 87+-33 pi- e+ nu_e events. The result gives |V(c d)/V(c s).f(+)**pi(0)/f(+)**K(0)|**2 = 0.052+-0.020+-0.007.


pdgid: S032Q80
text:
Seen 100% via D0 --> rho(770)- e+ nu_e, and also reported as the branching fraction for D0 --> rho(770)- e+ nu_e.


pdgid: S032C39
text:
This result is the same as the one reported for D0 --> pi- pi0 e+ nu_e which ABLIKIM 2019C found to proceed 100% via D0 --> rho(770)- e+ nu_e. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024CP.


pdgid: S032P95
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AW obtain f(+)**a_{{0}}()(0)|V(cd)| = 0.126+-0.013+-0.003 using a single-pole parametrization for the form factor and a_{{0}}() branching fractions deduced from the analysis of ABLIKIM 2017K.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
ABLIKIM 2018W measured the combined K-+ pi+- branching fraction to be 3.898%. We have subtracted off the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed branching fraction B(D0 --> K+ pi-) =, even though it is less than one-third of the uncertainty of the combined measurement, in order to treat this as a measurement of B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S032R12
text:
ABACHI 1988, DECAMP 1991J, AKERIB 1993, ALBRECHT 1994F, and BARATE 1997C use D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+ decays. The pi+ is both slow and of low pT with respect to the event thrust axis or nearest jet (~~D^*()+ direction). The excess number of such pi+'s over background gives the number of D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+ events, and the fraction with D0 --> K- pi+ gives the D0 --> K- pi+ branching fraction.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
ARTUSO 1998, following ALBRECHT 1994, uses D0 mesons from Bbar0 --> D^*(2010)+ X lepton- nubar_lepton decays. Our average uses the CLEO average of this value with the values of COAN 1998 and AKERIB 1993.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
COAN 1998 assumes that Gamma(B --> Dbar X lepton+ nu)/Gamma(B --> X lepton+ nu) = 1.0 -3|V(u b)/V(c b)|**2-0.010+-0.005, the last term accounting for Bbar --> D_s()+ K X lepton- nubar. COAN 1998 is included in the CLEO average in ARTUSO 1998.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
ALBRECHT 1994 uses D0 mesons from Bbar0 --> D^*()+ lepton- nubar_lepton decays. This is a different set of events than used by ALBRECHT 1994F.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
This AKERIB 1993 value includes radiative corrections; without them, the value is 0.0391+-0.0008+-0.0017. AKERIB 1993 is included in the CLEO average in ARTUSO 1998.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.24+-0.02 nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6 nb.


pdgid: S032R12
text:
PERUZZI 1977 (MARK-1) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.25+-0.05 nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6 nb.


pdgid: S032S07
text:
The difference of HE 2008 D0 --> K0S pi0 and K0L pi0 branching fractions over the sum is 0.108+-0.025+-0.024. This is consistent with U-spin symmetry and the Cabibbo angle.


pdgid: S032R21
text:
See the footnote on the ALBRECHT 1994F measurement of Gamma(K- pi+)/Gamma(total) for the method used.


pdgid: S032R21
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.30+-0.08 nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6 nb.


pdgid: S032R21
text:
PERUZZI 1977 (MARK-1) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.46+-0.12 nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6 nb.


pdgid: S032B59
text:
The error on this AUBERT 2008AL value includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties; the latter dominates.


pdgid: S032R19
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.68+-0.23 nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6 nb.


pdgid: S032R24
text:
SCHINDLER 1981 (MARK-2) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.68+-0.11 nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6 nb.


pdgid: S032R24
text:
PERUZZI 1977 (MARK-1) measures sigma(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) x branching fraction to be 0.36+-0.10 nb. We use the MARK-3 (ADLER 1988C) value of sigma = 5.8+-0.5+-0.6 nb.


pdgid: S032B43
text:
In addition to the 14 ABLIKIM 2017O branching ratios we have listed, the paper gives 15 more ratios for mostly non-resonant modes. Four of the 15 have less than 2-standard-deviation significance. Here are some of the omitted modes, with S, P, V, A, and T for scalar, pseudo-scalar, vector, axial-vector, and tensor spin sub-structures: pi+ (K- rho0)_P, pi+ (K- rho0)_V, pi+ (Kbar^*()0 pi-)_P, pi+ (Kbar^*()0 pi-)_V, pi+ ( pi- ( K- pi+)(S-wave))(A), (K- pi+)_V (pi+ pi-)_S, (K- pi+)_T (pi+ pi-)_S...


pdgid: S032R25
text:
AGUILAR-BENITEZ 1987F and BARLAG 1992C compute the branching fraction using topological normalization. They do not distinguish the presence of a third pi0, and thus are not included in the average.


pdgid: S032R25
text:
ADLER 1988C uses an absolute normalization method finding this decay channel opposite a detected Dbar0 --> K+ pi- in pure D Dbar events.


pdgid: S032D26
text:
ABLIKIM 2022U determines the ratios B(D0 --> K0S pi0 omega)/B(D0 --> K- pi+ omega) =   0.23+-0.01+-0.01 and B(D+ --> K0S pi+ omega)/B(D0 --> K- pi+ omega) =  0.21+-0.01+-0.01, in significant tension with statistical isospin model expectations of 0.4 and 0.9 respectively.


pdgid: S032D24
text:
ABLIKIM 2022U determines the ratio B(D0 --> K0S pi0 omega)/B(D0 --> K- pi+ omega)  =  0.23+-0.01+-0.01, in significant tension with statistical isospin model expectation of 0.4.


pdgid: S032S03
text:
The eta here is detected in its gamma gamma mode, but other eta modes are included in the value given.


pdgid: S032S04
text:
In addition to K0S a_0(980) and Kbar^*(892)0 eta modes, RUBIN 2004 finds a fit fraction of 0.246+-0.092+-0.091 for other, undetermined modes.


pdgid: S032Q97
text:
CHEN 2020A reports 0.500+-0.002+-0.020+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(D0 --> K- pi+ eta)/G(D0 --> K- pi+)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] assuming B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.41+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. The third reported uncertainty is the uncertainty from B(eta --> gamma gamma).


pdgid: S032Q98
text:
CHEN 2020A reports 1.41+-0.04+0.12-0.11+-0.01E-2 from a measurement of [G(D0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] assuming B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.41+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. The third reported uncertainty is the uncertainty from B(eta --> gamma gamma).


pdgid: S032D32
text:
ABLIKIM 2022W reports 0.414+-0.021+-0.010E-2 from a measurement of [G(D0 --> K0L phi)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 0.491+-0.005, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S032C45
text:
AUBERT,B 2005J calls the mode K0S f_0(1400), but insofar as it is seen here at all, it is certainly the same as f_{{0}}(1370).


pdgid: S032E05
text:
The pi pi S-wave is parametrized by a K-matrix with five coupled channels (2 pi, 2 K, 4 pi, 2 eta, eta eta^') and five poles, as in DEANDREA 2008.


pdgid: S032E13
text:
Seen with 4.6 sigma significance in a combined fit to 2.2k D0 --> pi+ pi- 2pi0 and 5.8k D0 --> 2pi+ 2pi- events.


pdgid: S032E15
text:
This comprises h_{{1}}()0 decays to rho+ pi-, rho0 pi0, and rho- pi+, with relative rates constrained to obey isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S032E27
text:
The relative size of the D0 --> f_2 ( pi+ pi- ), f_2 --> pi0 pi0 and D0 --> f_2 ( pi0 pi0 ), f_2 --> pi+ pi- amplitudes is constrained to obey isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S032P00
text:
AAIJ 2016N gives results for two S-wave parameterisations. We take the values from the model with LASS parametrization, and the difference as a systematic uncertainty.


pdgid: S032P02
text:
AAIJ 2016N gives results for two S-wave parameterisations. We take the values from the model with LASS parametrization, and the difference as a uncertainty (which in this case dominates)


pdgid: S032P03
text:
AAIJ 2016N gives results for two S-wave parameterisations. We take the values from the model with LASS parametrization, and the difference as a systematic uncertainty (which in this case dominates).


pdgid: S032S08
text:
The only major difference between fits I and II in the AUBERT 2007T analysis is in this mode, where the fit-I fraction is (16.3+-3.4+-2.1)%.


pdgid: S032S11
text:
When AUBERT 2007T replace the f_0(980) pi0 mode with a_0(980) pi0, the fit fraction is a negligibly different (11.0+-1.5+-1.2)%.


pdgid: S032R05
text:
The error is statistical only. CAWLFIELD 2006A also fits the Dalitz plot replacing this flat nonresonant background with broad S-wave kappa+- --> K+- pi0 resonances. There is no significant improvement in the fit, and K^*()+- K-+ and phi pi0 results are not much changed.


pdgid: S032D18
text:
LI 2021G reports [G(D0 --> phi(1020) eta)/G(D0 --> K- pi+ eta)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 4.82+-0.23+-0.16E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S032B9
text:
LINK 2005G uses a smaller, cleaner subset of 1279+-48 events for the amplitude analysis that gives the results in the next data blocks.


pdgid: S032Q03
text:
ARTUSO 2012 and DARGENT 2017 use the same dataset, but ARTUSO 2012 uses a formulation for the D-wave component that is in fact a mix of S- and D-wave, while DARGENT 2017 uses a pure D-wave. This explains the discrepancy in their rho phi S- and D-wave components.


pdgid: S032Q16
text:
ARTUSO 2012 use a formulation for the D-wave component that is in fact a mix of S- and D-wave, while DARGENT 2017 uses a pure D-wave.


pdgid: S032Q23
text:
DARGENT 2017 find K^*(1410)+ pi- and K^*(1680)+ pi-, which both peak outside the D0 --> K K pi pi kinematic range, effectively indistinguishable; we list their result under K^*(1680)+ pi-.


pdgid: S032P61
text:
DARGENT 2017 find K^*(1410)+ pi- and K^*(1680)+ pi-, which both peak outside the D0 --> K K pi pi kinematic range, effectively indistinguishable.


pdgid: S032B93
text:
ABLIKIM 2022 determines the longitudinal polarization fraction of the phi and omega, f_{{L}} = 0.00+-0.10+-0.08, corresponding to f_{{L}} < 0.24 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S032S26
text:
The BITENC 2008 right-sign sample includes about 15% of D0 --> K- pi0 lepton+ nu_lepton and other decays.


pdgid: S032S26
text:
AITALA 1996C uses D^*()+ --> D0 pi+ (and charge conjugate) decays to identify the charm at production and D0 --> K- lepton+ nu_lepton (and charge conjugate) decays to identify the charm at decay.


pdgid: S032R61
text:
This LINK 2005H result assumes no mixing but allows CP violation. If neither mixing nor CP violation is allowed, R = 4.29+-0.63+-0.28E-3.


pdgid: S032R61
text:
This AUBERT 2003Z result allows CP violation. If CP violation is not allowed, R = 0.00359+-0.00020+-0.00027.


pdgid: S032R08
text:
This AAIJ 2018K value is for direct and indirect CP violation allowed. The value is the same if either one or the other is not allowed, but in each case the error then is 0.028+-0.014E-3.


pdgid: S032R08
text:
This LINK 2005H result allows CP violation. Allowing mixing but not CP violation, R(D) = 3.81+1.67-1.63+-0.92E-3.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This ZHANG 2006 result allows CP violation, but the result does not change if CP violation is not allowed.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This LI 2005A result allows CP violation. The limit becomes < 0.00042 (95% CL) if CP violation is not allowed.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This AUBERT 2003Z result allows CP violation and assumes that the strong phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- is small, and limits only D0 --> Dbar0 transitions via off-shell intermediate states. The limit on transitions via on-shell intermediate states is 0.0016.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This GODANG 2000 result allows CP violation and assumes that the strong phase between D0 --> K+ pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- is small, and limits only D0 --> Dbar0 transitions via off-shell intermediate states. The limit on transitions via on-shell intermediate states is 0.0017.


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This BARATE 1998W result assumes no interference between the DCS and mixing amplitudes (y' = 0 in the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing'' near the start of the D0 Listings). When interference is allowed, the limit degrades to 0.036 (95%CL).


pdgid: S032R9
text:
This ANJOS 1988C result assumes no interference between the DCS and mixing amplitudes (y' = 0 in the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing'' near the start of the D0 Listings). When interference is allowed, the limit degrades to 0.019.


pdgid: S032R75
text:
This ASNER 2005 limit allows CP violation. If CP violation is not allowed, the limit is 0.0042 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S032C24
text:
A combined fit with a recent LHCb D0 Dbar0 mixing results in AAIJ 2016F is also reported to be 2.00+-0.11E-3.


pdgid: S032R00
text:
This AUBERT,B 2006N limit assumes no CP violation. The measured value corresponding to the limit is 2.3+1.8-1.4+-0.4E-4. If CP violation is allowed, this becomes 1.0+2.2-0.7+-0.3E-4.


pdgid: S032P22
text:
This result uses external input on the mixing parameters x, y. Without this input, the result is 3.215+-0.136E-3.


pdgid: S032P22
text:
A combined fit with a recent LHCb D0 Dbar0 mixing results in AAIJ 2016F is also reported to be 3.01+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: S032R62
text:
AAIJ 2016F result comes from time-dependent analysis that uses external input on the mixing parameters x, y. Without this input, the result is 3.29+-0.08E-3.


pdgid: S032R62
text:
AMMAR 1991 cannot and DYTMAN 2001, TIAN 2005 do not distinguish between doublyCabibbo-suppressed decay and D0-Dbar0 mixing.


pdgid: S032R62
text:
This AITALA 1998result assumes no D0-Dbar0 mixing (R(M) in the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing'').It becomes -0.0020+0.0117-0.0106+-0.0035 whenmixing is allowed and decay-time information is used todistinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from mixing.


pdgid: S032R62
text:
ANJOS 1988C uses decay-time information to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed (DCS) decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing. However, the result assumes no interference between the DCS and mixing amplitudes (y' = 0 in the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing'' near the start of the D0 Listings). When interference is allowed, the limit degrades to 0.033.


pdgid: S032S83
text:
AAIJ 2016F result comes from an unconstrained decay-time dependent fit to the wrong-sign to right-sign decay rates ratio as (x^2 + y^2)/2.


pdgid: S032S83
text:
ANJOS 1988C uses decay-time information to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed (DCS) decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing. However, the result assumes no interference between the DCS and mixing amplitudes (y' = 0 in the note on ``D0-Dbar0 Mixing'' near the start of the D0 Listings). When interference is allowed, the limit degrades to 0.007.


pdgid: S032R99
text:
AITALA 1998 uses decay-time information to distinguish doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decays from D0-Dbar0 mixing. The fit allows interference between the two amplitudes, and also allows CP violation in this term. The central value obtained is 0.0039+0.0036-0.0032+-0.0016. When interference is disallowed, the result becomes 0.0021+-0.0009+-0.0002.


pdgid: S032R99
text:
This combines results of ANJOS 1988C on K+ pi- and K+ pi- pi+ pi- (via Dbar0) reported in the data block above (see footnotes there). It assumes no interference.


pdgid: S032R7
text:
Here MISHRA 1994 uses ``the statistical approach advocated by the PDG.'' For an alternate approach, giving a limit of 9E-6 at 90% confidence level, see the paper.


pdgid: S032C14
text:
AAIJ 2025M value measured only in the region m(e+ e-) > 2mass(mu), for five different dielectron mass intervals. The systematic uncertainty includes a 13.7% relative uncertainty from the normalization mode D0 --> K- pi+ (e+ e-)(rho/omega).


pdgid: S032C14
text:
ADACHI 2025W sets limits at 90% CL of order E-7 to E-6 for four different dielectron mass ranges, 520 < m(e+ e-) < 560 MeV, 675 < m(e+ e-) < 875 MeV, 995 < m(e+ e-) < 1035 MeV, and m(e+ e-) > 200 MeV excluding resonance regions.


pdgid: S032R63
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <1.8E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032C15
text:
The second AAIJ 2017BG error is the systematic 0.51E-7 and normalization 0.97E-7 mode errors added in quadrature.


pdgid: S032P67
text:
AAIJ 2014B measures this branching-fraction limit relative to the pi+ pi- phi, phi --> mu+ mu- fraction. The above limit excludes the resonant phi, omega, and rho regions, and then fills those gaps with a phase-space model.


pdgid: S032R64
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <4.5E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S47
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <2.7E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S48
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <6.5E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032C18
text:
AAIJ 2025M sets limits for three different dielectron mass ranges, 2mass(mu) < m(e+ e-) < 525 MeV, 525 MeV < m(e+ e-) < 565 MeV, and m(e+ e-) > 565 MeV.


pdgid: S032C18
text:
ADACHI 2025W sets limits at 90% CL of order E-7 to E-6 for three different dielectron mass ranges, 520 < m(e+ e-) < 560 MeV, m(e+ e-) > 675 MeV, and m(e+ e-) > 200 MeV excluding resonance regions.


pdgid: S032S49
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <7.6E-5 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032C19
text:
The second AAIJ 2017BG error is the systematic 0.09E-7 and normalization 0.16E-7 mode errors added in quadrature.


pdgid: S032S50
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <2.4E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032R70
text:
ABLIKIM 2018P report a 90% C.L. limit on D0 --> KS e+ e- of 1.2E-5 which is here interpreted in terms of D0 --> Kbar0 e+ e-.


pdgid: S032Q86
text:
ADACHI 2025W also sets upper limits at 90% CL for the mass(e+ e-) resonant regions around the mass(eta) and mass(phi), < 5.6E-7 and < 2.9E-7, respectively.


pdgid: S032Q86
text:
Observation with 9.7 sigma significance. The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the branching fraction of the normalization mode, D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-. The second uncertainty is other systematic and is dominated by the model parameterization.


pdgid: S032Q86
text:
LEES 2019A also sets an upper limit for non-resonant regions, where long-distance effects are expected to be small: < 3.1E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S032S51
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <2.0E-4 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S52
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <1.0E-3 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S54
text:
LEES 2020A quotes separate limits B(D0 --> eta e+- mu-+, eta --> gamma gamma) < 24.0E-7 and B(D0 --> eta e+- mu-+, eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) < 43.0E-7.


pdgid: S032S55
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <5.0E-5 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S56
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The same limit is obtained using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032S57
text:
This FREYBERGER 1996 limit is obtained using a phase-space model. The limit changes to <3.3E-5 using a photon pole amplitude model.


pdgid: S032EFL
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CO also reports the measurement of the strong phase difference between D0 and Dbar0 decays in bins of the phase space.


pdgid: S032EFL
text:
A combination of three consistent measurements with CP-eigenstate, quasi-CP-eigenstate and CP-mixed tags.


pdgid: S032EFL
text:
MALDE 2015 and DARGENT 2017 use different CLEO data sets, so in principle their results could be averaged. However, given the importance that model-independence has in the use of this value, we exclude the amplitude model-derived result from the average.


pdgid: S032A96
text:
A combined measurement of the CP-even fraction using both CP tags and K_S,L()0 pi+ pi- tags. ABLIKIM 2023AJ reports CP-even fractions 0.704+-0.042+-0.028 and 0.798+-0.077+-0.019 for  the former and latter tags, respectively.


pdgid: S032A1
text:
AAIJ 2023AC result comes from 5.7 fb**-1 of data. Also reports the values of the direct CP asymmetries, a(pi pi)**CP = 23.2+-6.1E-4 and a(KK)**CP = 7.7+-5.7E-4, with a correlation of 88%, obtained using previous determinations of A(CP)(K K), DeltaA(CP), DeltaY, the reconstructed mean decay times of D0 --> pi pi and D0 --> K K in the aforementioned measurements, and the world average of the D0 lifetime  (PDG 2022).


pdgid: S032A1
text:
STARIC 2008 uses D0 --> K- pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- decays to correct for detector-induced asymmetries.


pdgid: S032A1
text:
AITALA 1998C, LINK 2000B, CSORNA 2002, and ACOSTA 2005C measure N(D0 --> K+ K-)/N(D0 --> K- pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the Dbar0.


pdgid: S032A8
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024BB reports a value of 6.3+-3.0+-0.2+-0.8E-2 where the third uncertainty is from the world-average value of A(CP)(K0S pi+ pi-) = 0.1+-0.8%. We have added the systematic uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S032A8
text:
AAIJ 2021X reports a value of -3.1+-1.2+-0.4+-0.2E-2 where the third uncertainty  is from A(CP)(K+ K-) = 0.04+-0.12+-0.10%, as measured by LHCb. We have added the systematic uncertainties in quadrature. Supersedes AAIJ 2018AV.


pdgid: S032A8
text:
The systematic uncertainty is dominated by the uncertainty on A(CP) in the control channel D0 --> KS pi0.


pdgid: S032A8
text:
Based on data collected by Belle and Belle II. D0 flavor determined using D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+ decays.


pdgid: S032A8
text:
Based on data collected by Belle and Belle II. D0 flavor inferred using the information from the charged particles of the rest of the event.


pdgid: S032A4
text:
AAIJ 2017M value combines DeltaA(CP)(pi pi, K K) from AAIJ 2016D, A(CP)(K K) from AAIJ 2017M, and A(CP)(pi pi) from AAIJ 2014AK.


pdgid: S032A4
text:
AITALA 1998C, LINK 2000B, CSORNA 2002, and ACOSTA 2005C measure N(D0 --> pi+ pi-)/N(D0 --> K- pi+), the ratio of numbers of events observed, and similarly for the Dbar0.


pdgid: S032A5
text:
This AUBERT 2003Z limit assumes no mixing. If mixing is allowed, the 95% confidence-level interval is (-2.8~<A(D)<~4.9)x10**-3.


pdgid: S032A5
text:
This GODANG 2000 result assumes no D0-Dbar0 mixing and becomes -0.43<A(CP)<+0.34 at 95% CL. If mixing is allowd A(CP) = -0.01+0.16-0.17+-0.01.


pdgid: S032A72
text:
ABLIKIM 2022B uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770) to  measure the asymmetry of the branching fraction of D0 --> K- pi+ in CP-odd and  CP-even eigenstates. It then extracts the strong-phase difference delta(K pi).


pdgid: S032A72
text:
ABLIKIM 2022B uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770) to   measure the asymmetry of the branching fraction of D0 --> K- pi+ in CP-odd and   CP-even eigenstates, using the predominantly CP-even decay D0 --> pi+ pi- pi0 mode as   reference. It then extracts the strong-phase difference delta(K pi).


pdgid: S032A72
text:
ABLIKIM 2014C uses quantum correlations in e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 at the psi(3770) to measure the asymmetry of the branching fraction of D0 --> K- pi+ in CP-odd and CP-even eigenstates. It then extracts the strong-phase difference delta(K pi). Superseded by ABLIKIM 2022BM.


pdgid: S032A6
text:
KOPP 2001 fits separately the D0 and Dbar0 Dalitz plots and then calculates the integrated difference of normalized densities divided by the integrated sum.


pdgid: S032A10
text:
This is the overall result of AALTONEN 2012AD. Following are the 15 CP fit-fraction asymmetries from the amplitude analysis of the D0 and Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- Dalitz plots.


pdgid: S032A10
text:
This is the overall result of ASNER 2004A; CP-violating limits are also given below for each of the 10 resonant submodes found in an amplitude analysis of the D0 and Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- Dalitz plots.


pdgid: S032D54
text:
SANGAL 2023 also measures the parity asymmetry A(T) in the sign of the triple product of momenta between one K(S)0 (the one with higher momentum) and the two charged pions, and reports the resulting CP asymmetry between the CP conjugate modes (A(T) - Abar(T))/2 = -1.95+-1.42+0.14-0.12E-2.


pdgid: S032C77
text:
Supersedes AAIJ 2018I. This analysis provides the first complete angular analysis of D0 --> K+ K- mu+ mu-,  and measures angular moments for several bins in the dimuon invariant mass. The mass of the  dihadron system is required to be less than 1200 MeV.


pdgid: S032C78
text:
Supersedes AAIJ 2018I. This analysis provides the first complete angular analysis of D0 --> pi+ pi- mu+ mu-,  and measures angular moments for several bins in the dimuon invariant mass. The mass of the  dihadron system is required to be less than 1200 MeV.


pdgid: S032DCP
text:
Calculated from the AUBERT 2008M values of A(CP)(K+ K-) and A(CP)(pi+ pi-). The systematic error here combines the systematic errors in quadrature, and therefore somewhat over-estimates it.


pdgid: S032L01
text:
Unusually, AAIJ 2015A assigns an uncertainty on the p value of +-0.5%. This results from limited test statistics.


pdgid: S032TV0
text:
KIM 2019 also study CP-violating asymmetries in several other kinematic variables. No evidence for CP violation is found in any of them.


pdgid: S032C76
text:
PRASANTH 2017 also measures A(Tviol) in sub-regions of the D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0 phase-space. No evidence of T violation is found.


pdgid: S032CPT
text:
The constraints are derived by reinterpreting the LHCb measurement of the time-dependent asymmetry in the Cabibbo-favored D0 --> K- pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- decay rates. These constraints can be directly translated into the flavor eigenstate decay width difference deltaGamma = Gamma(D0) - Gamma(Dbar0) by the relation deltaGamma = (yRe(z) - xIm(z)) x 2Gamma, yielding (-4.7 < deltaGamma < 2.1) x E-16 GeV at 95% CL.


pdgid: S032FP0
text:
LEES 2015F reports a value 0.1374+-0.0038+-0.0022+-0.0009, where the last uncertainty is due to the uncertainties of the D0 --> K- pi+ branching fraction.


pdgid: S032FA0
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AW uses a single-pole parametrization for the form factor and a_{{0}}() branching fractions deduced from the analysis of ABLIKIM 2017K.


pdgid: S032PWA
text:
AAIJ 2019C also provides measurements of CP violation in D0 --> K+ K- pi+ pi-, with results compatible with CP symmetry.


pdgid: M061DM
text:
Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration. This value comes from the average of the results for two decay modes, D0 --> K- pi+ and D0 --> K- pi+ pi- pi+.


pdgid: M061R2
text:
Derived from the ratio Gamma(D0 pi0) / Gamma(D0 gamma) assuming that the branching fractions of D^*()0 --> D0 pi0 and D^*()0 --> D0 gamma decays sum to 100%.


pdgid: M061R2
text:
The BUTLER 1992 and ALBRECHT 1995F branching ratios are not independent, they have been constrained by the authors to sum to 100%.


pdgid: M061R01
text:
AAIJ 2023D reports <2.6E-8 from a measurement of [G(D^*(2007)0 --> mu+ mu-)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+)] assuming B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+) = 4.90+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+) = 5.17E-3. The reported value also assumes B(B- --> J/psi(1S) K-) = 10.20+-0.19E-4 and B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 59.61+-0.33E-3 for the normalization mode B- --> J/psi(1S) K-.


pdgid: M062M
text:
From simultaneous fit to D^*(2010)+, D^*(2007)0, D+, and D0; not independent of FELDMAN 1977B mass difference below.


pdgid: M062M
text:
PERUZZI 1977 mass not independent of FELDMAN 1977B mass difference below and PERUZZI 1977 D0 mass value.


pdgid: M062EM
text:
Not independent of FELDMAN 1977B mass difference above, PERUZZI 1977 D0 mass, and GOLDHABER 1977 D^*(2007)0 mass.


pdgid: M062R2
text:
Not independent of G(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)/G(total) and [G(D^*(2010)+ --> D+ pi0)/G(total) measurement.


pdgid: M252M
text:
From the Dalitz plot analysis including various K^* and D^** mesons as well as broad structures in the K pi S-wave and the D pi S- and P-waves.


pdgid: M253M
text:
From the combined fit of the M(D+ pi-) and M(D^*()+ pi-) distributions. and A(D_{{2}}) fixed to the theoretical prediction of -1.


pdgid: M253M
text:
From the fit of the M(D0 pi+) distribution. The widths of the D_{{1}}()+ and D_{{2}}^*()+ are fixed to 25 MeV and 37 MeV, and A(D_{{1}}()) and A(D_{{2}}()) are fixed to the theoretical predictions of 3 and -1, respectively.


pdgid: M253M
text:
Calculated using the mass difference m(D_{{1}}^0()) - m(D^*()+)(PDG) reported below and m(D^*()+)(PDG) = 2010.27+-0.17 MeV. The 0.17 MeV uncertainty of the PDG mass value should be added to the experimental uncertainty of 0.9 MeV.


pdgid: M253PAH
text:
From the combined fit of the M(D+ pi-) and M(D^*()+ pi-) distributions. and A(D_{{2}}) fixed to the theoretical prediction of -1. A pure D-wave not excluded although some S-wave mixing possible.


pdgid: M253PAH
text:
Assuming Gamma(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) / Gamma(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 1.065+-0.026 and equal partial widths and helicity angle distributions for charged and neutral D_{{1}}() mesons.


pdgid: M254M
text:
From the amplitude analysis in the model describing the D+ pi- wave together with virtual contributions from the D^*(2007)0 and B^*0() states, and components corresponding to the D_{{2}}^*(2460)0, D_{{1}}^*(2680)0, D_{{3}}^*(2760)0, and D_{{2}}^*(3000)0 resonances.


pdgid: M254M
text:
From the amplitude analysis in the model describing the D+ pi- wave together with virtual contributions from the D^*(2007)0 and B^*()0 states, nonresonant spin-0 and spin-1 components as well as the D_{{0}}^*(2400)0, D_{{2}}^*(2460)0 and D_{{1}}^*(2760)0 resonances.


pdgid: M254M
text:
Calculated using the mass difference m(D_{{2}}^*()0) - m(D^*()+)(PDG) reported below and m(D^*()+)(PDG) = 2010.27+-0.17 MeV. The 0.17 MeV uncertainty of the PDG mass value should be added to the experimental uncertainty of +1.2 MeV.


pdgid: M254M
text:
Fit includes the contribution from D_{{0}}^*(2400)+-. Not independent of the corresponding mass difference measurement, (mass(D_{{2}}^*(2460)+-)) - (mass(D_{{2}}^*(2460)0)).


pdgid: M254R01
text:
Assuming Gamma(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) / Gamma(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 1.065+-0.026 and equal partial widths for charged and neutral D_{{2}}^*() mesons.


pdgid: M203PAM
text:
Systematic uncertainties not estimated. The states observed in the D^*() pi and D pi final states are not necessarily the same.


pdgid: S034T
text:
This AAIJ 2017AN value is derived from the difference between the D_{{s}}()- and D- widths. The 3rd uncertainty, +-1.7E-15 s, arises from the uncertainty of the D- width.


pdgid: S034R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AC finds that the ratio of the D_{{s}}()+ and D0 semielectronic widths is 0.790+-0.016+-0.020.


pdgid: S034R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AC reports a value of 6.30+-0.13+-0.09+-0.04E-2, where the last uncertainty is an external systematic from B(D_s()+ --> tau nu). We have added the systematic uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S034R28
text:
Using the D_{{s}}()+ and D0 lifetimes, ASNER 2010 finds that the ratio of the D_{{s}}()+ and D0 semileptonic widths is 0.828+-0.051+-0.025.


pdgid: S034R7
text:
ABLIKIM 2016O also reports that when constrained by the Standard Model ratio of Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.76, the branching fraction is found to be (0.495+-0.067+-0.026)%. The constrained value is used to obtain the decay constant, f(D_{{s}}()+) = (241.0+-16.3+-6.6) MeV.


pdgid: S034R7
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010J uses mu+ nu_mu and tau+ nu_tau events together to get f(D_{{s}}) = (258.6+-6.4+-7.5) MeV.


pdgid: S034R7
text:
PEDLAR 2007A also fits mu+ and tau+ events together and gets an effective mu+ nu_mu branching fraction of (6.38+-0.59+-0.33)xE-3


pdgid: S034R7
text:
This HEISTER 2002I result is not actually an independent measurement of the absolute mu+ nu_mu branching fraction, but is in fact based on our phi pi+ branching fraction of 3.6+-0.9%, so it cannot be included in our overall fit. HEISTER 2002I combines its D_s+ --> tau+ nu_tau and mu+ nu_mu branching fractions to get f(D_{{s}})= (285+-19+-40) MeV.


pdgid: S034R50
text:
AUBERT 2007V gets f(D_{{s}}()+)= (283+-17+-16) MeV, using Gamma(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)/Gamma(total) = (4.71+-0.46)%.


pdgid: S034R50
text:
ALEXANDROV 2000 uses f(D)**2/f(D_{{s}})**2 = 0.82+-0.09 from a lattice-gauge-theory calculation to get the relative numbers of D+ --> mu+ nu_mu and D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu events. The present result leads to f(D_{{s}})= (323+-44+-36) MeV.


pdgid: S034R50
text:
CHADHA 1998 obtains f(D_{{s}}) = (280+-19+-28+-34) MeV from this measurement, using Gamma(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)/Gamma(total) = 0.036+-0.009.


pdgid: S034R50
text:
ACOSTA 1994 obtains f(D_{{s}}) = (344+-37+-52+-42) MeV from this measurement, using Gamma(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)/Gamma(total) = 0.037+-0.009.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2016O also reports that when constrained by the Standard Model ratio of Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.76; the branching fraction is found to be (4.83+-0.65+-0.26)%.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010J (with a small correction; see LEES 2015D) uses mu+ nu_mu and tau+ nu_tau events together to get f(D_{{s}}) = (259.9+-6.6+-7.6) MeV.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
ALEXANDER 2009, NAIK 2009A, and ONYISI 2009 use different tau decay modes and are independent. The three papers combined give f(D_{{s}}) = (259.7+-7.8+-3.4) MeV.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2021BE uses tau+ --> pi+ nubar_tau decays. When constrained by the Standard Model ratio of Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.75, the branching fraction is found to be (5.22+-0.10+-0.14)%. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2023BP.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
ECKLUND 2008 and PEDLAR 2007A are independent: ECKLUND 2008 uses tau+ --> e+ nu_e nubar_tau events, PEDLAR 2007A uses tau+ --> pi+ nubar_tau events.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
HEISTER 2002I combines its D_s+ --> tau+ nu_tau and mu+ nu_mu branching fractions to get f(D_{{s}})= (285+-19+-40) MeV.


pdgid: S034R76
text:
The second ACCIARRI 1997F error here combines in quadrature systematic (0.016) and normalization (0.018) errors. The branching fraction gives f(D_{{s}}) = (309+-58+-33+-38) MeV.


pdgid: S034S20
text:
This ECKLUND 2008 value also uses results from PEDLAR 2007A, and it is not independent of other results in these Listings. Combined with earlier CLEO results, the decay constant f(D_{{s}}) is 274+-10+-5 MeV.


pdgid: S034S23
text:
This AUBERT 2008AN ratio is only for the K+ K- mass in the range 1.01-to-1.03 GeV in the numerator and 1.0095-to-1.0295 GeV in the denominator.


pdgid: S034R71
text:
BRANDENBURG 1995 uses both e+ and mu+ events and makes a phase-space adjustment to use the mu+ events as e+ events.


pdgid: S034P54
text:
Assuming B(f_0() --> pi0 pi0) = 1/3 via the isospin limit, this result implies B(D_s()+ --> f_0(980) e+ nu_e) = 2.4+-0.4E-3.


pdgid: S034S48
text:
HIETALA 2015 uses a tighter cut on the reconstructed pi+ pi- mass (+-60 MeV around the f0) than ECKLUND 2009. It finds that applying the same tight cut to both analyses gives consistent results.


pdgid: S034Q01
text:
Partial wave analysis of 939 D_s()+ --> K+ K- mu+ nu_mu events, assuming K+ K- S-wave is 100% f_{{0}}(980).


pdgid: S034S71
text:
ZUPANC 2013 finds the Kbar0 from its missing-mass squared, not from K0S --> pi+ pi-. The DCS (D_s()+ --> K+ K0) contribution to this fraction is estimated to be an order of magnitude below the statistical uncertainty.


pdgid: S034R6
text:
This AUBERT 2006N measurement uses Bbar0 --> D_s^(*)()- D^(*)()+ and B- --> D_s^(*)()- D^(*)()0 decays, including some from other papers. However, the result is independent of AUBERT 2005V.


pdgid: S034R6
text:
AUBERT 2005V uses the ratio of B0 --> D^*()- D_s^*()+ events seen in two different ways, in both of which the D^*()- --> Dbar()0 pi- decay is fully reconstructed: (1) The D_s^*()+ --> D_s()+ gamma, D_s()+ --> phi pi+ decay is fully reconstructed. (2) The number of events in the D_{{s}}()+ peak in the missing mass spectrum against the D^*()- gamma is measured.


pdgid: S034R6
text:
ARTUSO 1996 uses partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ D_s^*()- decays to get a model-independent value for Gamma(D_s()- --> phi pi-)/Gamma(D0 --> K- pi+) of 0.92+-0.20+-0.11.


pdgid: S034R6
text:
BAI 1995C uses e+ e- --> D_s()+ D_s()- events in which one or both of the D_{{s}}()+- are observed to obtain the first model-independent measurement of the D_s()+ --> phi pi+ branching fraction, without assumptions about sigma(D_{{s}}()+-). However, with only two ``doubly-tagged'' events, the statistical error is very large.


pdgid: S034P85
text:
ABLIKIM 2022AH observe an a_{{0}}()-like state with mass mass(a_{{0}}()) = 1.817+-0.008+-0.020  GeV,  and name the intermediate resonance a_{{0}}(1817). We interpret this as the a_{{0}}(1710)  observed by LEES 2021A.


pdgid: S034P65
text:
Based on isospin considerations, the authors interpret the suppression in the observed rate of this  mode compared to D_S()+ --> f_0(980) pi+, f_0() --> K+ K- as likely due to the destructive  interference between a_{{0}}(980) and f_{{0}}(980) in decays to KS KS.


pdgid: S034P16
text:
See G(D_s()+ --> phi rho+, phi --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(D_s()+ --> 2pi+ pi- 2pi0), Gamma(132)/Gamma(130). ABLIKIM 2025F reports 3.98+-0.33+0.21-0.19E-2 from a measurement of [[G(D_s()+ --> phi rho+)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> rho pi + pi+ pi- pi0)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> rho pi + pi+ pi- pi0) = 14.9+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> rho pi + pi+ pi- pi0) = 14.7+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S034S03
text:
ABLIKIM 2021U uses an amplitude analysis of D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+ pi0 with 9 components. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024BD.


pdgid: S034P24
text:
Kbar_1(1270)0 --> K^*(892) pi denotes a sum over Kbar(892)0 pi0 and K(892)- pi+ final states, which are assumed to have relative branching ratio 1/2, as per isospin.


pdgid: S034P26
text:
Kbar_1(1400)0 --> K^*(892) pi denotes a sum over Kbar(892)0 pi0 and K(892)- pi+ final states, which are assumed to have relative branching ratio 1/2, as per isospin.


pdgid: S034S13
text:
AAIJ 2023AN, ABLIKIM 2022BI, and AUBERT 2009O give the amplitude and phase of the  pi+ pi-  S-wave in bins of pi+ pi- invariant-mass. (50 bins for AAIJ 2023AN, 29  for ABLIKIM 2022BI and AUBERT 2009O.)


pdgid: S034R82
text:
FRABETTI 1997D calls this mode S(1475) pi+, but finds the mass and width of this S(1475) to be in excellent agreement with those of the f_{{0}}(1500).


pdgid: S034S17
text:
ABLIKIM 2025A reports [G(D_s()+ --> eta pi+)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 3.58+-0.21+-0.06E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 23.02+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S034Q55
text:
Amplitude analysis of 2.0k D_s()+ --> 2pi+ pi- 2pi0 events, with 14 components. The value quoted here includes an omega rho+ S-, P-, and D-wave, where the D-wave component dominates.


pdgid: S034Q56
text:
Amplitude analysis of 2.0k D_s()+ --> 2pi+ pi- 2pi0 events, with 14 components. The value quoted here includes a phi rho+ S- and P-wave components.


pdgid: S034Q58
text:
Amplitude analysis of 2.0k D_s()+ --> 2pi+ pi- 2pi0 events, with 14 components. The value quoted here includes an a_1 rho S- and P-wave components.


pdgid: S034P07
text:
Coherent sum of D_s()+ --> a_0()+ pi0 --> eta pi+ pi0 and D_s()+ --> a_0()0 pi+ --> eta pi+ pi0. ABLIKIM 2019BE find a_{{0}}(980)0-f(980) mixing effects negligibly small in this D_s()+ --> eta pi+ pi0 Dalitz plot analysis.


pdgid: S034R33
text:
This JESSOP 1998 fraction, when combined with other eta^' fractions, greatly overshoots the inclusive eta^' fraction. See the measurement just above, which fits nicely.


pdgid: S034P59
text:
Result of an amplitude analysis of D_s()+ --> pi+ pi0 eta^' which found that D_s()+ --> rho+ eta^' is the dominant decay mode, with other contributions negligible. No uncertainty is assigned to this 100% fit fraction; however, the fit fractions of non-resonant contributions are shown to be below 1%.


pdgid: S034S68
text:
An amplitude analysis in the same publication finds that D_s()+ --> rho+ eta^' is the only statistically significant contribution to this decay. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024BD.


pdgid: S034P72
text:
ABLIKIM 2022BL reports [G(D_s()+ --> K+ omega)/G(D_s()+ --> K+ pi+ pi- pi0)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 9.7+-1.5+-0.6E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S034P92
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AB uses an amplitude analysis with 5 resonant modes plus one background component. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024BD.


pdgid: S034A37
text:
Amplitude analysis with 7 components, one of which is a model-independent pi+ pi- S-wave  parametrisation as complex numbers in 50 pi+ pi- mass bins.


pdgid: S034A37
text:
Amplitude analysis with 4 components, one of which is a model-independent pi+ pi- S-wave parametrisation as complex numbers in 29 pi+ pi- mass bins.


pdgid: S034A52
text:
ABLIKIM 2025BR amplitude analysis with 4 resonant modes plus one background component measures the asymmetry of the branching fractions of D_s()+ --> K0S K^*(892)+ and D_s()+ --> K0L K^*(892)+.


pdgid: S034A30
text:
ABLIKIM 2021BE also reports that when constrained by the Standard Model ratio of Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.75, the result is (-0.1+-1.9+-1.0)%.


pdgid: S034A05
text:
LEES 2013E finds that after subtracting the contribution due to K0-Kbar0 mixing, the CP asymmetry is (+0.28+-0.23+-0.24)%.


pdgid: S034A21
text:
AAIJ 2014BD reports its result as A(CP)(D_s()+- --> K0S K+-) with CP-violation effects in the K0-Kbar0 system subtracted. It also measures A(CP)(D+- --> Kbar0 / K0 K+-) + A(CP)(D_s()+- --> Kbar0 / K0 pi+-) = (0.41+-0.49+-0.26)%.


pdgid: S034FR2
text:
To compare with previous measurements, this AUBERT 2008AN value is from a fit that fixes the pole masses at mass(A) = 2.5 GeV/c**2 and mass(V) = 2.1 GeV/c**2. A simultaneous fit to r(2), r(v), r(0) (a significant s-wave contribution) and mass(A), gives r(2) = 0.763+-0.071+-0.065.


pdgid: S034FRV
text:
To compare with previous measurements, this AUBERT 2008AN value is from a fit that fixes the pole masses at mass(A) = 2.5 GeV/c**2 and mass(V) = 2.1 GeV/c**2. A simultaneous fit to r(2), r(v), r(0) (a significant s-wave contribution) and mass(A), gives r(v) = 1.849+-0.060+-0.095.


pdgid: S034A50
text:
From an analysis of D_s()+ --> pi+ pi- e+ mu_e decays. ABLIKIM 2024AT uses a simple pole parametrization of the hadronic form factor and the Flatte' formula for describing the f_{{0}}(980) decay.


pdgid: S034A29
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CG uses tau+ --> (e+ nu_e, mu+ nu_nu, pi+, rho+) nubar_tau decays. The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the D_{{s}}()+ lifetime.


pdgid: S034A29
text:
ABLIKIM 2023BP uses tau+ --> pi+ nubar_tau decays. The third uncertainty is due to the input parameters, mainly the D_{{s}}()+ lifetime.


pdgid: S034A29
text:
The third uncertainty is dominated by the uncertainty of the D_{{s}}()+ lifetime. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2023BP.


pdgid: S034A29
text:
ABLIKIM 2021BE uses tau+ --> pi+ nubar_tau decays. When constrained by the Standard Model ratio  of Gamma(D_s()+ --> tau+ nu_tau)/Gamma(D_s()+ --> mu+ nu_mu) = 9.75, the result is  243.2+-2.3+-3.3+-1.0.


pdgid: M172M
text:
From a fit of the D_{{s}}^* recoil mass where the D_{{s0}}^*(2317) signal is described with a Crystal Ball function convolved with a Gaussian function.


pdgid: M173M
text:
The average of the values obtained from the D_s()+ gamma, D_s()+ pi0 gamma,D_s()+ pi+ pi- final state.


pdgid: M121M
text:
From a fit of the D_{{s}}()+ recoil mass distribution with an incoherent sum of the S-wave and D-wave Breit-Wigner line shapes.


pdgid: M121M
text:
Calculated using mass()(D^*(2010)+-) = 2010.0+-0.5 MeV, mass()(D^*(2007)0) = 2006.7+-0.5 MeV, and the mass difference below.


pdgid: M121M
text:
Calculated using the mass difference mass()(D_{{s1}}()+)- mass()(D^*()+)(PDG) below and mass()(D^*()+)(PDG) = 2010.25+-0.14 MeV. Assuming S-wave decay of the D_{{s1}}(2536) to D^*()+ K0S, using a Breit-Wigner line shape corresponding to L=0.


pdgid: M121M
text:
Calculated using the mass difference m(D_{{s1}}()+) - m(D^*()+)(PDG) reported below and m(D^*()+)(PDG) = 2010.27+-0.17 MeV.


pdgid: M121DN
text:
Assuming S-wave decay of the D_{{s1}}(2536) to D^*()+ K0S, using a Breit-Wigner line shape corresponding to L=0.


pdgid: M121W
text:
From a fit of the D_{{s}}()+ recoil mass distribution with an incoherent sum of the S-wave and S-wave Breit-Wigner line shapes.


pdgid: M121R01
text:
Determined as ratio of exclusive e+ e- --> D_s()+ [ Dbar^*()0 K- ] and inclusive e+ e- --> D_s()+ X measurements.


pdgid: M148R2
text:
Determined as ratio of exclusive e+ e- --> D_s()+ [ Dbar0 K- ] and inclusive e+ e- --> D_s()+ X measurements.


pdgid: M182M
text:
From the combined fit of the D+ K0S and D0 K+ modes in the model including the D_{{s2}}^*(2573)+, D_{{s1}}^*(2700)+ and spin-0 D_{{sJ}}^*(2860)+.


pdgid: M196M
text:
Separated from the spin-3 component D_{{s3}}^*(2860)- by a fit of the helicity angle of the  Dbar0 K- system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in excess of 10 sigma.


pdgid: M196W
text:
Separated from the spin-3 component D_{{s3}}^*(2860)- by a fit of the helicity angle of the Dbar0 K- system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in excess of 10 sigma.


pdgid: M226M
text:
Separated from the spin-1 component D_{{s1}}^*(2860)- by a fit of the helicity angle of the Dbar0 K- system, with a statistical significance of the spin-3 and spin-1 components in excess of 10 sigma.


pdgid: S041M
text:
CSORNA 2000 uses fully reconstructed 526 B+ --> J/psi^(') K+ events and invariant masses without beam constraint.


pdgid: S041M
text:
Found using fully reconstructed decays with J/psi(1S). ALBRECHT 1987D assume mass(Upsilon(4S)) = 10577 MeV.


pdgid: S041T
text:
Measured using B- --> D0 pi- with D0 --> K- pi+ events that were selected using a silicon vertex trigger.


pdgid: S041T
text:
Events are selected in which one B meson is fully reconstructed while the second B meson is reconstructed inclusively.


pdgid: S041S95
text:
URQUIJO 2007 report a measurement of (10.34+-023+-0.25)% for the partial branching fraction of B+ --> e+ nu_e X_c decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B+ --> e+ nu_e X branching fraction.


pdgid: S041S95
text:
The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame. The best precision on the ratio is achieved for a momentum threshold of 1.0 GeV: B(B+ --> e+ nu_e X) / B(B0 --> e+ nu_e X) = 1.074+-0.041+-0.026.


pdgid: S041S95
text:
ARTUSO 1997 uses partial reconstruction of B --> D^* lepton nu_lepton and inclusive semileptonic branching ratio from BARISH 1996B (0.1049+-0.0017+-0.0043).


pdgid: S041S95
text:
The measurements are obtained for charged and neutral B mesons partial rates of semileptonic decay to electrons with momentum above 0.6 GeV/c in the B rest frame, and their ratio of B(B+ --> e+ nu_e X)/B(B0 --> e+ nu_e X) = 1.08+-0.05+-0.02.


pdgid: S041S00
text:
Measure the independent B+ and B0 partial branching fractions with electron threshold energies of 0.4 GeV.


pdgid: S041A53
text:
The correlation of 50% with B(B0 --> lepton+ nu_lepton X_u)(letpon energy in B rest  frame E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV) was reported.


pdgid: S041B04
text:
The relative branching fractions of B- --> D0, D^*()0, D^**()0 in the B- --> D0 X mu- nubar channel are determined by fitting the distribution of the missing mass in Bbar_s2^*()0 --> B- K+ decays.


pdgid: S041D23
text:
Measures the lepton in a primary decay of the signal B meson, while tagging the partner B in fully reconstructed hadronic decay modes.


pdgid: S041R69
text:
Measured using the dependence of B- --> D^*()0 e- nubar_e decay differential rate and the form factor description by CAPRINI 1998.


pdgid: S041R69
text:
ALBRECHT 1992C reports 0.058+-0.014+-0.013. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+). Assumes equal production of B0 Bbar0 and B+ B- at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041R69
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)% and B(D^*()0 --> D0 pi0) = (63.6+-2.3+-3.3)%.


pdgid: S041R69
text:
Combining Dbar^*()0 lepton+ nu_lepton and Dbar^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton SANGHERA 1993 test V-A structure and fit the decay angular distributions to obtain A(FB) = 3/4*(Gamma**--Gamma**+)/Gamma = 0.14+-0.06+-0.03. Assuming a value of V(cb), they measure V, A(1), and A(2), the three form factors for the D^* lepton nu_lepton decay, where results are slightly dependent on model assumptions.


pdgid: S041R69
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 Bbar0 and B+ B- at the Upsilon(4S). Uncorrected for D and D^* branching ratio assumptions.


pdgid: S041B06
text:
In this measurement of f(D^**()0) = B(B- -->(D^**()0 --> D0 X)mu- nubar)/B(B- --> D0 X mu- nubar), D^**()0 refers collectively to L = 1 states D_{{0}}^*(2400), D_{{1}}(2420), D_{{1}}(2430), and D_{{2}}^*(2460), as well as other resonances such as radially excited D mesons, and to nonresonant contributions with additional pions.


pdgid: S041Q54
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008 reports 4.0+-0.4+-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.15+-0.22E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.21+-0.06E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041Q54
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005 reports [G(B+ --> D- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.25+-0.03+-0.03 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.06E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C07
text:
Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 2009Y reports B(B+ --> Dbar_2^*(2460)0 lepton+ nu_lepton). B(Dbar_2^*(2460)0 --> D^(*)()- pi+) = 2.29+-0.23+-0.21E-3 and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.


pdgid: S041Q55
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008 reports 6.4+-0.8+-0.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D^*()- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.15+-0.22E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.21+-0.06E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041Q55
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005 reports [G(B+ --> D^*()- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.12+-0.02+-0.02 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 4.90+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041T70
text:
STYPULA 2012 provides also an upper limit of 0.56E-3 at 90% CL for the same data. Also measures branching fraction of the combined modes of D_s()- K+ lepton+ nu_lepton and D_s^*()- K+ lepton+ nu_lepton as B(B+ --> D_s^(*)()- K+ lepton+ nu_lepton) = 5.9+-1.2+-1.5E-4.


pdgid: S041Q53
text:
Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes B(Y(4S) --> B+ B-) = (51.6+-0.6)% and B(Y(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = (48.4+-0.6)%.


pdgid: S041Q53
text:
The signal events are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in the semileptonic mode B --> D^(*)() lepton nu_lepton.


pdgid: S041Q53
text:
B+ and B0 decays combined assuming isospin symmetry. Systematic errors include both experimental and form-factor uncertainties.


pdgid: S041R70
text:
Derived based in the reported B0 result by assuming isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> pi- lepton+ nu)= 2Gamma(B+ --> pi0 lepton+ nu).


pdgid: S041T10
text:
Uses loose neutrino reconstruction technique. Assumes B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = (51.6+-0.6)% and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = (48.4+-0.6)%.


pdgid: S041T10
text:
The B0 and B+ results are combined assuming the isospin, B lifetimes, and relative charged/neutral B production at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041T10
text:
ATHAR 2003 reports systematic errors 0.16+-0.09, which are experimental systematic and systematic due to model dependence. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S041Q88
text:
The B0 and B+ results are combined assuming the isospin, B lifetimes, and relative charged/neutral B production at the Upsilon(4S). Corresponds to 90% CL interval (1.20 -- 4.46)xE-4.


pdgid: S041S47
text:
LEES 2013A reports 1.21+-0.14+-0.08E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] assuming B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2.


pdgid: S041S47
text:
Uses semileptonic tagging. Assumes B(omega --> pi+ pi- pi0) = (89.2+-0.7)% and that the production ratio of B+ B- to B0 Bbar0 from Upsilon(4S) is 1.056+-0.028. The partial branching fractions in three bins of q**2 are also reported.


pdgid: S041S47
text:
BEAN 1993B limit set using ISGW Model. Using isospin and the quark model to combine Gamma(rho0 lepton+ nu_lepton) and Gamma(rho- lepton+ nu_lepton) with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6 -- 2.7)*10**-4 at 90% CL for B+ --> omega lepton+ nu_lepton. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models. An upper limit on |V(ub)/V(cb)| <0.8 -- 0.13 at 90% CL is derived as well.


pdgid: S041S48
text:
Derived based in the reported B0 result by assuming isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> rho- lepton+ nu)= 2Gamma(B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu)~~ 2Gamma(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu).


pdgid: S041S48
text:
BEAN 1993B limit set using ISGW Model. Using isospin and the quark model to combine Gamma(omega0 lepton+ nu_lepton) and Gamma(rho- lepton+ nu_lepton) with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6 -- 2.7)*10**-4 at 90% CL for B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu_lepton. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models. An upper limit on |V(ub)/V(cb)| <0.8 -- 0.13 at 90% CL is derived as well.


pdgid: S041P88
text:
AAIJ 2020K reports [G(B+ --> p pbar mu+ nu_mu)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 8.75+-0.39+-0.35E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S56
text:
This is a 90% C.L. upper limit in the frequentist approach. The corresponding upper limit in the Bayesian approach is <8.9E-7. A 2.8 standard deviation signal above the background is found, with a measured branching fraction 5.3+-2.0+-0.9E-7.


pdgid: S041S56
text:
This is a 90% confidence interval in the frequentist approach. A 2.4 standard deviation signal above the background is found, with a measured branching fraction 6.46+-2.22+-1.60E-7.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
ADACHI 2025X evidence for the B+ --> tau+ nu_tau decay is found at 3.0 standard deviations, including systematic uncertainties. The accompanying B- mesons are fully reconstructed in exclusive hadronic decays, while the signal in the recoil side is identified in tau --> rho+ nubar_tau with a single charged particle plus a neutral particle final state.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
The authors combine their result with that from HARA 2010 obtaining B(B- --> tau- nubar_tau)=0.96+-0.26E-4 and deriving f_{{B}} |V_(ub)|=7.4+-0.8+-0.5E-4 GeV.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
Requires a fully reconstructed hadronic B-decay in the recoil. Reports that this result combined with AUBERT 2010E value gives B(B- --> tau- nubar_tau) = 1.79+-0.48E-4.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
Requires one reconstructed semileptonic B decay B- --> D^(*)()0 lepton- nubar_lepton X in the recoil.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
The analysis is based on a sample of events with one fully reconstructed tag B in a hadronic decay mode B- --> D^(*)()0 X-.


pdgid: S041S57
text:
BUSKULIC 1995 uses same missing-energy technique as in bbar --> tau+ nu_tau X, but analysis is restricted to endpoint region of missing-energy distribution.


pdgid: S041B9
text:
BROWDER 1997 uses the hermiticity of the CLEO II detector to reconstruct the neutrino energy and momentum.


pdgid: S041B10
text:
Note that the value given by AUBERT 2009AT is 24E-6 in the paper abstract, and 26E-6 in the paper itself (Table I).


pdgid: S041P68
text:
AAIJ 2019P limit established for the kinematic region where the lower of the two M(mu+ mu-) is less than 980 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041Q24
text:
Events are selected by completely reconstructing one B and searching for a reconstructed charmed particle in the rest of the event. The last error includes systematic and charm branching ratio uncertainties.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
ABULENCIA 2006J reports [G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.97+-0.10+-0.21 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
AHMED 2002B reports an additional uncertainty on the branching ratios to account for 4.5% uncertainty on relative production of B0 and B+, which is not included here.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses the Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
BEBEK 1987 value has been updated in BERKELMAN 1991 to use same assumptions as noted for BORTOLETTO 1992.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
AUBERT,B 2004P reports [G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 1.846+-0.032+-0.097E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R1
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D0 --> K- 2pi+ pi-)/B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S041B97
text:
Reports a double ratio of B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)() K+ )/B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)() pi+) and B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+), 1.13+-0.16+-0.08. We multiply by our best value of B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+) = 0.083+-0.006. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B97
text:
ABE 2006 reports [G(B+ --> D_CP(+1) K+)/G(B+ --> D_CP(+1) pi+)] / [[G(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)]] = 1.13+-0.06+-0.08 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value [G(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)]G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)] = 0.0789+-0.0027. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C18
text:
Reports R(CP+) = 2 (B(B- --> D_CP(+1)() K-) + B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)() K+)) / (B(B- --> D0 K-) + B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)) = 1.30+-0.24+-0.12 that we have divided by 2.


pdgid: S041B98
text:
Reports a double ratio of B(B+ --> D_CP(-1)() K+ )/B(B+ --> D_CP(-1)() pi+) and B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+), 1.17+-0.14+-0.14. We multiply by our best value of B(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+) = 0.083+-0.006. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B98
text:
CP=-1 eigenstate of D0 Dbar0 system is reconstructed via K0S pi0, K0S omega, K0S phi, K0S eta, and K0S eta^'.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
AAIJ 2021Q reports the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of B- --> [ K+ pi- ]_D K- and B- --> [ K- pi+ ]_D K- and the ratio of B+ --> [ K- pi+ ]_D K+ and B+ --> [ K+ pi- ]_D K+ are also reported to be 9.5+-0.5+-0.3E-3 and 25.2+-0.8+-0.4E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
AALTONEN 2011AJ also measures the ratio separately for B+ (R**+(K)) and B- (R**-(K)) and obtains: R**+(K) = 42.6+-13.7+-2.8E-3, R**-(K) = 3.8+-10.3+-2.7E-3.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
AUBERT 2005G extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+) / A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.23 at 90% CL (Bayesian). Similar measurements from B+ --> D^*()0 K+ are also reported.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
SAIGO 2005 extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+) / A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.27 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S041Q12
text:
AUBERT,B 2004L extract a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+)/A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.22 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S041Q89
text:
Extracts a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+)/ A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.13 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S041Q89
text:
Extracts a constraint on the magnitude of the ratio of amplitudes |A(B+ --> D0 K+)/ A(B+ --> Dbar0 K+)| < 0.19 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S041Q49
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of B- --> [ K+ pi- ]_D K- and B- --> [ K- pi+ ]_D K- and the ratio of B+ --> [ K- pi+ ]_D pi+ and B+ --> [ K+ pi- ]_D pi+ are also reported to be 4.15+-0.08+-0.04E-3 and 3.20+-0.07+-0.04E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041Q49
text:
AALTONEN 2011AJ also measures the ratio separately for B+ (R**+(pi)) and B- (R**-(pi)) and obtains: R**+(pi) = 2.4+-1.0+-0.4E-3, R**-(K) = 3.1+-1.1+-0.4E-3.


pdgid: S041QD0
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of B- --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D pi0 )_D^* pi- to B- --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D pi0 )_D^* pi- and the ratio of B+ --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D pi0 )_D^* pi+ to B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D pi0 )_D^* pi+, without inclusion of the neutral pion in the reconstruction, are also reported to be 4.05+-0.56+-0.59E-3 and 5.36+-0.56+-0.58E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041QD1
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual the ratio of B- --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma )_D^* pi- to B- --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D gamma )_D^* pi- and the ratio of B+ --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D gamma )_D^* pi+ to B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma )_D^* pi+, without inclusion of the photon in the reconstruction, are also reported to be 4.72+-0.92+-1.18E-3 and 4.03+-0.91+-1.14E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041QD2
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of B- --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D pi0 )_D^* K- to B- --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D pi0 )_D^* K- and the ratio of B+ --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D pi0 )_D^* K+ to B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D pi0 )_D^* K+, without inclusion of the neutral pion in the reconstruction, are also reported to be 20.2+-3.5+-2.3E-3 and 3.3+-3.5+-2.2E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041QD3
text:
AAIJ 2021Q gives the charge-averaged rate, where the statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the observables. The individual ratio of B- --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma )_D^* K- to B- --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D gamma )_D^* K- and the ratio of B+ --> ([ K- pi+ ]_D gamma )_D^* K+ to B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma )_D^* K+, without inclusion of the photon in the reconstruction, are also reported to be 11.7+-21.5+-31.3E-3 and 29.2+-21.4+-31.2E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S041Q61
text:
The authors report R(CP-)= 1.03+-0.27+-0.13 which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio,


pdgid: S041Q61
text:
The authors report R(CP-)= 0.65+-0.26+-0.08 which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio.


pdgid: S041Q62
text:
Measures the ratio separately for K+ K- and pi+ pi- final states, R(K K) = 1.22+-0.09+-0.02 and R(pi pi) = 1.08+-0.14+-0.03, and combines the two results.


pdgid: S041Q62
text:
The authors report R(CP+)= 2.17+-0.35+-0.09 which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio,


pdgid: S041Q62
text:
Measures the ratio separately for K+ K- and pi+ pi- final states, R(K K) = 1.22+-0.09+-0.01 and R(pi pi) = 1.08+-0.14+-0.03, and combines the two results.


pdgid: S041Q62
text:
The authors report R(CP+)= 1.96+-0.40+-0.11 which is, assuming CP conservation, twice the value of the quoted above branching ratio.


pdgid: S041B64
text:
ADACHI 2024L reports 3.64+-0.32+-0.16E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 51.6+-1.2E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 51.1+0.7-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B64
text:
DRUTSKOY 2002 reports 5.5+-1.4+-0.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 K+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 50+-0E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 51.1+0.7-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R85
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S041B54
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). The signal is consistent with all observed omega pi+ having proceeded through the rho^'+ resonance at mass 1349+-25+10-5 MeV and width 547+-86+46-45 MeV.


pdgid: S041R2
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) and absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D0 --> K- 2pi+ pi-)/B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S041R2
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D and D^*(2010). The authors also find the product branching fraction into D^** pi followed by D^** --> D^*(2010) pi to be 0.0014+0.0008-0.0006+-0.0003 where D^** represents all orbitally excited D mesons.


pdgid: S041R2
text:
ALBRECHT 1987C use PDG 1986 branching ratios for D and D^*(2010) and assume B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 55% and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 45%. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1990J.


pdgid: S041P42
text:
The branching fraction of the normalization mode B+ --> D^*()- pi+ pi+ is rescaled to the updated ratio of Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B- to Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0 decay rates of 1.058+-0.024.


pdgid: S041C69
text:
AAIJ 2011E reports 9.3+-1.6+-0.9E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar_1(2420)0 pi+, Dbar_1()0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ pi+ pi-)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2.


pdgid: S041R14
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the Mark III B(D+ --> K- 2pi+).


pdgid: S041R14
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D. The product branching fraction into D_0^*(2340) pi followed by D_0^*(2340) --> D pi is <0.005 at 90%CL and into D_{{2}}^*(2460) followed by D_2^*(2460) --> D pi is <0.004 at 90%CL.


pdgid: S041R14
text:
BEBEK 1987 assume the Upsilon(4S) decays 43% to B0 Bbar0. B(D- --> K+ pi- pi-) = (9.1+-1.3+-0.4)% is assumed.


pdgid: S041R15
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J reports [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)] = 1.14+-0.07+-0.04 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+) = 4.61+-0.10E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R15
text:
BRANDENBURG 1998 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at Upsilon(4S) and use the D^* reconstruction technique. The first error is their experiment's error and the second error is the systematic error from the PDG 1996 value of B(D^* --> D pi).


pdgid: S041R15
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) and absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D0 --> K- 2pi+ pi-)/B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S041R15
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D and D^*(2010).


pdgid: S041R15
text:
This is a derived branching ratio, using the inclusive pion spectrum and other two-body B decays. BEBEK 1987 assume the Upsilon(4S) decays 43% to B0 Bbar0.


pdgid: S041S41
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S) resonance. The second error combines the systematic and theoretical uncertainties in quadrature. CSORNA 2003 includes data used in ALAM 1994. A full angular fit to three complex helicity amplitudes is performed.


pdgid: S041S41
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) and absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D0 --> K- 2pi+ pi-)/B(D0 --> K- pi+). The nonresonant pi+ pi0 contribution under the rho+ is negligible.


pdgid: S041B48
text:
AUBERT 2005N reports [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+)] = 0.0813+-0.0040+0.0042-0.0031 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+) = 5.17+-0.15E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B48
text:
ABE 2001I reports [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+)] = 0.078+-0.019+-0.009 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+) = 5.17+-0.15E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C47
text:
AUBERT 2008BF reports [G(B+ --> Dbar_CP(+1)^*()0 K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+)] = 0.655+-0.065+-0.020 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+) = 4.19+0.31-0.28E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041P52
text:
Uses semi-inclusive reconstruction of B+ --> ([ K+ pi- ]_D gamma / pi0 )_D^* K+ / pi+. Decays of D^* --> D gamma / pi0 are reconstructed without inclusion of pi0 or gamma.


pdgid: S041Q71
text:
Reports a double ratio of B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> D_CP(+1)^*()0 pi+) and B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 pi+), 1.41+-0.25+-0.06. We multiply by our best value of B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 pi+) = 0.080+-0.011. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C48
text:
AUBERT 2008BF reports [G(B+ --> Dbar_CP(-1)^*()0 K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+)] = 0.55+-0.06+-0.02 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K+) = 4.19+0.31-0.28E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041Q81
text:
Reports a double ratio of B(B+ --> D^*_CP(-1)()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> D^*_CP(-1)()0 pi+) and B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 pi+), 1.15+-0.31+-0.12. We multiply by our best value of B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 K+ )/B(B+ --> Dbar^*()0 pi+) = 0.080+-0.011. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041S92
text:
The three pion mass is required to be between 1.0 and 1.6 GeV consistent with an a_{{1}} meson. (If this channel is dominated by a_{{1}}()+, the branching ratio for Dbar^*()0 a_1()+ is twice that for Dbar^*()0 pi+ pi+ pi-.)


pdgid: S041S96
text:
ALAM 1994 value is twice their Gamma(Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+ pi+ pi-)/Gamma(total) value based on their observation that the three pions are dominantly in the a_{{1}}(1260) mass range 1.0 to 1.6 GeV.


pdgid: S041B15
text:
BRANDENBURG 1998 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at Upsilon(4S) and use the D^* partial reconstruction technique. The first error is their experiment's error and the second error is the systematic error from the PDG 1996 value of B(D^* --> D pi).


pdgid: S041R12
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 0.018+-0.007+-0.005 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S041R03
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J reports [G(B+ --> Dbar^**0() pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)] = 1.22+-0.13+-0.23 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+) = 4.61+-0.10E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R93
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) and absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and the PDG 1992 B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0)/B(D0 --> K- pi+) and assuming B(D_1(2420)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 67%.


pdgid: S041R93
text:
ALBRECHT 1994D assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) assuming B(D_1(2420)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 67%.


pdgid: S041R94
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) assuming B(D_1(2420)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 67%.


pdgid: S041R91
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the Mark III B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) and B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D+ pi-) = 30%.


pdgid: S041R91
text:
ALAM 1994 assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the Mark III B(D+ --> K- 2pi+), the CLEO II B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) and B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 20%.


pdgid: S041R91
text:
ALBRECHT 1994D assume equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) and B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D^*(2010)+ pi-) = 30%.


pdgid: S041R39
text:
AUBERT 2006N reports 0.92+-0.14+-0.18E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R39
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.0126+-0.0022+-0.0025 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R39
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports 0.024+-0.012+-0.004 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes PDG 1990 D0 branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25%.


pdgid: S041R39
text:
BORTOLETTO 1990 reports 0.029+-0.013 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.02, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C4
text:
CHOI 2015A reports 8.0+1.3-1.2+-1.1+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s0^*(2317)+ Dbar0, D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.39+-0.21E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C4
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S reports 1.0+-0.3+0.4-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s0^*(2317)+ Dbar0, D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C4
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B reports 0.81+0.30-0.27+-0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s0^*(2317)+ Dbar0, D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C5
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S reports [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 2.2+0.8-0.7+-0.3E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C5
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B reports [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 1.0+0.5-0.4+-0.1E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041Q21
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S reports 0.6+-0.2+0.2-0.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar()0  x D_sJ(2457)+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041Q21
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B reports 0.56+0.16-0.15+-0.17E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar()0  x D_sJ(2457)+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041Q20
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S reports [G(B+ --> D_sJ(2457)+ Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 7.6+-1.7+3.2-2.4E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C63
text:
Uses Gamma(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) / Gamma(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 gamma) = 1.74+-0.13 and Gamma(D_s1(2536)+ --> D^*(2007)0 K+) / Gamma(D_s1(2536)+ --> D^*(2010)+ K0) = 1.36+-0.2.


pdgid: S041S49
text:
AUBERT 2006N reports 0.77+-0.15+-0.13E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S49
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.0087+-0.0027+-0.0017 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S49
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports 0.016+-0.012+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes PDG 1990 D0 branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25%.


pdgid: S041A95
text:
Uses simultaneous fits of Bbar0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and B+ --> D- D_s()+ pi+ amplitudes assuming isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S041S50
text:
AUBERT 2006N reports 0.76+-0.15+-0.13E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S50
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.0140+-0.0043+-0.0035 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S50
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports 0.013+-0.009+-0.002 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes PDG 1990 D0 and D^*(2007)0 branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25% and B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 55+-6%.


pdgid: S041S51
text:
AUBERT 2006N reports 1.62+-0.22+-0.18E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S51
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.0310+-0.0088+-0.0065 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S51
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports 0.031+-0.016+-0.005 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes PDG 1990 D0 and D^*(2007)0 branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25% and B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 55+-6%.


pdgid: S041B39
text:
AHMED 2000B reports their experiment's uncertainties (+-0.78+-0.48+-0.68)%, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty in the D_s --> phi pi branching fraction. We combine the first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S041D48
text:
The NR(0-+) line shapes is described by f(R)(m) = e**(alpha+beta i)/(m^2-m_{{0}}^2) with m(0) = 4.35 GeV. The parameters alpha and beta are determined from the fit to the data.


pdgid: S041A94
text:
AAIJ 2023AI report that the last error is due to the uncertainties on the branching fractions of the D_s()+- --> K-+ K+- pi+- and D+- --> K-+ pi+- pi+- decays.


pdgid: S041S83
text:
AUBERT 2007M reports [G(B+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 7.0+2.4-2.1+0.6-0.8E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S83
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <2.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S62
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <0.9E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)+ G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S84
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <3.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S85
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <4.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ eta)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S86
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <7.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ eta)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S87
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <3.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ rho0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S60
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <3.4E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B+ --> D_s()+ rho0)/G(total)+ G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S88
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <4.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ rho0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S61
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <2.0E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ rho0)/G(total)+ G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S63
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <4.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S63
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <3.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S64
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <6.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S64
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <1.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S65
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <3.0E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ a_1(1260)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S66
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <2.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ a_1(1260)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041P49
text:
AAIJ 2018B reports [G(B+ --> D_s()+ K+ K-)/G(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)] / [B(D0 --> K+ K-)] = 0.197+-0.015+-0.017 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K+ K-) = 4.07+-0.06E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S67
text:
AAIJ 2013R reports 1.87+1.25-0.73+-0.19+-0.32E-6 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+)] assuming B(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+) = 10.0+-1.7E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar0 D_s()+) = 9.3+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041S67
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <1.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S67
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <3.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S68
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <2.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S68
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <4.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ phi)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S69
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <2.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S69
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <10.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S70
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <3.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S70
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <10.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S89
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <4.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S90
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <4.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()+ Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S71
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()- pi+ K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S72
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <1.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()- pi+ K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S73
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <8.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s()- pi+ K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041S74
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <1.1E-2 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> D_s^*()- pi+ K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 39.4+4.1-3.9+2.2-1.8E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 3.4+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
The ratio of B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 7.4+-0.5+-0.7E-5 reported in AUBERT,B 2004B and B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) = 8.7+-1.5E-3 reported in AUBERT 2006E contribute to the determination of B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi), which is used by others for normalization.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
AUBERT,B 2005L reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.8+0.3-0.2+-0.2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.11+-0.12E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
AUBERT,B 2004B reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.074+-0.005+-0.007E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 5.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B40
text:
EDWARDS 2001 assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S). The correlated uncertainties (28.3)% from B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c) in those modes have been accounted for.


pdgid: S041Q96
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.57+0.56-0.46+0.45-0.36E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.11+-0.12E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041BA2
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) * B(J/psi --> p pbar)= 2.17+-0.08E-6. The last uncertainty includes the uncertainty of B(B+ --> J/psi K+) * B(J/psi --> p pbar).


pdgid: S041BA2
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.013+-0.034E-3 and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: S041C65
text:
The first uncertainty includes both statistical and interference effects while the second is due to systematics.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
CHOUDHURY 2021 uses the relative production fraction of charged (f**+-) to neutral (f**00) B mesons at Upsilon(4S) value of f**+-/f**00 = 1.058+-0.024.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 56.4+3.3-3.2+2.7-2.5E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
AUBERT,B 2005L reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 2.2+-0.2+-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R3
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 8+-2+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041R3
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 7+-3+-1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041Q06
text:
AAIJ 2013S reports [G(B+ --> eta_c K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.578+-0.035+-0.026 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.11+-0.12E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ACOSTA 2002F uses as reference of B(B --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 10.1+-0.6E-4. The second error includes the systematic error and the uncertainties of the branching ratio.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 1.2+-0.6+-0.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D reports 1.2+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. They actually report 0.0011+-0.0007 assuming B+ B-/B0 Bbar0 ratio is 55/45. We rescale to 50/50. Analysis explicitly removes B+ --> psi(2S) K+.


pdgid: S041R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports <1.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971E-2. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041C3
text:
AUBERT 2006 reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 10.1+-2.5+-1.0E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C3
text:
AUBERT 2005R reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 12.8+-4.1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C3
text:
CHOI 2003 reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 13.6+-3.0+-0.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041P98
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 4.8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S041Q52
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). The isovector-X hypothesis is excluded with a likelihood test at 1E-4 level.


pdgid: S041C85
text:
BALA 2015 reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K0 pi+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 10.6+-3.0+-0.9E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R65
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 3.78+0.72-0.64+0.28-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R65
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 1.3+-0.9+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041R65
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 1.6+-1.1+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041S98
text:
JESSOP 1997 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). The measurement is actually measured as an average over kaon charged and neutral states.


pdgid: S041A67
text:
AAIJ 2023AK measurements last uncertainty includes +-0.07 uncertainties on the branching fractions of the intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041B43
text:
ANASTASSOV 2000 finds 10 events on a background of 0.5+-0.2. Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S), a uniform Dalitz plot distribution, isotropic J/psi(1S) and phi decays, and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) phi K+)= B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) phi K0).


pdgid: S041T94
text:
Reported a threshold enhancement in the J/psi phi mass distribution consistent with the chi_{{c1}}(4140) state with a statistical significance of 3.1 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041C1
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019CM reports B(B+ --> J/psi Lambdabar p)/B(B+ --> J/psi K^*(892)) = 1.054+-0.057+-0.035+-0.011E-2 and rescaled with the best value of B(B+ --> J/psi K^*(892)) =1.43+-0.08E-3, where the last uncertainty is the uncertainty from the branching fractions of Lambdabar and K^*(892) to reconstructed final states.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
AAIJ 2013S reports [G(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(psi(2S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.080+-0.012+-0.009 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> p pbar) = 2.95+-0.09E-4, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
AAIJ 2012L reports 0.594+-0.006+-0.016+-0.015 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.95+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S041B46
text:
Assumes B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) / B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = B(J/psi --> e+ e-) / B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.69+-0.19.


pdgid: S041P29
text:
AAIJ 2025P reports [G(B+ --> psi(2S) phi(1020) K+)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) phi K+)] = 0.061+-0.004+-0.009 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) phi K+) = 5.0+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041P29
text:
Measured using B+ --> psi(2S) K+ as a normalization channel. The second error represents total systematic uncertainties including those from branching fractions which were taken from PDG 2016 as B(phi --> K+ K-) = 0.489+-0.005 and B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+) = 6.26+-0.24E-4.


pdgid: S041P29
text:
An upper limit on the fraction of the non-phi component in B+ --> psi(2S) K+ K- K+ decays is set as 0.26 at the 95% confidence level.


pdgid: S041A20
text:
AAIJ 2020AI reports [G(B+ --> psi(3770) K+)/G(B+ --> D- D+ K+)] * [B(psi(3770) --> D+ D-)] = 14.5+-1.2+-0.8E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(3770) --> D+ D-) = 41+-4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041P44
text:
Measured relative to B+ --> J/psi K+ decay with charmonia reconstructed in p pbar final state and using B(B+ --> J/psi K+) * B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.08E-6.


pdgid: S041C88
text:
AAIJ 2022D reports [G(B+ --> psi(4040) K+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta)] = 8.53+-2.35+-0.30E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta) = 5.2+-0.7E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C88
text:
IWASHITA 2014 reports [G(B+ --> psi(4040) K+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta)] < 15.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(4040) --> J/psi eta) = 5.2E-3.


pdgid: S041T97
text:
AAIJ 2013BC reports [Gamma(B+ --> psi(4160) K+)]/Gamma(total)] x B(psi(4160) --> mu+ mu-) = 3.5+0.9-0.8E-9 which we devide by our best value B(psi(4160) --> e+ e-) =  assuming lepton universality. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 3.7+1.2-1.0+0.2-0.3E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 1.9+-1.1E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
LEES 2011I reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi)] = 1.53+-0.66+-0.27E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c0(1P) --> pi pi) = 8.76+-0.26E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 0.70+-0.10+0.12-0.10E-6 for B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+) x B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+) using the PDG value B(chi_c0() --> pi pi)= and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006M reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] = 6.1+-2.6+-1.1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.35+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. The significance of the observed signal is 2.4 sigma.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AAIJ 2013S reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] < 6E-8 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.35E-4.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma gamma)] < 0.11E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma gamma) = 1.96E-4.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 0.66+-0.22+-0.08E-6 for B(B+ --> chi_c()0 K+) x B(chi_c()0 --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> chi_c()0 K+) using the PDG value B(chi_c()0 --> pi+ pi-) = 7.1+-0.6E-3 and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
The measurement performed using decay channels chi_c0() --> pi+ pi- and chi_c0() --> K+ K-. The ratio of the branching ratios for these channels is found to be consistent with world average.


pdgid: S041B41
text:
AUBERT 2004P reports B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)xB(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) = 1.5+-0.4+-0.1E-6 and used PDG value of B(chi_c0() --> pi pi) = 7.4+-0.8E-3 and Clebsh-Gordan coefficient to compute B(B+- -> chi_c0() K+).


pdgid: S041B41
text:
ABE 2002B measures the ratio of B(B+ --> chi_c0() K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.60+0.21-0.18+-0.05+-0.08, where the third error is due to the uncertainty in the B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-), and uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 10.0+-1.0E-4 to obtain the result.


pdgid: S041D05
text:
The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B+ --> J/psi K+ uncertainties.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 4.7+1.3-1.2+0.4-0.2E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.9E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
Uses chi_c1,2() --> J/psi gamma. Assumes B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = (51.6+-0.6)% and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = (48.4+-0.6)%.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006M reports [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] = 1.76+-0.07+-0.12E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R90
text:
AUBERT 2002 reports 7.5+-0.9+-0.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041B47
text:
AUBERT 2002 reports 0.75+-0.08+-0.05 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S041C73
text:
LEES 2012B reports 0.501+-0.024+-0.028 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K0 pi+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.4+-1.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B24
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(B+ --> eta^' K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma)] = 1.40+0.16-0.15+0.15-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma) = 2.307+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B21
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(B+ --> eta K+)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 0.87+0.16-0.15+0.10-0.07E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041T39
text:
The second uncertainty includes the systematic and the uncertainties on the known branching fractions.


pdgid: S041T39
text:
This is the inverse-variance weighted average of the branching fraction measurements B+ --> K0 K- pi+ K+  and B+ --> Kbar0 K+ pi- K+ decays. AAIJ 2025F also lists the two measurements separately and finds that the resulting fractions are consistent among the two channels when including the systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S041D51
text:
This is the inverse-variance weighted average of the branching fraction measurements from B+ --> K0 K- pi+ K+ and B+ --> Kbar0 K+ pi- K+ decays. AAIJ 2025F also lists the two measurements separately and finds that the resulting fractions are consistent among the two channels when including the systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports B(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+). B(f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi-) = 0.73+-0.21+0.47-0.48E-6. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = multiplied by 2/3 to account for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best value.


pdgid: S041T03
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports B(B+ --> f_0(1500) K+). B(f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi-) <4.4E-6. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = multiplied by 2/3 to account for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best value.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
Obtains the result from a Dalitz analysis of B+ --> K0S pi+ pi0 decays. The first error is statistical, the second combines all the systematic uncertainties reported in the paper, including signal modelling.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
AUBERT 2004P also report a branching ratio for B+ --> ''higher resonances'' pi+, K* --> K+ pi-, 25.1+-2.0+11.0-5.7E-6.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
Uses a reference decay mode B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- with B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+).B(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 20.3+-2.0E-5.


pdgid: S041R6
text:
ABE 2000C assumes B(Z --> b bbar)=(21.7+-0.1)% and the B fractions f(B0)=f(B+)= (39.7+1.8-2.2)% and f(B_{{s}})=(10.5+1.8-2.2)%.


pdgid: S041B60
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S); charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041R32
text:
Calculate the total nonresonant contribution by combining the S-wave composed of K_{{0}}^*(1430) and nonresonant that are described using LASS shape.


pdgid: S041T34
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports [G(B+ --> omega(782) K+)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 0.09+-0.13+0.036-0.045E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B59
text:
AUBERT,B 2004P also reports B(B+ --> ''higher f0 resonances'' pi+, f(980)0 --> pi+ pi-) = 3.2+-1.2+6.0-2.9E-6.


pdgid: S041B59
text:
Uses a reference decay mode B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ and Dbar0 --> K+ pi- with B(B+ --> Dbar0 pi+)xB(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 20.3+-2.0E-5. Only charged pions from the f_{{0}}(980) are used.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 0.50+-0.15+0.15-0.11E-6 for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2() --> pi+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)= and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 8.9E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.7% and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041T00
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 1.3E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> f_2(1270) K+) x B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.7% and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
AUBERT 2008AI reports 1.85+-0.41+0.61-0.29E-6 for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi)= and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 7.7E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = 49.9% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041R72
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 2.3E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K_2^*(1430)0 pi+) x B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = 49.9% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041Q64
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 2.0E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1410)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1410)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1410)0 --> K pi) = 6.6% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041S09
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports 3.1E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1680)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1680)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1680)0 --> K pi) = 38.7% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- mode.


pdgid: S041S09
text:
AUBERT,B 2005N reports 3.8E-6 at 90% CL for B(B+ --> K^*(1680)0 pi+) x B(K^*(1680)0 --> K+ pi-). We rescaled it using the PDG value B(K^*(1680)0 --> K pi) = 38.7% and 2/3 for the K+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S041R73
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 4.9E-5.


pdgid: S041B62
text:
Charm and charmonium contributions are subtracted, otherwise no assumptions about intermediate resonances.


pdgid: S041B4
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.323+-0.015+-0.041 fit fraction for B+ --> K+ K- pi+ nonresonant from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+ nonresonant). Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B38
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 7.5+-0.6+-0.5E-2 fit fraction for B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0 from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0, Kbar^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> K+ Kbar^*(892)0) using 2/3 of B(Kbar^*(892)0 --> ( K pi )^0 ) = (99.754+-0.021)% for the K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041C04
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 4.5+-0.7+-1.2E-2 for fit fraction for B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0 from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0, Kbar_0^*(1430)0 --> K+ pi-). We compute B(B+ --> K+ Kbar_0^*(1430)0) using 2/3 of PDG 2019 value B(K_0^*(1430)0 --> K pi) = (93+-10)% for the K+ pi- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P74
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.307+-0.012+-0.009 fit fraction for B+ --> rho(1450) pi+ from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> rho(1450) pi+, rho(1450) --> K+ K-). Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041P76
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.164+-0.008+-0.01 fit fraction for B+ --> pi+ ( K+ K- )_S-wave in the region of 0.95 < m(K+ K-) < 1.42 GeV/c**2 from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> pi+ ( K+ K- )_S-wave). Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041A81
text:
Investigated the angular distribution of K+ K- pairs with invariant mass below 1.1 GeV/c**2, which exhibits both a strong enhancement in signal and very large direct CP violation.


pdgid: S041Q67
text:
GARMASH 2005 reports B(B+ --> f_2^'(1525) K+). B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) < 4.9E-6 at 90% CL. We divide this result by our best value of B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = multiplied by 2/3 to account for the K+ K- fraction.


pdgid: S041C9
text:
No evidence is found for such decay and set a limit on B(B+ --> f_J(2220))xB(f_J(2220) --> phi phi) <1.2E-6 at 90%CL where the f_{{J}}(2220) is a possible glueball state.


pdgid: S041B55
text:
Signal significance is 2.7 standard deviations. This measurement corresponds to an upper limit of < 1.31E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S041B55
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 4.8E-5.


pdgid: S041D06
text:
The second uncertainty includes systematic and reference branching reaction of B+ --> eta_c K+ uncertainties.


pdgid: S041C8
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S) and the phi phi invariant mass below 2.85 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041R9
text:
ADACHI 2025Z reports 4.04+-0.13+0.13-0.15E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> K^*(892)+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 51.13+0.73-1.08E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 51.1+0.7-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B42
text:
No evidence for a nonresonant K pi gamma contamination was seen; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.075+-0.008+-0.007 fit fraction for B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+ from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+, f_2(1270) --> K+ K-). We compute B(B+ --> f_2(1270) pi+) using 1/2 of PDG 2019 value of B(f_2(1270) --> K Kbar) = (4.6+0.5-0.4)% for K+ K- fraction. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AUBERT 2009L reports [G(B+ --> pi+ f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-)] = 0.9+-0.2+-0.1+0.3-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) = 56.2+1.9-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R35
text:
AUBERT,B 2005G reports [G(B+ --> pi+ f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-)] = 2.3+-0.6+-0.4E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) = 56.2+1.9-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R41
text:
The second uncertainty includes both systematics (+-0.09E-5) and possible interference with  B+ --> rho(1450)+ pi0  (+0.08).


pdgid: S041B28
text:
AAIJ 2019AL reports 0.3+-0.1+-0.1E-2 fit fraction for B+ --> phi(1020) pi+ from the amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays. We use the PDG 2019 value B(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.2+-0.4E-6 to obtain B(B+ --> phi(1020) pi+, phi(1020) --> K+ K-). We compute B(B+ --> phi(1020) pi+) using the PDG 2019 value of B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = (49.2+-0.5)%. Our first error is the experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S041B28
text:
Measures B(B+ --> phi pi+ )/B(B+ --> phi K+ )< 0.018 at 90% C.L. and assumes B(B+ --> phi K+ ) = 8.8+0.7-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S041B56
text:
AMMAR 2001B searched for the two-body decay of the B meson to a massless neutral feebly-interacting particle X0 such as the familon, the Nambu-Goldstone boson associated with a spontaneously broken global family symmetry.


pdgid: S041P46
text:
AAIJ 2017AQ searched for a long-lived scalar particle X0 --> mu+ mu- in the mass range 250 -- 4700 MeV and lifetime range 0.1 -- 1000 ps. The limit is between E-7 and 2E-10 in these ranges except in vetoed mass regions around K(S)0, J/psi, psi(2S), and psi(3770).


pdgid: S041R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1988F reports 5.2+-1.4+-1.9E-4 assuming the Upsilon(4S) decays 45% to B0 Bbar0. We rescale to 50%.


pdgid: S041P84
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ from Upsilon(4S) decays. This measurement is quoted for M(pi+ pi0) < 1.3 GeV.


pdgid: S041BA1
text:
AAIJ 2013S reports [G(B+ --> p pbar K+)/G(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 4.91+-0.19+-0.14 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041Q46
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.016+-0.033E-3, B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3 and B(Lambda(1520) --> K- p) = 0.234+-0.016.


pdgid: S041Q07
text:
Explicitly vetoes resonant production of p pbar from charmonium states. The branching fraction for M(p pbar) < 2.85 GeV/c**2 is also reported.


pdgid: S041R23
text:
Statistical significance of the signal is 4.1 standard deviations where the the normalisation is based on B(B+ --> KS pi+) = 11.895+-0.375E-06.


pdgid: S041Q11
text:
Excluding charmonium events in 2.85< mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.128 GeV/c**2 and 3.315< mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.735 GeV/c**2. Measurements in various mass(Lambda Lambdabar) bins are also reported.


pdgid: S041D87
text:
AAIJ 2025AT reports [G(B+ --> Lambdabar p eta_c)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] < 2.1E-8 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.11E-3.


pdgid: S041T72
text:
Uses B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5%, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.89+-0.05%, and B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi0) = 13.9+-0.5%.


pdgid: S041T73
text:
CHEN 2011F reports <4.8E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> p Lambdabar0 Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)] / [B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0)] assuming B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 61.9+-2.9E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2007)0 --> D0 pi0) = 64.7E-2.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports 3.4+-0.1+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A reports 2.01+-0.15+-0.20E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
DYTMAN 2002 reports 2.4+0.63-0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B14
text:
GABYSHEV 2002 reports 1.87+0.51-0.49E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R07
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A reports 5.9+-1.0+-0.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- Delta_X(1600)++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R08
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A reports 4.7+1.0-0.9+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- Delta_X(2420)++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R09
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A reports 3.9+0.8-0.7+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> ( Lambdabar_c()- p )_s pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041C50
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2800)0 p)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+)] = 0.117+-0.023+-0.024 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+) = 2.2+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B11
text:
DYTMAN 2002 measurement uses B(Lambda_c- --> pbar K+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.3%. The second error includes the systematic and the uncertainty of the branching ratio.


pdgid: S041R02
text:
AUBERT 2008H reports 1.14+-0.15+-0.62E-3 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda_c()+ Lambda_c()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R02
text:
GABYSHEV 2006 reports 7.9+1.0-0.9+-3.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda_c()+ Lambda_c()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041A71
text:
The second uncertainty includes both systematic (+-0.22) and the charm decay branching fraction  (+-0.25).


pdgid: S041P53
text:
The Xi_{{c}}(2930) is found in its decay to K- Lambda_c()+ in B- --> K- Lambda_c()- Lambda_c()+ with a significance more than 5 sigma.


pdgid: S041B88
text:
GABYSHEV 2006A reports 3.7+-0.7+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B79
text:
DYTMAN 2002 reports 4.4+-1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B76
text:
DYTMAN 2002 reports 4.4+-1.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B77
text:
LEES 2012Z reports 2.98+-0.16+-0.15+-0.77E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+ pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041B77
text:
DYTMAN 2002 reports 2.8+-0.9+-0.5+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+ pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R04
text:
AUBERT 2008H reports 2.51+-0.89+-0.61E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+, Xibar_c()0 --> Xibar+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R04
text:
CHISTOV 2006A reports 5.6+1.9-1.5+-1.9E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+, Xibar_c()0 --> Xibar+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R05
text:
AUBERT 2008H reports 1.70+-0.93+-0.53E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+, Xibar_c()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041R05
text:
CHISTOV 2006A reports 4.0+1.1-0.9+-1.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Xibar_c()0 Lambda_c()+, Xibar_c()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S041D50
text:
LEES 2025 searched for psi_{{DS}} in the recoil mass against Lambda_{{c}}()+ and the fully reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for m(psi_{{DS}}) between 0.94 and 2.99 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041D21
text:
LEES 2023C searched for psi_{{DS}}, where psi_{{DS}} is a dark sector antibaryon, in the recoil mass against p and the fully reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for mass(psi_{{DS}}) between 1 and 4.3 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041R55
text:
AAIJ 2015AR reports 1.83+-0.24+-0.05E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> pi+ mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.05+-0.05E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S041R11
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at Upsilon(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence.


pdgid: S041P41
text:
Measured in amplitude analysis using model including short-distance K+ mu+ mu- and rho(770), omega(782), phi(1020), J/psi, psi(2S), psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) contributions.


pdgid: S041P28
text:
Uses only leptonic decays of tau and the quoted limit combines the final states K+ e+ e-, K+ mu+ mu-, and K+ e+- mu-+.


pdgid: S041P28
text:
If observed events are interpreted as a signal the branching fraction measurement becomes 1.31+0.66-0.61+0.35-0.25E-3.


pdgid: S041B51
text:
Taking an average value from two methods, using (1) a hadronic tagging of the other B meson in the event, and (2) an inclusive tagging method that exploits the inclusive properties of the other B meson in the event.


pdgid: S041B51
text:
Using an inclusive tagging method that exploits not only the properties of the B+ --> K+ nu nubar decay, but also the inclusive properties of the other B meson in the event.


pdgid: S041R82
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ at Upsilon(4S). The second error is a total of systematic uncertainties including model dependence. The 90% C.L. upper limit is 2.2E-6.


pdgid: S041T29
text:
Also reported a limit <11.6E-5 at 90% CL obtained using a fully reconstructed hadronic B-tag evnets.


pdgid: S041P75
text:
Signal candidates are identified by first fully reconstructing B+ in one of many possible exclusive decays to hadronic final states.


pdgid: S041R60
text:
Uses B+ --> J/psi K+, J/psi --> mu+ mu- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.4 -- 4.0E-9. This limit is applicable for Majorana neutrino lifetime < 1 ps.


pdgid: S041R60
text:
Uses B+ --> J/psi K+, J/psi --> mu+ mu- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.4 -- 1.0E-8.


pdgid: S041BL5
text:
Uses B+ --> psi(2S) K+, psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 1.5 -- 8.0E-7.


pdgid: S041BL6
text:
Uses B+ --> psi(2S) K+, psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi- mode for normalization. Obtains neutrino-mass-dependent upper limits in the range 0.3 -- 1.5E-6.


pdgid: S041T66
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K reports <6.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda0 mu+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T67
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K reports <3.2E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambda0 e+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T68
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K reports <6.2E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar0 mu+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041T69
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K reports <8.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B+ --> Lambdabar0 e+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1E-2.


pdgid: S041D26
text:
The signals are reconstructed in decay chains: Xi_c()0 --> Xi- pi+, Lambda0 K- pi+, p K- K- pi+, and Lambda_c()- --> pbar K0S, pbar K+ pi-.


pdgid: S041A39
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 1.0 < q**2 < 8.68 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041A49
text:
The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q**2. The  measured Gamma(L) is related to the polarisation of the K^*(892)+.


pdgid: S041A40
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 10.09 < q**2 < 12.86 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041A41
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AC measurement is performed in 14.18 < q**2 < 19.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041AX1
text:
A +0.3% correction is applied due to a slightly higher reconstruction efficiency for the positive kaons.


pdgid: S041AC2
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of D0 --> pi+ pi- pi0. Also reports the one-sigma regions: 0.06 < r(B)< 0.78, -30degree<gamma< 76degree, and -27degree<delta< 78degree.


pdgid: S041AY3
text:
Reports the first evidence for direct CP violation in B --> D K decays with 3.6 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041AY3
text:
AAIJ 2012M reports an evidence of direct CP violation in B+- --> D K+- decays with a total significance of 5.8 sigma.


pdgid: S041AA1
text:
The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the R(K)**- and R(K)**+ observables.


pdgid: S041AA2
text:
The statistical and systematic uncertainties have been combined according to the correlations between the R(pi)**- and R(pi)**+ observables.


pdgid: S041AD+
text:
Measures the asymmetry separately for K+ K- and pi+ pi- final states, A(K K) = 0.06+-0.07+-0.01and A(pi pi) = 0.15+-0.13+-0.01, and combines the two results. The value of A(pi pi) was updated in AAIJ 2018X.


pdgid: S041AY6
text:
The second error includes both systematics and the uncertainties from CP asymmetries in restricted regions of phase space.


pdgid: S041CQ5
text:
Measured in the B+ --> K+ K- K+ decay assuming A(CP)(B+ --> f_2^'(1525)0 K+) = A(CP)(B+ --> f_0(1500)0 K+) = A(CP)(B+ --> f_0(1710)0 K+)


pdgid: S041CKK
text:
AAIJ 2014 reports A(CP)(B+ --> K+ K- pi+) = -0.648+-0.070+-0.013+-0.007 in the Dalitz plot region of mass**2(K+ K-) < 1.5 GeV**2/c**4. The third uncertainty is due to the CP asymmetry of the B+- --> J/psi K+- reference mode uncertainty.


pdgid: S041A82
text:
Investigated the angular distribution of K+ K- pairs with invariant mass below 1.1 GeV/c**2,  which exhibits both a strong enhancement in signal and very large direct CP violation.


pdgid: S041A17
text:
Uses amplitude analysis of B+- --> pi+- K+ K- decays in the pi pi - K K rescattering mass region of 0.95 < m(K+ K-) < 1.42 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S041AY5
text:
AAIJ 2014 reports A(CP)(B+ --> pi+ pi- pi+) = 0.584+-0.082+-0.027+-0.007 in the Dalitz plot region of mass**2(pi+ pi-) > 15 GeV**2/c**4 or mass**2(pi+ pi-)< 0.4 GeV**2/c**4. The third uncertainty is due to the CP asymmetry of the B+- --> J/psi K+- reference mode uncertainty.


pdgid: S041CP4
text:
This result is obtained with an amplitude analysis of B+ --> pi+ pi+ pi- decays, using the isobar model within the mass range 1.0 < m(pi+ pi-) < 1.5 GeV to describe the pi+ pi- S-wave contribution.


pdgid: S041CR1
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements A(CP)(B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton-) = 0.02+-0.18+-0.01 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and A(CP)(B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton-) = -0.06+0.22-0.21+-0.01 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Extracted from B+- --> D K^*()+- decays, using the D decays: D --> K+- pi-+, K+ K-, pi+ pi-, K+- pi-+ pi+- pi-+, pi+ pi- pi+ pi-, K0S pi+ pi-, and K0S K+ K-.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = -0.031+-0.018 rad. The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Combines the result with that of AAIJ 2018U, for which the values of the nuisance parameters Deltam_{{s}}, Gamma_{{s}} and DeltaGamma_{{s}} have been re-evaluated and the related systematic uncertainties updated.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses combined sample of Belle and Belle II experiments in B+ decays to D K+, D^* K+, and D pi+ final states.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Extracted from yields of partially reconstructed B+- --> D^* K+-, D^* --> D pi0 / gamma, D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The uncertainty is predominantly statistical. Its correlation with the AAIJ 2023BA result is found to be less than 3%.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent binned Dalitz plot analysis of the decays B0 --> D K^*()0, with D --> K0S h+ h-, h = pi, K. Angle gamma is required to satisfy 0 < gamma < 180 degrees.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* K+- and B+- --> D^* pi+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma, D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured using B+- --> D [ K-+ pi+- pi+- pi-+ ] h+- decays in bins of the phase space of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of the D-meson decay parameters.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D K+-  modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot  are used as input. Value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 2021AM presents a combination of existing measurements from LHCb collaboration. It includes also charm mixing parameters.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent coherence factor for the decay B_s --> D_s K pi pi (in the restricted phase  space region) is also reported.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()+- K-+ pi+- pi-+ decays in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-) < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-) < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV. The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0 from B+- --> D K+- modes over the phase space. Strong phase measurements from RESMI 2018 analysis of CLEO-c data of the D decay over the phase space binning are used as input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D K+- modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = 0.030+-0.033 from HFLAV. The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 2018Z reports the intervals (5 -- 86)degree or (185 -- 266)degree at 68% C.L. The extraction uses the time dependent CP violation measurement in B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays with external input and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0 modes. Measures r(B0) = 0.39+-0.13, and delta(B0) = 197+24-20 degrees.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A combination of measurements from analyses of time-integrated B+ --> D K+, B0 --> D K^(*)()0, B0 --> D K+ pi-, and B+ --> D K+ pi+ pi- tree-level decays. In addition, results from a time-dependent analysis of B_s()0 --> D_s K decays are included.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0 modes.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
A model-independent binned Dalitz plot analysis of the decays B0 --> D K^*()0, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-. The results cannot be combined with the model-dependent analysis of the same dataset reported in AAIJ 2016AA.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Obtained by measuring time-dependent CP asymmetry in B_s()0 --> K+ K- and using a U-spin relation between B_s()0 --> K+ K- and B0 --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Results are also presented using additional inputs on B0 --> pi0 pi0 and B+ --> pi+ pi0 decays from other experiments and isospin symmetry assumptions. The dependence of the results on the maximum allowed amount of U-spin breaking up to 50% is also included.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input. Solution that satisfies 0 <gamma< 180 is chosen.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
AAIJ 14BE uses model-dependent analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- amplitudes. The model is the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010F.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.0 from AAIJ 2013AR. The value is modulo 180degree at 68% CL.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Presents a confidence region 55.4degrees<gamma< 82.3degrees at 68% CL with best fit value 72.6degrees and includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The corresponding 95% CL is 40.2 degrees<gamma< 92.7degrees. The value is determined from combination of measuremets using D meson decaying to K+ K-, pi+ pi-, K+- pi-+, K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K-, and K+- pi-+ pi+- pi-+. Combines B+- --> D K+- and B+- --> D pi+-.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods. Reports also 2sigma range of 41 -- 102degrees and a 5.9sigma significance for gamma(B+ --> D^(*)()0 K^(*)()+) not= 0 hypothesis.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot of Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> Dbar0 K+. Measurement of strong phases in Dbar0 --> K0S pi+ pi- Dalitz plot from LIBBY 2010 is used as input.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty  due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between D0 and Dbar0  amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 2022.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K+, D K^*()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval for gamma is 39degree<gamma< 98degree. CP conservation in the combined result is ruled out with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Reports confidence intervals for the CKM angle gamma from the measured values of the GLW parameters using B()+- --> D K()+- decays with D mesons decaying to non-CP(K pi), CP-even (K+ K-, pi+ pi-), and CP-odd (K0S pi0, K0S omega) states.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval for gamma is 54.2degree<gamma< 100.5degree. CP conservation in the combined result is ruled out with a significance of 3.5 standard deviations.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D0 --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B0 --> D0 K^*()0 modes. The corresponding 95% CL interval is 77degrees<gamma< 247degrees. A 180 degree ambiguity is implied.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- and Dbar^0() --> K0S K+ K- decays coming from B()+- --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+- modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 29degree<gamma< 122degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays; Combines the D K+, D^* K+ and D K^*+() modes. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 8degree<gamma< 111degree.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of neutral D --> K0S pi+ pi- decays coming from B+- --> D K+- and B+- --> D^*()0 K+- followed by D^*()0 --> D pi0, D gamma. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 12degree < gamma < 137degree. AUBERT,B 2005Y also reports the amplitude ratios and the strong phases.


pdgid: S041GGM
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the 3-body D --> KS pi+ pi- decays coming from B+- --> D K+- and B+- --> D^* K+- followed by D^* --> D pi0; here we use D to denote that the neutral D meson produced in the decay is an admixture of D0 and Dbar0. The corresponding two standard deviations interval for gamma is 26**degrees <gamma< 126**degrees. POLUEKTOV 2004 also reports the amplitude ratios and the strong phases.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-.  Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the D decay over the Dalitz plot  are used as input. Supersedes AIHARA 2012.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses binned analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- pi0 from B+- --> D K+- modes over the phase  space. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III data of the D decay over the phase space binning are used as input.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.037 <r_{{B}}<0.155.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^0() K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.084 <r_{{B}}< 0.239.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- and Dbar^0() --> K0S K+ K- decays coming from B()+- --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+- modes.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses a Dalitz plot analysis of the Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays; Combines the D K+, D^* K+ and D K^*+() modes.


pdgid: S041ARX
text:
Uses a Dalitz analysis of neutral D decays to K0S pi+ pi- in the processes B+- --> D^(*)() K+-, D^*() --> D pi0, D gamma.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of B+ --> D K+ decays, with D --> K0S pi+ pi- and D --> K0S K+ K-. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c (LIBBY 2010) of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
AAIJ 2014BE uses model-dependent analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- amplitudes. The model is the same as in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010F.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
We combined the systematics in quadrature. The authors report separately the contribution to the systematic uncertainty due to the uncertainty on the bin-averaged strong phase difference between D0 and Dbar0 amplitudes. Superseded by ABUDINEN 2022.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 75degree<delta_{{B}}<157degree.


pdgid: S041DRX
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> Dbar^0() K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 102.2degree<delta_{{B}}< 162.3degree.


pdgid: S041A32
text:
Measured using B+- --> D [ K-+ pi+- pi+- pi-+ ] h+- decays in bins of the  phase space of the D decay. The third uncertainty includes systematic and finite knowledge of  the D-meson decay parameters.


pdgid: S041A32
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D pi+-  modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot are used as input.


pdgid: S041A33
text:
Uses binned Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi- and K0S K+ K- from B+- --> D pi+-  modes. Strong phase measurements from CLEO-c and BES-III of the D decay over the Dalitz plot  are used as input. Value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* K+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma, D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.049 <r^*_B()<0.215.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses the Cabibbo suppressed decay of B+ --> Dbar^*() K+ followed by Dbar^*() --> Dbar pi0 or Dbar gamma, and Dbar --> K- pi+.


pdgid: S041ARY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^*()0 K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 0.061 <r^*_B()< 0.271.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Reports combination of published measurements using GGSZ, GLW, and ADS methods. We added 360degrees to the value of (-66+21-31)degrees quoted by LEES 2013B.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays from B+ --> D^(*)() K^(*)()+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 236degree<delta_{{B}}^*()<322degree.


pdgid: S041DRY
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of Dbar^0() --> K0S pi+ pi- decays from B+ --> D^* K+ modes. The corresponding two standard deviation interval is 296.5degree<delta_{{B}}^*()< 382.7degree.


pdgid: S041D18
text:
Measured using B+- --> D^* pi+- decays analysing the signal yield variation with the fully reconstructed D^* --> D pi0 / gamma, D --> K0S pi+ pi- / K0S K+ K- decays. The model-independent approach uses external strong phase input from BESIII and CLEO collaborations.


pdgid: S041PBO
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.431+-0.027+-0.090E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S041PB7
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.431+-0.027+-0.090E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair. Measured in 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041A54
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 9.2+1.9-1.8+0.8-0.6E-8  (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 5.955  GeV**2/c**4 range.


pdgid: S041PBN
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.998+-0.014+-0.040E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Measured by taking the ratio of the branching fraction from B+ --> K+ e+ e- and B+ --> J/psi ( e+ e- ) K+ decays and multiplying it by the measured value of B+ --> J/psi K+ and J/psi --> e+ e- as in PDG 2018. The branching fraction of B+ --> K+ e+ e- is determined in the region 1.1 < q**2 < 6 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.998+-0.014+-0.040E-3 for normalization and mu+ mu- for leptons. Measured for 1.1 < q**2< 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBF
text:
Measured by taking the ratio of the branching fraction from B+ --> K+ e+ e- and B+ --> J/psi ( e+ e- ) K+decays and multiplying it by the measured value of B+ -->J/psi K+ and J/psi --> e+ e- as in PDG 2012.The branching fraction of B+ --> K+ e+ e- is determined in the region 1 < q**2 < 6 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBP
text:
The ratio is determined using the relative branching fractions of the decays B+ --> K+ lepton+ lepton- and B+ --> J/psi(lepton+ lepton-) K+, with lepton = e, mu. Measured for the region 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S041PBJ
text:
Measurement is performed in 1.0 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4. SIRUNYAN 2018DX reports also measurements in several other q**2 intervals.


pdgid: S041PBJ
text:
AAIJ 2014O reports 68% C.L. interval, which we encode as midpoint with uncertainty as half of the width of interval.


pdgid: S041A51
text:
The full set of CP-averaged angular observables is measured as a function of the q**2. The A(FB) is measured related to the dimuon system.


pdgid: S041A03
text:
AAIJ 2017AP uses B+ --> Dbar0 pi+ decays with B+ transverse momenta pT and rapidities y in the region of 2 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S041A03
text:
AAIJ 2017BF uses B+ --> J/psi K+ decays with B+ transverse momenta pT and rapidities y in the region of 0 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S042M
text:
CSORNA 2000 uses fully reconstructed 135 B0 --> J/psi^(') K0S events and invariant masses without beam constraint.


pdgid: S042M
text:
Found using fully reconstructed decays with J/psi. ALBRECHT 1987D assume mass(Upsilon(4S)) = 10577 MeV.


pdgid: S042DM
text:
BEBEK 1987 actually measure the difference between half of Ecm and the B+- or B0 mass, so the mass(B0)-mass(B+-) is more accurate. Assume mass(Upsilon(4S)) = 10580 MeV.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Measured using a simultaneous fit of the B0 lifetime and Bbar0 B0 oscillation frequency Deltamass(d) in the partially reconstructed B0 --> D^*()- lepton nu decays.


pdgid: S042T
text:
AUBERT 2003C uses a sample of approximately 14,000 exclusively reconstructed B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton nu and simultaneously measures the lifetime and oscillation frequency.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Measurement performed with decays B0 --> D^*()- pi+ and B0 --> D^*()- rho+ using a partial reconstruction technique.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Reported the combined measurement of 1.64+-0.08+-0.08 ps**-1 using the charge of the secondary vertex with the lepton and without. Only the flavor-specific measurement with the lepton is reported and used.


pdgid: S042T
text:
Combined result of D/D^* lepton x analysis, fully reconstructed B analysis, and partially reconstructed D^*()- pi+ X analysis.


pdgid: S042T
text:
WAGNER 1990 tagged B0 mesons by their decays into D^*()- e+ nu and D^*()- mu+ nu where the D^*()- is tagged by its decay into pi- Dbar0.


pdgid: S042DT2
text:
ARTUSO 1997 uses partial reconstruction of B --> D^* lepton nu_lepton and independent of B0 and B+ production fraction.


pdgid: S042DT2
text:
ATHANAS 1994 uses events tagged by fully reconstructed B- decays and partially or fully reconstructed B0 decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Measured using B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 and B0 --> J/psi K0S decays, and assuming beta = 21.9+-0.7 degrees.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Measured from the ratio of decay time distributions of B0 --> J/psi K0S and B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
Reports -DeltaGamma_{{d}}/Gamma_{{d}} using B0 --> J/psi K0S, J/psi K0L, D- pi+, D^*()- pi+, D^*()- rho+, and D^*()- lepton+ nu decays.


pdgid: S042DGS
text:
BEHRENS 2000B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ pi-, rho- decays to determine the flavor of the B meson. Assumes Delta(md)=0.478+-0.018 ps**-1 and tau(B0)=1.548+-0.032 ps.


pdgid: S042R94
text:
URQUIJO 2007 report a measurement of (9.80+-0.29+-0.21)% for the partial branching fraction of B --> e nu_e X_c decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B --> e nu_e X branching fraction.


pdgid: S042P68
text:
The correlation of 50% with B(B+ --> lepton+ nu_lepton X_u)(letpon energy in B rest frame E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV) was reported.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side while the other, on the signal side, is partially reconstructed from B --> D lepton nu.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
BUSKULIC 1997 assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for B lifetime and branching ratio of D^* and D decays.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
FULTON 1991 assumes assuming equal production of B0 and B+ at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III D and D^* branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R35
text:
ALBRECHT 1989J reports 0.018+-0.006+-0.005. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+).


pdgid: S042B94
text:
AAIJ 2025G simultaneously measures also B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- tau+ nu_tau)/B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- mu+ nu_mu) and reports correlation factor -0.39.


pdgid: S042B94
text:
Uses leptonic decay modes of tau+ and reconstruction of the companion B meson in semileptonic decay modes.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
Measured using fully reconstructed D^*() sample and a simultaneous fit to the Caprini-Lellouch-Neubert form factor parameters: rho**2 = 1.191+-0.048+-0.028, R(1)(1) = 1.429+-0.061+-0.044, and R(2)(1) = 0.827+-0.038+-0.022.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ABBIENDI 2000Q assumes the fraction B(b --> B0)= (39.7+1.8-2.2)%. This result is an average of two methods using exclusive and partial D^* reconstruction.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BUSKULIC 1997 assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for B lifetime and D^* and D branching fractions.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997G assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = (37.8+-2.2)% and PDG 1996 values for B lifetime and branching ratio of D^* and D decays.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)% and B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = (68.1+-1.0+-1.3)%.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
BUSKULIC 1995N assumes fraction (B+) = fraction (B0) = 38.2+-1.3+-2.2% and meanlife(B0) = 1.58+-0.06 ps. Gamma(D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton)/total = [5.18-0.13(fraction(B0)-38.2)-1.5(meanlife(B0)-1.58)]%.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1994 assumes B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 68.1+-1.0+-1.3%. Uses partial reconstruction of D^*()+ and is independent of D0 branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1993 reports 0.052+-0.005+-0.006. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+). We have taken their average e and mu value. They also obtain alpha= 2*Gamma**0/(Gamma**-+Gamma**+)-1 = 1.1+-0.4+-0.2, A(AF) = 3/4*(Gamma**--Gamma**+)/Gamma = 0.2+-0.08+-0.06 and a value of |V(cb)| = 0.036 -- 0.045 depending on model assumptions.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
The measurement of ALBRECHT 1989C suggests a D^* polarization gamma_{{L}}/gamma_{{T}} of 0.85+-0.45. or alpha = 0.7+-0.9.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1989J is ALBRECHT 1987J value rescaled using B(D^*(2010)- --> D0 pi-) = 0.57+-0.04+-0.04. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1993.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
We have taken average of the the BORTOLETTO 1989B values for electrons and muons, 0.046+-0.005+-0.007. We rescale using the method described in STONE 1994 but with the updated PDG 1994 B(D0 --> K- pi+). The measurement suggests a D^* polarization parameter value alpha = 0.65+-0.66+-0.25.


pdgid: S042R21
text:
ALBRECHT 1987J assume mu-e universality, the B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.45, the B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (0.042+-0.004+-0.004), and the B(D^*(2010)- --> D0 pi-) = 0.49+-0.08. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1989J.


pdgid: S042B95
text:
AAIJ 2025G simultaneously measures also B(B0 --> D- tau+ nu_tau)/B(B0 --> D- mu+ nu_mu) and reports correlation factor -0.39.


pdgid: S042Q36
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008 reports 4.2+-0.7+-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.06E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q36
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005 reports [G(B0 --> Dbar0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.15+-0.03+-0.03 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.21+-0.06E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S04
text:
Uses a simultaneous fit of all B semileptonic decays without full reconstruction of events. AUBERT 2009Y reports B(B0 --> Dbar_2^*(2460)- lepton+ nu_lepton). B(Dbar_2^*(2460)- --> Dbar^(*)()0 pi-) = 1.77+-0.26+-0.11E-3 and the authors have provided us the individual measurement.


pdgid: S042Q37
text:
LIVENTSEV 2008 reports 5.6+-2.1+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar^*()0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] assuming B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.06E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q37
text:
LIVENTSEV 2005 reports [G(B0 --> Dbar^*()0 pi- lepton+ nu_lepton)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 0.10+-0.02+-0.01 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)0 lepton+ nu_lepton) = 5.53+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
Averaging with ALEXANDER 1996T results including experimental and theoretical correlations considered, BEHRENS 2000 reports systematic errors (-0.46)**+0.33+-0.41, where the second error is theoretical model dependence. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
ATHAR 2003 reports systematic errors +0.47, which are experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
Uses isospin constraints and extrapolation to all electron energies according to five different form-factor calculations. The second error combines the systematic and theoretical uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
BEHRENS 2000 reports +0.35, where the second error is the theoretical model dependence. We combine these in quadrature. B+ and B0 decays combined using isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> rho- lepton+ nu)=2Gamma(B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu)~~ 2Gamma(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu). No evidence for omega lepton nu is reported.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
ALEXANDER 1996T reports +0.5 where the second error is the theoretical model dependence. We combine these in quadrature. B+ and B0 decays combined using isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> rho- lepton+ nu) =2Gamma(B+ --> rho0 lepton+ nu) ~~ 2Gamma(B+ --> omega lepton+ nu). No evidence for omega lepton nu is reported.


pdgid: S042R95
text:
BEAN 1993B limit set using ISGW Model. Using isospin and the quark model to combine Gamma(rho0 lepton+ nu_lepton) and Gamma(omega lepton+ nu_lepton) with this result, they obtain a limit <(1.6 -- 2.7)*10**-4 at 90% CL for B+ --> (omega or rho0) lepton+ nu_lepton. The range corresponds to the ISGW, WSB, and KS models. An upper limit on |V(ub)/V(cb)| <0.08 -- 0.13 at 90% CL is derived as well.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
Reports also a branching fraction value B(B0 --> pi- lepton+ nu) = 1.45+-0.04+-0.06E-4 from the decays of B+ and B0 that are combined using the isospin symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
Also report the rate for q**2> 16 GeV**2 of 0.41+-0.08+-0.04E-4 from which they obtain |V_(ub)| = 3.6+-0.4+-0.2+0.6-0.4 (last error is from theory).


pdgid: S042S48
text:
The analysis uses events in which the signal B decays are reconstructed with an innovative loose neutrino reconstruction technique.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
The signals are tagged by a second B meson reconstructed in a semileptonic or hadronic decay. The B0 and B+ results are combined assuming the isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
ATHAR 2003 reports systematic errors 0.11+-0.01+-0.07, which are experimental systematic, systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the signal, and systematic due to residual form-factor uncertainties in the cross-feed modes, respectively. We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S042S48
text:
ALEXANDER 1996T gives systematic errors +-0.3+-0.2 where the second error reflects the estimated model dependence. We combine these in quadrature. Assumes isospin symmetry: Gamma(B0 --> pi- lepton+ nu) = 2xGamma(B+ --> pi0 lepton+ nu).


pdgid: S042R30
text:
ALBRECHT 1988K assumes B0 Bbar0:B+ B- production ratio is 45:55. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1990J which assumes 50:50.


pdgid: S042R30
text:
AUBERT,B 2004O reports [G(B0 --> D- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K0S pi+)] = 42.7+-2.1+-2.2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K0S pi+) = 1.554+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R30
text:
ALAM 1994 reports [G(B0 --> D- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.265+-0.032+-0.023E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042R33
text:
ALAM 1994 reports [G(B0 --> D- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.000704+-0.000096+-0.000070 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042R1
text:
The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper. AAIJ 2015Y reports B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.46+-0.14+-0.49E-4 in the kinematic region m(Dbar0 pi+-) > 2.1 GeV which we corrected to the full phase-space dividing by 0.945 from Belle.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D. The product branching fraction into D_0^*(2340) pi followed by D_0^*(2340) --> D0 pi is <0.0001 at 90% CL and into D_{{2}}^*(2460) followed by D_2^*(2460) --> D0 pi is <0.0004 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
BEBEK 1987 assume the Upsilon(4S) decays 43% to B0 Bbar0. We rescale to 50%. B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (4.2+-0.4+-0.4)% and B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-) = (9.1+-0.8+-0.8)% were used.


pdgid: S042R1
text:
Corrected by us using assumptions: B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (0.042+-0.006) and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 50%. The product branching ratio is B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)B(Dbar0 --> K+ pi-) = 0.39+-0.26E-2.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
KROHN 2023 reports 2.623+-0.016+-0.086E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.486+-0.006, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.6+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 0.99+-0.11+-0.08 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 4.0+-1.0+-0.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 2.8+-0.9+-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
BEBEK 1987 reports 2.8+1.5-1.2+1.0-0.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Updated in BERKELMAN 1991 to use same assumptions as noted for BORTOLETTO 1992 and ALBRECHT 1990J.


pdgid: S042R2
text:
Assumes B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.60+0.08-0.15. Assumes B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.40+-0.02 Does not depend on D branching ratios.


pdgid: S042R19
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 0.018+-0.004+-0.005 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
The second error combines the systematic and theoretical uncertainties in quadrature. CSORNA 2003 includes data used in ALAM 1994. A full angular fit to three complex helicity amplitudes is performed.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 0.019+-0.008+-0.011 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 0.007+-0.003+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
MATVIENKO 2015 reports B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- rho+, rho+ --> omega pi+) = 1.48+-0.27+0.15-0.09+0.21-0.56E-3. The last uncertainty is a model one.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
This decay is nearly completely longitudinally polarized, Gamma(L)/Gamma = (93+-5+-5)%, as expected from the factorization hypothesis (ROSNER 1990). The nonresonant pi+ pi0 contribution under the rho+ is less than 9% at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042R3
text:
Uses B(D^* --> D0 pi+) = 0.6+-0.15 and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.4. Does not depend on D branching ratios.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
KROHN 2023 reports 2.221+-0.063+-0.077E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 0.486+-0.006, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.6+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
AUBERT 2006A reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)] = 0.0776+-0.0034+-0.0029 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+) = 2.66+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B5
text:
ABE 2001I reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- K+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+)] = 0.074+-0.015+-0.006 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+) = 2.66+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R20
text:
The three pion mass is required to be between 1.0 and 1.6 GeV consistent with an a_{{1}} meson. (If this channel is dominated by a_{{1}}()+, the branching ratio for Dbar^*()- a_1()+ is twice that for Dbar^*()- pi+ pi+ pi-.)


pdgid: S042R20
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 0.0159+-0.0028+-0.0037 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R20
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 0.012+-0.003+-0.004 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R90
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D and D^*(2010).


pdgid: S042R92
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 0.0068+-0.0032+-0.0021 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ rho0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R87
text:
ALAM 1994 value is twice their Gamma(D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi-)/Gamma(total) value based on their observation that the three pions are dominantly in the a_{{1}}(1260) mass range 1.0 to 1.6 GeV.


pdgid: S042R87
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 0.018+-0.006+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- a_1(1260)+)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R65
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 0.041+-0.015+-0.016 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- pi+ pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042B7
text:
The signal is consistent with all observed omega pi+ having proceeded through the rho^'+ resonance at mass 1349+-25+10-5 MeV and width 547+-86+46-45 MeV.


pdgid: S042B75
text:
The measurement is obtained by amplitude analysis of B0 --> D^*()- omega pi+. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.


pdgid: S042B75
text:
Obtained by fitting the events with cos( theta(D^*()) ) < 0.5 and scaling up the result by a factor of 4/3. No interference effects between B0 --> D_1^'() omega and D^* omega pi are assumed.


pdgid: S042C45
text:
Obtained by amplitude analysis of Bbar0 --> D^*()- omega pi+. The second uncertainty combines in qudrature experimental systematic and model uncertainties.


pdgid: S042R77
text:
AUBERT,BE 2006J reports [G(B0 --> Dbar^**()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 0.77+-0.22+-0.29 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S22
text:
Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042S23
text:
ALAM 1994 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the CLEO II absolute B(D0 --> K- pi+) and B(D_2^*(2460)+ --> D0 pi+) = 30%.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
ZUPANC 2007 reports 7.5+-0.2+-1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
AUBERT 2006N reports 0.64+-0.13+-0.10E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.0087+-0.0024+-0.0020 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports 0.017+-0.013+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes PDG 1990 D+ branching ratios, e.g., B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 7.7+-1.0%.


pdgid: S042R48
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 0.0080+-0.0045+-0.0030 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.030+-0.011, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AUBERT 2006N reports 0.71+-0.13+-0.09E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AUBERT 2003I reports 0.0103+-0.0014+-0.0013 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
AHMED 2000B reports 0.0110+-0.0018+-0.0011 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports 0.014+-0.010+-0.003 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes PDG 1990 D+ and D^*(2010)+ branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25%, B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 7.1+-1.0%, and B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 55+-4%.


pdgid: S042R47
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 0.016+-0.009+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.030+-0.011, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses Mark III branching fractions for the D and D^*(2010).


pdgid: S042R47
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.0093+-0.0023+-0.0016 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
AUBERT 2006N reports 0.69+-0.16+-0.09E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.0100+-0.0035+-0.0022 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R98
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports 0.027+-0.017+-0.009 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes PDG 1990 D+ branching ratios, e.g., B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 7.7+-1.0%.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AUBERT 2006N reports 1.68+-0.21+-0.19E-2 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.0462+-0.0062, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
A partial reconstruction technique is used and the result is independent of the particle decay rate of D_{{S}}()+ meson. It also provides a model-independent determination of B(D_S()+ --> phi pi+) = (4.81+-0.52+-0.38)%.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AUBERT 2003I reports 0.0197+-0.0015+-0.0030 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
AHMED 2000B reports 0.0182+-0.0037+-0.0025 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports 0.026+-0.014+-0.006 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes PDG 1990 D+ and D^*(2010)+ branching ratios, e.g., B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.71+-0.25%, B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 7.1+-1.0%, and B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 55+-4%.


pdgid: S042R00
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.0203+-0.0050+-0.0036 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P66
text:
AAIJ 2021S reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)] * [B(D_s^*()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)] = 2.045+-0.022+-0.071 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s^*()+ --> D_s()+ gamma) = 93.6+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R64
text:
AUBERT 2003I reports 3.00+-0.19+-0.39E-2 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R64
text:
BORTOLETTO 1990 reports 7.5+-2.0E-2 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s^*()+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.02, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q55
text:
DRUTSKOY 2005 reports 5.3+1.5-1.3+-1.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0(2317)- K+, D_s0()- --> D_s()- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
CHOI 2015A reports 10.2+1.3-1.2+-1.0+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-, D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.39+-0.21E-2,B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.13+-0.19E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2, B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S reports 1.8+-0.4+0.7-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-, D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B57
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B reports 0.86+0.33-0.26+-0.26E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s0^*(2317)+ D-, D_s0^*()+ --> D_s()+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B58
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S reports [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 2.3+1.0-0.7+-0.3E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B58
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B reports [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 1.9+0.7-0.6+-0.2E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q10
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S reports 0.8+-0.2+0.3-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D()-, D_sJ()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q10
text:
KROKOVNY 2003B reports 0.82+0.22-0.19+-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_sJ(2457)+ D()-, D_sJ()+ --> D_s()+ gamma)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q09
text:
AUBERT,B 2004S reports [G(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_sJ(2457)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0)] = 5.5+-1.2+2.2-1.6E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s1(2460)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0) = 48+-11E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C05
text:
DAS 2010 reports [G(B0 --> D+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 2.92+-0.38+-0.31E-4 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C05
text:
Derived using tan(theta_{{C}}) f_{{D}}/f(D_{{s}}()) sqrt( B(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-) / B(B0 --> D- pi+) ) by assuming the flavor SU(3) symmetry, where theta_{{C}} is the Cabibbo angle, f_{{D}} (f(D_{{s}}())) is the D (D_{{s}}()) meson decay constant.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
AUBERT 2007K reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.63+-0.15+-0.05E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
AUBERT 2003D reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.13+-0.33+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
KROKOVNY 2002 reports [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.86+0.37-0.30+-0.11E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R49
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <270E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S4
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <1.7E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D_s()+ pi-)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S17
text:
AUBERT 2007K reports [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.32+-0.27+-0.15E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S17
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <44E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S6
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <1.2E-3 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ pi-)/G(total)+ G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S7
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <2.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S7
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <6.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S8
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <2.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S8
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <7.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ rho-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S9
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <3.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()+ a_1(1260)-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S10
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <2.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()+ a_1(1260)-)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
AUBERT 2007K reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.21+-0.17+-0.11E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
AUBERT 2003D reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.16+-0.36+-0.24E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
KROKOVNY 2002 reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 1.61+0.45-0.38+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R50
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <230E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S18
text:
AUBERT 2007K reports [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.97+-0.24+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S18
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <17E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <4.6E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S11
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <9.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <5.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S12
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <11.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- K^*(892)+)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S13
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <7.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- pi+ K0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <4.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- pi+ K0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042C10
text:
AAIJ 2012AX reports [G(B0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-)] = 0.54+-0.07+-0.07 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- K+ pi+ pi-) = 3.2+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S15
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <5.0E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- pi+ K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042S16
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <2.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s^*()- pi+ K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S042B47
text:
AAIJ 2015X reports 5.13+-0.20+-0.15+-0.24+-0.60E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B47
text:
Measured via amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-, which excludes contribution from decay via D^*(2010)- resonance.


pdgid: S042C38
text:
AAIJ 2015X reports 0.71+-0.27+-0.33+-0.47+-0.08E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K_0^*(1430)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C39
text:
AAIJ 2015X reports 2.04+-0.45+-0.30+-0.54+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Dbar0 K_2^*(1430)0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C40
text:
AAIJ 2015X reports 1.77+-0.26+-0.19+-0.67+-0.20E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_0^*(2300)- K+, D_0^*()- --> Dbar0 pi-)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q52
text:
AAIJ 2015X reports 2.12+-0.10+-0.11+-0.11+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_2^*(2460)- K+, D_2^*()- --> Dbar0 pi-)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 9.2+-0.6+-0.7+-0.6E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ pi-) = 8.8+-1.7E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S26
text:
NEMATI 1998 assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and use the PDG 1996 values for D0, D^*()0, eta, eta^', and omega branching fractions.


pdgid: S042R34
text:
Measured using isobar formalism in the decay chain B0 --> Dbar0 rho(770), rho --> pi+ pi- assuming B(rho(770) --> pi+ pi-) = 1. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042Q73
text:
Result obtained using the isobar formalism. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper. Measured in the decay chain B0 --> Dbar0 f_2(1270), f_2() --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042S29
text:
Result obtained using the isobar model. The second uncertainty combines in quadrature all systematic uncertainties quoted in the paper.


pdgid: S042P99
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fractions B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and B(phi --> K+ K-).


pdgid: S042B97
text:
Uses D0 --> K- pi+ mode. Restricts K+ pi- mass within +-50 MeV of the nominal K^*()0 mass. Corresponds to the upper limit, < 0.16 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S042B97
text:
Reports a signal at the level of 2.5 standard deviations after combining results from D0 --> K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, and K+ pi- pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042S70
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fraction B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and B(phi --> K+ K-).


pdgid: S042S52
text:
BARATE 1998Q (ALEPH) observes 2 events with an expected background of 0.10+-0.03 which corresponds to a branching ratio of 2.3+1.9-1.2+-0.4E-3.


pdgid: S042S52
text:
ASNER 1997 at CLEO observes 1 event with an expected background of 0.022+-0.011. This corresponds to a branching ratio of 5.3+7.1-3.7+-1.0E-4.


pdgid: S042S82
text:
The measurement is performed using a partial reconstruction technique for the D^* and fully reconstructed D+ decays as a cross check.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 38.0+6.4-2.9+1.3-4.7E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 3.4+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.83+0.28-0.26+-0.05E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.11+-0.12E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S88
text:
AUBERT,B 2004B reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.0648+-0.0085+-0.0071E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 5.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P28
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 0.357+-0.015+-0.008 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.11+-0.12E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S042P32
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K^*(1410)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K^*(1410) --> K pi)] = 0.021+-0.011+-0.011 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K^*(1410) --> K pi) = 6.6+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P34
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_0^*(1430)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_0^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 0.253+-0.035+0.035-0.028 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K_0^*(1430) --> K pi) = 93+-10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P35
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_2^*(1430)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 0.041+-0.015+0.010-0.016 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P36
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K^*(1680)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K^*(1680) --> K pi)] = 0.022+-0.020+0.015-0.017 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K^*(1680) --> K pi) = 38.7+-2.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P37
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports [G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K_0^*(1950)0)/G(B0 --> eta_c(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(K_0^*(1950) --> K- pi+)] = 0.038+-0.018+0.014-0.025 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K_0^*(1950) --> K- pi+) = 52+-14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AAIJ 2018AN reports B(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0, K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.95+-0.16+0.36-0.44E-4 using the fitted fraction of 0.514+-0.019+0.017-0.048 from Dalitz decay of B(B0 --> eta_c K+ pi-)=5.73+-0.24+-0.67E-4 and corrected for B(K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-) = 2/3.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AUBERT 2008AB reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 0.62+-0.06+-0.05 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.20+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B43
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> eta_c K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.03+0.27-0.24+-0.17E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar) = 1.11+-0.12E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 48.6+4.6-4.4+2.4-2.6E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 1.87+0.28-0.26+-0.07E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R23
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 6+-3+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042R23
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 8+-6+-2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042R4
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 1.0+-0.4+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042R4
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D assume B+ B-/B0 Bbar0 ratio is 55/45. K pi system is specifically selected as nonresonant.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
AUBERT 2007AV reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] = 2.82+0.30-0.28+0.36-0.35E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ABE 1998O reports [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)]/[B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] =1.76+-0.14+-0.15. We multiply by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)=9.9+-1.0E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports 1.1+-0.5+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALBRECHT 1990J reports 1.1+-0.5+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042R22
text:
BEBEK 1987 reports 3.5+-1.6+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Updated in BORTOLETTO 1992 to use the same assumptions.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
The neutral and charged B events together are predominantly longitudinally polarized, Gamma(L)/Gamma =0.080+-0.08+-0.05. This can be compared with a prediction using HQET, 0.73 (KRAMER 1992). This polarization indicates that the B --> psi K^* decay is dominated by the CP = -1 CP eigenstate. Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALBRECHT 1994G measures the polarization in the vector-vector decay to be predominantly longitudinal, Gamma(T)/Gamma = 0.03+-0.16+-0.15 making the neutral decay a CP eigenstate when the K^*()0 decays through K0S pi0.


pdgid: S042R22
text:
ALAM 1986 assumes B+-/B0 ratio is 60/40. The observation of the decay B+ --> J/psi K^*(892)+ (HAAS 1985) has been retracted in this paper.


pdgid: S042B6
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and uses the PDG value of B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.00+-0.10E-3.


pdgid: S042S35
text:
AAIJ 2024N reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+)] = 1.153+-0.053+-0.048E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)+) = 1.43+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S51
text:
AAIJ 2025AN value obtained by multiplying reported B(B_s()0 --> J/psi eta) = 4.58+-0.14+-0.16+-0.26E-4 by the ratio B(B0 --> J/psi eta)/B(B_s()0 --> J/psi eta) = 2.16+-0.16+-0.05+-0.07E-2. The last uncertainty combines the systematic uncertainty with branching fraction uncertainties.


pdgid: S042S51
text:
AAIJ 2015D reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)] = 1.85+-0.61+-0.14E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta) = 4.45+-0.25E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B45
text:
AAIJ 2013M reports 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.018+-0.042E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B45
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state.


pdgid: S042C11
text:
AAIJ 2013M reports 6.4+-0.8+2.4-0.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(500), f_0() --> pi pi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C11
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042Q75
text:
AAIJ 2013M reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 3.5+-0.4+-0.4E-6 from a measurement of [[G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S042Q75
text:
AUBERT 2007AC reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] < 0.46E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3E-2.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2014X uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-. We assume B(rho(770)0 --> pi+ pi-) = 100%.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2013M reports 2.49+0.20-0.13+0.16-0.23E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S46
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not report correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi pi final state. Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-. Assumes B(rho(770)0 --> pi pi) = 100%.


pdgid: S042C12
text:
AAIJ 2013M does not provide correlations between various measurements of the J/psi pi+ pi- final state. The measurements were obtained from a Dalitz plot like analysis of B0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-. Also reports = 6.1+3.1-2.0+1.7-1.4E-6.


pdgid: S042C13
text:
AAIJ 2013M reports 2.1+1.0-0.6+2.2-0.4E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho(1450)0, rho()0 --> pi pi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.97+-0.09+-0.11+-0.16E-5, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 3.99+-0.15E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S47
text:
AAIJ 2014X reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) omega)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 2.7+0.8-0.6+0.7-0.5E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C14
text:
AAIJ 2013M reports 0.61+0.24-0.14+0.31-0.16 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) omega)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] assuming B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+0.11-0.13E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042BA1
text:
AAIJ 2013BT reports 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.018+-0.042E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042BA2
text:
AAIJ 2013BT uses B(Bbar0 --> J/psi K+ K-) = 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 to derive this result. It also reports the equivalent upper limit of < 9.0E-7 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042B53
text:
AAIJ 2013BT uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ K-) = 2.53+-0.31+-0.19E-6 and B(phi --> K+ K-) = (48.9+-0.5)% to obtain this result.


pdgid: S042B54
text:
AAIJ 2025AN value obtained by multiplying reported B(B_s()0 --> J/psi eta^') = 3.76+-0.13+-0.19+-0.21E-4 by the ratio B(B0 --> J/psi eta^')/B(B_s()0 --> J/psi eta^') = 1.33+-0.12+-0.05E-2. The last uncertainty combines the systematic uncertainty with branching fraction uncertainties.


pdgid: S042B54
text:
AAIJ 2015D reports [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^'(958))/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^')] = 2.28+-0.65+-0.16E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^') = 3.53+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042RB4
text:
AAIJ 2025AN reports B(B0 --> J/psi eta^')/B(B0 --> J/psi eta) = 0.48+-0.06+-0.02+-0.01 from which the reciprocal of ratio is derived. The last error is total systematic, including the branching ratios of eta^' uncertainties.


pdgid: S042C23
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> J/psi K0S K+ K-) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S) using PDG 2012 for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042RB3
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> J/psi K0S K+- pi-+) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042C22
text:
AAIJ 2014Y reports 8.37+-1.95+0.71-0.66+-0.35E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-)] assuming B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 0.11+0.007-0.006, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 10.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
HIRATA 2023 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.34+0.47-0.40+0.10-0.12 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
CHOI 2011 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.50+-0.14+-0.04 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))] = 6+-3+-1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S)) = 5.0+-1.9E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
BHARDWAJ 2011 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 2.4E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUSHEV 2010 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 0.97+-0.46+-0.13E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 4.9E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2008B reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 2.22+-1.05+-0.42E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2008Y reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 6.0E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
AUBERT 2006 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 10.3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
Measure the near-threshold enhancements in the (D0 Dbar^0() pi0) system at a mass 3875.2+-0.7+0.3-1.6+-0.8 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042P59
text:
GOKHROO 2006 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)] = 1.66+-0.70+0.32-0.37E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0) = 55+-28E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
BALA 2015 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 4.0+-1.5+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 2.8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: S042P60
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma psi(2S))] < 4.4E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042P61
text:
BALA 2015 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] = 7.9+-1.3+-0.4E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P62
text:
CHOU 2019 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) gamma)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 5.1E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: S042B52
text:
Measured relative to B_s()0 --> J/psi phi assuming B( B_s()0 --> J/psi phi) = 10.5+-0.13+-0.64E-4 and taking into account small K+ K- S-wave contribution. Measurement assumes f(s)/f(d) = 0.259+-0.015 for 7, 8 TeV data and f(s)/f(d) multiplied by 1.068+-0.046 for 13 TeV data.


pdgid: S042Q04
text:
Branching fractions of normalization modes B0 --> J/psi gamma X taken from PDG 2014. Uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S042R66
text:
Measured with B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0S) x B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S042QA1
text:
Assuming lepton universality for dimuon decay modes of J/psi and psi(2S) mesons, the ratio B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-)/B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = B(J/psi --> e+ e-)/B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.69+-0.19 was used.


pdgid: S042R68
text:
Combines measurements with psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton- with measurement from MIZUK 2009 which uses psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S042R67
text:
ABE 1998O reports [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)]/[B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] =0.908+-0.194+-0.10. We multiply by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)=9.9+-1.0E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042T97
text:
AAIJ 2012L reports 0.476+-0.014+-0.010+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.95+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S042S89
text:
AAIJ 2018F uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used. We compute B(B0 --> chi_c0() K0) using the PDG value B(chi_c0() --> pi pi) = 8.51+-0.33E-3 and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction. Our first error is their experiment's error and the second error is systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S042S89
text:
LEES 2012I reports [G(B0 --> chi_c0() K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S)] = 0.46+0.25-0.17+-0.21E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S) = 3.08+-0.18E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S24
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)] = 7.4+2.4-2.0+0.6-0.4E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-) = 5.0+-1.9E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S24
text:
AVERY 2000 reports 3.9+1.9-1.3+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042S24
text:
AUBERT 2002 reports 5.4+-1.4+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042B3
text:
AUBERT 2002 reports 0.66+-0.11+-0.17 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K0)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042C16
text:
LEES 2012B reports 0.474+-0.013+-0.026 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 pi- K+)/G(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K+ pi-)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.4+-1.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S25
text:
AUBERT 2002 reports 4.8+-1.4+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> chi_c1 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S042B92
text:
Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Finds a good description of the data without this B0 --> X(4051)+ K- decay mode in a fit.


pdgid: S042B93
text:
Uses chi_c1() --> J/psi gamma mode. Finds a good description of the data without this B0 --> X(4248)+ K- decay mode in a fit.


pdgid: S042R10
text:
ADAM 1996D assumes f(B0) = f(B-) = 0.39 and f(B_{{s}}) = 0.12. Contributions from B0 and B_{{s}} decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.


pdgid: S042R10
text:
Assumes a B0, B- production fraction of 0.39 and a B_{{s}} production fraction of 0.12. Contributions from B0 and B_{{s}}()0 decays cannot be separated. Limits are given for the weighted average of the decay rates for the two neutral B mesons.


pdgid: S042S41
text:
This is the combined result of this analysis (ADACHI 2024) and the updated analysis of ADACHI 2023E. The individual results are 10.40+-0.66+-0.60E-6 and 11.15+-0.68+-0.62E-6, respectively.


pdgid: S042Q07
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K+ pi- pi0 decays. The quoted value is only for the flat part of the non-resonant component.


pdgid: S042B00
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042P43
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. (Kpi)_{0}^*() is the S-wave component of K0 pi+. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042B06
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> f_2(1270) K0)xB(f_2(1270) --> pi+ pi-) <1.4E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> f_2(1270) K0) using the PDG value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = and 2/3 for the pi+ pi- fraction.


pdgid: S042R72
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-) using the PDG 2018 value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = and 2/3 for the K0 pi+ fraction. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042R72
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-)xB(K_2^*()+ --> K0 pi+) <2.1E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-) using the PDG value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = and 2/3 for the K0 pi+ fraction.


pdgid: S042B03
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of the B0 --> K0S pi+ pi- final state decays. We compute B(B0 --> K_2^*(1430)+ pi-) using the PDG 2018 value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2 and 2/3 for the K0 pi+ fraction. For the branching fraction of the reference mode, the PDG 2018 average B(B0 --> K0S pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5 is used.


pdgid: S042B03
text:
GARMASH 2007 reports B(B0 --> K^*(1680)+ pi-)xB(K^*()+ --> K0 pi+) <2.6E-6 using Dalitz plot analysis. We compute B(B0 --> K^*(1680)+ pi-) using the PDG value B(K^*(1680) --> K pi)= and 2/3 for the K0 pi+ fraction.


pdgid: S042R15
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 2.4E-5.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B0 --> K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> K+ K-)] / [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]/G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.018+0.008-0.007+-0.009 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B_s()0 --> K+ K-) = 2.61+-0.16E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.251+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
Obtains this result from B(K+ K-)/B(K+ pi-) = 0.020+-0.008+-0.006, assuming B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S042S1
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from Gamma(K+ K-)/Gamma(K+ pi-) < 0.10 at 90% CL, assuming B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S042T74
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range.


pdgid: S042T30
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range. The quoted result is equivalent to the upper limit of <13.9E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
AAIJ 2019L reports [G(B0 --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0)] = 0.0758+-0.0057+-0.0030 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0) = 1.11+-0.27E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
Measured in the range 0.7< mass(K pi)< 1.7 and corrected using PS assumption for the full K pi mass range. The quoted result is equivalent to the upper limit of <0.8E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S042S87
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 1.9E-5.


pdgid: S042B9
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 2.9E-5.


pdgid: S042B10
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 8.9E-5.


pdgid: S042R76
text:
The angular distribution of B --> phi K^*(1430) provides evidence with statistical significance of 3.2~sigma.


pdgid: S042R16
text:
ADACHI 2025Z reports 4.14+-0.10+-0.11E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.61+0.74-0.80, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.6+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R16
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). No evidence for a nonresonant K pi gamma contamination was seen; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S042R58
text:
PAL 2015 signal significance is 3.0 standard deviations. The measurement corresponds to 90% CL upper limit of < 6.5E-7.


pdgid: S042S76
text:
GUAN 2024 reports 1.53+-0.29+-0.17E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> omega omega)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0)] assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.4+-1.2E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = 48.6+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R26
text:
Assumes a helicity 00 configuration. For a helicity 11 configuration, the limit decreases to 1.4E-5.


pdgid: S042R27
text:
DALSENO 2012 reports B(B0 --> a_1()+- pi-+) B(a_1()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 11.1+-1.0+-1.4E-6 which we rescaled assuming a_{{1}}(1260) decays only to 3pi and B(a_1()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 0.5.


pdgid: S042R28
text:
DALSENO 2012 reports B(B0 --> a_2()+- pi-+) B(a_2()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) < 2.2E-6 which we rescaled using B(a_2()+- --> pi+- pi+ pi-) = 1/2 B() = 0.35+-0.013.


pdgid: S042R55
text:
The quoted result is obtained after combining with AUBERT 2004G result by AUBERT 2004R alone gives 33+-4+-5E-6.


pdgid: S042R31
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 1.07+-0.04+-0.04 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.896+-0.010E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S042R31
text:
Assumes equal production of B0 and B+ from Upsilon(4S) decays. This measurement is quoted for M(pi+ pi-) < 1.22 GeV excluding the 0.46 < M(pi+ pi-) < 0.53 GeV region.


pdgid: S042R31
text:
ALBRECHT 1988F reports 6.0+-2.0+-2.2 assuming the Upsilon(4S) decays 45% to B0 Bbar0. We rescale to 50%.


pdgid: S042B23
text:
The last uncertainty includes the systematic uncertainties due to the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the normalisation channel.


pdgid: S042B23
text:
Explicitly vetoes resonant production of p pbar from charmonium states and p K0 production from Lambda_{{c}}.


pdgid: S042P22
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 2.34+-0.12+-0.12 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.896+-0.010E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S042P23
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B0 --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.045+-0.011+-0.004 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.896+-0.010E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S042P27
text:
AAIJ 2023AD reports 2.2+-0.4+-0.1+-0.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> p pbar p pbar)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values. It also includes B(K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi-) = 2/3.


pdgid: S042Q85
text:
Excluding charmonium events in 2.85 < mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.128 GeV/c**2 and 3.315 < mass(Lambda Lambdabar)< 3.735 GeV/c**2. Measurements in various mass(Lambda Lambdabar) bins are also reported.


pdgid: S042B08
text:
MEDVEDEVA 2007 reports 2.9+-0.7+-0.5+-0.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> D_s()- Lambdabar p)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S21
text:
PROCARIO 1994 reports <0.0012 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c()-- Delta()++)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.043, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37E-2.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
Uses Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ mode. The second error includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the Lambda_{{c}} decay, B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (5.0+-1.3)%.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
PARK 2007 reports 11.2+-0.5+-3.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
DYTMAN 2002 reports 1.67+0.27-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S59
text:
GABYSHEV 2002 reports 1.1+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S55
text:
AUBERT 2008BN reports 1.89+-0.21+-0.49E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042S55
text:
The second error for GABYSHEV 2003 includes the systematic and the error of Lambda_c --> pbar K+ pi- decay branching fraction.


pdgid: S042S56
text:
AUBERT 2010H reports 1.94+-0.17+-0.52E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C31
text:
LEES 2015B reports [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 12.5+-2.0+-1.0E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C32
text:
LEES 2015B reports <1.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p phi)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37E-2.


pdgid: S042Q91
text:
AUBERT 2010H reports [G(B0 --> Sigma_c(2455)- p)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37E-2.


pdgid: S042R83
text:
PARK 2007 reports 6.4+-0.4+-1.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- p pi+ pi- (nonresonant))/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B39
text:
PARK 2007 reports 1.2+-0.1+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2520)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B39
text:
GABYSHEV 2002 reports 1.63+0.64-0.58E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2520)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q84
text:
KIM 2008 reports 0.80+-0.15+-0.25E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 N0, N0 --> p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
DYTMAN 2002 reports 2.2+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
PARK 2007 reports 1.4+-0.2+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B26
text:
GABYSHEV 2002 reports 0.48+0.46-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)0 p pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
DYTMAN 2002 reports 3.7+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
PARK 2007 reports 2.1+-0.2+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042B27
text:
GABYSHEV 2002 reports 2.38+0.75-0.69E-4 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.05, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q88
text:
AUBERT 2009AG reports 4.33+-0.82+-0.33+-1.13E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()- p K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042Q89
text:
AUBERT 2009AG reports 1.11+-0.30+-0.09+-0.29E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Sigmabar_c(2455)-- p K+, Sigmabar_c()-- --> Lambdabar_c()- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042C20
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S) and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.050+-0.013.


pdgid: S042Q96
text:
LEES 2011F reports 3.8+-0.8+-0.2+-1.0E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambdabar_c()- Lambda K+)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda --> p pi-)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2,B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 63.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2, B(Lambda --> p pi-) = 64.1+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values. The reported uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and Lambdabar_{{c}}()- branching fraction uncertainty.


pdgid: S042P54
text:
LI 2019C reports 1.16+-0.74+-0.33E-3 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
LI 2019C reports 3.32+-0.74+-0.33E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+, Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
AUBERT 2008H reports 1.5+-1.07+-0.44E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+, Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042R78
text:
CHISTOV 2006A reports 9.3+3.7-2.8+-3.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+, Xibar_c()- --> Xibar+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042P55
text:
LI 2019C reports 5.27+-1.51+-0.69E-6 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Xibar_c()- Lambda_c()+, Xibar_c()- --> pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042A56
text:
Uses B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) based on the CHOUDHURY 2023 to estimate N(B0 Bbar0) pairs. Omega_{{c}}(2770)0 is partially reconstructed and assumed to exclusively decay to final states containing Omega_{{c}}()0.


pdgid: S042P77
text:
LEES 2023B searched for psi_{{DS}} in the recoil mass against Lambda and the fully reconstructed accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for m(psi_{{DS}}) between 1 and 4.1 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042P77
text:
HADJIVASILIOU 2022 searched for psi_{{DS}}, in the mass range 1 -- 3.9 GeV/c**2, in the recoil mass against Lambda and the accompanying B meson. The cited upper limit is for m(psi_{{DS}}) = 2.0 GeV/c**2 and is the most stringent. The least stringent limit is <3.8E-5 at m(psi_{{DS}}) = 3.9 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042S36
text:
Used combined Belle and Belle II data and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar0) = (48.4+-1.2)%. A signal with 2.5sigma significance, including systematic uncertainties, is observed, corresponding to a branching fraction 3.7+2.2-1.8+-0.5E-8.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.010+-0.029E-3 and B production ratio f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B0) = 0.256+-0.013.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
This value is obtained from a profile-likelihood fit, see Fig. 9. It corresponds to an uppper limit of < 0.42E-9 at 95% C.L.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Derived from the combined fit to CMS and LHCb data. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic component. Also reports B(B0 --> mu+ mu-)/B(B_s --> mu+ mu-) = 0.14+0.08-0.06.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Reports also a limit of <7.4E-10 at 95% CL. Uses normalization modes B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+ and B0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Reports also a limit of <9.2E-10 at 90% CL. and uses B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S042R7
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.71+-0.47 and three normalization modes.


pdgid: S042R69
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0) = 1.19+-0.01+-0.08E-3. The second error is the total systematic uncertainty.


pdgid: S042C49
text:
The limt is obtained as a function of di-muon mass. A normalizing mode branching fraction value of B(B0 --> K^*()0 mu+ mu-) = 1.6+-0.3E-7 is used.


pdgid: S042C36
text:
AAIJ 2015S reports 2.11+-0.51+-0.15+-0.16E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> pi+ pi- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.3+-0.1E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S042SN1
text:
A reinterpretation of an old inclusive ALEPH search for b-hadron decays with large missing energy reported in BARATE 2001E.


pdgid: S042SN1
text:
Identified by fully reconstructing a hadronic decay of the accompanying B meson and requiring no other particles in the event.


pdgid: S042R8
text:
AAIJ 2018T uses normalization modes B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.026+-0.031E-3.


pdgid: S042Q92
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K reports <180E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()+ mu-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37E-2.


pdgid: S042Q93
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011K reports <520E-8 from a measurement of [G(B0 --> Lambda_c()+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37E-2.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
AAIJ 2013AT obtains Gamma((parallel))/Gamma = 0.227+-0.004+-0.011. The relation 1 = ( Gamma(L) + Gamma((perp)) + Gamma((parallel)))/Gamma is used to obtain Gamma(L)/Gamma.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
Measured the angular and lifetime parameters for the time-dependent angular untagged decays B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*0() and B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
AFFOLDER 2000N measurements are based on 190 B0 candidates obtained from a data sample of 89 pb**-1. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.13+0.12-0.09+-0.06.


pdgid: S042P1
text:
JESSOP 1997 is the average over a mixture of B0 and B+ decays. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.16+-0.08+-0.04.


pdgid: S042A66
text:
AAIJ 2024AN value restricted to q**2< 7.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports correlation of -0.18 with the measurement in the region q**2> 7.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042A66
text:
AAIJ 2024AN value restricted to q**2> 7.0 GeV**2/c**4. Reports correlation of -0.18 with the measurement in the region q**2< 7.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042P5
text:
AUBERT,B 2004W also measures the fraction of parity-odd transverse contribution f(perp) = 0.22+-0.05+-0.02 and the phases of the parity-even and parity-odd transverse amplitudes relative to the longitudinal amplitude.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
BEHRENS 2000B uses high-momentum lepton tags and partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ pi-, rho- decays to determine the flavor of the B meson.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1994 reports r=0.194+-0.062+-0.054. We convert to chi for comparison. Uses tagged events (lepton + pion from D^*).


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
BARTELT 1993 analysis performed using tagged events (lepton+pion from D^*). Using dilepton events they obtain 0.157+-0.016+0.033-0.028.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1992L is a combined measurement employing several lepton-based techniques. It uses all previous ARGUS data in addition to new data and therefore supersedes ALBRECHT 1987I. A value of r = 20.6+-7.0% is directly measured. The value can be used to measure x = DeltaM/Gamma = 0.72+-0.15 for the B_{{d}} meson. Assumes f(+-)/f(0) = 1.0+-0.05 and uses meanlife(B+-)/meanlife(B0) = (0.95+-0.14) (f(+-)/f(0)).


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
ALBRECHT 1987I is inclusive measurement with like-sign dileptons, with tagged B decays plus leptons, and one fully reconstructed event. Measures r=0.21+-0.08. We convert to chi for comparison. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1992L.


pdgid: S042CHD
text:
Same-sign dilepton events. Limit assumes semileptonic BR for B+ and B0 equal. If B0/B+- ratio <0.58, no limit exists. The limit was corrected in BEAN 1987B from r < 0.30 to r < 0.37. We converted this limit to chi.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Uses semileptonic decays of B0 --> D- mu+ nu_mu X and B0 --> D^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu X, where the D mesons are reconstructed in D- --> K+ pi- pi- and D^(*)()- --> Dbar0 pi- with Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Uses semileptonic decays of B0 --> D- mu+ nu_mu X where the D- mesons are reconstructed in D- --> K+ K- pi-.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Events with a high transverse momentum lepton were removed and an inclusively reconstructed vertex was required.


pdgid: S042D
text:
HASTINGS 2003 measurement based on the time evolution of dilepton events. It also reports f(+)/f(0) = 1.01+-0.03+-0.09 and CPT violation parameters in B0-Bbar0 mixing.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ZHENG 2003 data analyzed using partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()- pi+ decay and a flavor tag based on the charge of the lepton from the accompanying B decay.


pdgid: S042D
text:
Data analyzed using partially reconstructed Bbar0 --> D^*()+ lepton- nubar decay and a combination of flavor tags from the rest of the event.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ACCIARRI 1998D combines results from lepton-lepton, lepton-Q(hem), and lepton-lepton with impact parameters.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ABREU 1997N combines results from D^*()+--Q(hem), lepton-Q(hem), pi_s()+- lepton-Q(hem), and lepton-lepton.


pdgid: S042D
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997V combines results from lepton-lepton, lepton-Q(hem), D^*-lepton, and D^*()+--Q(hem).


pdgid: S042RZ1
text:
The first uncertainty is the uncertainty from Re(z) and the second uncertainty is from Re(lambda/|lambda|).


pdgid: S042RZ0
text:
Measured using B0 --> J/psi K0S, J/psi K0L, D- pi+, D^*()- pi+, D^*()- rho+, and D^*()- lepton+ nu decays.


pdgid: S042IZ1
text:
Measurement uses B0/Bbar0 --> lepton+ X/lepton- X decays. Assuming DeltaGamma = 0, the result becomes Im(z) = -0.37+-0.54E-2.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
AAIJ 2015F uses semileptonic B0 decays in the inclusive final states D- mu+ and D^*()- mu+, where the D- meson decays into the K+ pi- pi- final state, and the D^*()- meson into the Dbar0(K+ pi-)pi- final state. Reports A_{{{SL}}}^d() = (-0.02+-0.19+-0.30)%, which equals to 4Re(epsilon(B0))/(1+|epsilon(B0)|**2).


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
Uses the charge asymmetry in like-sign dilepton events. LEES 2015A reports A_{{{SL}}}^d() = -3.9+-3.5+-1.9E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{{SL}}}^d() = -0.62+-0.42E-2.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
Uses B0 --> D^*()- X lepton+ nu_lepton and a kaon-tagged sample which yields measurement of A_{{SL}}^d() = (0.06+-0.17+0.38-0.32)%, corresponding to Delta(CP) = 1-|q/p| = 0.29+-0.84+1.88-1.61E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2012AC uses B0 --> D- mu+ X and B0 --> D^*(2010)- mu+ X decays without initial state flavor tagging which yields measurement of A(SL)**d = 6.8+-4.5+-1.4E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
JAFFE 2001 finds a(lepton lepton) = 0.013+-0.050+-0.005 and combines with the previous BEHRENS 2000B independent measurement.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^d() = -1.2+-5.2E-3.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
BARATE 2001D measured by investigating time-dependent asymmetries in semileptonic and fully inclusive B_{{d}}()0 decays.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
Data analyzed using the time-dependent asymmetry of inclusive B0 decay. The production flavor of B0 mesons is determined using both the jet charge and the charge of secondary vertex in the opposite hemisphere.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997U assumes CPT and is based on measuring the charge asymmetry in a sample of B0 decays defined by lepton and Q(hem) tags. If CPT is not invoked, Re(epsilon_{{B}}) = -0.006+-0.010+-0.006 is found. The indirect CPT violation parameter is determined to Im(delta B) = -0.020+-0.016+-0.006.


pdgid: S042EPS
text:
BARTELT 1993 finds a(lepton lepton) = 0.031+-0.096+-0.032 which corresponds to |a(lepton lepton)|<0.18, which yields the above |Re(epsilon(B0))/(1+|epsilon(B0)|**2)|.


pdgid: S042CQ9
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0 pi+ pi- decays and the first of two equivalent solutions is used.


pdgid: S042AC3
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0 pi+ pi- decays and the first of two consistent solutions that may be preferred.


pdgid: S042CPJ
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of C = -0.059+-0.092+-0.020 and DeltaC = -0.031+-0.092+-0.016 such that C(D^*(2010)- D+) = C - DeltaC.


pdgid: S042CPJ
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of C = -0.01+-0.11+-0.04 and DeltaC = 0.12+-0.11+-0.03 such that C(D^*(2010)- D+) = C - DeltaC.


pdgid: S042SPJ
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of S = -0.861+-0.077+-0.019 and DeltaS = 0.019+-0.075+-0.012 such that S(D^*(2010)- D+) = S - DeltaS.


pdgid: S042SPJ
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of S = -0.78+-0.15+-0.05 and DeltaS = -0.13+-0.15+-0.04 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S - DeltaS.


pdgid: S042CPK
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of C = -0.059+-0.092+-0.020 and DeltaC = -0.031+-0.092+-0.016 such that C(D^*(2010)+ D-) = C + DeltaC.


pdgid: S042CPK
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of C = -0.01+-0.11+-0.04 and DeltaC = 0.12+-0.11+-0.03 such that C(D^*(2010)+ D-) = C + DeltaC.


pdgid: S042SPK
text:
AAIJ 2020L reports the measurements of S = -0.861+-0.077+-0.019 and DeltaS = 0.019+-0.075+-0.012 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S + DeltaS.


pdgid: S042SPK
text:
ROHRKEN 2012 reports the measurements of S = -0.78+-0.15+-0.05 and DeltaS = -0.13+-0.15+-0.04 such that S(D^*(2010)+ D-) = S + DeltaS.


pdgid: S042LD1
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component.


pdgid: S042LD1
text:
AUBERT 2003Q reports |lambda|=0.75+-0.19+-0.02 and Im(lambda)=0.05+-0.29+-0.10. We convert them to S and C parameters taking into account correlations.


pdgid: S042CD+
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Extracted under assumption of equal C(+) and C(-).


pdgid: S042SD+
text:
Measured partially reconstructed candidates when one D0 meson is not excplicitely reconstructed. Analysis does not separate CP-even and CP-odd component. Value is obtained from S = -0.34+-0.12+-0.05 using S = S(+) (1 - 2 R((perp))) with R((perp)) = 0.158+-0.029.


pdgid: S042SD-
text:
KRONENBITTER 2012 reported S(-) = 1.52+-0.62+-0.12. A minus sign results from a different convention, see AUBERT 2009C.


pdgid: S042SDS
text:
This value includes an unknown CP dilution factor D due to possible contributions from intermediate resonances and different partial waves.


pdgid: S042CPR
text:
Time-dependent CP violation is measured in the B0 --> J/psi rho0 and was used to limit the size of penguin amplitude contributions to phi_{{s}} in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays to be between [-1.05degree, 1.18degree] at 95% confidence level.


pdgid: S042CDH
text:
BABAR and BELLE combined analysis uses CP-eigenstate decay modes D0 --> K+ K-, K0S pi0, K0S omega, and h0 = pi0, eta, omega.


pdgid: S042CKP
text:
The measurement is using BELL II data reported in ADACHI 2024. The combination with ADACHI 2023E is also reported.


pdgid: S042CEK
text:
Asymmetries are measured using B0 --> eta^' K0S decays, with eta^' --> eta ( --> gamma gamma ) pi+ pi- and eta^' --> rho ( --> pi+ pi- ) gamma.


pdgid: S042CEK
text:
The mixing-induced CP violation is reported with a significance of more than 5 standard deviations in this b --> s penguin dominated mode.


pdgid: S042CF1
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B0 --> K0S K+ K- decays and the first of four consistent solutions that may be preferred.


pdgid: S042CX2
text:
Excludes the events from B0 --> phi K0S decay. The results are derived from a combined sample of K+ K- K0S and K+ K- K0L decays.


pdgid: S042SX2
text:
This measurement is performed on all the isobar components, excluding phi K0S and f_0(980) K0S. Note that the nonresonant component is not a CP eigenstate.


pdgid: S042SX2
text:
Excludes events from B0 --> phi K0S decay. The results are derived from a combined sample of K+ K- K0S and K+ K- K0L decays.


pdgid: S042CK0
text:
Requires M (K pi pi) < 1.8 GeV/c**2, 0.6 GeV/c**2 < mass(pi+ pi-) < 0.9 GeV/c**2, mass(K pi) < 0.845 GeV/c**2 or mass(K pi) > 0.945 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042CKR
text:
Reports value of A(eff) which is equal to -C, and includes the non-resonant pi+ pi- contribution in the rho0 region.


pdgid: S042SPI
text:
An isospin analysis using other BELLE measurements, disfavors the region of 23.8degree< phi_{{2}}< 66.8degree at 68% CL.


pdgid: S042CX6
text:
Quotes A(pi0 pi0) = -0.14+-0.46+-0.07 (correction published May 22, 2024) which is equal to -C(pi0 pi0).


pdgid: S042CJ1
text:
The measurement is obtained when sin( 2beta) is fixed to 0.726 and the sign of cos( 2beta) is positive with 86% confidence level.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
Analyzes joint data sample of Belle and BaBar using Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi-; the second error combines experimental systematic uncertainty and the Dalitz plot model uncertainty.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
AUBERT 2007BH evaluates the likelihoods for the positive and negative solutions assuming sin(2 beta(eff)) = 0.678. It quotes L(+) / (L(+)+ L(-)) = 0.86 corresponding to a likelihood ratio of L(+)/L(-) = 6.14 in favor of the positive solution.


pdgid: S042CJ2
text:
KROKOVNY 2006 evaluates the likelihoods for the positive and negative solutions assuming sin(2 beta(eff)) = 0.689. It quotes L(+) / (L(+)+ L(-)) = 0.983 corresponding to a likelihood ratio of L(+)/L(-) = 57.8 in favor of the positive solution.


pdgid: S042LD3
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D^*() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042LD5
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042A06
text:
Measured in the simultaneous analysis of B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays. AAIJ 2018Z reports a statistical (systematic) correlation of 0.6 (-0.41) with the measured value of S(-)(B0 --> D+ pi-).


pdgid: S042A07
text:
Measured in the simultaneous analysis of B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays. AAIJ 2018Z reports a statistical (systematic) correlation of 0.6 (-0.41) with the measured value of S(+)(B0 --> D- pi+).


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
A combination of this Run 2 result with the Run 1 result from AAIJ 2017BN is reported with a correlation coefficient of 0.40.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
Measurement based on B0 --> J/psi K0S, B0 --> psi(2S) K0S, B0 --> J/psi K0L, and B0 --> chi_c1(1P) K0S decays.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
Measurement based on B0 --> J/psi K0S, B0 --> psi(2S) K0S with J/psi --> mu+ mu-, J/psi --> e+ e- and psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho=0.441 between the uncertainties of sin(2beta) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CCC
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho=0.42 between the uncertainties of S(B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0)(B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
SATO 2012 uses 121 fb**-1 data collected on Y(5S) resonance. Uses the ''B-pi tagging'' where B pi+ and B pi- tagged J/psi K0S events are compared.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
Measurement in which the J/psi decays to hadrons or to muons that do not satisfy the standard identification criteria.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AFFOLDER 2000C uses about 400 B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S events. The production flavor of B0 was determined using three tagging algorithms: a same-side tag, a jet-charge tag, and a soft-lepton tag.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
BARATE 2000Q uses 23 candidates for B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S decays. A combination of jet-charge, vertex-charge, and same-side tagging techniques were used to determine the B0 production flavor.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998Z uses 24 candidates for B_d()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S decay. A combination of jet-charge and vertex-charge techniques were used to tag the B_{{d}}()0 production flavor.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.441 between the uncertainties of sin(2beta) and C(c cbar K^(*)()0) (B0 --> c cbar K^(*)()0) measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the uncertainties of sin(2beta) and cos(2beta) measurements.


pdgid: S042BET
text:
ABE 1998U uses 198+-17 B_d()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 events. The production flavor of B0 was determined using the same side tagging technique.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2024 provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.441 between the uncertainties of C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2017BN provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the uncertainties of S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2015N uses 41,560 flavor-tagged B_d() --> J/psi K0S events from 3 fb**-1 of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.483 between the statistical uncertainties of and measurements.


pdgid: S042CJK
text:
AAIJ 2013K uses 8200 flavor-tagged B_d --> J/psi KS events from 1 fb**-1 of integrated luminosity. Provides the correlation coefficient rho = 0.42 between the statistical uncertainties of S(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) and C(J/psi(nS) K0) (B0 --> J/psi(nS) K0) measurements.


pdgid: S042SJK
text:
SATO 2012 uses 121 fb**-1 data collected at Upsilon(5S) resonance. Uses the ''B-pi tagging'' where B pi+ and B pi- tagged J/psi K0S events are compared.


pdgid: S042SJS
text:
This S(J/psi K^*()0) value has been corrected for the dilution of the sin(DeltaM Deltat) coefficient of the CP asymmetry by a factor of 1-R((perp)), which arises from the mixture of CP-even and CP-odd B decay amplitudes.


pdgid: S042BFK
text:
Measured using the CP-violation phase difference Deltaphi_{{00}}() between the B and Bbar decay amplitude.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+ and D+- rho-+ decays and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses a time dependent CP violation measurement in B0 --> D-+ pi+- decays with external input and some theoretical assumptions.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Combines the results from fully reconstructed and partially reconstructed D^(*)() pi events by taking weighted averages. Assumes that systematic errors from physics parameters and fit biases in the two measurements are 100% correlated.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Uses fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+ decays and some theoretical assumptions, such as the SU(3) symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042BGA
text:
Combining this measurement with the results from AUBERT 2004V for fully reconstructed B0 --> D^(*)()+- pi-+ and some theoretical assumptions, such as the SU(3) symmetry relation.


pdgid: S042BG0
text:
Used a time-dependent Dalitz-plot analysis of B0 --> D()-+ K0 pi()+- assuming the ratio of the b --> u and b --> c decay amplitudes to be 0.3.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using the time dependent analysis of B0 --> a_1(1260)+- pi-+ and branching fraction measurements of B --> a_1(1260) K and B --> K_1 pi. Uses SU(3) flavor relations.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
The angle alpha(eff) is obtained using the measured CP parameters of B0 --> a_1(1260)+- pi-+ and choosing one of the four solutions that is compatible with the result of SM-based fits.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using isospin relation and selecting a solution closest to the CKM best fit average; the 90% CL allowed interval is 59degrees<phi(2) (==alpha) < 115degrees.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained using isospin relation and selecting a solution closest to the CKM best fit average; 90% CL allowed interval is 79degrees < alpha < 123degrees.


pdgid: S042ALP
text:
Obtained from the measured CP parameters of the longitudinal polarization by selecting the solution closest to the CKM best fit central value of alpha = 95degrees - 98degrees.


pdgid: S042XP
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of D --> K0S pi+ pi-, K0S K+ K- decays coming from B0 --> D K^*(892)0 modes. The second error is the systematic contribution from the D decay strong-phase inputs and from the experimental systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S042AR
text:
Measurement is performed with K+ pi- masses within 50 MeV of the K^*()0 mass and an absolute value of the cosine of the K^*()0 helicity angle greater than 0.4. Angle gamma is required to satisfy 0 < gamma < 180 degrees.


pdgid: S042PBH
text:
The last uncertainty is due to uncertainties of B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) and B(J/psi --> e+ e-) branching fraction measurements.


pdgid: S042PBF
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 0.928+-0.013+-0.037E-3 for normalisation and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair. Measured in 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S042A34
text:
Measured from the ratio of K0S mu+ mu- and K0S e+ e-. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S042PBK
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 0.928+-0.013+-0.037E-3 for normalisation and mu+ mu- as a lepton pair.


pdgid: S042A41
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 2.6+-0.6+-0.1E-8  (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 4.9 GeV**2/c**4 range.


pdgid: S042A03
text:
Measured the differential branching fraction and angular moments of the decay B0 --> K+ pi- mu+ mu- in the K+ pi- invariant mass range 1330 < m(K+ pi-) < 1530 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S042A03
text:
The reported value is converted from the measured dB/dq^2 = 0.82+-0.09+-0.063E-8 (GeV**2/c**4)**-1 by multiplying by the Deltaq^2 = 4.9 GeV**2/c**4 range.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
AAIJ 2017BF uses B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 decays with B0 transverse momenta pT and rapidities y in the region of 0 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 < y < 4.5.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 decay in kinematic range pT > 10 GeV/c and |eta| < 2.5.


pdgid: S042PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 and B0 --> D- pi+ in kinematic range 4 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.5 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S042A52
text:
ADACHI 2023H measurement is based on the angular asymmetries of B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton decays using explicit reconstruction of the B tag. Other asymmetries from Delta(S(3)), Delta(S(5)), Delta(S(7)), and Delta(S(9)) are also reported.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
LEES 2017B measurement is obtained from semileptonic decays to electrons. The result is averaged over B+- and B0 mesons, assuming lepton universality.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
URQUIJO 2007 report a measurement of (10.07+-0.18+-0.21)% for the partial branching fraction of B --> e nu_e X_c decay with electron energy above 0.6 GeV. We converted the result to B --> e nu_e X branching fraction.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses charge and angular correlations in Upsilon(4S) events with a high-momentum lepton and an additional electron.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1993H analysis performed using tagged semileptonic decays of the B. This technique is almost model independent for the lepton branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
The semileptonic branching ratio, |V_cb| and other heavy-quark parameters are determined from a simultaneous fit to moments of the hadronic-mass and lepton-energy distribution.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method. They also report |V(c b)| = 0.0423+-0.0007(exp) +-0.0020(theo.).


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Uses the high-momentum lepton tag method. ABE 2002Y also reports |V(c b)| = 0.0408+-0.0010(exp) +-0.0025(theo.). The second error is due to uncertainties of theoretical inputs.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
BARISH 1996B analysis performed using tagged semileptonic decays of the B. This technique is almost model independent for the lepton branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
HENDERSON 1992 measurement employs e and mu. The systematic error contains 0.004 in quadrature from model dependence. The authors average a variation of the Isgur, Scora, Grinstein, and Wise model with that of the Altarelli-Cabibbo-Corbo-Maiani-Martinelli model for semileptonic decays to correct the acceptance.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
YANAGISAWA 1991 also measures an average semileptonic branching ratio at the Upsilon(5S) of 9.6 -- 10.5% depending on assumptions about the relative production of different B meson species.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1990H uses the model of ALTARELLI 1982 to correct over all lepton momenta. 0.099+-0.006 is obtained using ISGUR 1989B.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
ALBRECHT 1990H uses the model of ALTARELLI 1982 to correct over all lepton momenta. 0.097+-0.006 is obtained using ISGUR 1989B.


pdgid: S049S45
text:
Using data above p(e) = 2.4 GeV, WACHS 1989 determine CS(B --> e nu up)/CS(B --> e nu charm) < 0.065 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S049R45
text:
Measured from the partial branching fractions by extrapolating to the full phase-space via a correction factor of 1.0045+-0.0001, extracted from a simulation.


pdgid: S049R45
text:
The accompanying B meson is fully reconstructed in its hadronic decay modes. Superseded by by HOHMANN 2025.


pdgid: S049R17
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)%, B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = (68.1+-1.0+-1.3)%, B(D^*()0 --> D0 pi0) = (63.6+-2.3+-3.3)%.


pdgid: S049R49
text:
This is the lepton-flavor universality ratio R(e mu) for the B+ --> Dbar^*()0 lepton+ nu_lepton and B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu_lepton average.


pdgid: S049R96
text:
ALBRECHT 1993 assumes the GISW model to correct for unseen modes. Using the BHKT model, the result becomes 0.023+-0.006+-0.004. Assumes B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 68.1%, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.65%, B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi- pi+) = 7.5%. We have taken their average e and mu value.


pdgid: S049R96
text:
BARISH 1995 use B(D0 --> K- pi+) = (3.91+-0.08+-0.17)%, assume all nonresonant channels are zero, and use GISW model for relative abundances of D^** states.


pdgid: S049R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1997B assumes B(D_1(2420) --> D^* pi) = 1, B(D_1(2420) --> D^* pi+-) = 2/3, and B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022.


pdgid: S049R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar_1(2420)0 lepton+ nu_lepton anything) * B(Dbar_1(2420)0 --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+) = (2.04+-0.58+-0.34)10**-3, where f(B) is the production fraction for a single B charge state.


pdgid: S049R34
text:
Assumes no contribution from B_{{s}} and b baryons. Further assumes contributions from single pion (D pi and D^* pi) states only, allowing isospin conservation to relate the relative pi0 and pi+ rates.


pdgid: S049R34
text:
BUSKULIC 1997B assumes B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022 and uses isospin invariance by assuming that all observed D0 pi+, D^*()0 pi+, D+ pi-, and D^*()+ pi- are from D^** states. A correction has been applied to account for the production of B_{{s}}()0 and Lambda_{{b}}()0.


pdgid: S049R26
text:
A revised number based on BUSKULIC 1997B which assumes B(D_2^*(2460) --> D^* pi+-) = 0.20 and B(b --> B) = 0.378+-0.022.


pdgid: S049R26
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar_2^*(2460)0 lepton+ nu_lepton anything) * B(Dbar_2^*(2460)0 --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+) <=0.81E-3 at CL=95%, where f(B) is the production fraction for a single B charge state.


pdgid: S049R27
text:
BUSKULIC 1995B reports f(B) * B(B --> Dbar^*(2010)- pi+ lepton+ nu_lepton anything) = (3.7+-1.0+-0.7)10**-3. Above value assumes f(B) = 0.37+-0.03.


pdgid: S049S75
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S76
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <0.008 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton K+ anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S77
text:
ALBRECHT 1993E reports <0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton K0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.027, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2.


pdgid: S049S96
text:
The measurement is obtained from semileptonic decays to electrons B --> X e nu, and using a theoretical model (GAMBINO 2007, GAMBINO 2011) to predict the contribution from B --> X_u e nu. The result is averaged over B+- and B0 mesons, assuming lepton universality.


pdgid: S049S96
text:
Obtained from a combined fit to the moments of observed spectra in inclusive B --> X_c() lepton+ nu_lepton decay.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most inclusive result of the full branching fraction is obtained in the region for lepton energy in B rest frame E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV, where the measured partial branching fraction is DeltaB = 1.59+-0.07+-0.16E-3. The acceptance in that region is reported to be 0.86.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Obtained from the partial rate DeltaB = 1.554+-0.082+0.095-0.086E-3 for the electron momentum interval of 0.8 -- 2.7 GeV/c based on GGOU1 method (X_c lepton nu, mass(c) constraint fit of SF parameters).


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most precise result on the full branching fraction is obtained in the region for lepton momentum in B rest frame p(lepton)*** > 1 GeV/c, where the measured partial branching fraction is DeltaB = 1.80+-0.13+-0.15E-3. The acceptance in that region is reported in a private communication by the Authors to be 0.894. The corresponding |V(ub)| from the BLNP method is 4.28+-0.15+-0.18+-0.19E-3, where the last uncertainty comes from theoretical prediction.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Determined from the partial rate DeltaB = 4.41+-0.42+-0.42E-4 measured for electron energy > 2 GeV and hadronic mass squared < 3.5 GeV**2, and calculated acceptance 0.174 in that region. The V_(ub) is measured as 4.41+-0.30+0.65-0.47+-0.28E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Uses electrons in the momentum interval 1.9 -- 2.6 GeV/c in the center-of-mass frame. The V_(ub) is found to be 5.08+-0.47+0.49-0.48E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
BORNHEIM 2002 uses the observed yield of leptons from semileptonic B decays in the end-point momentum interval 2.2 -- 2.6 GeV/c with recent CLEO-2 data on B --> X_s gamma. The V_(ub) is found to be 4.08+-0.34+-0.53E-3.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measurement requires lepton energy E(lepton)*** > 1 GeV in the B rest frame. It is a part of the inclusive and exclusive |V(ub)| determination.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Uses a multivariate analysis method and requires lepton momentum in the B rest frame, p(lepton)***> 1.0 GeV/c.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Measures several partial branching fractions in different phase space regions. The most precise result is obtained in the region for hadronic mass M(X)< 1.55 GeV/c**2, and is DeltaB = 1.18+-0.09+-0.07E-3. The corresponding |V_(ub)| from the BLNP method is 4.27+-0.16+-0.13+-0.30E-3, where the last uncertainty comes from the theoretical prediction of the partial rate in the given phase-space region.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Obtained from the partial rate DeltaB = 0.572+-0.041+-0.065E-3 for the electron momentum interval of 2.0 -- 2.6 GeV/c based on BLNP method.


pdgid: S049S95
text:
Used BaBar measurement of Semileptonic branching fraction B(B --> X lepton nu_lepton) = (10.87+-0.18+-0.30)% to convert the ratio of rates to branching fraction.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
Derived using the ratio of DeltaB(B- --> X_u lepton nu)/DeltaB(B- --> X_c lepton nu) = 1.99+-0.17+-0.16E-2 with the lepton p_{{{{mathit ell}}}} > 1 GeV, which covers approximately 86% and 78% of the B(B- --> X_u lepton nu) and B(B- --> X_c lepton nu) phase space.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
BARTELT 1993B (CLEO II) measures an excess of 107+-15+-11 leptons in the lepton momentum interval 2.3 -- 2.6 GeV/c which is attributed to b --> u lepton nu_lepton. This corresponds to a model-dependent partial branching ratio DeltaB(u b) between 1.15+-0.16+-0.15E-4, as evaluated using the KS model (KOERNER 1988), and 1.54+-0.22+-0.20E-4 using the ACCMM model (ARTUSO 1993). The corresponding values of |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| are 0.056+-0.006 and 0.076+-0.008, respectively.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1991C result supersedes ALBRECHT 1990. Two events are fully reconstructed providing evidence for the b --> u transition. Using the model of ALTARELLI 1982, they obtain |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.11+-0.012 from 77 leptons in the 2.3 -- 2.6 GeV momentum range.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
ALBRECHT 1990 observes 41+-10 excess e and mu (lepton) events in the momentum interval p = 2.3-2.6 GeV signaling the presence of the b --> u transition. The events correspond to a model-dependent measurement of |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.10+-0.01.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
FULTON 1990 observe 76+-20 excess e and mu (lepton) events in the momentum interval p = 2.4-2.6 GeV signaling the presence of the b --> u transition. The average branching ratio, 1.8+-0.4+-0.3E-4, corresponds to a model-dependent measurement of approximately |V(u b)/V(c b)| = 0.1 using B(b --> c lepton nu) = 10.2+-0.2+-0.7%.


pdgid: S049S11
text:
The quoted possible limits range from 0.018 to 0.04 for the ratio, depending on which model or momentum range is chosen. We select the most conservative limit they have calculated. This corresponds to a limit on |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| < 0.20. While the endpoint technique employed is more robust than their previous results in CHEN 1984, these results do not provide a numerical improvement in the limit.


pdgid: S049R09
text:
The correlation of 53% with B(B --> X_u mu+ nu_mu)(letpon energy in B rest frame  E(mu+)*** > 1 GeV) is reported.


pdgid: S049R44
text:
The correlation of 53% with B(B --> X_u e+ nu_e)(letpon energy in B rest frame E(e+)*** > 1 GeV) is reported.


pdgid: S049R36
text:
Combines measurement in B0 --> D- tau+ nu_tau with tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau with results from AAIJ 2023AR and AAIJ 2023W. Simultaneously extracts also B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- tau+ nu_tau)/B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- mu+ nu_mu) and reports correlation factor -0.30.


pdgid: S049R36
text:
The tag-side B meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side tau is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The Belle combination of HUSCHLE 2015 and CARIA 2020 yields R(D) =32.6+-3.4E-2.


pdgid: S049R36
text:
Uses tau+ --> e+ nu_e nubar_tau and tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and e+ or mu+ as lepton+. Obtained from simultaneous fit to B+ and B0 assuming isospin symmetry.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Combines measurement in B0 --> D^*(2010)- tau+ nu_tau with tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau with results from AAIJ 2023AR and AAIJ 2023W. Simultaneously extracts also B(B0 --> D- tau+ nu_tau)/B(B0 --> D- mu+ nu_mu) and reports correlation factor -0.30.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses leptonic tau decays and a fully reconstructed B meson in hadronic final states as a tag on the recoil side.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
The tag-side B meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side tau is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The Belle combination of HUSCHLE 2015, HIROSE 2017, and CARIA 2020 yields R(D^*) = 0.238+-0.018.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses tau+ --> e+ nu_e nubar_tau and tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and e+ or mu+ as lepton+. Obtained from simultaneous fit to B+ and B0 assuming isospin symmetry. Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses tau+ --> mu+ nu_mu nubar_tau and mu+ as lepton+. The measurement combines fully reconstructed D^*()+ sample with sample where only D0 from D^* decays is reconstructed.


pdgid: S049R37
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The results are normalized to the B+ decay rate.


pdgid: S049S24
text:
GIBBONS 1997B from charm counting using B(D_s()+ --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009 and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.044+-0.006.


pdgid: S049S24
text:
From the difference between K- and K+ widths. ALAM 1987B measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It does not consider the possibility of B Bbar mixing. We have thus removed it from the average.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
GIBBONS 1997B reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0216+-0.0008+-0.00082 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0226+-0.0030+-0.0018 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.0209+-0.0027+-0.0040 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S17
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987 reports [G(B --> D+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 0.019+-0.004+-0.002 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
GIBBONS 1997B reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0251+-0.0006+-0.00075 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0233+-0.0012+-0.0014 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0194+-0.0015+-0.0025 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987 reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.0210+-0.0015+-0.0021 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S8
text:
GREEN 1983 reports [G(B --> D0/Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.024+-0.006+-0.004 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
GIBBONS 1997B reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) = 0.239+-0.015+-0.014+-0.009 using CLEO measured D and D^* branching fractions. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1996D reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) 0.196+-0.019 using CLEO measured B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.681+-0.01+-0.013, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0401+-0.0014, B(D0 --> K- pi+ pi+ pi-) = 0.081+-0.005., We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
BORTOLETTO 1992 reports B(B --> D^*(2010)+ anything) = 0.25+-0.03+-0.04 using MARK II B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.57+-0.06 and B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.042+-0.008. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
ALBRECHT 1991H reports 0.348+-0.060+-0.035 from a measurement of [G(B --> D^*(2010)+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+)] assuming B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.55+-0.04, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 67.7+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Uses the PDG 1990 B(D0 --> K- pi+) =0.0371+-0.0025.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
BORTOLETTO 1987 uses old MARK III (BALTRUSAITIS 1986E) branching ratios B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.056+-0.004+-0.003 and also assumes B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.60+0.08-0.15. The product branching ratio for B(B --> D^*(2010)+) B(D^*(2010)+ --> D0 pi+) is 0.13+-0.02+-0.012. Superseded by BORTOLETTO 1992.


pdgid: S049S12
text:
V-A momentum spectrum used to extrapolate below p = 1 GeV. We correct the value assuming B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.042+-0.006 and B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.6+0.08-0.15. The product branching fraction is B(B --> D^*()+ X).B(D^*()+ --> pi+ D0).B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 68+-15+-9E-4.


pdgid: S049R35
text:
GIBBONS 1997B reports B(B --> D^*(2007)0 anything) 0.247+-0.012+-0.018+-0.018 using CLEO measured D and D^* branching fractions. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of D and D^* branching ratios. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ARTUSO 2005B reports 0.0905+-0.0025+-0.0140 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
AUBERT 2002G reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00393+-0.00007+-0.00021 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1992G reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00292+-0.00039+-0.00031 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
BORTOLETTO 1990 reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00306+-0.00047 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
HAAS 1986 reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.0038+-0.0010 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. 64+-22% decays are 2-body.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
GIBAUT 1996 reports 0.1211+-0.0039+-0.0088 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.035, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S14
text:
ALBRECHT 1987H reports [G(B --> D_s()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.0042+-0.0009+-0.0006 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. 46+-16% of B --> D_s X decays are 2-body. Superseded by ALBRECHT 1992G.


pdgid: S049R63
text:
AUBERT 2002G reports [G(B --> D_s^*()+- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.00284+-0.00029+-0.00025 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049R73
text:
The product branching ratio for B(B --> Dbar D_s0(2317)+)xB(D_s0(2317)+ --> D_s pi0) is measured to be 8.5+2.1-1.9+-2.6E-4.


pdgid: S049R74
text:
The product branching ratio for B(B --> Dbar D_sJ(2457)+)xB(D_sJ(2457)+ --> D_s^*()+ pi0, D_s+ gamma) are measured to be 17.8+4.5-3.9+-5.3E-4 and 6.7+1.3-1.2+-2.0E-4, respectively.


pdgid: S049S36
text:
BARATE 1998Q measures B(B --> D_s^(*) Dbar^(*)) = 0.056+0.021-0.015+0.009-0.008+0.019, where the third error results from the uncertainty on the different D branching ratios and is dominated by the uncertainty on B(D_s+ --> phi pi+). We divide B(B --> D_s^(*) Dbar^(*)) by our best value of B(B --> D_s anything)= 0.1+-0.025.


pdgid: S049S54
text:
LESIAK 1992 set a limit on the inclusive process B(b --> s gamma) <2.8E-3 at 90% CL for the range of masses of 892 -- 2045 MeV, independent of assumptions about s-quark hadronization.


pdgid: S049S91
text:
ALEXANDER 1993B reports <4.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(B --> D_s+ pi-, D_s^*()+ pi-, D_s+ rho-, D_s^*()+ rho-, D_s+ pi0, D_s^*()+ pi0, D_s+ eta, D_s^*()+ eta, D_s+ rho0, D_s^*()+ rho0, D_s+ omega, D_s^*()+ omega)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.037, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5E-2. This branching ratio limit provides a model-dependent upper limit |V(u b)|/|V(c b)| <0.16 at CL=90%.


pdgid: S049R32
text:
Assuming factorization, the decay constant f(D_{{s1}}()+) is at least a factor of 2.5 times smaller than f(D_{{s}}()+).


pdgid: S049S7
text:
AUBERT 2003F also reports the momentum distribution and helicity of J/psi --> lepton+ lepton- in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
MASCHMANN 1990 reports 1.12+-0.33+-0.25E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
ALBRECHT 1987D reports 1.07+-0.16+-0.22E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.069+-0.009, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. ALBRECHT 1987D find the branching ratio for J/psi not from psi(2S) to be 0.0081+-0.0023.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
ALAM 1986 reports 1.09+-0.16+-0.21E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.074+-0.012, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
BALEST 1995B reports 1.12+-0.04+-0.06E-2 from a measurement of [G(B --> J/psi(1S) anything)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.0599+-0.0025, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. They measure J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and mu+ mu- and use PDG 1994 values for the branching fractions. The rescaling is the same for either mode so we use e+ e-.


pdgid: S049S7
text:
Statistical and systematic errors were added in quadrature. ALBRECHT 1985H also report a CL = 90% limit of 0.007 for B --> J/psi(1S) + X where mass(X) <1 GeV.


pdgid: S049R23
text:
Also reports the measurement of J/psi --> lepton+ lepton- polarization produced directly from B decay.


pdgid: S049R23
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios. J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-. The B --> J/psi(1S) X branching ratio contains J/psi(1S) mesons directly from B decays and also from feeddown through psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S), chi_c1(1P) --> J/psi(1S), or chi_c2(1P) --> J/psi(1S). Using the measured inclusive rates, BALEST 1995B corrects for the feeddown and finds the B --> J/psi(1S) (direct) X branching ratio.


pdgid: S049S25
text:
Also reports the measurement of psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton- polarization produced directly from B decay.


pdgid: S049S25
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios. They find B(B --> psi(2S) X, psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.30+-0.05+-0.04 and B(B --> psi(2S) X, psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 0.37+-0.05+-0.05. Weighted average is quoted for B(B --> psi(2S) X).


pdgid: S049R89
text:
ABE 2002L uses PDG 2001 values for B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) and B(chi_c1,c2 --> J/psi(1S) gamma).


pdgid: S049R89
text:
CHEN 2001 reports 0.00414+-0.00031+-0.00040 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S049R89
text:
BALEST 1995B assume B(chi_c1(1P) --> J/psi(1S) gamma) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, the PDG 1994 value. Fit to psi-photon invariant mass distribution allows for a chi_{{c1}}(1P) and a chi_{{c2}}(1P) component.


pdgid: S049R24
text:
CHEN 2001 reports 0.00383+-0.00031+-0.00040 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c1(1P) (direct) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.273+-0.016, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S049R24
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values. J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in the e+ e- and mu+ mu- modes. The B --> chi_c1(1P) X branching ratio contains chi_{{c1}}(1P) mesons directly from B decays and also from feeddown through psi(2S) --> chi_c1(1P) gamma. Using the measured inclusive rates, BALEST 1995B corrects for the feeddown and finds the B --> chi_c1(1P) (direct) X branching ratio.


pdgid: S049R21
text:
CHEN 2001 reports 9.8+-4.8+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(B --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.135+-0.011, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.0+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.  Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S).


pdgid: S049R21
text:
BALEST 1995B assume B(chi_c2(1P) --> J/psi(1S) gamma) = 13.5+-1.1E-2, the PDG 1994 value. J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in the e+ e- and mu+ mu- modes, and PDG 1994 branching fractions are used. If interpreted as signal, the 35+-13 events correspond to B(B --> chi_c2(1P) X) =0.25+-0.10+-0.03E-2.


pdgid: S049R22
text:
BALEST 1995B assume PDG 1994 values for sub mode branching ratios. J/psi(1S) mesons are reconstructed in J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-. Search region 2960 <mass(eta_{{c}}(1S))<3010 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049S41
text:
AUSHEV 2010 reports [G(B --> K chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)] = 0.80+-0.20+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0) = 46+-16E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S41
text:
GOKHROO 2006 reports [G(B --> K chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)] = 1.22+-0.31+0.23-0.30E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0) = 55+-28E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049R20
text:
CHOI 2005 reports the observation of a near-threshold enhancement in the omega J/psi mass spectrum in exclusive B --> K omega J/psi. The new state, denoted as chi_{{c0}}(3915), is measured to have a mass of 3943+-11+-13 GeV/c**2 and a width Gamma = 87+-22+-26 MeV.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
ALBRECHT 1993I value is not independent of the sum of B --> K+ anything and B --> K- anything ALBRECHT 1994C values.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
Assuming Upsilon(4S) --> B Bbar, a total of 3.38+-0.34+-0.68 kaons per Upsilon(4S) decay is found (the second error is systematic). In the context of the standard B-decay model, this leads to a value for (b-quark --> c-quark)/(b-quark --> all) of 1.09+-0.33+-0.13.


pdgid: S049S6
text:
GIANNINI 1982 at CESR-CUSB observed 1.58+-0.35 K0 per hadronic event much higher than 0.82+-0.10 below threshold. Consistent with predominant b --> c X decay.


pdgid: S049S21
text:
Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It is for the weak decay vertex and does not include mixing of the neutral B meson. Mixing effects were corrected for by assuming a mixing parameter r of (18.1+-4.3)%.


pdgid: S049S21
text:
Measurement relies on lepton-kaon correlations. It includes production through mixing of the neutral B meson.


pdgid: S049S26
text:
An average of B(B+ --> K^*(892)+ gamma) and B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma) measurements assuming B(Upsilon(4S) --> B+ B-) = 0.5113+0.0073-0.0108 and B(Upsilon(4S) --> B0 Bbar()0) = 0.4861+0.0074-0.0080.


pdgid: S049S26
text:
An average of B(B+ --> K^*(892)+ gamma) and B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma) measurements reported in COAN 2000 by assuming full correlated systematic errors.


pdgid: S049S28
text:
COAN 2000 obtains a fitted signal yield of 15.9+5.7-5.2 events. A search for contamination by K^*(1410) yielded a rate consistent with 0; the central value assumes no contamination.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
SAITO 2015 measured 3.51+-0.17+-0.33E-4 using a sum-of-exclusive approach in which 38 of the hadronic final states with mass(X_{{s}}) < 2.8 GeV/c**2 are reconstructed. The cut of minimum photon energy is E(gamma) > 1.9 GeV.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
We extrapolate the measured value to E(gamma)> 1.6 GeV using the method of BUCHMUELLER 2006 (average of three theoretical models).


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Reports 3.21+-0.15+-0.29+-0.08E-4 for 1.8 < E(gamma) < 2.8 GeV, where the last systematic uncertainty is for model dependency. Results with other cutoffs are also reported.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The measurement reported is 3.66+-0.85+-0.60E-4 for E(gamma)> 1.9 GeV.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}() is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.5 -- 2.0 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}() is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6 -- 1.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R15
text:
ABE 2001F reports their systematic errors +-0.42+0.50-0.54E-4, where the second error is due to the theoretical uncertainty. We combine them in quadrature.


pdgid: S049R38
text:
Measured using sums of seven exclusive final states B --> X_d(s)() gamma where X_{{d}(s)}}()  is a nonstrange (strange) charmless hadronic system in mass range 0.6 -- 1.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049R14
text:
ALBRECHT 1995D use full reconstruction of one B decay as tag. Two candidate events for charmless B decay can be interpreted as either b --> s gluon or b --> u transition. If interpreted as b --> s gluon they find a branching ratio of ~0.026 or the upper limit quoted above. Result is highly model dependent.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
AUBERT,B 2004F reports branching ratio B --> eta^'() X_s() for high momentum eta^'() between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame. X_{{s}} represents a recoil system consisting of a kaon and zero to four pions.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
BONVICINI 2003 observed a signal of 61.2+-13.9 events in B --> eta^' X_nc production for high momentum eta^' between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c in the Upsilon(4S) center-of-mass frame. The X_{{nc}} denotes ``charmless'' hadronic states recoiling against eta^'. The second error combines systematic and background subtraction uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S049R48
text:
BROWDER 1998 observed a signal of 39.0+-11.6 events in high momentum B --> eta^' X_s production between 2.0 and 2.7 GeV/c. The branching fraction is based on the interpretation of b --> s g, where the last error includes additional uncertainties due to the color-suppressed b --> backgrounds.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
Assumes Gamma(B --> rho gamma) = Gamma(B+ --> rho+ gamma) = 2 Gamma(B0 --> rho0 gamma) and uses lifetime ratio of meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.071+-0.009.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
Assumes Gamma(B --> rho gamma) = Gamma(B+ --> rho+ gamma) = 2 Gamma(B0 --> rho0 gamma) and uses lifetime ratio of meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.083+-0.017.


pdgid: S049R54
text:
COAN 2000 reports B(B --> rho gamma)/B(B --> K^*(892) gamma) <0.32 at 90%CL and scaled by the central value of B(B --> K^*(892) gamma)=4.24+-0.54+-0.32E-5.


pdgid: S049R9
text:
ALBRECHT 1993 excludes pi+- from K(S)0 and Lambda decays. If included, they find 4.105+-0.025+-0.080.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
AUBERT 2007C reports 0.045+-0.003+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B --> Lambda_c()+ ~/~Lambdabar_c()- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 5.0+-1.3E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 result derived from lepton baryon correlations. Assumes all charmed baryons in B0 and B+- decay are Lambda_{{c}}.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
ALBRECHT 1988E measured B(B --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (0.30+-0.12+-0.06)% and used B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = (2.2+-1.0)% from ABRAMS 1980 to obtain above number.


pdgid: S049S16
text:
Assuming all baryons result from charmed baryons, ALAM 1986 conclude the branching fraction is 7.4+-2.9%. The limit given above is model independent.


pdgid: S049R04
text:
LEES 2012 quotes also the measurement G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- lepton+ anything)/G(B --> Lambda_c()+ ~/~Lambdabar_c()- anything) = 1.2+-0.7+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: S049R02
text:
LEES 2012 quotes also the measurement G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- lepton+ anything)/G(B --> Lambdabar_c()- anything) = 1.7+-1.0+-0.6E-2.


pdgid: S049S78
text:
PROCARIO 1994 reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()-- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 0.00021+-0.00008+-0.00007 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S79
text:
PROCARIO 1994 reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()- anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] < 0.00048 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37E-2.


pdgid: S049S80
text:
PROCARIO 1994 reports [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 0.00023+-0.00008+-0.00007 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S049S82
text:
PROCARIO 1994 reports <0.0017 from a measurement of [G(B --> Sigmabar_c()0 N (N = p or n))/G(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.043, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37E-2.


pdgid: S049S9
text:
ALAM 1983B reported their result as >0.036+-0.006+-0.009. Data are consistent with equal yields of p and pbar. Using assumed yields below cut, B(B --> p + X) = 0.03 not including protons from Lambda decays.


pdgid: S049S10
text:
ALAM 1983B reported their result as >0.022+-0.007+-0.004. Values are for (B(Lambda X)+B(Lambdabar X))/2. Data are consistent with equal yields of p and pbar. Using assumed yields below cut, B(B --> Lambda X) = 0.03.


pdgid: S049S32
text:
ALBRECHT 1992O result is from simultaneous analysis of p and Lambda yields, p pbar and Lambda pbar correlations, and various lepton-baryon and lepton-baryon-antibaryon correlations. Supersedes ALBRECHT 1989K.


pdgid: S049S32
text:
ALBRECHT 1989K obtain this result by adding their their measurements (5.5+-1.6)% for direct protons and (4.2+-0.5+-0.6)% for inclusive Lambda production. They then assume (5.5+-1.6)% for neutron production and add it in also. Since each B decay has two baryons, they divide by 2 to obtain (7.6+-1.4)%.


pdgid: S049S43
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 value is not independent of their [Gamma(Lambda pbar anything)+Gamma(Lambdabar p anything)]/Gamma(total) value.


pdgid: S049S42
text:
CRAWFORD 1992 value is not independent of their Gamma(Lambda Lambdabar anything)/Gamma(total) value.


pdgid: S049S3
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K(S)0, K0S pi0, K0S pi+, K0S pi+ pi0, and K0S pi + pi- corrected for unobserved modes.


pdgid: S049R76
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements G(B --> K mu+ mu-)/G(B --> K e+ e-) = 0.74+0.40-0.31+-0.06 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and [G(B --> K mu+ mu-)G(B --> K e+ e-)] = 1.43+0.65-0.44+-0.12 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049R77
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements G(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-)/G(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-) = 1.06+0.48-0.33+-0.08 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and [G(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-)G(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)] = 1.18+0.55-0.37+-0.11 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049R61
text:
Assumes equal production rate for charge and neutral B meson pairs, isospin invariance, lepton universality for B --> K lepton+ lepton-, and B(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.33. The second error is total systematic uncertainties including model dependence.


pdgid: S049R62
text:
Assumes the partial width ratio of electron and muon modes to be Gamma(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)/Gamma(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.33.


pdgid: S049R62
text:
For averaging K^*(892) mu+ mu- and K^*(892) e+ e- modes, AUBERT 2002L assumed B(B --> K^*(892) e+ e-)/B(B --> K^*(892) mu+ mu-) = 1.2.


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
Measured with 16 exclusively reconstructed B --> X_s gamma decays with 0.6 < mass(X_{{s}})< 2.0 GeV/c**2 (ten charged and six neutral self-tagging B modes).


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
Uses a sum of exclusively reconstructed B --> X_s() decay modes, with X_{{s}}() mass between 0.6 and 2.8 GeV/c**2.


pdgid: S049CP2
text:
This measurement is performed inclusively for recoil mass X_{{s}} less than 2.1 GeV, which corresponds to -0.093 < A_{{CP}} < 0.096 at 90% CL.


pdgid: S049CP4
text:
Assumes equal production of B+ and B0 at the Upsilon(4S). Uses an opposite side lepton tag. Requires center-of-mass frame E(gamma) > 2.1 GeV.


pdgid: S049CP3
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K0S pi+, and K0S pi+ pi0.


pdgid: S049CP3
text:
The final state flavor is determined by the kaon and pion charges where modes with X_{{s}} = K(S)0, K0S pi0 or K0S pi+ pi- are not used.


pdgid: S049CPA
text:
Measured from sum of exclusive modes through K+, K+ pi0, K+ pi-, K+ pi- pi0, K+ pi- pi+, K0S pi+, and K0S pi + pi-0.


pdgid: S049CP5
text:
Measured in the union of 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4. LEES 2012S reports also individual measurements A(CP)(B --> K^* lepton+ lepton-) = -0.13+0.18-0.19+-0.01 for 0.10 < q**2< 8.12 GeV**2/c**4 and A(CP)(B --> K^* lepton+ lepton-) = 0.16+0.18-0.19+-0.01 for q**2 > 10.11 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049FL9
text:
Measured by combining B0 and B+ with e and mu as leptons. Results are also provided separately for B0 and B+.


pdgid: S049A20
text:
Events are reconstructed in B0 --> K^*()0 ( --> K+ pi- ) e+ e- and B+ --> K^*()+ ( --> K0S pi+ ) e+ e- decay modes. The effective dielectron invariant mass is required to be in the range 0.0008 < q**2 < 1.12 GeV**2/c**4.


pdgid: S049A20
text:
A(T)**Im and A(T)**(2) measure the ratio of the right- and left-handed Wilson coefficients, C(7)**'/C(7), which constrains non-SM contributions at small q**2.


pdgid: S049FB1
text:
Using an unbinned max. likelihood fits to the M(bc) distribution in five q**2 bins for cos( theta)>0 and cos( theta)<0.


pdgid: S049FBE
text:
Uses K^* --> K- pi+, K- pi0, K0S pi- in the range M(K pi) < 1.1 GeV/c**2. Uncertainty is statistical only.


pdgid: S049A00
text:
Uses the sum of 10 exclusive X_{{s}} modes in the range M(X_{{s}}) > 1.1 GeV/c**2. Uncertainty is statistical only.


pdgid: S049A07
text:
Uses a fully reconstructed B meson as a tag on the recoil side. The result is for E(gamma) > 2.2 GeV.


pdgid: S049IS1
text:
Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from Upsilon(4S) decays and the lifetime ratio meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) = 1.071+-0.009. The 90% CL interval is 0.017< Delta(0+)< 0.116


pdgid: S049IS1
text:
Uses the production ratio of charged and neutral B from Upsilon(4S) decays R**+/0 = 1.006+-0.048 and the lifetime ratio of tau(B+) / tau(B0) = 1.083+-0.017. The 90% CL interval is -0.046 < Delta(0+) < 0.146.


pdgid: S049IA2
text:
ADACHI 2025G reports the ratio (2 Gamma(B0 --> rho0 gamma) - Gamma(B+ --> rho+ gamma) ) / (2 Gamma(B0 --> rho0 gamma) + Gamma(B+ --> rho+ gamma) ) = 0.109+0.112-0.117+0.068-0.062+0.038-0.039, where the last uncertainty comes from f_{{+-}}()/f_{{00}}() uncertainty combined with the one from meanlife(B+)/meanlife(B0) lifetimes ratio.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 1.0 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using both mu+ mu- and e+ e- as a lepton pair. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B --> J/psi(1S) K. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA3
text:
For 15.0 < q**2 < 19.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B --> J/psi(1S) K. Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA4
text:
For 1.1 < q**2 < 6.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B(B --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)). Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049IA4
text:
For 15.0 < q**2 < 22.0 GeV**2/c**4 using mu+ mu- as a lepton pair and assuming isospin symmetry for the B(B --> J/ psi(1S) K^*(892)). Measurements in other q**2 bins are also reported.


pdgid: S049AEL
text:
The leptons are required to have E(l) > 1.5 GeV in the B rest frame. The result with E(l) > 0.6 GeV is also given.


pdgid: S049AEL
text:
Uses E(e) > 1.5 GeV and also reports moments with other minimum minimum E(e) conditions, as low as E(e) > 0.6 GeV.


pdgid: S049GM1
text:
LEES 2012U uses E(gamma) > 1.897 GeV to calculate the moments; the moments are used to calculate the HQET parameters mass(b) = 4.579+0.032-0.029 GeV/c**2 and mu_{{pi}}^2() = 0.257+0.034-0.039 GeV**2 in the shape function model. The same HQET parameters are also determined in the kinetic model.


pdgid: S051T
text:
ABREU 1994L uses charged particle impact parameters. Their result from inclusively reconstructed secondary vertices is superseded by ABREU 1996E.


pdgid: S051T
text:
ABREU 1992 is combined result of muon and hadron impact parameter analyses. Hadron tracks gave (12.7+-0.4+-1.2)*10**-13 s for an admixture of B species weighted by production fraction and mean charge multiplicity, while muon tracks gave (13.0+-1.0+-0.8)*10**-13 s for an admixture weighted by production fraction and semileptonic branching fraction.


pdgid: S051T
text:
BUSKULIC 1992G use J/psi(1S) tags to measure the average b lifetime. This is comparable to other methods only if the J/psi(1S) branching fractions of the different b-flavored hadrons are in the same ratio.


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> e+ X or mu+ X, ADEVA 1991H determined the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the impact parameter distribution of the lepton.


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> J/psi(1S) X, J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-, ALEXANDER 1991G determined the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the decay point of the J/psi(1S).


pdgid: S051T
text:
Using Z --> e X or mu X, DECAMP 1991C determines the average lifetime for an admixture of B hadrons from the signed impact parameter distribution of the lepton.


pdgid: S051T
text:
LYONS 1990 combine the results of the B lifetime measurements of ONG 1989, BRAUNSCHWEIG 1989B, KLEM 1988, and ASH 1987, and JADE data by private communication. They use statistical techniques which include variation of the error with the mean life, and possible correlations between the systematic errors. This result is not independent of the measured results used in our average.


pdgid: S051T
text:
We have combined an overall scale error of 15% in quadrature with the systematic error of +-0.7 to obtain +-2.1 systematic error.


pdgid: S051DTB
text:
Data analyzed using both the jet charge and the charge of secondary vertex in the opposite hemisphere.


pdgid: S051R9
text:
The analysis is based on a neural network, to estimate the charge of the weakly-decaying b hadron by distinguishing its decay products from particles produced at the primary vertex.


pdgid: S051R45
text:
ABE 1999P uses the numbers of K^*(892)0, K^*(892)+, and phi(1020) events produced in association with the double semileptonic decays b --> c mu- X with c --> s mu+ X.


pdgid: S051R74
text:
AALTONEN 2009E errata to the measurement reported in AFFOLDER 2000E using the pT spectra from fully reconstructed B0 and Lambda_{{b}}() decays.


pdgid: S051R73
text:
AAIJ 2020V measures the average value using the observed B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B+ --> J/psi K+ yields, over the ranges b-hadron pT of 0.5 and 40 GeV and eta of 2.0 and 6.5. The value is not used in averages as BR-related systematic uncertainties are not evaluated.


pdgid: S051R73
text:
AAIJ 2020V reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)/G(bbar --> B+ at p p)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1238+-0.0010+-0.0022 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.02+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R73
text:
AAIJ 2020V reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)/G(bbar --> B+ at p p)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1270+-0.0007+-0.0022 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.02+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R73
text:
AAIJ 2020V reports [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)/G(bbar --> B+ at p p)] * [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.1326+-0.0007+-0.0023 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.02+-0.04E-3, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R73
text:
AAIJ 2019AD measured the average value using b-hadron semileptonic decays and assuming isospin symmetry for b-hadron pT of 4 and 25 GeV and eta of 2 and 5.


pdgid: S051R73
text:
AAIJ 2011F measured f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.253+-0.017+-0.017+-0.020, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and theoretical. We divide their value by 2. Our second error combines systematic and theoretical uncertainties.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAD 2015CM measurement is derived from the observed B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*()0 yields and a recent theory prediction of B(B_s()0 --> J/psi phi)/B(B_d()0 --> J/psi K^*()0).  The second uncertainty combines in quadrature systematic and theoretical uncertainties.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAIJ 2013P studies also separately the pT(B) and eta(B) dependency of G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)/G(bbar --> B0 at p p),  finding f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}(pT)= (0.256+-0.020) + (-2.0+-0.6) E-3 /GeV/c (pT-<pT>) and f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}(eta)= (0.256+-0.020) + (0.005+-0.006) (eta-<eta>), where <pT> = 10.4 GeV/c and <eta> = 3.28. AAIJ 2013P reports the measurement as 0.238+-0.004+-0.015+-0.021 where the last uncertainly is theoretical.


pdgid: S051R01
text:
AAIJ 2021Y uses hadronic decays B0 --> D- pi+, B0 --> D- K+, B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ and B_s()0 --> J/psi phi as well as semileptonic B0 and B_{{s}}()0 decays. Measured within the pT range [0.5,40] GeV/c, eta range [2, 6.4].


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AAIJ 2019AD measured the average value for Lambda_{{b}}()0 using semileptonic decays and assuming isospin symmetry for b-hadron pT of 4 and 25 GeV and eta of 2 and 5.


pdgid: S051R3
text:
AAIJ 2012J measured the ratio to be (0.404+-0.017+-0.027+-0.105) x [1 - (0.031+-0.004+-0.003)xP(T)]using b-hadron semileptonic decays where the P(T) is the momentum of charmed hadron-muon pair in GeV/c.We quote their weighted average value where the second error combines systematic and the error on B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+).


pdgid: S051R6
text:
ACCIARRI 1996C assumes relative b semileptonic decay rates e:mu:tau of 1:1:0.25. Based on missing-energy spectrum.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
Uses the combination of lepton transverse momentum spectrum and the correlation between the charge of the lepton and opposite jet charge. The first error is statistic and the second error is the total systematic error including the modeling.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABBIENDI 2000E result is determined by comparing the distribution of several kinematic variables of leptonic events in a lifetime tagged Z --> b bbar sample using artificial neural network techniques. The first error is statistic; the second error is the total systematic error.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ACCIARRI 2000 result obtained from a combined fit of R(b)= Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(Z --> hadrons) and B(b --> lepton nu X), using double-tagging method.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABREU 1995D give systematic errors +-0.0019 (model) and 0.0012 (R(c)). We combine these in quadrature.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
BUSKULIC 1994G uses e and mu events. This value is from a global fit to the lepton p and pT (relative to jet) spectra which also determines the b and c production fractions, the fragmentation functions, and the forward-backward asymmetries. This branching ratio depends primarily on the ratio of dileptons to single leptons at high pT, but the lower pT portion of the lepton spectrum is included in the global fit to reduce the model dependence. The model dependence is +-0.0026 and is included in the systematic error.


pdgid: S051S45
text:
ABREU 1993C event count includes e e events. Combining e e, mu mu, and e mu events, they obtain 0.100+-0.007+-0.007.


pdgid: S051S1
text:
ADEVA 1991C measure the average B(b --> e X) branching ratio using single and double tagged b enhanced Z events. Combining e and mu results, they obtain 0.113+-0.010+-0.006. Constraining the initial number of b quarks by the Standard Model prediction (378+-3 MeV) for the decay of the Z into b bbar, the electron result gives 0.112+-0.004+-0.008. They obtain 0.119+-0.003+-0.006 when e and mu results are combined. Used to measure the b bbar width itself, this electron result gives 370+-12+-24 MeV and combined with the muon result gives 385+-7+-22 MeV.


pdgid: S051S1
text:
ABE 1993E experiment also measures forward-backward asymmetries and fragmentation functions for b and c.


pdgid: S051S2
text:
ABREU 1993C event count includes mu mu events. Combining e e, mu mu, and e mu events, they obtain 0.100+-0.007+-0.007.


pdgid: S051S2
text:
ADEVA 1991C measure the average B(b --> e X) branching ratio using single and double tagged b enhanced Z events. Combining e and mu results, they obtain 0.113+-0.010+-0.006. Constraining the initial number of b quarks by the Standard Model prediction (378+-3 MeV) for the decay of the Z into b bbar, the muon result gives 0.123+-0.003+-0.006. They obtain 0.119+-0.003+-0.006 when e and mu results are combined. Used to measure the b bbar width itself, this muon result gives 394+-9+-22 MeV and combined with the electron result gives 385+-7+-22 MeV.


pdgid: S051R15
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0019+-0.0016+-0.0018, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the D branching fraction. We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R15
text:
AKERS 1995Q reports [G(bbar --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] = 1.82+-0.20+-0.12E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R16
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0034+-0.0036+-0.0017, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the D branching fraction. We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R16
text:
AKERS 1995Q reports [G(bbar --> Dbar0 lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 2.52+-0.14+-0.17E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R17
text:
ABREU 2000R reports their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0017+-0.0013+-0.0009, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the D branching fraction. We combine first two in quadrature.


pdgid: S051R17
text:
AKERS 1995Q reports [B(bbar --> D^* lepton+ nu_lepton X) * B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) * B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = (7.53+-0.47+-0.56E-4) and uses B(D^*()+ --> D0 pi+) = 0.681+-0.013 and B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0401+-0.0014 to obtain the above result. The first error is the experiments error and the second error is the systematic error from the D^*()+ and D0 branching ratios.


pdgid: S051R31
text:
Obtained from the best fit of the MC simulated events to the data based on the b --> X_u lepton nu neutral network output distributions.


pdgid: S051R31
text:
ABREU 2000D result obtained from a fit to the numbers of decays in b --> u enriched and depleted samples and their lepton spectra, and assuming |V(c b)|= 0.0384+-0.0033 and tau(b)= 1.564+-0.014 ps.


pdgid: S051S94
text:
ABREU 1995D give systematic errors +-0.0033 (model) and 0.0032 (R(c)). We combine these in quadrature. This result is from the same global fit as their Gamma(bbar --> lepton+ nu_lepton X) data.


pdgid: S051S94
text:
BUSKULIC 1994G uses e and mu events. This value is from the same global fit as their Gamma(bbar --> lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/Gamma(total) data.


pdgid: S051R24
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y reports 0.605+-0.024+-0.016 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> Dbar0 anything)/G(total)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] assuming B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 0.0383, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R70
text:
The second error is the total of systematic uncertainties including the branching fractions used in the measurement.


pdgid: S051R25
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y reports 0.234+-0.013+-0.010 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> D- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] assuming B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 0.091, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R32
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997W assumes B(D_2^*(2460)0 --> D^*()+ pi-) = 0.21+-0.04 and Gamma(b bbar)/Gamma(hadrons) = 0.216 at Z decay.


pdgid: S051R26
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y reports 0.183+-0.019+-0.009 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> D_s^- anything)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] assuming B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 0.036, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R27
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y reports 0.110+-0.014+-0.006 from a measurement of [Gamma(b --> Lambda_c+ anything)/Gamma(total)] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 0.044, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R28
text:
ABREU 1998D results are extracted from a fit to the b-tagging probability distribution based on the impact parameter.


pdgid: S051R28
text:
BUSKULIC 1996Y assumes PDG 1996 production fractions for B0, B+, B_{{s}}, b baryons, and PDG 1996 branching ratios for charm decays. This is sum of their inclusive Dbar0, D-, Dbar_{{s}}, and Lambda_{{c}} branching ratios, corrected to include inclusive Xi_{{c}} and charmonium.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ABREU 1994P is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z. Uses J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- and mu+ mu- channels. Assumes Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(hadron)=0.22.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ADRIANI 1993J is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z. Uses J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- and J/psi(1S) --> e+ e- channels.


pdgid: S051S7
text:
ADRIANI 1992 measurement is an inclusive result for B(Z --> J/psi(1S) X) = 4.1+-0.7+-0.3E-3 which is used to extract the b-hadron contribution to J/psi(1S) production.


pdgid: S051S25
text:
ABREU 1994P is an inclusive measurement from b decays at the Z. Uses psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-, J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- channels. Assumes Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(hadron)=0.22.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
AAIJ 2012BD reports B(b --> psi (2S) X) = 3.08+-0.07+-0.36+-0.27E-3 and we divided our best value of B(b --> psi (1S) X) = 1.16+-0.10E-2 as the ratio listed here.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012AK really reports Gamma(61)/Gamma = 3.08+-0.12+-0.13+-0.42E-3 assuming PDG 2010 value of Gamma(60)/Gamma = 1.16+-0.10E-2 which we present as a ratio of Gamma(61)/Gamma(60) = 26.5+-1.0+-1.1+-2.8E-2.


pdgid: S051R95
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012AK reports 26.5+-1.0+-1.1+-2.8E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> psi(2S) anything)/G(bbar --> J/psi(1S) anything)] * [B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 7.7+-0.8E-3,B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.93+-0.06E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 7.8+-0.9E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.93+-0.06E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S051R43
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] = 6.74+-1.18+-0.62E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.35+-0.12E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R00
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.147+-0.023+-0.011 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.4+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.3+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar)] = 3.88+-0.91+-0.36E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.97+-0.29E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
ABREU 1994P reports 1.4+-0.6+0.4-0.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Assumes no chi_{{c2}}(1P) and Gamma(Z --> b bbar)/Gamma(hadron)=0.22.


pdgid: S051R89
text:
ADRIANI 1993J reports 2.4+-0.9+-0.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 27.3+-1.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051S59
text:
ADRIANI 1993J is a ratio of inclusive measurements from b decays at the Z using only the J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- channel since some systematics cancel.


pdgid: S051R05
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar)] = 0.58+-0.23+-0.02 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.35+-0.12E-4, B(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar) = 7.97+-0.29E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S051R05
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.50+-0.11+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.3+-0.4E-4, B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi) = 4.22+-0.20E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S051R03
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c1(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.073+-0.016+-0.006 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.4+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi) = 4.22+-0.20E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S051R44
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar)] = 1.13+-0.83+-0.10E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar) = 8.06+-0.33E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R06
text:
AAIJ 2024AP reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar)] = 0.17+-0.12+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) = 2.35+-0.12E-4, B(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar) = 8.06+-0.33E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S051R06
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> chi_c0(1P) anything)] / [B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.56+-0.10+-0.01 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi) = 8.3+-0.4E-4, B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi) = 1.22+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S051R04
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> chi_c2(1P) anything)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi)] = 0.081+-0.013+-0.005 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.4+-0.4E-3, B(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi) = 1.22+-0.07E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S051R07
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports [G(bbar --> eta_c(2S) anything, eta_c --> phi phi)/G(bbar --> eta_c(1S) anything)] / [B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi)] = 0.040+-0.011+-0.004 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> phi phi) = 1.4+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S051R5
text:
ADAM 1996 measurement obtained from a fit to the rapidity distribution of pi0**'s in Z --> b b events.


pdgid: S051R36
text:
Measured from R = [B(bbar --> Xi_b()+)xB(Xi_b() --> J/psi Xi+)]/[B(bbar --> Lambdabar_b()0)xB(Lambdabar_b()0 --> J/psi Lambdabar0)] and assumes width(Xi_b()+ --> J/psi Xi+)/width(Lambdabar_b()0 --> J/psi Lambdabar0) = 3/2 related through SU(3) flavor symmetry.


pdgid: S051R29
text:
Average branching fraction of weakly decaying B hadrons into two long-lived charged hadrons, weighted by their production cross section and lifetimes.


pdgid: S051R7
text:
ABREU 1998D results are extracted from a fit to the b-tagging probability distribution based on the impact parameter. The expected hidden charm contribution of 0.026+-0.004 has been subtracted.


pdgid: S051S4
text:
Both ABBOTT 1998B and GLENN 1998 claim that the efficiency quoted in ALBAJAR 1991C was overestimated by a large factor.


pdgid: S051R20
text:
GROSSMAN 1996 limit is derived from the ALEPH BUSKULIC 1995 limit B(B+ --> tau+ nu_tau) <1.8E-3 at CL=90% using conservative simplifying assumptions.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
The average B mixing parameter is determined simultaneously with b and c forward-backward asymmetries in the fit.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ACCIARRI 1999D uses maximum-likelihood fits to extract chi_{{b}} as well as the A(FB)**b in Z --> b bbar events containing prompt leptons.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
This ABREU 1994J result is from 5182 lepton lepton and 279 Lambda lepton events. The systematic error includes 0.004 for model dependence.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ALEXANDER 1996 uses a maximum likelihood fit to simultaneously extract chi as well as the forward-backward asymmetries in e+ e- --> Z --> b bbar and c cbar.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ABREU 1994F uses the average electric charge sum of the jets recoiling against a b-quark jet tagged by a high p(T) muon. The result is for chibar = f_d chi_d+0.9f_s chi_s.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
This ABREU 1994J result combines lepton lepton, Lambda lepton, and jet-charge lepton (ABREU 1994F) analyses. It is for chibar = f(d)chi_{{d}}+0.96f(s)chi_{{s}}.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ADEVA 1990P measurement uses e e, mu mu, and e mu events from 118k events at the Z. Superseded by ADEVA 1992C.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
The WEIR 1990 measurement supersedes the limit obtained in SCHAAD 1985. The 90% CL are 0.06 and 0.38.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
These experiments are not in the average because the combination of B_{{s}} and B_{{d}} mesons which they see could differ from those at higher energy.


pdgid: S051CB
text:
ALBAJAR 1987C measured chi = (Bbar0 --> B0 --> mu+ X) divided by the average production weighted semileptonic branching fraction for B hadrons at 546 and 630 GeV.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
AABOUD 2017E reports a measurement of charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b = -25+-21+-19E-3 in lepton + jets t tbar events in which a b-hadron decays semileptonically to a soft muon.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b = -4.96+-1.53+-0.72E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A_{{SL}}^b() = -7.87+-1.72+-0.93E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays.


pdgid: S051EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010H reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A(SL)**b=-9.57+-2.51+-1.46E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays. Using the measured production ratio of B_{{d}}()0 and B_{{s}}()0, and the asymmetry of B_{{d}}()0 A(SL)**d=-4.7+-4.6E-3 measured from B-factories, they obtain the asymmetry for B_{{s}}()0 as A(SL)**s=-14.6+-7.5E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
PRIM 2024 value established from a complete set of angular coefficients for exclusive B --> Dbar^* lepton+ nu_lepton decays with hadronic tag-side reconstruction. The |V_(cb)|xF(1) is derived from the extracted the BGL and CNL form factor parameters: |V_(cb)|(BGL) = 40.7+-0.7E-3 with the zero-recoil lattice QCD point F(1) = 0.900+-0.009 and |V_(cb)|(CNL) = 40.3+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ADACHI 2023J result comes from differential shapes of exclusive B --> D^* lepton- nu_lepton (lepton = e or mu) decays. Using CNL form factor parametrization and the zero-recoil lattice QCD point F(1) = 0.906+-0.013 ADACHI 2023J finds |V(cb)|(CNL) = 40.57+-0.31+-0.95+-0.58E-3 where the last uncertainty is due to the prediction of F(1). Also reports a measurement of |V(cb)|(BGL) = 40.13+-0.27+-0.93+-0.58E-3 using BGL form factors parametrization.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
WAHEED 2021 uses fully reconstructed D^*()- lepton+ nu events (lepton = e or mu) and eta_{{EW}} = 1.0066.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Obtained from a global fit to B --> D^(*)() lepton nu_lepton events, with reconstructed D0 lepton and D+ lepton final states and rho**2 = 1.22+-0.02+-0.07.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Average of the B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu and B+ --> Dbar^*(2007)) lepton+ nu modes with rho**2 = 1.61+-0.09+-0.21 and f(+-) = 0.521+-0.012.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ABREU 2001H measured using about 5000 partial reconstructed D^* sample with a rho**2=1.34+-0.14+0.24-0.22.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
ABBIENDI 2000Q: measured using both inclusively and exclusively reconstructed D^*()+- samples with a rho**2=1.21+-0.12+-0.20. The statistical and systematic correlations between |V_(cb)|*F(1) and rho**2 are 0.90 and 0.54 respectively.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
BUSKULIC 1997: measured using exclusively reconstructed D^*()+- with a a**2=0.31+-0.17+-0.08. The statistical correlation is 0.92.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured from differential shapes of exclusive B --> D^* lepton- nu_lepton decays with hadronic tag-side reconstruction and extracting the CNL and BGL form factor parameters. PRIM 2023 finds |V(cb)|(CNL) = 40.2+-0.9E-3 with the zero-recoil lattice QCD point F(1) = 0.906+-0.013. PRIM 2023 provides also a measurement of |V(cb)|(BGL) = 40.7+-1.0E-3.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured using the dependence of B- --> D^*()0 e- nubar_e decay differential rate and the form factor description by CAPRINI 1998 with rho**2 = 1.16+-0.06+-0.08.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
Measured using exclusive B0 --> D^*(892)- e+ nu decays with rho**2= 1.35+-0.17+-0.19 and a correlation of 0.91.


pdgid: S052CB1
text:
BARISH 1995: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D^*()- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D^*()0 lepton+ nu samples. They report their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0019+-0.0018+-0.0008, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty in the lifetimes. We combine the last two in quadrature.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
The listed value, obtained by averaging B0 and B+ results, is based on CLN form factor model. ADACHI 2025Y also lists |V_cb| = 39.2+-0.9E-3 based on BCL form factor model, which results in more precise than the value based on CLN.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a 2D fit to the combined B --> Dbar lepton+ nu_lepton sample with a model-independent parametrization according to Boyd-Grinstein-Lebed (BGL), in which a hadronic decay of the second B meson is fully reconstructed.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a fit to the combined partially reconstructed B --> Dbar lepton nu_lepton sample while tagged by the other fully reconstructed B meson in the event. Also reports fitted rho**2 = 1.09+-0.05.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a fit to the combined B --> Dbar lepton+ nu_lepton sample in which a hadronic decay of the second B meson is fully reconstructed and rho**2 = 1.20+-0.09+-0.04.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Obtained from a global fit to B --> D^(*)() lepton nu_lepton events, with reconstructed D0 lepton and D+ lepton final states and rho**2 = 1.20+-0.04+-0.07.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
BARTELT 1999: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D0 lepton+ nu samples.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
BUSKULIC 1997: measured using exclusively reconstructed D+- with a a**2=-0.05+-0.53+-0.38. The statistical correlation is 0.99.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
Using the missing energy and momentum to extract kinematic information about the undetected neutrino in the B0 --> D- lepton+ nu decay.


pdgid: S052CB2
text:
ATHANAS 1997: measured using both exclusive reconstructed B0 --> D- lepton+ nu and B+ --> D0 lepton+ nu samples with a rho**2=0.59+-0.22+-0.12(-0)**+0.59. They report their experiment's uncertainties +-0.0044+-0.0048+0.0053-0.0012, where the first error is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is the uncertainty due to the form factor model variations. We combine the last two in quadrature.


pdgid: S052A00
text:
Measured from an inclusive sample of D_s()- mu+ candidates using CNL parameterization of the form factor. AAIJ 2020E provides also measurement of |V(cb)| = 42.3+-0.8+-0.9+-1.2E-3 using BGL parameterization of the form factor. The third uncertainty is due to the external inputs used in the measurement.


pdgid: S085DM
text:
These papers report E(gamma) in the B^* center of mass. The mass(B^*)-mass(B) is 0.2 MeV higher. Ecm = 10.61 -- 10.7 GeV. Admixture of B0 and B+ mesons, but not B_{{s}}.


pdgid: S085DM
text:
LEE-FRANZINI 1990 value is for an admixture of B0 and B+. They measure 46.7+-0.4+-0.2 MeV for an admixture of B0, B+, and B_{{s}}, and use the shape of the photon line to separate the above value.


pdgid: M244DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{1}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) -  mass(pi+) = 260.9+-1.8+-3.1 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass and assume (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) =  (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.


pdgid: M244DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{1}}(5721)+) - mass(B^*()0) - mass(pi+) = 262+-3+1-3 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M244DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{1}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) - mass(pi-) = 263.9+-0.7+-1.4 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass and (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.


pdgid: M244DM1
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{1}}(5721)0) - mass(B^*()+) - mass(pi-) = 262.7+-0.9+1.1-1.2 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M151M
text:
AFFOLDER 2001F uses the reconstructed B meson through semileptonic decay channels. The fraction of light B mesons that are produced at L=1 B^{**} states is measured to be 0.28+-0.06+-0.03.


pdgid: M151M
text:
BARATE 1998L uses fully reconstructed B mesons to search for B**** production in the B pi+- system. In the framework of heavy quark symmetry (HQS), they also measured the mass of B_{{2}}^* to be 5739+8-11+6-4 MeV/c**2 and the relative production rate of B(b --> B_2^* --> B^(*) pi)/B(b --> B_u,d) = (31+-9+6-5)%.


pdgid: M151M
text:
ACCIARRI 1999N uses inclusive reconstructed B mesons to search for B**** production in the B**(*)pi+- system. In the framework of HQET, they measured the mass of B^*_1 and B^*_2 to be 5670+-10+-13 MeV and 5768+-5+-6 with the B(b --> B^**)= 32+-3+-6E-2. They also reported the evidence for the existence of an excited B-meson state or mixture of states in the region 5.9 -- 6.0 GeV.


pdgid: M245DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{2}}^*()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 318.1+-0.7+-0.4 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.


pdgid: M245DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{2}}^*(5747)+) - mass(B0) - mass(pi+) = 317.7+-1.2+0.3-0.9 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M245DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{2}}^*()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 320.6+-0.4+-0.3 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event.


pdgid: M245DM2
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{2}}^*(5747)0) - mass(B+) - mass(pi-) = 317.9+-1.2+0.8-0.9 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M245R03
text:
Converted from measured ratio of R = B(B_2^*()0 --> B^*()+ pi-) / B(B_2^*()0 --> B^(*)()+ pi-) = 0.475+-0.095+-0.069.


pdgid: M246DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 431+-13+-14 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 455+-26+-14 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) - mass(pi+) = 425+-15+-14 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) = (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 444+-5+-7 MeV  which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each  candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 471+-22+-7 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) - mass(pi-) = 444+-5+-7 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = (-1)**J and using two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = (-1)**J and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M246W+
text:
Assuming P = -(-1)**J and using three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 545.8+-4.1+-2.5  MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for  each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic  Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{J}}(5970)+) - mass(B0) - mass(pi+) = 541+-5+-12 MeV which we adjusted by the pi+ mass.


pdgid: M248DM+
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - mass(pi+) = 547+-5+-3 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM1
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()+)-mass(B0)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) - mass(pi+) = 547+-4+-3 MeV which we adjust by the pi+ mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()0)-mass(B0)) = (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 550.4+-2.9+-5.1 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses two relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{J}}(5970)0) - mass(B+) - mass(pi-) = 558+-5+-12 MeV which we adjusted by the pi- mass.


pdgid: M248DM0
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - mass(pi-) = 575+-6+-5 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = (-1)**J and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: M248DM2
text:
AAIJ 2015AB reports [mass(B_{{J}}()0)-mass(B+)] - (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) - mass(pi-) = 552+-4+-5 MeV which we adjust by the pi- mass. The masses inside the square brackets were measured for each candidate event. The result assumes P = -(-1)**J, (mass(B^*()+)-mass(B+)) = 45.01+-0.30+-0.23 MeV, and uses three relativistic Breit-Wigner functions in the fit for mass difference.


pdgid: S086M
text:
Uses J/psi --> mu+ mu-, phi --> K+ K- decays, and observes 128+-13 events of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi phi.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B_{{s}}()0)-mass(B0) = 87.45+-0.44+-0.09 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2. Uses the mode B_s()0 --> psi(2S) K- pi+.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B_{{s}}()0)-mass(B+) = 87.52+-0.30+-0.12 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2.


pdgid: S086DM
text:
The reported result is mass(B^0_s()) - mass(B0) = 86.38+-0.90+-0.06 MeV. We convert it to the mass difference with respect to the average of (mass(B+-) + mass(B0))/2.


pdgid: S086T
text:
AALTONEN 2011AP combines the fully reconstrcuted B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ decays and partially reconstructed B_s()0 --> D_s X decays.


pdgid: S086T
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998F use fully reconstructed D_s()- --> phi pi- and D_s()- --> K^*()0 K- in the inclusive B_{{s}}()0 decay.


pdgid: S086T
text:
ABREU 1994E uses the flight-distance distribution of D_{{s}} vertices, phi-lepton vertices, and D_s mu vertices.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays with the ML-improved flavor-tagging algorithm.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Reports width(s) - width(d) = -0.0056+0.0013-0.0015+-0.0014 ps**-1 using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays and the current B0 lifetime of 1.517+-0.004 ps**-1.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays with J/psi --> e+ e-.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) > 1.05 GeV.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Reports width(s) - width(d) = -0.0041+-0.0024+-0.0015 ps**-1 using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays and the B0 lifetime of 1.520+-0.004 ps**-1. The results are further combined with those coming from B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi-, B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi, and B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-.


pdgid: S086GS
text:
Measured using a combined time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Measured using CP eigenstates B_s()0 --> J/psi eta^' and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- (selected to be predominantly CP-odd). Negligible CP violation and width(B_{{s}}()0) = 0.6628+-0.0035 ps**-1 are assumed.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
AAIJ 2013AR result comes from a combined fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- data sets. Also reports DeltaGamma(s) = 0.100+-0.016+-0.003 ps**-1 from a fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays and assuming CP-violating angle beta_{{s}}(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 0.02.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays and assuming CP-violating phase phi(s) = 0.


pdgid: S086DGS
text:
Combines D0 measurements of time-dependent angular distributions in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays. There is a 4-fold ambiguity in the solution.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using a pure CP-odd final state J/psi K0S with the assumption that contributions from penguin diagrams are small.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s --> mu+ mu- decays which, in the Standard Model, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0  decays. Assumes -2 Re(lambda)/(1 + |lambda|**2) = 1.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays with 0.9240 < m(pi pi) < 1.0204 GeV, which is dominated by the f_{{0}}(980) resonance, making it a CP-odd state.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using J/psi pi+ pi- mode with 0.880 < m(pi pi) < 1.080 GeV/c**2, which is mostly J/psi f(0)(980) mode, a pure CP-odd final state.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Measured using B_s --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays which, in the limit of phi_{{s}} = 0 and |lambda| = 1, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0 decays.


pdgid: S086TSH
text:
Uses the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays assuming CP-violating angle beta_{{s}}(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 0.02.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
AAIJ 2023P reports a tau_{{L}} value combined with AAIJ 2016AL result as tau_{{L}} = 1.452+-0.014+-0.007 ps.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
Measured using results in SIRUNYAN 2018BY for the heavy B_{{s}}()0 lifetime obtained from B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays and the average effective B_s()0 --> J/psi phi lifetime, and magnitude squared of the CP-odd amplitude |A((perp))|**2 = 0.250+-0.006. The uncertainty includes all statistical and systematic contributions.


pdgid: S086TSL
text:
Measured using B_s()0 --> D_s()- D_s()+. The effective lifetime is translated into a decay width of Gamma(L) = 0.725+-0.014+-0.009 ps**-1.


pdgid: S086TFS
text:
AAIJ 2017AN value was measured using B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu decays relative to B0 --> D^(*)()- mu+ nu_mu decays.


pdgid: S086TJF
text:
Based on DeltaGamma = Gamma(H) - Gamma(B0) = -0.05+-0.004+-0.004 ps**-1 and meanlife(B0) = 1.517+-0.004 ps. The first error is due to the combined DeltaGamma uncertainty and the second is from meanlife(B0) uncertainty.


pdgid: S086TMM
text:
Measured using B_s --> mu+ mu- decays which, in the Standard Model, correspond to B_{{sH}}()0 decays. Assumes -2 Re(lambda)/(1 + |lambda|**2) = 1.


pdgid: S086P72
text:
ADACHI 2025O branching fraction is measured to be 0.0686+-0.072+-0.040. They improve the measurement by averaging this result with the previous BELLE measurement with semileptonic tagging in WANG 2022 after rescaling the previous measurement with the most recent values of D_{{s}}()+ branching fractions and taking into account correlated uncertainties.


pdgid: S086P72
text:
The extraction of this result takes into account the correlation between the measurements of B(Upsilon(5S) --> D_s X) and B(Upsilon(5S) --> D0 X).


pdgid: S086P72
text:
BUSKULIC 1996E separate c cbar and b bbar sources of D_{{s}}()+ mesons using a lifetime tag, subtract generic bbar --> W+ --> D_s()+ events, and obtain B(bbar --> B_s()0) * B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- anything) = 0.088+-0.020+-0.020 assuming B(D_s --> phi pi) = 3.5+-0.4E-2 and PDG 1994 values for the relative partial widths to other D_{{s}} channels. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi).


pdgid: S086P72
text:
ACTON 1992N assume that excess of 147+-48 D_{{s}}()0 events over that expected from B0, B+, and c cbar is all from B_{{s}}()0 decay. The product branching fraction is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- anything)xB(D_s()- --> phi pi-) = 5.9+-1.9+-1.1E-3. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi).


pdgid: S086P72
text:
This measurement, originally 0.602+-0.058+-0.023, has been rescaled by ADACHI 2025O with the most recent values of D_{{s}}()+ branching fractions.


pdgid: S086P72
text:
WANG 2022 selects the B_{{s}} events by tagging the accompanying B_{{s}} via partial reconstruction of the semileptonic decays B_s --> D_s X lepton+ nu. Partially superseded by ADACHI 2025O.


pdgid: S086P92
text:
ADACHI 2025O direct measurement of the branching fraction is 0.215+-0.061+-0.018. They improve the measurement by averaging this result with the previous BELLE measurement of B(B_s()0 --> D0 / Dbar0 X)/B(B_s()0 --> D_s()+- X) = 0.416+-0.018+-0.092 of ZHUKOVA 2023, multiplied by best value of B(B_s()0 --> D_s()+- X) obtained by ADACHI 2025O, and taking into account correlated uncertainties.


pdgid: S086R54
text:
The measurement corresponds to a branching fraction where the lepton originates from bottom decay and is the average between the electron and muon branching fractions. LEES 2012A uses the correlation of the production of phi mesons in association with a lepton in e+ e- data taken at center-of-mass energies between 10.54 and 11.2 GeV.


pdgid: S086R2
text:
Obtains B_s --> D_s X e nu, and D_s X mu nu separately, then combines them by assuming  systematic uncertainties are fully correlated, except for the one on lepton identification. The  third uncertainty adds in quadrature systematic uncertainties from external sources (number of  B_{{s}} events, and D_{{s}}^(*)() branching fractions). OSWALD 2015 also measures the  cross-section CS(e+ e- --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 53.8+-1.4+-5.3 pb at sqrt(s) = 10.86 GeV.


pdgid: S086R2
text:
BUSKULIC 1995O use D_s lepton correlations. The measured product branching ratio is B(bbar --> B_s) * B(B_s --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) = (0.82+-0.09+0.13-0.14)% assuming B(D_s --> phi pi) = 3.5+-0.4E-2 and PDG 1994 values for the relative partial widths to the six other D_{{s}} channels used in this analysis. Combined with results from Upsilon(4S) experiments this can be used to extract B(bbar --> B_s) = (11.0+-1.2+2.5-2.6)%. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi).


pdgid: S086R2
text:
ABREU 1992M measured muons only and obtained product branching ratio B(Z --> b or bbar) x B(bbar --> B_s) x B(B_s --> D_s mu+ nu_mu anything) x B(D_s --> phi pi) = 18+-8E-5. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi). We use B(Z --> b or bbar) = 2B(Z --> b bbar) = 2*(0.2212+-0.0019).


pdgid: S086R2
text:
ACTON 1992N is measured using D_s --> phi pi+ and K^*(892)0 K+ events. The product branching fraction measured is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) xB(D_s^- --> phi pi-) = 3.9+-1.1+-0.8E-4. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi).


pdgid: S086R2
text:
BUSKULIC 1992E is measured using D_s --> phi pi+ and K^*(892)0 K+ events. They use 2.7+-0.7% for the phi pi+ branching fraction. The average product branching fraction is measured to be B(bbar --> B_s()0)B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- lepton+ nu_lepton anything) =0.020+-0.0055+0.005-0.006. We evaluate using our current values B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.107+-0.014 and B(D_s --> phi pi) = 0.036+-0.009. Our first error is their experiment's and our second error is that due to B(bbar --> B_s()0) and B(D_s --> phi pi). Superseded by BUSKULIC 1995O.


pdgid: S086S04
text:
Obtains B_s --> D_s^*() X e nu, and D_s^*() X mu nu separately, then combines them by assuming systematic uncertainties are fully correlated, except for the one on lepton identification. The third uncertainty adds in quadrature systematic uncertainties from external sources (number of B_{{s}} events, and D_{{s}}^(*)() branching fractions). OSWALD 2015 also measures the cross-section CS(e+ e- --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 53.8+-1.4+-5.3 pb at sqrt(s) = 10.86 GeV.


pdgid: S086P49
text:
AAIJ 2020E reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ nu_mu)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 1.09+-0.05+-0.06+-0.05 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 2.12+-0.06E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P50
text:
AAIJ 2020E reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton)] = 1.06+-0.05+-0.07+-0.05 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- lepton+ nu_lepton) = 4.90+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R36
text:
ABAZOV 2009G reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s1(2536)- mu+ nu_mu, D_s1()- --> D^*()- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z)] = 2.66+-0.52+-0.45E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z) = 10.0+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P54
text:
AAIJ 2021G measures B(B_s()0 --> K- mu+ nu_mu )/B( B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ nu_mu ) = 4.89+-0.21+0.20-0.21+-0.14E-3 over the whole q**2 range, where the last uncertainty is due to the D_s()- --> K+ K- pi- branching fraction.


pdgid: S086P54
text:
AAIJ 2021G reports this branching ratio for q**2 < 7 GeV**2 as 1.66+-0.08+-0.07+-0.05E-3 and for q**2 > 7 GeV**2 as 3.25+-0.21+0.16-0.17+-0.09E-3.


pdgid: S086P55
text:
The total systematic error includes D_{{s}}()- branching fractions, B_{{s}}()0 lifetime, |V(cb)|, and B_s()0 --> D_s()- form factor integral uncertainties.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AAIJ 2021Y reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.18+-0.04 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
LOUVOT 2009 reports 3.67+0.35-0.33+0.65-0.645E-3 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())] assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 19.5+-2.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 21.3+-1.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
ABULENCIA 2007C reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.13+-0.08+-0.23 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AAIJ 2012AG reports 2.95+-0.05+-0.17+0.18-0.22E-3 where the last uncertainty comes from the semileptonic f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} measurement. We combined the systematics in quadrature.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
ABULENCIA 2006J reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] = 1.32+-0.18+-0.38 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R3
text:
AKERS 1994J sees <=6 events and measures the limit on the product branching fraction f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+) < 1.3% at CL = 90%. We divide by our current value B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.105.


pdgid: S086R30
text:
ABULENCIA 2007C reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- pi+ pi+ pi-)] = 1.05+-0.10+-0.22 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+ pi+ pi-) = 6.0+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R35
text:
LOUVOT 2009 reports 2.4+1.2-1.0+-0.42E-4 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)())] assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 19.5+-2.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = 21.3+-1.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P77
text:
AAIJ 2023AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s1(2536)-+ K+-, D_s1()- --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.409+-0.019+-0.022 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
Use Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() decays assuming B(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) = (17.1+-3.0)% and Gamma(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(5S) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (87.0+-1.7)%.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.183+-0.021+-0.017. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} =. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() assuming B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (19.3+-2.9)% and Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (90.1+3.8-4.0)%.


pdgid: S086R32
text:
AALTONEN 2008F reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.44+0.48-0.44 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R73
text:
AAIJ 2014AA reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s()- D+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 0.038+-0.004+-0.003 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value..


pdgid: S086P74
text:
AAIJ 2023J reports [G(B_s()0 --> D^*()+ D^*()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2010)-)] = 0.269+-0.032+-0.011+-0.008 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2010)-) = 8.0+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R33
text:
AAIJ 2016P reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s()- + D_s^*()- D_s()+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.88+-0.08+-0.12 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R33
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s()- + D_s^*()- D_s()+) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.424+-0.046+-0.035. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} =. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R34
text:
AAIJ 2016P reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s^*()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 1.76+-0.11+-0.14 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R34
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^*()+ D_s^*()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 0.654+-0.072+-0.065. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} =. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
AAIJ 2016P reports [G(B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()+ D_s^(*)()-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)] = 4.24+-0.14+-0.27 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = 8.1+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
AALTONEN 2012C reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> D_s^(*)()+ D_s^(*)()-) / B(B0 --> D- D_s()+)) = 1.261+-0.095+-0.112. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> D- D_s()+) = and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} =. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R23
text:
Reports B(B_s()0(short) --> D_s^(*)() D_s^(*)()) = (0.23+-0.10+-0.05). [0.17/B(D_s --> phi chi)]**2 assuming B(B_s()0 --> B_s()0(short)) = 50%. We use our best value of B(D_s --> phi chi) = 15.7+-1.0% to obtain the quoted result.


pdgid: S086P60
text:
AAIJ 2021S reports [G(B_s()0 --> D^*()- D_s()+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+)] = 0.049+-0.006+-0.0036 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D^*(2010)- D_s()+) = 8.2+-0.8E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P57
text:
AAIJ 2021N reports [[G(B_s()0 --> D^*()+ D-)/G(total)+ G(B_s()0 --> D^*()- D+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D+- D^*()-+ (CP-averaged))] = 0.137+-0.017+-0.006 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D+- D^*()-+ (CP-averaged)) = 6.1+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P20
text:
Measured and normalized to the B_s()0 --> Dbar^*()0 K0S decay with f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015. Signal significance is 4.4 standard deviations.


pdgid: S086R65
text:
AAIJ 2013AQ reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.18+-0.05+-0.12 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P62
text:
AAIJ 2022N reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.178+-0.029+-0.091+-0.037 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar^*(2007)0 pi+ pi-) = 6.2+-2.2E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R52
text:
AAIJ 2011D reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 rho0)] = 1.48+-0.34+-0.19 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 rho0) = 3.21+-0.21E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R52
text:
AAIJ 2013BX reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0)] = 7.8+-0.7+-0.3+-0.6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K^*(892)0) = 4.5+-0.6E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R85
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+ decays. Corresponds to the resonant K_0^*(1430) part of LASS parametrization.


pdgid: S086R91
text:
Uses Dalitz plot analysis of B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K- pi+ decays. Corresponds to the non-resonant part of the LASS parametrization.


pdgid: S086R03
text:
AAIJ 2018AZ reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.930+-0.089+-0.069 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


