# pdgfootnote

pdgid: M076R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 20E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 22E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] = 9+-4+-2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M076R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 37E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 77E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R16
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <7.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b0(1P) --> J/psi J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M076R17
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <12E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b0(1P) --> J/psi psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M076R18
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <3.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b0(1P) --> psi(2S) psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M076B02
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of = 8.3+-5.6+3.7-2.6E-4 and derives a 90% CL upper limit of G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) < 4.6% using B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) =(3.8+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
FULSOM 2018 reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 2.45+-0.02+0.11-0.15E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))/G(total) = (2.51+-0.12) % combining the results from samples of Upsilon(2S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 2.51+-0.12E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 22.8+-0.4+-1.2E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 24.1+-0.6+-1.5E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
WALK 1986 reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 23.4+-3.63+-2.82E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
WALK 1986 quotes B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))xB(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) x B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (5.8+-0.9+-0.7) %.


pdgid: M077R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 14+-3+-3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 9+-3+-2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] < 42E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9E-2.


pdgid: M077R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 55+-9+-14E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 10+-3+-2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 24+-6+-6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 59+-14+-17E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 64+-16+-16E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 13+-3+-3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 119+-18+-32E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 18+-4+-4E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 52+-11+-14E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 18+-4+-5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 96+-24+-29E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M077R23
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 3.3E-5 to 44.4E-5.


pdgid: M077R16
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <2.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b1(1P) --> J/psi J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M077R17
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <1.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b1(1P) --> J/psi psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M077R18
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <6.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b1(1P) --> psi(2S) psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M077R22
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 1.8E-5 to 22.7E-5.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
FULSOM 2018 reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 1.17+-0.01+0.06-0.07E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))/G(total) = (1.32+-0.06)% combining the results from samples of Upsilon(2S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 1.32+-0.06E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 1.33+-0.04+-0.07E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 13.9+-0.5+0.9-1.1E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
WALK 1986 reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 17.7+-3.6+-2.0E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
WALK 1986 quotes B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))xB(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) x B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (4.4+-0.9+-0.5) %.


pdgid: M078R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 6+-3+-2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] < 7E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15E-2.


pdgid: M078R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 38+-14+-10E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 25+-8+-6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 8+-2+-2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 15+-5+-4E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 28+-11+-7E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] < 36E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15E-2.


pdgid: M078R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 5+-2+-1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 73+-16+-20E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] < 6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15E-2.


pdgid: M078R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 26+-8+-7E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 6+-2+-2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 132+-31+-40E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M078R16
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <4.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b2(1P) --> J/psi J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: M078R17
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <4.9E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b2(1P) --> J/psi psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: M078R18
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <1.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b2(1P) --> psi(2S) psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: M200M
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(2S)) = 4.9 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding mass difference measurement.


pdgid: M200M
text:
SANDILYA 2013 (Belle Collab.) search for such a state reconstructed in the same 26 exclusive  hadronic final states as DOBBS 2012 using a sample of 157.8+-3.6E6 Upsilon(2S)  decays or about 17 times larger and find no evidence for a signal. Their 90% C.L. upper limit  on the branching fraction B(Upsilon(2S) --> eta_b(2S) gamma) x  Sum(i)B(eta_b(2S) --> X_i) < 4.9E-6, summed over the exclusive hadronic  final states X_{{i}}, is an order of magnitude smaller than that reported by DOBBS 2012.


pdgid: M200M
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(2S)) = 5 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding mass difference measurement.


pdgid: M200DM
text:
SANDILYA 2013 (Belle Collab.) search for such a state reconstructed in the same 26 exclusive hadronic final states as DOBBS 2012 using a sample of 157.8+-3.6E6 Upsilon(2S) decays or about 17 times larger and find no evidence for a signal. Their 90% C.L. upper limit on the branching fraction B(Upsilon(2S) --> eta_b(2S) gamma) x Sum(i)B(eta_b(2S) --> X_i) < 4.9E-6, summed over the exclusive hadronic final states X_{{i}}, is an order of magnitude smaller than that reported by DOBBS 2012.


pdgid: M052M
text:
Obtained by reanalysing ARGUS and Crystal Ball data (BARBER 1984), but not authored by the ARGUS and Crystal Ball collaboration.


pdgid: M052R4
text:
LEES 2011C reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> Upsilon(2S) anything)] = 1.78+-0.02+-0.11E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> Upsilon(2S) anything) = 10.6+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M052R4
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> e+ e-) = (1.91+-0.16)%, B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.93+-0.17)% and, (Upsilon(2S)) = 0.612+-0.011 keV.


pdgid: M052R3
text:
BESSON 2007 reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> tau+ tau-)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.04+-0.04+-0.05 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 1.93+-0.17E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M052R10
text:
TAMPONI 2013 reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi0)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)] < 2.3E-4 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-) = 17.85E-2.


pdgid: M052R6
text:
TAMPONI 2013 reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 1.99+-0.14+-0.11E-3 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-) = 17.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M052R69
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 4.4E-6 to 36.7E-6.


pdgid: M052R01
text:
Calculated using the value Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (3.18+-0.04+-0.22+-0.41)% from BESSON 2006A and PDG 2008 values of B(pi+ pi- Upsilon(1S)) = (18.1+-0.4)%, B(pi0 pi0 Upsilon(1S)) = (8.6+-0.4)%, B(mu+ mu-) = (1.93+-0.17)%, and R(hadrons) = 3.51. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2006A.


pdgid: M052R70
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 7.8E-6 to 64.7E-6.


pdgid: M052R81
text:
WANG 2011B reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 0.8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: M052R06
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, excluding known resonances, with mass in the range 0.3 -- 7 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of mass(A0) range from 1E-6 to 8E-5.


pdgid: M052R24
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with mass in the range 212 -- 9300 MeV, excluding J/psi and psi(2S). Measured 90% CL limits as a function of mass(A0) range from 0.26 -- 8.3E-6.


pdgid: M079R2
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] = 7.7+-1.6E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M079R2
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) x B(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (0.28+-0.12+-0.03)% using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M079R2
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = (-0.3+-0.2+0.5-0.4)%.


pdgid: M079R2
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.37+-0.26)%, B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma Upsilon(2S))*2 B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) < 1.19E-4, and B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b0(2P) gamma) = 0.049.


pdgid: M079R00
text:
STOTTLER 2025 reports 0.55+-0.19+-0.07 % from a measurement of [G(chi_b0(2P) --> omega Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9+-0.6E-2.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] = 2.1+-1.0E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = 2.1+-1.0E-4 combining the results from Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- samples with and without photon conversions.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) x B(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = (0.05+-0.04+-0.01)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.05)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = 3.9+-2.2+1.2-0.6E-4.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
Using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.07)%, B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma Upsilon(1S))*2 B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) < 0.63E-4, and B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b0(2P) gamma) = 0.049.


pdgid: M079R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 13E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 14E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 9E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 13E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 63E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 39E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 4E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 72E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 9E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 43E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 10E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 38E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079B01
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = 3.9+-2.2+1.2-0.6E-4 and derives a 90% CL upper limit of B(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) < 1.2% using B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = (5.9+-0.6)%.


pdgid: M079A02
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) xB(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = (0.05+-0.04+-0.01)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) =(2.57+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M079B02
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = (-0.3+-0.2+0.5-0.4)% and derives a 90% CL upper limit of B(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) < 2.8% using B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = (5.9+-0.6)%.


pdgid: M079A03
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) xB(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (0.28+-0.12+-0.03)% using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) =(1.44+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M080R3
text:
STOTTLER 2025 reports 2.39+0.20-0.19+-0.24E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_b1(2P) --> omega Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2.


pdgid: M080R3
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2004 reports 1.63+0.35-0.31+0.16-0.15E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_b1(2P) --> omega Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 11.3+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 2.66+-0.22E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))/G(total) = (2.66+-0.22)% combining the results from  Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- samples with and without photon conversions.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 2.4+-0.1+-0.2E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) x 2 B(Upsilon(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (10.23+-1.20+-1.26) E-4.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (2.29+-0.23+-0.21) % using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 13.48+-0.72E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))/G(total) = 13.48+-0.72E-3 combining the results from samples of Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 12.4+-0.3+-0.6E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) x 2 B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (6.47+-1.12+-0.82) E-4.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) x B(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = (0.91+-0.11+-0.06)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.05)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M080R4
text:
LEES 2011C measures B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b1(2P) X) x B(chi_b1(2P) --> chi_b1(1P) pi+ pi-) = 1.16+-0.07+-0.12E-3. We derive the value assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b1(2P) X) = B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b1(2P) gamma) =.


pdgid: M080R4
text:
CAWLFIELD 2006 quote Gamma(chi_b(2P) --> pi pi chi_b(1P)) = 0.83+-0.22+-0.08+-0.19 keV assuming I-spin conservation, no D-wave contribution, Gamma(chi_b1(2P)) = 96+-16keV, and Gamma(chi_b2(2P)) = 138+-19 keV.


pdgid: M080R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 39+-8+-9E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 14+-5+-3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 97+-30+-26E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 74+-16+-19E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 12+-4+-3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 69+-13+-17E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 121+-29+-33E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 85+-23+-22E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 15+-4+-3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 150+-30+-40E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 25+-7+-6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 77+-17+-21E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 22+-6+-5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 241+-47+-72E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M080A00
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes 2xB(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_bJ(2P)) B(chi_bJ(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(nS)) B(Upsilon(nS) --> lepton+ lepton-).


pdgid: M080A00
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = (0.91+-0.11+-0.06)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) =(2.57+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M080A01
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (2.29+-0.23+-0.21) % usingB(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M081R3
text:
STOTTLER 2025 reports 0.47+0.13-0.12+-0.06E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_b2(2P) --> omega Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2.


pdgid: M081R3
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2004 reports 1.10+0.32-0.28+0.11-0.10E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_b2(2P) --> omega Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 11.4+-0.8E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 1.12+-0.13E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))/G(total) = (1.12+-0.13)% combining the results from samples of Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 1.1+-0.1+-0.1E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) x 2 B(Upsilon(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (4.98+-0.94+-0.62) E-4.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (1.90+-0.23+-0.18) % using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 8.03+-0.50E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))/G(total)  = 8.03+-0.50E-3 combining the results from samples of Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 9.2+-0.3+-0.4E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) x 2 B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (5.03+-0.94+-0.63) E-4.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) =(0.77+-0.11+-0.05)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.05)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M081R4
text:
0.64+-0.05+-0.08E-3. We derive the value assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b2(2P) X) = B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b2(2P) gamma) =.


pdgid: M081R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] < 14E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1E-2.


pdgid: M081R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] < 12E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1E-2.


pdgid: M081R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] < 87E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1E-2.


pdgid: M081R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 51+-16+-13E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 12+-4+-3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 32+-11+-8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 62+-23+-17E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] < 58E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1E-2.


pdgid: M081R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 12+-4+-3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 159+-33+-43E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 19+-7+-5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 55+-16+-15E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 12+-5+-3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 165+-46+-50E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M081A01
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) =(0.77+-0.11+-0.05)% usingB(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M081A02
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (1.90+-0.23+-0.18) % using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M048R8
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) gamma gamma) = (0.038+-0.007)%, and B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi0 pi0) = (1/2)B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-).


pdgid: M048R8
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.31+-0.21)%, B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) gamma gamma)x2B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (0.188+-0.035)%, and B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi0 pi0)x2B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (0.436+-0.056)%. With the assumption of e mu universality.


pdgid: M048R4
text:
Using B(Upsilon(1S) --> e+ e-) = (2.38+-0.11)%, B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.48+-0.05)%, and (Upsilon(3S)) = 0.443+-0.008 keV.


pdgid: M048R3
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> e+ e-) = (1.91+-0.16)%, B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.93+-0.17)%, and (Upsilon(3S)) = 0.443+-0.008 keV.


pdgid: M048R28
text:
Using B(Upsilon(1S) --> e+ e-) = (2.38+-0.11)%, B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.48+-0.05)%, B(Upsilon(2S) --> e+ e-) = (1.91+-0.16)%, and B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.93+-0.17)%. Not independent of other values reported by AUBERT 2008BP.


pdgid: M048R11
text:
Using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.07)% and assuming e mu universality. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M048R03
text:
Assuming M(h_{{b}}(1P)) = 9900 MeV and Gamma(h_{{b}}(1P)) = 0 MeV, and allowing B(h_b(1P) --> gamma eta_b(1S)) to vary from 0 -- 100%.


pdgid: M048R18
text:
BESSON 2007 reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> tau+ tau-)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(3S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.05+-0.08+-0.05 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(3S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.18+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M048R30
text:
Calculated using BESSON 2006A value of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (2.72+-0.06+-0.32+-0.37)% and the PDG 2008 values of B(Upsilon(2S) + anything) = (10.6+-0.8)%, B(pi+ pi- Upsilon(1S)) = (4.40+-0.10)%, B(pi0 pi0 Upsilon(1S)) = (2.20+-0.13)%, B(gamma chi_b2(2P)) = (13.1+-1.6)%, B(gamma chi_b1(2P)) = (12.6+-1.2)%, B(gamma chi_b0(2P)) = (5.9+-0.6)%, B(gamma chi_b0(1P)) = (0.30+-0.11)%,B(mu+ mu-) = (2.18+-0.21)%, and R(hadrons) = 3.51. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) BESSON 2006A value.


pdgid: M048R31
text:
Calculated using BESSON 2006A values of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (2.72+-0.06+-0.32+-0.37)% and Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) BESSON 2006A value.


pdgid: M048R21
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))] = 1.435+-0.162+-0.169E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = 18.0+-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M048R21
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] < 27.1E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15E-2.


pdgid: M048R21
text:
HEINTZ 1992, while unable to distinguish between different J states, measures Sum(J)B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_bJ()) x B(chi_bJ() --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = 1.7+-0.4+-0.6E-3 for J = 0,1,2 using inclusive Upsilon(1S) decays and 1.2+0.4-0.3+-0.09E-3 for J = 1,2 using Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-.


pdgid: M048R22
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))] = 5.38+-1.20+-0.95E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = 35.2+-2.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M048R22
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] < 2.5E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9E-2.


pdgid: M048R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 21.9E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M048R04
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with mass in the range 212 -- 9300 MeV, excluding J/psi and psi(2S). Measured 90% CL limits as a function of mass(A0) range from 0.27 -- 5.5E-6.


pdgid: M048R29
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with M(tau+ tau-) in the ranges 4.03 -- 9.52 and 9.61 -- 10.10 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of M(tau+ tau-) range from 1.5 -- 16E-5.


pdgid: M206M
text:
Systematic error includes an additional 0.5 MeV for the uncertainty on the Upsilon(3S) mass. Also measures mass(chi_{{b2}}(3P))-mass(chi_{{b1}}(3P)) = 10.60+-0.64+-0.17 MeV. A total of 372 chi_{{b1}}(3P) and chi_{{b2}}(3P) events was observed.


pdgid: M206M
text:
From chi_b1(3P) --> Upsilon(1S,2S) gamma transitions assuming mass(chi_{{b2}}(3P))-mass(chi_{{b1}}(3P)) = 10.5+-1.5 MeV and allowing for +-30% variation in the chi_{{b2}}(3P) production rate relative to that of chi_{{b1}}(3P).


pdgid: M206M
text:
The mass of the chi_{{b1}}(3P) state obtained by combining the results of AAIJ 2014BG with that of AAIJ 2014BI. The first uncertainty is experimental and the second attributable to the unknown mass splitting, assumed to be mass(chi_{{b2}}(3P))-mass(chi_{{b1}}(3P)) = 10.5+-1.5 MeV.


pdgid: M206M
text:
From chi_b1(3P) --> Upsilon(3S) gamma transition assuming mass(chi_{{b2}}(3P))-mass(chi_{{b1}}(3P)) = 10.5+-1.5 MeV.


pdgid: M047R11
text:
The quantities Gamma(B+ B-)/width(total), Gamma(B0 Bbar0)/width(total), Gamma(B+ B-)/Gamma(B0 Bbar0) and Gamma(non-B Bbar)/width(total) produced by the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) are correlated.


pdgid: M047R13
text:
ARTUSO 2005B reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> D_s()+ anything + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 8.0+-0.2+-0.9E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M047R12
text:
Direct measurement. This value is averaged with the value extracted from the Gamma(B+ B-) / Gamma(B0 Bbar0) measurements.


pdgid: M047R7
text:
SOKOLOV 2009 reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.211+-0.030+-0.014E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.48+-0.04E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M047R7
text:
SOKOLOV 2007 reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 4.42+-0.81+-0.56E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.48+-0.04E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M047R7
text:
Superseded by AUBERT 2008BP. AUBERT 2006R reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 2.23+-0.25+-0.27E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.48+-0.04E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M047R9
text:
Superseded by AUBERT 2008BP. AUBERT 2006R reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> Upsilon(2S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.69+-0.26+-0.20E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 1.93+-0.17E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M047R01
text:
From the upper limit on the ratio of CS(e+ e- --> h_b(1P) pi+ pi-) at the Upsilon(4S) to that at the Upsilon(5S) of 0.27.


pdgid: M243M
text:
From a fit to the dressed cross sections of AUBERT 2009E by BaBar and SANTEL 2016 by Belle above 10.68 GeV with a coherent sum of a continuum amplitude and three Breit-Wigner functions with constant widths.


pdgid: M243M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2, 3, cross sections at 28 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.63 -- 11.02 GeV, including the initial-state radiation at Upsilon(10860). Superseded by ADACHI 2024V.


pdgid: M243R00
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2, 3, cross sections at 28 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.63 -- 11.02 GeV, including the initial-state radiation at Upsilon(10860).


pdgid: M243R00
text:
Reported as the range 0.12 -- 0.47 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M243R02
text:
Reported as the range 0.53 -- 1.22 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M243R03
text:
Reported as the range 0.21 -- 0.26 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M243R05
text:
A fit solution with constructive interference. The other solution corresponding to destructive interference gives a value of 2.01+-0.38+-0.76 eV.


pdgid: M243R06
text:
A fit solution with constructive interference. The other solution corresponding to destructive interference gives a value of 1.32+-0.44+-0.55 eV.


pdgid: M092M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2, 3, cross sections at 28 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.6 -- 11.05 GeV, including the initial-state radiation at Upsilon(10860).


pdgid: M092M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the h_b(nP) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2 cross sections at 22 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.77 -- 11.02 GeV to a pair of interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudes modified by phase space factors, with eight resonance parameters (a mass and width for each of Upsilon(10860) and Upsilon(11020),  a single relative phase, a single relative amplitude, and two overall normalization factors, one for each n). The systematic error estimate is dominated by possible interference with a small nonresonant continuum amplitude.


pdgid: M092M
text:
Not including uncertain and potentially large systematic errors due to assumed continuum amplitude 1/sqrt(s) dependence and related interference contributions.


pdgid: M092M
text:
From a fit to the total hadronic cross sections measured at 60 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.82 -- 11.05 GeV to a pair of interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudes and two floating continuum amplitudes with 1/sqrt(s) dependence, one coherent with the resonances and one incoherent, with six resonance parameters (a mass, width, and an amplitude for each of Upsilon(10860) and Upsilon(11020), one relative phase, and one decoherence coefficient).


pdgid: M092M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2, 3, cross sections at 25energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.6 -- 11.05 GeV to a pair of interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudesmodified by phase space factors, with fourteen resonance parameters (a mass, width, and threeamplitudes for each of Upsilon(10860) and Upsilon(11020), a single universal relativephase, and three decoherence coefficients, one for each n). Continuum contributions weremeasured (and therefore fixed) to be zero.


pdgid: M092M
text:
In a model where a flat non-resonant b bbar-continuum is incoherently added to a second flat component interfering with two Breit-Wigner resonances. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.


pdgid: M092M
text:
In a model where a flat nonresonant Upsilon(1S,2S,3S) pi+ pi- continuum interferes with a single Breit-Wigner resonance.


pdgid: M092M
text:
In a model where a non-resonant b bbar-continuum represented by a threshold function at sqrt(s)=2mass(B) is incoherently added to a flat component interfering with two Breit-Wigner resonances. Not independent of other AUBERT 2009E results. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.


pdgid: M092R50
text:
Reported as the range 0.75 -- 1.43 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M092R51
text:
Reported as the range 1.35 -- 3.80 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M092R52
text:
Reported as the range 0.43 -- 1.03 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M092R13
text:
Not independent of DRUTSKOY 2010 values for Upsilon(5S) --> B+-**,0 anything. Superseded by ADACHI 2025O.


pdgid: M092R01
text:
Supersedes ARTUSO 2005B. Combining inclusive phi, D_{{s}}, and B measurements. Using B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.6% from PDG 2006.


pdgid: M092R19
text:
The ratios N(B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / N(B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) and N(B^*_s() Bbar_s()0) / N(B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) are measured with a correlation coefficient of -0.72.


pdgid: M092R19
text:
From a measurement of CS(e+ e- --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / CS(e+ e- --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) at sqrt(s) = 10.86 GeV.


pdgid: M092R36
text:
Assuming that all the b bbar events are from Upsilon(5S) resonance decays and using CS(e+ e- --> b bbar) = 0.340+-0.016 nb from ESEN 2013. Correlated with other results from HE 2014.


pdgid: M092R47
text:
Assuming that all the b bbar events are from Upsilon(5S) resonance decays and using CS(e+ e- --> b bbar) = 0.340+-0.016 nb from ESEN 2013. Correlated with other results from HE 2014. For a state X_{{b}} with mass between 10.55 GeV/c**2 and 10.65 GeV/c**2, the obtained 90% upper limit as a function of mass(X_{{b}}) varies from 2.6E-5 to 3.8E-5.


pdgid: M092R02
text:
ARTUSO 2005B reports [G(Upsilon(10860) --> D_s()  anything + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.0198+-0.0019+-0.0038 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M093W
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n=1, 2, 3, cross sections at 25energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.6 -- 11.05 GeV to a pair of interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudesmodified by phase space factors, with fourteen resonance parameters (a mass, width, and threeamplitudes for each of Upsilon(10860) and Upsilon(11020), a single universal relativephase, and three decoherence coefficients, one for each n). Continuum contributions weremeasured (and therefore fixed) to be zero.


pdgid: M093R04
text:
Reported as the range 0.38 -- 0.54 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M093R05
text:
Reported as the range 0.13 -- 1.16 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M093R06
text:
Reported as the range 0.17 -- 0.49 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M250M
text:
Obtained from the full amplitude analysis. Parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner line shape. Also confirmed by the model-independent analysis of AAIJ 2020AF.


pdgid: M250R00
text:
Obtained from fit fractions based an amplitude analyses. Parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner line shape. The last error includes uncertainties from B(B+ --> D+ Dbar0 KS) and B(B+ --> D+ D- K+) values.


pdgid: M269M
text:
From an amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi-. A simultaneous fit to B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+ assuming isospin symmetry yields a mass of 2908+-11+-20 MeV.


pdgid: M269M++
text:
From an amplitude analysis of B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+. A simultaneous fit to B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and  B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+ assuming isospin symmetry yields a mass of 2908+-11+-20 MeV.


pdgid: M269W
text:
From an amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi-. A simultaneous fit to B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+ assuming isospin symmetry yields a width of 136+-23+-13 MeV.


pdgid: M269W++
text:
From an amplitude analysis of B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+. A simultaneous fit to B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and  B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+ assuming isospin symmetry yields a width of 136+-23+-13 MeV.


pdgid: M265TMP
text:
The fit uses a coupled channel model accounting for the D0 D^*()+ threshold. The real part is given relative to the D0 D^*()+ threshold.


pdgid: M265TMP
text:
The study provides fits results of three different coupled-channel calculations of increasing levels of sophistication to the LHCb data of AAIJ 2022Z. We quote the result of the most advanced calculation with full three-body unitarity. The real part is given relative to the D0 D^*()+ threshold.


pdgid: M265W
text:
The fit uses a relativistic P-wave Breit-Wigner function without taking into account the D0 D^*()+ threshold. The fit uses a relativistic P-wave Breit-Wigner function. Parameters are shown to be biased in AAIJ 2022Z.


pdgid: M210M
text:
For M**2(pi+ pi-) < 0.65 GeV**2. Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.


pdgid: M210M
text:
The signal of the T_c_cbar_1(3900) is correlated with a parent J/psi pi+ pi- system in the invariant mass range 4.2 -- 4.7 GeV. Superseded by ABAZOV 2019.


pdgid: M210R01
text:
ADOLPH 2015D measure B(T_c_cbar_1(3900)+- --> J/psi pi+-) CS(gamma N --> T_c_cbar_1(3900)+- N)/CS(gamma N --> J/psi N) < 3.7E-3 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M210R12
text:
Using e+ e- --> pi-+ ( T_c_cbar_1(3900)+- --> J/psi pi+- ) cross section at 4.23 and 4.26 GeV from ABLIKIM 2017J.


pdgid: M259M
text:
From an amplitude analysis of the decay B0 --> J/psi phi K0S with a significance of 4.0 sigma. The mass difference with respect to the charged partner in AAIJ 2021E is -12+11-10+6-4 MeV.


pdgid: M259M
text:
Pole mass for a mass-, width-dependent Breit-Wigner fit to the mass spectrum recoiling against K(S)0 at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.699 GeV, with a significance of 4.6 sigma.


pdgid: M259M
text:
Pole mass for a mass-dependent Breit-Wigner fit to the mass spectrum recoiling against K+ at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.698 GeV, with a significance of 5.3 sigma.


pdgid: M259W
text:
Pole width for a mass-, width-dependent Breit-Wigner fit to the mass spectrum recoiling against K(S)0 at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.699 GeV, with a significance of 4.6 sigma.


pdgid: M259W
text:
Pole width for a mass-dependent Breit-Wigner fit to the mass spectrum recoiling against $K^+$ at  center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.698 GeV, with a significance of 5.3 sigma.


pdgid: M259R00
text:
Seen in the spectrum recoiling against K+ in e+ e- --> K+ ( D_s()- D^*()0 + D_s^*()- D0 ) collisions at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.698 GeV, with a significance of 5.3 sigma.


pdgid: M259R03
text:
Seen in the mass spectrum recoiling against K(S)0 at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.699 GeV, with a significance of 4.6 sigma.


pdgid: M213R00
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports B(B+ --> K+ T_c_cbar(4020)0) x B(T_c_cbar --> eta_c pi+ pi-) < 1.6E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M213R05
text:
Using e+ e- --> pi-+ ( Z_c(4020)+- --> h_c(1P) pi+- ) cross section at 4.23, 4.26 and 4.36 GeV from ABLIKIM 2013X.


pdgid: M191R01
text:
With a product branching fraction measurement of B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar(4050)+) x B(T_c_cbar(4050)+ --> pi+ chi_c1(1P)) = 3.0+1.5-0.8+3.7-1.6E-5.


pdgid: M191R01
text:
With a product branching fraction limit of B(Bbar0 --> T_c_cbar(4050)+ K-) x B(T_c_cbar(4050)+ --> chi_c1() pi+) < 1.8E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M223M
text:
Statistical error only, with significance of 5.9 sigma (from a fit with a 19% CL). Identified as the same structure observed in ABLIKIM 2017V in e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(2S) decays.


pdgid: M223M
text:
Statistical error only, with significance of 9.2 sigma. From an unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- psi(2S) Dalitz plot from data collected at sqrt(s) = 4.416 GeV for a J**C = 1+ state. The fit does not match the detailed structure of the data, having a C.L. of only 8%.


pdgid: M240R01
text:
AAIJ 2018AN quotes a fit fraction for B0 --> T_c_cbar(4100)- K+ --> eta_c(1S) pi- K+ of (3.3+-1.1+1.2-1.1)% from an amplitude analysis.


pdgid: M216M
text:
From a 4-dimensional analysis when a second, lower mass resonance is allowed in the T_{{{c cbar 1}}}(4430) fit, with significance 6 sigma including systematic variations.


pdgid: M216R01
text:
From a 4-dimensional analysis when a second, lower mass resonance is allowed in the T_{{{c cbar 1}}}(4430) fit. No partial branching fraction quoted.


pdgid: M192R01
text:
With a product branching fraction measurement of B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar(4250)+) x B(T_c_cbar(4250)+ --> pi+ chi_c1(1P)) = 4.0+2.3-0.9+19.7-0.5E-5.


pdgid: M192R01
text:
With a product branching fraction limit of B(Bbar0 --> T_c_cbar(4250)+ K-) x B(T_c_cbar(4250)+ --> chi_c1() pi+) < 4.0E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M195R01
text:
From a four-dimensional amplitude analysis. Measured a product of branching fractions B(B0 --> T_c_cbar_1(4430)- K+)xB(T_c_cbar_1(4430)- --> psi(2S) pi-) = 6.0+1.7-2.0+2.5-1.4E-5.


pdgid: M195R01
text:
AUBERT 2009AA quotes B(B+ --> Kbar0 T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ psi(2S)) < 4.7E-5 and B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ psi(2S)) < 3.1E-5 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M195R01
text:
Measured a product of branching fractions B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ psi(2S)) = 3.2+1.8-0.9+5.3-1.6E-5. Superseded by CHILIKIN 2013.


pdgid: M195R02
text:
CHILIKIN 2014 reports B(Bbar0 --> T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ K-) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> J/psi pi+) = 5.4+4.0-1.0+1.1-0.9E-6.


pdgid: M195R02
text:
A broad enhancement seen by AAIJ 2019R in the decays B0 --> J/psi pi+ K- at 4600 MeV can be due to an interplay of T_{{{c cbar 1}}}(4430), T_{{{c cbar 1}}}(4200) and the fitting polynomials.


pdgid: M195R02
text:
AUBERT 2009AA quotes B(B+ --> Kbar0 T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ J/psi) < 1.5E-5 and B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ J/psi) < 0.4E-5 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M232M
text:
Assumes T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- decay. If T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s^* pi+- decay is assumed, the mass shifts upward by 49 MeV.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Seen in p pbar collisions at 1.96 TeV at a rate of (8.6+-1.9+-1.4)% relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production in the kinematic region 10 < pT(B_{{s}}) < 30 GeV/c, with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to J/psi phi.An alternative possibility, T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s^* pi+- with a missing gamma, could not be ruled out.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Not seen in 24.4 fb**-1 of p p collision data at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to J/psi phi. An upper limit on the production rate times branching fraction for T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production is less than 1.5% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 10 GeV/c and less than 1.6% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 15 GeV/c at 95% CL.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Not seen in 9.6 fb**-1 of p pbar collision data at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to J/psi phi. An upper limit on the production rate times branching fraction for T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production is less than 6.7% at 95% CL.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Not seen in 19.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions data at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to J/psi phi. An upper limit on the production rate times branching fraction for T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production is less than 1.1% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 10 GeV/c and less than 1.0% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 15 GeV/c at 95%CL.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Not seen in 3 fb**-1 of p p collision data at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV in a scan over the T_{{{b sbar}}}(5568) mass and width, with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to D_s()- pi+ or J/psi phi. An upper limit on the production rate times branching fraction for T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production is less than 2.1% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 10 GeV/c at 90% CL.


pdgid: M272M
text:
In a model with three resonances described by interfering relativistic Breit-Wigner functions above background from non-resonant single and double parton scattering and a threshold enhancement.


pdgid: M272M
text:
In a model with two resonances, with the T_{{c c cbar cbar}}(6600) interfering with single parton scattering, and a non-interfering T_{{c c cbar cbar}}(6900).


pdgid: M268M
text:
In a model where the broad structure above threshold interferes with non-resonant single parton scattering. Without interference the mass is 6905+-11+-7 MeV.


pdgid: M268M
text:
Assuming a single resonance (could be another state). A 3sigma signal is observed for an additional resonance with mass 7220+-30+10-40 MeV and width 90+-60+60-50 MeV.


pdgid: M268W
text:
In a model where the broad structure above threshold interferes with non-resonant single parton scattering. Without interference the width is 80+-38 MeV.


pdgid: M207M0
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the KROKOVNY 2013 Dalitz analysis of e+ e- --> Upsilon(2S)/Upsilon(3S) pi0 pi0 decays with fixed width Gamma(T_b_bbar_1(10610)0) = 18.4 MeV.


pdgid: M207R01
text:
Assuming the T_b_bbar_1(10610) decay width is saturated by the channels pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B+ Bbar^*()0 + Bbar0 B^*()+, and using the results from BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016.


pdgid: M207R10
text:
Combined significance in e+ e- --> Upsilon(2S)/Upsilon(3S) pi0 pi0, including systematics, of 6.5sigma.


pdgid: M207R00
text:
Assuming the T_b_bbar_1(10610) decay width is saturated by the channels pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B+ Bbar^*()0 + B^*()+ Bbar0, and using the results from BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016. Using the mass and width of the T_b_bbar_1(10610) from BONDAR 2012.


pdgid: M207R07
text:
Combined with the results of BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016. Not independent from T_b_bbar_1(10610) branching fractions to pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S),  pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B+ Bbar^*()0 + Bbar0 B^*()+.


pdgid: M208R01
text:
Assuming the T_b_bbar_1(10650) decay width is saturated by the channels pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B^*()+ Bbar^*()0, and using the results from BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016.


pdgid: M208R06
text:
Assuming the T_b_bbar_1(10650) decay width is saturated by the channels pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B^*()+ Bbar^*()0, and using the results from BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016. Using the mass and width of the T_b_bbar_1(10650) from BONDAR 2012.


pdgid: M208R07
text:
Combined with the results of BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016. Not independent from T_b_bbar_1(10650) branching fractions to pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B^*()+ Bbar^*()0.


pdgid: M300J98
text:
K-matrix pole from combined analysis of pi- p --> pi0 pi0 n, pi- p --> K Kbar n, pbar p --> pi0 pi0 pi0, pi0 eta eta, pi0 pi0 eta at rest.


pdgid: M300J08
text:
A broad peak observed at K+ K- invariant mass. Mass and width above are its pole position. The observed branching ratio is B(J/psi --> X pi0) B(X --> K+ K-) = 8.5+-0.6+2.7-3.6E-4.


pdgid: M300J01
text:
Signal observed with a statistical significance >20sigma comes from 3883 candidate events. Spin parity determined to be J**P = 1+ with a statistical significance >5sigma over 0**-**, 1**-**, 2**+** hypotheses, and in the range within 3.1 -- 7.5 sigma with respect to 2**-**.


pdgid: M300J01
text:
From a fit in the region M(p Lambdabar)-M(p)-M(Lambda) < 150 MeV. S-wave in the p Lambdabar system preferred. A similar near-threshold enhancement in the p Lambdabar system is observed in B+ --> p Lambdabar Dbar()0 by CHEN 2011F.


pdgid: M300J48
text:
From a partial wave analysis of J/psi --> gamma phi phi, for which the primary signal is eta(2225) --> phi phi, and that also finds significant signals for for **0**-+ phase space, f_{{0}}(2100), f_{{2}}(2010), f_{{2}}(2300), f_{{2}}(2340), and a previously unseen **0**-+ state X(2500) (M = 2470+15-19+101-23 MeV, Gamma = 230+64-35+56-33 MeV).


pdgid: M300K43
text:
From a fit with more than 5sigma to the Born cross section line shapes of e+ e- --> rho pi and e+ e- --> rho(1450) pi.


pdgid: M300A05
text:
Fit of the tensor partial waves from BES3 in the multipole basis. Might be a cluster of  J**PC = 2++ resonances. The ratio of decay widths K K- / pi pi is 0.23+-0.05.


pdgid: M300K26
text:
From the combined analysis of ANISOVICH 1999C, ANISOVICH 1999F, ANISOVICH 1999J, ANISOVICH 1999K, and ANISOVICH 2000B. See also ANISOVICH 2012.


pdgid: M300K22
text:
From the combined analysis of ANISOVICH 1999C, ANISOVICH 1999E, ANISOVICH 2001F, and ANISOVICH 2001G.


pdgid: M300A18
text:
From a partial wave analysis of psi(2S) --> phi eta eta^'. Reported in psi(2S) --> h_1(2300) eta^' with 9.6sigma significance and in psi(2S) --> h_1(2300) eta at 5.6sigma.


pdgid: M300J18
text:
From the combined analysis of pbar p --> eta eta eta from ANISOVICH 2000M and pbar p --> eta pi0 pi0 from ANISOVICH 2000J.


pdgid: M300K52
text:
From a K-matrix model analysis including f_{{0}}(500) and T_{{c sbar 0}}^*(). The T_{{c sbar 0}}^*() resonance is claimed by one experiment only.


pdgid: M300J54
text:
Dominant decay into rho0 rho0 pi+. BALTAY 1978 finds confirmation in 2pi+ pi- 2pi0 events which contain rho+ rho0 pi0 and 2rho+ pi-.


pdgid: M300J09
text:
A similar enhancement in the Lambda_c^+() pbar final state is also reported by BABAR collaboration in AUBERT 2010H.


pdgid: M300K39
text:
Assuming one single Breit-Wigner resonance in omega chi_c2(1P) (chi_c2 --> gamma J/psi). Measured width(e e).B(omega chi_c1(1P)) = 1.86+-0.32+-0.13 eV.


pdgid: M300K39
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. Gamma(e+ e-).B(D^*()0 D^*()- pi+) = 107 -- 1744 eV depending on solutions I - VIII with the same fit qualities. The two other resonances have masses (widths) 4209.6+-7.5 (81.6+-19.9) MeV and 4675.3+-29.7 (218.3+-73.5) MeV.


pdgid: M300K39
text:
ABLIKIM 2022AU cross sections analysis of the process e+ e- --> K+ K- J/psi at c.m. energies 4.127 -- 4.600 GeV from 15.6 fb^{-1} of data.


pdgid: S016AMU
text:
FINK 2021 simultaneously measure the cyclotron frequencies of an H_{{2}}()+ ion and a deuteron in a coupled magnetron orbit. The proton mass is extracted using the precise deuteron mass value.


pdgid: S016AMU
text:
The 2018 CODATA combination in TIESINGA 2021 includes data from HEISSE 2017, but does not include updates in HEISSE 2019, which superseded HEISSE 2017. Consequently, we do not average HEISSE 2019 and TIESINGA 2021. Updating the 2018 CODATA combination to use HEISSE 2019 would shift the central value for the proton mass upwards by less than half a standard deviation. Therefore, we take the 2018 CODATA result in TIESINGA 2021 as the recommended value for the proton mass.


pdgid: S016AMU
text:
The value is an update of HEISSE 2017; the result is shifted by 1.5E-11 u, corresponding to 0.45 sigma due to the corrected motional temperatures of the particles. The statistical and total systematic uncertainties are given as 16 and 29 in the last two digits.


pdgid: S016AMU
text:
The statistical and systematic errors are 15 and 29 in the last two places of the value. Superseded by HEISSE 2019.


pdgid: S016DM
text:
HORI 2001, HORI 2003, HORI 2006, and HORI 2011 use the more-precisely-known constraint on the pbar charge-to-mass ratio of GABRIELSE 1999 (see below) to get their results. Their results are not independent of the HORI 2001, HORI 2003, HORI 2006, and HORI 2011 values for |q(p)+q(pbar)|/e, below.


pdgid: S016DM
text:
TORII 1999 uses the more-precisely-known constraint on the pbar charge-to-mass ratio of GABRIELSE 1995 (see below) to get this result. This is not independent of the TORII 1999 value for |q(p)+q(pbar)|/e, below.


pdgid: S016CMR
text:
Equation (2) of GABRIELSE 1995 should read M(pbar)/M(p) = 0.999 999 995 (11) (G. Gabrielse, private communication).


pdgid: S016CMR
text:
GABRIELSE 1990 also measures mass(pbar)/mass(e-) = 1836.152660+-0.000083 and mass(p)/mass(e-) = 1836.152680+-0.000088. Both are completely consistent with the 1986 CODATA (COHEN 1987) value for mass(p)/mass(e-) of 1836.152701+-0.000037.


pdgid: S016DQ2
text:
HORI 2001, HORI 2003, HORI 2006, and HORI 2011 use the more-precisely-known constraint on the pbar charge-to-mass ratio of GABRIELSE 1999 (see above) to get their results. Their results are not independent of the HORI 2001, HORI 2003, HORI 2006, and HORI 2011 values for |mass(p)-mass(pbar)|/mass(p), above.


pdgid: S016DQ2
text:
TORII 1999 uses the more-precisely-known constraint on the pbar charge-to-mass ratio of GABRIELSE 1995 (see above) to get this result. This is not independent of the TORII 1999 value for |mass(p)-mass(pbar)|/mass(p), above.


pdgid: S016DQ
text:
BRESSI 2011 uses the method of DYLLA 1973 but finds serious errors in that experiment that greatly reduce its accuracy. The BRESSI 2011 limit assumes that n --> p e- nu_e conserves charge. Thus the limit applies equally to the charge of the neutron.


pdgid: S016DQ
text:
SENGUPTA 2000 uses the difference between the observed rate of of rotational energy loss by the binary pulsar PSR B1913+16 and the rate predicted by general relativity to set this limit. See the paper for assumptions.


pdgid: S016EDM
text:
SAHOO 2017 and DMITRIEV 2003 are not direct measurements of the proton electric dipole moment. They use theory to calculate this limit from the limit on the electric dipole moment of the Hg199 atom.


pdgid: S016EDM
text:
This WILKENING 1984 value is more cautious than the other and excludes the finite-size effect, which relies on uncertain nuclear integrals.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
MORNACCHI 2022 perform the first simultaneous extraction of the six leading-order proton polarizabilities using fixed-t subtracted dispersion relations and a bootstrap-based fitting technique.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
BEANE 2003 uses effective field theory and low-energy gamma p and gamma d Compton-scattering data. It also gets for the isoscalar polarizabilities (see the erratum) alpha(N)= 13.0+-1.9+3.9-1.5E-4 fm**3 and beta(N)= -1.8+-1.9+2.1-0.9E-4 fm**3.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
BLANPIED 2001 gives alpha_{{p}}+beta_{{p}} and alpha_{{p}}-beta_{{p}}. The separate alpha_{{p}} and beta_{{p}} are provided to us by A. Sandorfi. The first error above is statistics plus systematics; the second is from the model.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
This OLMOSDELEON 2001 result uses the TAPS data alone, and does not use the (re-evaluated) sum-rule constraint that alpha+beta= 13.8+-0.4E-4 fm**3. See the paper for a discussion.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
MACGIBBON 1995 combine the results of ZIEGER 1992, FEDERSPIEL 1991, and their own experiment to get a ``global average'' in which model errors and systematic errors are treated in a consistent way. See MACGIBBON 1995 for a discussion.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
PASQUINI 2019 fit data sets for the unpolarized proton RCS cross section, using fixed-t subtracted dispersion relations and a bootstrap-based fitting technique.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
BARANOV 2001 combines the results of 10 experiments from 1958 through 1995 to get a global average that takes into account both systematic and model errors and does not use the theoretical constraint on the sum alpha(p)+beta(p).


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
FEDERSPIEL 1991 obtains for the (static) electric polarizability alpha_{{p}}, defined in terms of the induced electric dipole moment by D = 4piepsilon(0)alpha_{{p}}E, the value (7.0+-2.2+-1.3)*10**-4 fm**3.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
CUI 2021 employ a new mathematical procedure (statistical SPM, Schlessinger point method)  based on form-unbiased interpolations of existing e p scattering data.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
MIHOVILOVIC 2021 reports a value of 0.878+-0.011+-0.031+-0.002 fm where the last uncertainty comes from the dependence on the model form factor function.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
BEZGINOV 2019 measures the 2S_{{1/2}} to 2P_{{1/2}} transition frequency in atomic hydrogen using the frequency-offset separated oscillatory field (FOSOF) technique. The result agrees well with the muonic hydrogen Lamb shift value.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
FLEURBAEY 2018 measures the 1S-3S transition frequency in hydrogen and in combination with the 1S-2S transition frequency deduces the proton radius and the Rydberg constant.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
The BEYER 2017 result is 3.3 combined standard deviations below the MOHR 2016 (2014 CODATA) value. The experiment measures the 2S-4P transition in hydrogen and gets the proton radius and the Rydberg constant.


pdgid: S016MCR
text:
In a consistent reanalysis LEE 2015 extract values separately for the Mainz 2010 data only (0.776+-0.034+-0.017) fm and for the world data without Mainz data (0.914+-0.035) fm. The quoted value is a simple combination of the two, which ignores possible discrepancies and unknown correlations and should be considered with caution.


pdgid: S016MCR
text:
CUI 2021B employ a new mathematical procedure (statistical SPM, Schlessinger point method) based on form-unbiased interpolations of existing e p scattering data.


pdgid: S016T
text:
ALLEGA 2022 look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual  N15*** following the disappearance of p in O16.


pdgid: S016T
text:
ALLEGA 2022 look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual   O15*** following the disappearance of n in O16.


pdgid: S016T
text:
AGOSTINI 2024A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual As75*** following the disappearance of p in Ge76 (through the  transition chain Ge76 --> Ga75 --> Ge75 --> As75).


pdgid: S016T
text:
AGOSTINI 2024A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual As75*** following the disappearance of n in Ge76 (through the transition chain Ge76 --> Ge75 --> As75).


pdgid: S016T
text:
AHMED 2004 and ANDERSON 2019A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual O15*** or N15*** following the disappearance of a neutron or proton in O16.


pdgid: S016T
text:
ARAKI 2006 looks for signs of de-excitation of the residual nucleus after disappearance of a neutron from the s shell of C12.


pdgid: S016T
text:
BACK 2003 looks for decays of unstable nuclides left after N decays of parent C12, C13, O16 nuclei. These are ``invisible channel'' limits.


pdgid: S016T
text:
ZDESENKO 2003 gets this limit on proton disappearance in deuterium by analyzing SNO data in AHMAD 2002.


pdgid: S016T
text:
AHMAD 2002 (see its footnote 7) looks for neutrons left behind after the disappearance of the proton in deuterons.


pdgid: S016T
text:
BERNABEI 2000B looks for the decay of a (53)**128I nucleus following the disappearance of a proton in the otherwise-stable (54)**129Xe nucleus.


pdgid: S016T
text:
This mean-life limit has been obtained from a half-life limit by dividing the latter by ln(2) = 0.693.


pdgid: S016T
text:
EVANS 1977 looks for the daughter nuclide Xe129 from possible Te130 decays in ancient Te ore samples.


pdgid: S016T
text:
FLEROV 1958 looks for the spontaneous fission of a Th232 nucleus after the disappearance of one of its nucleons.


pdgid: S016TA
text:
GEER 2000D uses agreement between a model of galactic pbar production and propagation and the observed pbar/p cosmic-ray spectrum to set this limit.


pdgid: S016T10
text:
In estimating the background, this HIRATA 1989C limit (as opposed to the later limits of WALL 2000B and MCGREW 1999) does not take into account present understanding that the flux of nu_{{mu}} originating in the upper atmosphere is depleted. Doing so would reduce the background and thus also would reduce the limit here.


pdgid: S016T09
text:
MATSUMOTO 2022 limit >4500E30 is derived from the latest dataset SKA IV phase (from 2008 to 2018) with 0.20 Mton.years of exposure.


pdgid: S016T09
text:
MATSUMOTO 2022 limit >3600E30 is derived from a combination of all datasets SKA I,II, III and IV phase (from 1996 to 2018) with a total of 0.37 Mton.years of exposure. Note, the limit from only SKA IV is stronger, because there were some events observed in SKA II.


pdgid: S016T11
text:
This ALLISON 1998 limit is with no background subtraction; with subtraction the limit becomes >46E30 years.


pdgid: S016T75
text:
We have doubled the n --> nu K0 limit given in YAMAUCHI 2025 to obtain this n --> nu K0S limit. The result is based on the full 0.401 Mton.year exposure of all pure water phases.


pdgid: S016T75
text:
Superseded by YAMAUCHI 2025. We have doubled the n --> nu K0 limit given in KOBAYASHI 2005 to obtain this n --> nu K0S limit.


pdgid: S016T21
text:
The SUZUKI 1993B limit applies to any of nu_e nu_e nubar_e, nu_mu nu_mu nubar_mu, or nu_tau nu_tau nubar_tau.


pdgid: S016T21
text:
GLICENSTEIN 1997 uses Kamioka data and the idea that the disappearance of the neutron's magnetic moment should produce radiation.


pdgid: S016T21
text:
The first BERGER 1991B limit is for n --> nu_e nu_e nubar_e, the second is for n --> nu_mu nu_mu nubar_mu.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
ARAKI 2006 looks for signs of de-excitation of the residual nucleus after disappearance of two neutrons from the s shell of C12.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
ALLEGA 2022 and ANDERSON 2019A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual O14*** following the disappearance of n n in O16.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
TRETYAK 2004 uses data from an old Homestake-mine radiochemical experiment on limits for invisible decays of K39 to Ar37.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
BACK 2003 looks for decays of unstable nuclides left after N N decays of parent C12, C13, O16 nuclei. These are ``invisible channel'' limits.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
BERNABEI 2000B looks for the decay of a (54)**127Xe nucleus following the disappearance of an n n pair in the otherwise-stable (54)**129Xe nucleus. The limit here applies as well to n n --> nu_mu nubar_mu, n n --> nu_tau nubar_tau, or any ``disappearance'' mode.


pdgid: S016T77
text:
ALLEGA 2022 and ANDERSON 2019A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a  residual N14*** following the disappearance of p n in O16.


pdgid: S016T76
text:
ALLEGA 2022 look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a  residual  C14*** following the disappearance of p p in O16. Supersedes ANDERSON 2019A result.


pdgid: S016T76
text:
BERNABEI 2000B looks for the decay of a (52)**127Te nucleus following the disappearance of a p p pair in the otherwise-stable (54)**129Xe nucleus.


pdgid: S017M
text:
We use the 1998 CODATA u-to-MeV conversion factor (see the heading above) to get this mass in MeV from the much more precisely measured KESSLER 1999 value of 1.00866491637+-0.00000000082 u.


pdgid: S017M
text:
The mass is known much more precisely in u: m = 1.0086649235+-0.0000000023 u. We use the 1986 CODATA conversion factor to get the mass in MeV.


pdgid: S017M1
text:
This is a corrected result (see the erratum). The error is statistical. The maximum systematic error is 0.029 MeV.


pdgid: S017D
text:
Calculated by us from the MOHR 2008 ratio mass(n)/mass(p) = 1.00137841918(46). In u, mass(n)-mass(p) = 1.38844920(46)*10**-3 u.


pdgid: S017D
text:
Calculated by us from the MOHR 2005 ratio mass(n)/mass(p) = 1.00137841870+-0.00000000058. In u, mass(n)-mass(p) = 1.3884487+-0.0000006E-3 u.


pdgid: S017D
text:
Calculated by us from the MOHR 1999 ratio mass(n)/mass(p) = 1.00137841887+-0.00000000058. In u, mass(n)-mass(p) = (1.3884489+-0.0000006)*10**-3 u.


pdgid: S017D
text:
Calculated by us from the COHEN 1987 ratio mass(n)/mass(p) = 1.001378404+-0.000000009. In u, mass(n)-mass(p) = 0.001388434+-0.000000009 u.


pdgid: S017T
text:
MUSEDINOVIC 2025 result is the average value of the previously published data of 2018 -- 2019 in GONZALEZ 2021 with the new 2020 -- 2022 data. The new data alone yields a value of 877.96+-0.37 s. GONZALEZ 2021 results are thus superseded.


pdgid: S017T
text:
PATTIE 2018 uses a new technique, with a semi-toroidal magneto-gravitational asymmetric trap and a novel in situ n-detector.


pdgid: S017T
text:
ARZUMANOV 2015 is a reanalysis of their 2008 -- 2010 dataset, with improved systematic corrections of of ARZUMANOV 2000 and ARZUMANOV 2012.


pdgid: S017T
text:
STEYERL 2012 is a detailed reanalysis of neutron storage loss corrections to the raw data of MAMPE 1989, and it replaces that value.


pdgid: S017T
text:
WILSON 2021 extract the value from the flux of n escaping the moon using data from the Lunar Prospector Neutron Spectrometer.


pdgid: S017T
text:
YUE 2013 differs from NICO 2005 in that a different and better method was used to measure the neutron density in the fiducial volume. This shifted the lifetime by +1.4 seconds and reduced the previously largest source of systematic uncertainty by a factor of five.


pdgid: S017T
text:
ARZUMANOV 2012 reanalyzes its systematic corrections in ARZUMANOV 2000 and obtains this corrected value.


pdgid: S017T
text:
IGNATOVICH 1995 calls into question some of the corrections and averaging procedures used by MAMPE 1993. The response, BONDARENKO 1996, denies the validity of the criticisms.


pdgid: S017MM
text:
GREENE 1982 measures the moment to be 1.04187564+-0.00000026E-3 Bohr magnetons. The value above is obtained by multiplying this by mass(p)/mass(e) = 1836.152701+-0.000037 (the 1986 CODATA value from COHEN 1987).


pdgid: S017EDM
text:
SAHOO 2017 develops theory to calculate this limit from the measured limit by GRANER 2016 of the Hg199 atom EDM.


pdgid: S017EDM
text:
LAMOREAUX 2007 faults BAKER 2006 for not including in the estimate of systematic error an effect due to the Earth's rotation. BAKER 2007 replies (1) that the effect was included implicitly in the analysis and (2) that further analysis confirms that the BAKER 2006 limit is correct as is. See also SILENKO 2007.


pdgid: S017EDM
text:
This HARRIS 1999 result includes the result of SMITH 1990. However, the averaging of the results of these two experiments has been criticized by LAMOREAUX 2000.


pdgid: S017MCR
text:
HEACOCK 2021 extract the value from Pendelloesung interferometry to measure the neutron structure factors of silicon. This value is strongly anti-correlated with the mean-square thermal atomic displacement.


pdgid: S017MCR
text:
FILIN 2020 extract the value based on their chiral-EFT calculation of the deuteron structure radius and use as input the atomic data for the difference of the deuteron and proton charge radii.


pdgid: S017EPL
text:
KOSSERT 2003 gets alpha(n)-beta(n) =(9.8+-3.6+2.1-1.1+-2.2)x10**-4 fm**3, and uses alpha(n)+beta(n) = 15.2+-0.5E-4 fm**3 from LEVCHUK 2000. Thus the errors on alpha(n) and beta(n) are anti-correlated.


pdgid: S017EPL
text:
LUNDIN 2003 measures alpha(N)-beta(N) = 6.4+-2.4E-4 fm**3 and uses accurate values for alpha(p) and alpha(p) and a precise sum-rule result for alpha(n)+beta(n). The second error is a model uncertainty, and errors on alpha(n) and beta(n) are anticorrelated. The data from this paper aer included in the analysis of MYERS 2014.


pdgid: S017EPL
text:
KOLB 2000 obtains this value with a lower limit of 7.6E-4 fm**3 but no upper limit from this experiment alone. Combined with results of ROSE 1990, the 1-sigma range is (7.6 -- 14.0)*10**-4 fm**3.


pdgid: S017EPL
text:
KOESTER 1995 uses natural Pb and the isotopes 208, 207, and 206. See this paper for a discussion of methods used by various groups to extract alpha(n) from data.


pdgid: S017MPL
text:
LUNDIN 2003 measures alpha(N)-beta(N) = 6.4+-2.4E-4 fm**3 and uses accurate values for alpha(p) and alpha(p) and a precise sum-rule result for alpha(n)+beta(n). The second error is a model uncertainty, and errors on alpha(n) and beta(n) are anticorrelated.


pdgid: S017MPL
text:
KOLB 2000 obtains this value with an upper limit of 7.6E-4 fm**3 but no lower limit from this experiment alone. Combined with results of ROSE 1990, the 1-sigma range is (1.2 -- 7.6)*10**-4 fm**3.


pdgid: S017NAN
text:
The AHARMIM 2017 value is an unbounded limit (it does not assume a positive lifetime). The bounded limit is 1.23E8 sec.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
BAN 2023 determine limits on the oscillation time for the |deltam(nn')| range of 2 -- 59 peV. The quoted value is meanlife(nn')/sqrt(cos(beta)) > 1 sec. for B in 30 -- 1143 muT, for the case beta = 0.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
ALMAZAN 2022 reports an experimental constraint on the probability for neutron conversion  into a hidden neutron, p < 3.1E-11 at 95% CL, which may be used to set a limit on the n n^' oscillation time.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
ABEL 2021 determine several limits on the oscillation time as a function of the mirror magnetic field B^', and of the fixed angle, beta, between the applied magnetic field and B^'. The latter is assumed to be bound to Earth. Two values are quoted from two analysis methods: (i) meanlife(nn')/sqrt(cos(beta)) > 9 sec for B^' in 5 -- 25.4 muT, and (ii) for any angle beta, meanlife(nn') > 6 sec for B^' in 0.4 -- 25.7 muT. The authors also quote a limit of 352 sec for the case B^' = 0 T.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
The B field was set to (0.09, 0.12, 0.21) G. Limits on oscillation time are valid for any mirror field B^' in (0.08 -- 0.17) G, and for aligned fields B and B^'. For larger values of B^', the limits are significantly reduced.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
Losses of neutrons due to oscillations to mirror neutrons would be maximal when the magnetic fields B and B^' in the two worlds were equal. Hence the scan over B by ALTAREV 2009A: the limit applies for any B^' over the given range. At B^' = 0, the limit is 141 s (95% CL).


pdgid: S017R3
text:
BALES 2016 gets a branching fraction of 5.82+-0.23+-0.62E-3 for a photon energy range 0.4 to 14.0 keV, and with a different detector array, 3.35+-0.05+-0.15E-3 for 14.1 to 782 keV. Our result above is the sum; the error on the sum is completely dominated by the error on the lower range.


pdgid: S017R2
text:
CZARNECKI 2018 limit from an analysis of experimental discrepancies on the neutron lifetime and axial coupling applies as well to other possible exotic neutron decays.


pdgid: S017R2
text:
GREEN 1990 infers that tau(hydrogen-atom nubar_e) > 3E4 s by comparing neutron lifetime measurements made in storage experiments with those made in beta-decay experiments. However, the result depends sensitively on the lifetime measurements, and does not of course take into account more recent measurements of same.


pdgid: S017R1
text:
NORMAN 1996 gets this limit by attributing SAGE and GALLEX counting rates to the charge-nonconserving transition ^71Ga --> ^71Ge+neutrals rather than to solar-neutrino reactions.


pdgid: S017R00
text:
KLOPF 2019 value is for baryon number violating decay of neutron to electrons plus an invisible state, chi. The limit is valid for KE(e+ e-) range between 32 keV and 664 keV, strengthening to few x E-4 above approximately 100 keV.


pdgid: S017R00
text:
SUN 2018 value is for baryon number violating decay of neutron to electrons plus an invisible state, chi. The limit is valid for 100 keV < KE(e+ e-) < 644 keV. Assuming this decay chi e e is the only allowed chi decay channel, a 0.01 BR is ruled out for 100 keV < E(e+ e-) < 644 keV at over 5sigma.


pdgid: S017R01
text:
LE-JOUBIOUX 2024 search for the baryon number violating decay of n to invisible dark matter candidate, using the He6 --> He4 + n + chi reaction, looking for a coincident neutron signal.


pdgid: S017R01
text:
TANG 2018 search for the baryon number violating decay of n to gamma plus an invisible dark matter candidate. They exclude the presence of a monoenergetic gamma ray in the E(gamma) range 782 -- 1664 keV with branching ratio ~1% at 97% CL or greater.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
WIETFELDT 2024 updates HASSAN 2021, see footnote to HASSAN 2021. The value is extracted from the angular correlation coefficient.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
BECK 2020 calculates this value from the measurement of the beta-decay e-nubar_{{e}} angular correlation coefficient a.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
BROWN 2018 gets A = -0.12054+-0.00044+-0.00068 and lambda = -1.2783+-0.0022. We quote the combined values that include the earlier UCNA measurements (MENDENHALL 2013).


pdgid: S017AV
text:
MOSTOVOI 2001 measures the two P-odd correlations A and B, or rather SA and SB, where S is the n polarization, in free neutron decay.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
HASSAN 2021 include earlier data of DARIUS 2017. The value is extracted from the angular correlation coefficient a.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
SAUL 2020 quote this value of lambda under the SM assumption of the Fierz term b = 0. In a combined fit authors extract a value of lambda = -1.2792+-0.0060.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
DARIUS 2017 calculates this value from the measurement of the a parameter (see  below). Data is included in HASSAN 2021.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
MENDENHALL 2013 gets A = -0.11954+-0.00055+-0.00098 and lambda = -1.2756+-0.0030. We quote the nearly identical values that include the earlier UCNA measurement (PLASTER 2012), with a correction to that result.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
This PLASTER 2012 value is identical with that given in LIU 2010, but the experiment is now described in detail.


pdgid: S017BA
text:
MAERKISCH 2019 further derive a value for the CKM-element |V_{{ud}}| = 0.97351+-0.00060, using meanlife(n) = 879.7(8) sec and the relation from CZARNECKI 2018.


pdgid: S017BA
text:
This MUND 2013 value includes earlier PERKEO II measurements (ABELE 2002 and ABELE 1997D), with a correction to those results.


pdgid: S017BA
text:
Under the SM assumption that the Fierz term b = 0, SAUL 2020 obtain the quoted asymmetry parameter A and lambda = -1.27607+-0.00068. In a combined fit authors extract the values A = -0.1209+-0.0015, lambda = -1.2792+-0.0060, and b = 0.017+-0.021.


pdgid: S017BA
text:
These results are not corrected for radiative effects and weak magnetism, but the corrections are small compared to the errors.


pdgid: S017BNC
text:
WIETFELDT 2024 updates HASSAN 2021. Includes radiative and recoil corrections to first order, and is averaged over the full Fermi neutron beta spectrum. Supersedes HASSAN 2021.


pdgid: S017BNC
text:
HASSAN 2021 includes the data of DARIUS 2017. Uses the asymmetry in time-of-flight between the beta electron and recoil proton in delayed coincidence. Supersedes DARIUS 2017.


pdgid: S017BNC
text:
DARIUS 2017 exploits a "wishbone" correlation, where the p time of flight is correlated  with the momentum of the electron in delayed coincidence. Data is included in HASSAN 2021.


pdgid: S017D1
text:
EROZOLIMSKII 1978 says asymmetric proton losses and nonuniform beam polarization may give a systematic error up to 30E-4, thus increasing the EROZOLIMSKII 1974 error to 50E-4. STEINBERG 1974 and STEINBERG 1976 estimate these systematic errors to be insignificant in their experiment.


pdgid: S017TCC
text:
KOZELA 2012 also measures the polarization of the electron along the direction of the neutron spin. This is nonzero in the Standard Model; the correlation coefficient is N = +0.067+-0.011+-0.004.


pdgid: S017A00
text:
In a combined fit SAUL 2020 extract this best fit value of the Fierz interference term b and the values A = -0.1209+-0.0015 and lambda = -1.2792+-0.0060. For b it translates into a 90% CL region of -0.018 <= b <= 0.052 as a function of A.


pdgid: B014RE
text:
BATINIC 2010 finds evidence for a second null state with all parameters except for the phase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.


pdgid: B033RE
text:
See HOEHLER 1993 for a detailed discussion of the evidence for and the pole parameters of N and Delta resonances as determined from Argand diagrams of pi N elastic partial-wave amplitudes and from plots of the speeds with which the amplitudes traverse the diagrams.


pdgid: B033IM+
text:
The second (lower) value of HANSTEIN 1996 here goes with the second (higher) value of the real part in the preceding data block.


pdgid: B033EMR
text:
This ARNDT 1997 value is very sensitive to the database being fitted. The result is from a fit to the full pion photoproduction database, apart from the BLANPIED 1997 cross-section measurements.


pdgid: S018M
text:
We assume CPT invariance: this is the Lambdabar mass as measured by HARTOUNI 1994. See below for the fractional mass difference, testing CPT.


pdgid: S018M
text:
The SCHMIDT 1965 masses have been reevaluated using our April 1973 proton and K+- and pi+- masses. P. Schmidt, private communication (1974).


pdgid: S018M
text:
The mass has been raised 35 keV to take into account a 46 keV increase in the proton mass and an 11 keV decrease in the pi+- mass (note added Reviews of Modern Physics 39 1 (1967)).


pdgid: S018R8
text:
This ABLIKIM 2022AJ value is a factor of 2.1 smaller and differs by 5.6sigma from the  previous LARSON 1993 value.


pdgid: S018R5
text:
Changed by us from G(Lambda --> p e- nubar_e)/G(Lambda --> N pi) assuming the authors used Gamma(Lambda --> p pi-)/Gamma(total) = 2/3.


pdgid: S018R5
text:
Changed by us from G(Lambda --> p e- nubar_e)/G(Lambda --> N pi) because Gamma(p e- nu)/Gamma(p pi-) is the directly measured quantity.


pdgid: S018R00
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AG use Lambdabar --> pbar pi+ decay mode as the double tag identifier and thus as indirect normalization.


pdgid: S018A05
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AT quote the oscillation rate limit P(Lambda) < 1.4E-6 and calculate the oscillation parameter deltam(Lambdabar Lambda) given here.


pdgid: S018A05
text:
ABLIKIM 2023BM quote the oscillation rate limit P(Lambda) < 4.4E-6 and calculate the oscillation parameter deltam(Lambdabar Lambda) given here.


pdgid: S018A-
text:
This is a new analysis based on existing kaon photoproduction data of the CLAS collaboration and using spin algebra constraints.


pdgid: S018AL
text:
LI 2023C quote the average Lambda-hyperon asymmetry A(CP)**alpha from 264k Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+ decays and 105k Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma0 pi+ decays, under the assumption of no CP violation in the SM for Lambda_c()+, i.e. alpha(Lambda_{{c}}()+) = -alpha(Lambdabar_{{c}}()-).


pdgid: S018AL
text:
CHAUVAT 1985 actually gives alpha(+)(Lambdabar)/alpha(-)(Lambda) = -1.04+-0.29. Assumes polarization is same in pbar p --> Lambdabar X and p p --> Lambda X. Tests of this assumption, based on C-invariance and fragmentation, are satisfied by the data.


pdgid: S018A02
text:
ABLIKIM 2025BQ provides values in a range of sqrt(s) energies of 2.396 -- 2.90 GeV. We quote their most precise value at 2.396 GeV.


pdgid: S018AV
text:
The tabulated result assumes the weak-magnetism coupling w == electron gfactor(w)(0)/electron gfactor(v)(0) to be 0.97, as given by the CVC hypothesis and as assumed by the other listed measurements. However, DWORKIN 1990 measures w to be 0.15+-0.30, and then electron gfactor(A)/electron gfactor(V) = -0.731+-0.016.


pdgid: B037M2
text:
The KIMURA 2000 values are from fits A and B from a coupled-channel potential model using low-energy Kbar N and Sigma pi data, kaonic-hydrogen x-ray measurements, and our Lambda(1405) mass and width. The results bear mainly on the nature of the Lambda(1405): three-quark state or Kbar N bound state.


pdgid: B037M2
text:
The MARTIN 1981 fit includes the K+- p forward scattering amplitudes and the dispersion relations they must satisfy.


pdgid: B038R9
text:
The central bin (1514-1524 MeV) gives 0.74+-0.10; other bins are lower by 2-to-5 standard deviations.


pdgid: B038R5
text:
Calculated from G(Lambda(1520) --> Lambda gamma)/G(total), assuming SU(3). Needed to constrain the sum of all the branching ratios to be unity.


pdgid: B040M
text:
MARTIN 1977 obtains identical resonance parameters from a T-matrix pole and from a Breit-Wigner fit.


pdgid: B055M
text:
The two MARTIN 1977 values are from a T-matrix pole and from a Breit-Wigner fit. Another D(03) Lambda at 1966 MeV is also suggested by MARTIN 1977, but is very uncertain.


pdgid: B039R5
text:
There is a suggestion of a bump, enough to be consistent with what is expected from Sigma(1385) --> Sigma pi decay.


pdgid: B056RE
text:
The preferred solution A in KAMANO 2015 reports two poles. This entry is from the preferred solution A.


pdgid: B056R4
text:
The CAMERON 1978 upper limit on G-wave decay is 0.03. The published sign has been changed to be in accord with the baryon-first convention.


pdgid: B041M
text:
The NAKKASYAN 1975 values are from the two best solutions found. Each has the Lambda(2100) and one additional resonance (P(3) or F(5)).


pdgid: B041R7
text:
The published sign has been changed to be in accord with the baryon-first convention. The upper limit on the G(3) wave is 0.03.


pdgid: B035R4
text:
The CAMERON 1978 upper limit on F-wave decay is 0.03. The sign here has been changed to be in accord with the baryon-first convention.


pdgid: B035R5
text:
The published sign has been changed to be in accord with the baryon-first convention. The CAMERON 1978B upper limits on the P(3) and F(3) waves are each 0.03.


pdgid: S019M
text:
BOHM 1972 is updated with our 1973 K-, pi-, and pi0 masses (Reviews of Modern Physics 45 S1 (1973)).


pdgid: S019M
text:
These masses have been raised 30 keV to take into account a 46 keV increase in the proton mass and a 21 keV decrease in the pi0 mass (note added 1967 edition, Reviews of Modern Physics 39 1 (1967)).


pdgid: S019T
text:
This is a measurement of the Sigmabar- lifetime. Here we assume CPT invariance; see below for the fractional Sigma+-Sigmabar- lifetime difference obtained by BARBOSA 2000.


pdgid: S019T
text:
We have increased the CHANG 1966 error of 0.018; see our 1970 edition, Reviews of Modern Physics 42 87 (1970).


pdgid: S019MM
text:
We assume CPT invariance: this is (minus) the Sigmabar- magnetic moment as measured by MORELOS 1993. See below for the moment difference testing CPT.


pdgid: S019MM
text:
ANKENBRANDT 1983 gives the value 2.38+-0.02moment(N). MORELOS 1993 uses the same hyperon magnet and channel and claims to determine the field integral better, leading to the revised value given here.


pdgid: S019MMD
text:
This is our calculation from the MORELOS 1993 measurements of the Sigma+ and Sigmabar- magnetic moments given above. The statistical error on moment(Sigmabar-) dominates the error here.


pdgid: S019R00
text:
This value is quoted by ABLIKIM 2023Y for the simultaneous fit to Sigma --> p gamma and   Sigmabar --> pbar gamma assuming no CP violation. Individual values for the branching fractions are given as 1.005+-0.032E-3 and  0.993+-0.030E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S019R8
text:
ANG 1969B found three p e+ e- events in agreement with gamma --> e+ e- conversion from Sigma+ --> p gamma. The limit given here is for neutral currents.


pdgid: S019R12
text:
The masses of the three dimuons of PARK 2005 are within 1 MeV of one another, perhaps indicating the existence of a new state P0 with mass 214.3+-0.5 MeV. In that case, the decay is Sigma+ --> p P0, P0 --> mu+ mu-, with a branching fraction of 3.1+2.4-1.9+-1.5E-8.


pdgid: S019R03
text:
FCNC search for invisible massless particles (dark photons) using missing energy in Sigma hyperon decays to a proton. For a QCD axion scenario, a competitive lower limit can be derived for the axial-vector part of the s-d flavor-violating axion-fermion effective decay constant F_{{sd}}^A > 2.8E7 GeV.


pdgid: S019A0
text:
ABLIKIM 2025BT uses production through e+ e --> J/psi --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- and e+ e --> psi(2S) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-, with 1016678+-1398 and 53293+-299 events, respectively.


pdgid: S019A0
text:
ABLIKIM 2020X uses production through e+ e --> J/psi --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- and e+ e --> psi(2S) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-, with 87,815 and 5,327 events, respectively. Note that the reported values of decay parameters alpha_{{0}}() of Sigma+ and alphabar_{{0}}() of Sigmabar- are correlated.


pdgid: S019AG
text:
This value is quoted by ABLIKIM 2023Y for the simultaneous fit to Sigma --> p gamma and   Sigmabar --> pbar gamma assuming no CP violation.  Individual values are given as  -0.587+-0.082 and 0.710+-0.076,  respectively.


pdgid: S021T
text:
DEVLIN 1986 is a recalculation of the results of DYDAK 1977 removing a numerical approximation made in that work.


pdgid: S020T
text:
We have increased the CHANG 1966 error of 0.026; see our 1970 edition, Reviews of Modern Physics 42 87 (1970).


pdgid: S020R2
text:
An additional negative systematic error is included for internal radiative corrections and latest form factors; see BOURQUIN 1983C.


pdgid: S020AV2
text:
The sign is, with our conventions, unambiguously positive. The value assumes, as usual, that g(2) = 0. If g(2) is included in the fit, than (with our sign convention) g(2) = -0.56+-0.37, with a corresponding reduction of electron gfactor(A)/electron gfactor(V) to +0.20+-0.08.


pdgid: S020AV2
text:
TANENBAUM 1974 gives 0.435+-0.035, assuming no q**2 dependence in g(A) and electron gfactor(V). The listed result allows q**2 dependence, and is taken from HSUEH 1988.


pdgid: B043R6
text:
KELLER 2012 gives Gamma(Sigma+ gamma)/Gamma(Sigma+ pi0) = (11.95+-2.21+0.53-1.21)%, using 1/2 our total Sigma(1385) --> Sigma pi fraction for Sigma+ pi0. We divide the KELLER 2012 value by two.


pdgid: B000M
text:
The main effect observed by LITCHFIELD 1974 is in the Lambda pi final state; the Kbar N and Sigma pi couplings are estimated from a multichannel fit including total-cross-section data of LI 1973.


pdgid: B000R1
text:
From the preferred solution A in KAMANO 2015. The main effect observed by LITCHFIELD 1974 is in the Lambda pi final state; the Kbar N and Sigma pi couplings are estimated from a multichannel fit including total-cross-section data of LI 1973.


pdgid: B057RE
text:
From the preferred solution A in KAMANO 2015. Solution B reports two poles at M = 1551+2-9 MeV and 1940+2-2 MeV.


pdgid: B057IM
text:
From the preferred solution A in KAMANO 2015. Solution B Reports two poles with Gamma = 376+12-2 and 172+4-4 MeV.


pdgid: B057M
text:
An S-wave Breit-Wigner fit to the threshold cross section with no background and errors statistical only.


pdgid: B045R9
text:
For about 3/4 of this, the Sigma pi system has I = 0 and is almost entirely Lambda(1520). For the rest, the Sigma pi has I = 1, which is about what is expected from the known Sigma(1775) --> Sigma(1385) pi rate, as seen in Lambda pi pi.


pdgid: B045R3
text:
This rate combines P-wave- and F-wave decays. The CAMERON 1977 results for the separate P-wave- and F-wave decays are -0.303+-0.010 and -0.037+-0.014. The published signs have been changed here to be in accord with the baryon-first convention.


pdgid: B046W
text:
The two entries for CORDEN 1977C are from two different acceptable solutions. Preferred solution 3; see CORDEN 1976 for other possibilities.


pdgid: S023T
text:
The ZECH 1977 result is meanlife(Xi0) = [2.77-(meanlife(Lambda)-2.69)]*10**-10 s, in which we use meanlife(Lambda) = 2.63E-10 s.


pdgid: S023R8
text:
LAI 2004A used our 2002 value of 99.5% for the Xi0 --> Lambda pi0 branching fraction to get Gamma(Xi0 --> Lambda gamma)/Gamma(total)= 1.16+-0.05+-0.06E-3. We adjust slightly to go back to what was directly measured.


pdgid: S023R8
text:
FANTI 2000 used our 1998 value of 99.5% for the Xi0 --> Lambda pi0 branching fraction to get Gamma(Xi0 --> Lambda gamma)/Gamma(total)= 1.90+-0.34+-0.19E-3. We adjust slightly to go back to what was directly measured.


pdgid: S023R9
text:
FANTI 2000 used our 1998 value of 99.5% for the Xi0 --> Lambda pi0 branching fraction to get Gamma(Xi0 --> Sigma0 gamma)/Gamma(total)= 3.14+-0.76+-0.32E-3. We adjust slightly to go back to what was directly measured.


pdgid: S023R13
text:
BATLEY 2013 used Xi0 --> Sigma+ e- nubar_e decay as a normalization mode and its branching fraction value of 2.51+-0.03+-0.09E-4 from BATLEY 2007.


pdgid: S023F
text:
The errors have been multiplied by 1.2 due to approximations used for the Xi polarization; see DAUBER 1969 for a discussion.


pdgid: S023LG
text:
BATLEY 2010B also measured the Xibar^0() --> Lambdabar gamma asymmetry to be -0.798+-0.064 (no systematic error given) with 4769 events.


pdgid: S023LEE
text:
This BATLEY 2007C result is consistent with the asymmetry alpha for Xi0 --> Lambda gamma, as expected if the mechanism is internal bremsstrahlung.


pdgid: S023AG
text:
BATLEY 2010B also measured the Xibar^0() --> Sigmabar0 gamma asymmetry to be -0.786+-0.104 (no systematic error given) with 1404 events.


pdgid: S023AH
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 2001I assumes here that the second-class current is zero and that the weak-magnetism term takes its exact SU(3) value.


pdgid: S022R9
text:
DUBBS 1994 also finds weak evidence that the asymmetry parameter alpha_{{gamma}} is positive (alpha_{{gamma}} = 1.0+-1.3).


pdgid: S022R7
text:
See the separate BOURQUIN 1983 values for G(Xi- --> Lambda e- nubar_e)/G(Xi- --> Lambda pi-) and [G(Xi- --> Sigma0 e- nubar_e)G(Xi- --> Lambda pi-)] above.


pdgid: S022R7
text:
DUCLOS 1971 cannot distinguish Sigma0's from Lambda's. The Cabibbo theory predicts the Sigma0 rate is about a factor 6 smaller than the Lambda rate.


pdgid: S022R14
text:
This LITTENBERG 1992B limit and the identical YEH 1974 limits for the preceding three modes all result from nonobservance of any 3-prong decays of the Xi-. One could as well apply the limit to the sum of the four modes.


pdgid: S022R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2025CQ reports branching fraction limits ranging from 8E-4 to 5E-5 at 95% CL over the mass range 1.07 -- 1.16 GeV for the invisible particle.


pdgid: S022AA
text:
This LUK 2000 value is for alpha(Xibar+) alpha(+)(Lambdabar). We assume CP conservation here by including it in the average for alpha(Xi-) alpha(-)(Lambda). But see the second data block below for the CP test.


pdgid: S022F
text:
From this result and alpha(Xi), HUANG 2004 gets beta(Xi) = -0.037+-0.011+-0.010 and gamma(Xi) = 0.888+-0.0004+-0.006. And the strong p-s phase difference for Lambda pi- scattering is (4.6+-1.4+-1.2)degree.


pdgid: S022F
text:
From this result and alpha(Xi), CHAKRAVORTY 2003 obtains beta(Xi) = -0.025+-0.042+-0.006 and gamma(Xi) = 0.889+-0.001+-0.007. And the strong p-s phase difference for Lambda pi- scattering is (3.17+-5.28+-0.73)degree.


pdgid: S022AV
text:
BOURQUIN 1983 assumes that g(2) = 0. Also, the sign has been changed to agree with our conventions, given in the ``Note on Baryon Decay Parameters'' in the neutron Listings.


pdgid: B050M
text:
BIAGI 1987 also sees weak signals in the in the Xi- pi+ pi- channel at 1782.6+-1.4 MeV (Gamma = 6.0+-1.5 MeV) and 1831.9+-2.8 MeV (Gamma = 9.6+-9.9 MeV).


pdgid: B050M
text:
BADIER 1972 adds all channels and divides the peak into lower and higher mass regions. The data can also be fitted with a single Breit-Wigner of mass 1800 MeV and width 150 MeV.


pdgid: B103M
text:
CHLIAPNIKOV 1979 does not uniquely identify the K+ in the (Lambdabar K+) X final state. It also reports bumps with fewer events at 2240, 2540, and 2830 MeV.


pdgid: B103M
text:
GAY 1976C sees a 4-standard deviation signal. However, HEMINGWAY 1977, with more events from the same experiment points out that the signal is greatly reduced if a cut is made on the 4-momentum u. This suggests an anomalous production mechanism if the Xi(2120) is real.


pdgid: S024M
text:
The FRY 1955 and FRY 1955B events were identified as Omega- by ALVAREZ 1973. The masses assume decay to Lambda K- at rest. For FRY 1955B, decay from an atomic orbit could Doppler shift the K- energy and the resulting Omega- mass by several MeV. This shift is negligible for FRY 1955 because the Omega decay is approximately perpendicular to its orbital velocity, as is known because the Lambda strikes the nucleus (L.Alvarez, private communication 1973). We have calculated the error assuming that the orbital n is 4 or larger.


pdgid: S024M
text:
Excluded from the average; the Omega- lifetimes measured by the experiments differ significantly from other measurements.


pdgid: S024M
text:
The EISENBERG 1954 mass was calculated for decay in flight. ALVAREZ 1973 has shown that the Omega interacted with an Ag nucleus to give K- Xi ^Ag.


pdgid: S024R8
text:
This KAMAEV 2010 value uses 76 Omega- --> Xi- pi+ pi- and 24 Omegabar+ --> Xibar+ pi- pi+ decays. The Omega- and Omegabar+ branching fractions measurements are statistically equal. The errors given combine statistical and systematic contributions. The CP branching-fraction asymmetry, (Omega--Omegabar+)/sum, is +0.12+-0.20.


pdgid: S024R6
text:
The same 4 events as in the previous mode, with the isospin factor to take into account Xi(1530)0 --> Xi0 pi0 decays included. BOURQUIN 1984 adopted a theoretical assumption that Xi(1530)0 pi- would dominate Xi- pi+ pi- decay.


pdgid: S033M
text:
AUBERT,B 2005S uses low-Q Lambda K0S K+ and Sigma0 K0S K+ decays to minimize systematic errors. The error above includes systematic as well as statistical errors. Many cross checks and adjustments to properties of the BABAR detector, as well as the large number of clean events, make this by far the best measurement of the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: S033T
text:
AAIJ 2019AG reports [Lambda_{{c}}()+ MEAN LIFE] / [D+- MEAN LIFE] = 0.1956+-0.0010+-0.0013 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value D+- MEAN LIFE = 1.033+-0.005E-12 s. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S033P75
text:
Comparing with the PDG 2022 value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S) = 1.59+-0.07E-2, ABLIKIM 2024CQ notes the K(S)0 - K(L)0 splitting to be -0.025+-0.031 in these modes.


pdgid: S033R1
text:
This ZUPANC 2014 value is the FIRST-EVER model-independent measurement of a Lambda_{{c}}()+ branching fraction.


pdgid: S033R1
text:
See the note by P. Burchat, "Lambda_{{c}}()+ Branching Fractions," in any edition of the Review from 2002 through 2014 for how this value was obtained. It is now obsolete.


pdgid: S033P57
text:
AAIJ 2023Z uses an amplitude analysis of 400k Lambda_c --> p K- pi+ decays, the last uncertainty is due to the amplitude model.


pdgid: S033R2
text:
AITALA 2000 makes a coherent 5-dimensional amplitude analysis of 946+-38 Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: S033P76
text:
Comparing with the PDG 2022 value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S pi0) = 1.96+-0.12E-2, ABLIKIM 2024CQ notes the K(S)0 - K(L)0 splitting to be 0.015+-0.046 in these modes.


pdgid: S033P77
text:
Comparing with the PDG 2022 value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S pi+ pi-) = 1.60+-0.11E-2, ABLIKIM 2024CQ notes the K(S)0 - K(L)0 splitting to be -0.027+-0.048 in these modes.


pdgid: S033P78
text:
AAIJ 2024AI reports [G(Lambda_c()+ --> p eta)/G(Lambda_c()+ --> p phi)] * [B(eta --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.032+-0.013+-0.004 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(eta --> mu+ mu-) = 5.8+-0.8E-6, B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.86+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S033P36
text:
Observed with 3.6 sigma statistical significance with 4.5 fb**-1 of e+ e- collisions between 4.600 and 4.699 GeV. The eta^' is reconstructed in the two decay modes eta^' --> pi+ pi- eta and eta^' --> pi+ pi- gamma, with signal yields 4.9+3.2-2.6 and 4.3+2.6-2.2 events, respectively.


pdgid: S033P79
text:
AAIJ 2024AI reports [G(Lambda_c()+ --> p omega(782)0)/G(Lambda_c()+ --> p phi)] * [B(omega(782) --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.240+-0.030+-0.018 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(omega(782) --> mu+ mu-) = 7.4+-1.8E-5, B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.86+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S033P80
text:
AAIJ 2024AI reports [G(Lambda_c()+ --> p rho(770)0)/G(Lambda_c()+ --> p phi)] * [B(rho(770) --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.229+-0.051+-0.022 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(rho(770) --> mu+ mu-) = 4.55+-0.28E-5, B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.86+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S033R88
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2003 finds this channel to be dominantly Lambda eta pi+ and Lambda omega pi+; see below.


pdgid: S033P88
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AN reports [G(Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma(1385)+ eta)/G(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+ eta)] * [B(Sigma(1385) --> Lambda pi)] = 30.4+-2.6+-0.7E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Sigma(1385) --> Lambda pi) = 87.0+-1.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S033P83
text:
ABLIKIM 2025BN reports B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda K+ K0S) = 3.07+-0.26+-0.13E-3, which we have multiplied by 2, as a combination of their result with ABLIKIM 2025AR, taking into account a small overlap of the two samples.


pdgid: S033P83
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AR reports B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda K+ K0S) = 3.04+-0.30+-0.16E-3, which we have multiplied by 2.


pdgid: S033P83
text:
ABLIKIM 2025BN reports B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda K+ K0S) = 3.12+-0.46+-0.15E-3, which we have multiplied by 2.


pdgid: S033P15
text:
ABLIKIM 2019X report evidence for the observation of the decay Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma+ eta at 2.5sigma significance.


pdgid: S033P16
text:
ABLIKIM 2019X report evidence for the observation of the decay Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma+ eta^' at 3.2sigma significance.


pdgid: S033P64
text:
We do not include this measurement in our average because it is highly correlated to the relative branching fractions B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ K+ K-) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-) and B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ phi) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-) measured in the same analysis (which we do use). Although the measurements are done on the same data, ABLIKIM 2023BY do not obtain exactly B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ phi).B(phi --> K+ K-) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-) + B(Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma+ K+ K- (non-phi )) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-) = B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ K+ K-) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-).


pdgid: S033P86
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AR finds evidence of a Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda K^*(892)+ resonant contribution at 4.7sigma, and estimates the branching fraction for this intermediate decay under three different interference scenarios.


pdgid: S033P87
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AR finds evidence of a Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda K^*(892)+ resonant contribution in Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda K0S pi+ at 4.7sigma, and estimates the branching fraction for this intermediate decay under three different interference scenarios.


pdgid: S033R73
text:
BERGFELD 1994 measures CS(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e) = (4.87+-0.28+-0.69) pb.


pdgid: S033R73
text:
To extract Gamma(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e)/Gamma(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+), we use sigma(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c --> p K- pi+) = (11.2+-1.3) pb, which is the weighted average of measurements from ARGUS (ALBRECHT 1996E) and CLEO (AVERY 1991).


pdgid: S033R73
text:
ALBRECHT 1991G measures CS(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e) = (4.20+-1.28+-0.71) pb.


pdgid: S033P38
text:
ABLIKIM 2022BB reports B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda(1520) e+ nu_e ). B(Lambda(1520) --> p K-) = 2.3+-1.2+-0.2E-4, which is divided by the best value for B(Lambda(1520) --> p K-) assuming the isospin limit 2. B(Lambda(1520) --> p K-) = B(Lambda(1520) --> N Kbar) = 0.45+-0.01.


pdgid: S033R74
text:
BERGFELD 1994 measures CS(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda mu+ nu_mu) = (4.43+-0.51+-0.64) pb.


pdgid: S033R74
text:
To extract Gamma(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda mu+ nu_mu)/Gamma(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+), we use sigma(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c --> p K- pi+) = (11.2+-1.3) pb, which is the weighted average of measurements from ARGUS (ALBRECHT 1996E) and CLEO (AVERY 1991).


pdgid: S033R74
text:
ALBRECHT 1991G measures CS(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda mu+ nu_mu) = (3.91+-2.02+-0.90) pb.


pdgid: S033P00
text:
This is the ratio of the ABLIKIM 2017D Lambda mu+ nu_e branching fraction and the ABLIKIM 2015Y Lambda e+ nu_e branching fraction (see above), and so is not an independent measurement.


pdgid: S033R59
text:
This CRAWFORD 1992 value includes protons from Lambda decay. The value is model dependent, but account is taken of this in the systematic error.


pdgid: S033R61
text:
This CRAWFORD 1992 value includes neutrons from Lambda decay. The value is model dependent, but account is taken of this in the systematic error.


pdgid: S033R65
text:
AAIJ 2024AI measures B(Lambda_c()+ --> p mu+ mu- non-res)/B(Lambda_c()+ --> p phi, phi --> mu+ mu-) < 0.09 (0.10) at 90% (95%) CL corresponding to a limit of 2.9 (3.2) E-8.


pdgid: S033A
text:
AAIJ 2024AH also reports the measurements of the decay parameters beta and gamma, the phase difference Delta, the CP asymmetry R_{{beta}} and the CP average R_{{beta}}^' for Lambda_c --> Lambda pi and its charge-conjugated decay.


pdgid: S033A
text:
LI 2023C obtained the value by a fit for the product alpha x alpha(Lambda)**avg, and dividing by the value alpha(Lambda)**avg = 0.7542+-0.0026 reported in ABLIKIM 2022AG.


pdgid: S033A
text:
BISHAI 1995 actually gives alpha=-0.94+0.21-0.06+0.12-0.06, chopping the errors at the physical limit -1.0. However, for alpha~~-1.0, some experiments should get unphysical values (alpha<-1.0), and for averaging with other measurements such values (or errors that extend below -1.0) should not be chopped.


pdgid: S033ALC
text:
ABLIKIM 2023AT measures alpha of Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda mu+ nu_mu decay over eight q^2 bins from zero to the kinematic  endpoint. The value provided here is, averaged over q^2. The analysis uses form factors extracted from a simultaneous fit to electron and muon mode data.


pdgid: S033ALC
text:
HINSON 2005 measures the form-factor ratio R==f(2)/f(1) for Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e events to be -0.31+-0.05+-0.04 and the pole mass to be 2.21+-0.08+-0.14 GeV/c**2, and from these calculates alpha, averaged over q**2, where <q**2> = 0.67 (GeV/c)**2.


pdgid: S033ALC
text:
ALBRECHT 1994B uses Lambda e+ and Lambda mu+ events in the mass range 1.85<M(Lambda lepton+)<2.20 GeV.


pdgid: S033ALC
text:
CRAWFORD 1995 measures the form-factor ratio R==f(2)/f(1) for Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e events to be -0.25+-0.14+-0.08 and from this calculates alpha, averaged over q**2, to be the above.


pdgid: S033A11
text:
AAIJ 2024AH also reports the measurements of the decay parameters beta and gamma, the phase difference Delta, the CP asymmetry R_{{beta}} and the CP average R_{{beta}}^' for Lambda_c --> Lambda K and its charge-conjugated decay.


pdgid: S033A17
text:
AAIJ 2023Z uses an amplitude analysis of 400k Lambda_c --> p K- pi+ decays, the last uncertainty is due to the amplitude model. Sign determined per authors; see also AAIJ 2023AJ.


pdgid: S033A30
text:
ABLIKIM 2024AP report the phase shift between P- and S-wave amplitudes has two solutions, which are delta(P) - delta(S) = -1.55+-0.25+-0.05 rad and 1.59+-0.25+-0.05 rad.


pdgid: S033A31
text:
AAIJ 2025N measures A(CP) only in the dimuon mass range close to the phi resonance, m(mu mu) = 979.46 -- 1059.46 MeV. Also reports, in the same mass range, the CP average and the CP asymmetry of the forward-backward asymmetry in the dimuon system, 3.9+-4.0+-0.6% and 3.1+-4.0+-0.4%, respectively.


pdgid: S033A01
text:
AAIJ 2018R applies phase-space-dependent weights to the Lambda_c()+ --> p pi+ pi- sample to align its kinematics with the Lambda_c()+ --> p K+ K- sample.


pdgid: B119D
text:
BLECHMAN 2003 finds that a more sophisticated treatment than a simple Breit-Wigner for the proximity of the threshold of the dominant decay, Sigma_c(2455) pi, lowers the Lambda_{{c}}(2595)+-Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass difference by 2 or 3 MeV. The analysis of AALTONEN 2011H bears this out.


pdgid: B119W
text:
AALTONEN 2011H treats the three charged modes Lambda_c(2595)+ --> Sigma_c(2455)++ pi-, Sigma_c(2455)+ pi0, Sigma_c(2455)0 pi+ separately in terms of a common coupling constant h_{{2}} and obtains h_{{2}}^2() = 0.36+-0.08. From this the width is determined.


pdgid: B178M
text:
The third AAIJ 2017S uncertainty comes from modeling the resonant shape of the nearby Lambda_{{c}}(2880)+ and the background (non-resonant) amplitudes.


pdgid: B151M
text:
The third AAIJ 2017S uncertainty comes from modeling the resonant shape of the Lambda_{{c}}(2880)+ and the background (non-resonant) amplitudes.


pdgid: B151W
text:
AAIJ 2017S reports 5.43+0.77-0.71+-0.29+0.75-0.00 MeV value where the third uncertainty comes from modeling the resonant shape of the Lambda_{{c}}(2880)+ and the background (non-resonant) amplitudes. We have combined in quadrature the systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: B104D13
text:
DIESBURG 1987 is completely incompatible with the other experiments, which is surprising since it agrees with them about mass(Sigma_{{c}}(2455)++)-mass(Lambda_{{c}}()+). We go with the majority here.


pdgid: S045M
text:
AAIJ 2014Z systematic error includes in quadrature the 0.14 MeV uncertainty from the m(Lambda_{{c}}^+) mass value.


pdgid: S045M
text:
Although COTEUS 1987 claims to agree well with BIAGI 1983 on the mass and width, there appears to be a discrepancy between the two experiments. BIAGI 1983 sees a single peak (stated significance about 6 standard deviations) in the Lambda K- pi+ pi+ mass spectrum. COTEUS 1987 sees two peaks in the same spectrum, one at the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass, the other 75 MeV lower. The latter is attributed to Xi_c()+ --> Sigma0 K- pi+ pi+ --> (Lambda gamma) K- pi+ pi+, with the gamma unseen. The combined significance of the double peak is stated to be 5.5 standard deviations. But the absence of any trace of a lower peak in BIAGI 1983 seems to us to throw into question the interpretation of the lower peak of COTEUS 1987.


pdgid: S045T
text:
AAIJ 2019AG reports [Xi_{{c}}()+ MEAN LIFE] / [D+- MEAN LIFE] = 0.4392+-0.0034+-0.0028 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value D+- MEAN LIFE = 1.033+-0.005E-12 s. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S045R3
text:
LI 2019C report a significance of 6.8 sigma for the observation of this decay mode, observed in Xi_{{c}}()+ from Bbar0 --> Lambdabar_c()- Xi_c()+.


pdgid: S045R05
text:
AAIJ 2020AH extracts B(Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+) assuming production fraction ratios f(Xi_{{c}}()0)/f(Lambda_{{c}}()+) = 9.7+-0.9+-3.1E-2 (from AAIJ 2019AB plus heavy quark symmetry arguments) as well as f(Xi_{{c}}()0)/f(Xi_{{c}}()+) = 1.00+-0.01, and uses the input B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.23+-0.33E-2. Its correlation with B(Xi_c()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-), as measured in AAIJ 2020AH, is 0.414.


pdgid: S045R05
text:
LI 2019C report a significance of 4.4 sigma for the observation of this decay mode, observed in Xi_{{c}}()+ from Bbar0 --> Lambdabar_c()- Xi_c()+.


pdgid: S045R27
text:
Amplitude analysis of 20 resonance modes, the third uncertainty is due to the amplitude model. We report those only those fit fractions that are either large or incompatible with zero at approximately at least 2sigma significance, and whose interpretation is not subject to large interference effects.


pdgid: S048T
text:
Uses B- --> D0 pi-, D0 --> K- K+ pi- pi+ as a normalization mode to minimize the uncertainties associated with the decay time acceptance. The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the D0 lifetime, which is taken to be 410.3+-1.0 fs.


pdgid: S048T
text:
Measured in Xi_c()0 produced promptly in p p collisions, using D0 --> K+ K- pi+ pi- as  normalisation mode. AAIJ 2022Y reports this lifetime value as 148.0+-2.3+-2.2+-0.2E-15 s where the last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the D0 lifetime value from PDG 2020 average, meanlife(D0) = (410.1+-1.5) fs.


pdgid: S048T
text:
AAIJ 2019AG reports [Xi_{{c}}()0 MEAN LIFE] / [D+- MEAN LIFE] = 0.1485+-0.0017+-0.0016 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value D+- MEAN LIFE = 1.033+-0.005E-12 s. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S048R15
text:
MCNEIL 2021 assumes an azimuthally symmetric amplitude model to recover resonant and nonresonant contributions to Xi_c()0 --> Xi()0 K+ K-.


pdgid: S048R7
text:
LI 2021C measures ratio B(Xi_c()0 --> Xi- e+ nu_e) / B(Xi_c()0 --> Xi- mu+ nu_mu) = 1.03+-0.05+-0.07.


pdgid: S048R7
text:
This ALBRECHT 1993B value is the average of the (Xi- e+ anything)/Xi- pi+ and (Xi- mu+ anything)/Xi- pi+ ratios. Here we average it with the Xi- e+ nu_e/Xi- pi+ ratio.


pdgid: S048R06
text:
AAIJ 2020AH extracts B(Xi_c()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) using two different normalization modes: Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ and Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+. The mean value of both results, taking their correlations into account, is presented as the final result. The measurement assumes production fraction ratios f(Xi_{{c}}()0)/f(Lambda_{{c}}()+) = 9.7+-0.9+-3.1E-2 (from AAIJ 2019AB plus heavy quark symmetry arguments) as well as f(Xi_{{c}}()0)/f(Xi_{{c}}()+) = 1.00+-0.01. It further uses the inputs B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.23+-0.33E-2 and B(Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 4.5+-2.1+-0.7E-3 (from LI 2019C). Its correlation with B(Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+), as measured in AAIJ 2020AH, is 0.414.


pdgid: S048R20
text:
TANG 2023 reports fitted masses mass(Lambda_{{c}}()+) = 2286.55+-0.03 MeV and mass(Xi_{{c}}()0) = 2470.43+-0.06 MeV.


pdgid: S048A02
text:
JIA 2021 measures alpha(Xi_c()0 --> Lambda Kbar^*(892)0) alpha(Lambda --> p pi-) = 0.115+-0.164+-0.031, and uses alpha(Lambda --> p pi-) = 0.747+-0.010.


pdgid: S048A03
text:
JIA 2021 measures alpha(Xi_c()0 --> Sigma+ Kbar^*(892)-) alpha(Sigma+ --> p pi0) =  0.514+-0.295+-0.012, and uses alpha(Sigma+ --> p pi0) = -0.980+-0.017.


pdgid: S048B00
text:
Search for baryon-number violating decay B- --> Xibar_c()0 Lambdabar_c()-, which can be interpreted as a search for B- --> Xi_c()0 Lambdabar_c()- followed by Xi_{{c}}()0-Xibar_{{c}}()0 baryon-number violating oscillation, from which a bound on the oscillation period tau(mix) can be inferred, assuming no direct B- --> Xibar_c()0 Lambdabar_c()- decay.


pdgid: B149R00
text:
Assumes B(Xi_c^'+ --> Xi_c()+ gamma) = 100%, noting no strong decay of the Xi_{{c}}^' is permitted in the available phase space. YELTON 2020 measures B(Xi_c(2790)0 --> Xi_c()0 gamma)/B(Xi_c(2790)0 --> Xi_c^'+ pi- --> Xi_c()+ gamma pi-).


pdgid: B149R02
text:
Assumes B(Xi_c^'0 --> Xi_c()0 gamma) = 100%, noting no strong decay of the Xi_{{c}}^' is permitted in the available phase space. YELTON 2020 measures B(Xi_c(2790)+ --> Xi_c()+ gamma)/B(Xi_c(2790)+ --> Xi_c^'0 pi+ --> Xi_c()0 gamma pi+).


pdgid: B149R03
text:
AAIJ 2023X observes this decay mode at 3.7sigma significance from a study of the Lambda_c()+ K- system within B- --> Lambda_c()+ Lambdabar_c()- K- decays.


pdgid: B148R00
text:
Assumes B(Xi_c(2645)+ --> Xi_c()0 pi+) = 100%, which is the only strong decay of the Xi_{{c}}(2645) permitted in the available phase space. YELTON 2020 measures B(Xi_c(2815)0 --> Xi_c()0 gamma)/B(Xi_c(2815)0 --> Xi_c(2645)+ pi- --> Xi_c()0 pi+ pi-).


pdgid: B148R04
text:
Assumes B(Xi_c(2645)0 --> Xi_c()+ pi-) = 100%, which is the only strong decay of the Xi_{{c}}(2645) permitted in the available phase space. YELTON 2020 measures B(Xi_c(2815)+ --> Xi_c()+ gamma)/B(Xi_c(2815)+ --> Xi_c(2645)0 pi+ --> Xi_c()+ pi- pi+).


pdgid: B192M0
text:
AAIJ 2020X uses a prompt Lambda_c()+ K- sample, and reports 2923.04+-0.25+-0.20+-0.14 MeV where the last uncertainty is due to the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: B156A04
text:
AAIJ 2020X uses a prompt Lambda_c()+ K- sample and reports 2938.55+-0.21+-0.17+-0.14 MeV where the last uncertainty is due to the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass. Observes that the broader resonance at 2930 MeV seen in B- --> K- Lambda_c()+ Lambdabar_c()- by LI 2018A and AUBERT 2008H resolves into two narrower peaks at approximately 2939 MeV and 2923 MeV.


pdgid: B156A06
text:
AAIJ 2020X uses a prompt Lambda_c()+ K- sample and observes that the broader resonance at 2930 MeV seen in B- --> K- Lambda_c()+ Lambdabar_c()- by LI 2018A and AUBERT 2008H resolves into two narrower peaks at approximately 2939 MeV and 2923 MeV.


pdgid: B130M+
text:
AAIJ 2025AI reports 2968.6+-0.5+-0.5+-0.2 MeV value where the third uncertainty is due to the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: B130M0
text:
AAIJ 2020X reports 2964.88+-0.26+-0.14+-0.14 MeV where the last uncertainty is due to the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass. Further studies are required to establish whether the narrow resonance at 2965 MeV is a different baryon from the narrow resonance at 2970 MeV seen by YELTON 2016.


pdgid: B130W0
text:
Further studies are required to establish whether the narrow resonance at 2965 MeV is a different baryon from the narrow resonance at 2970 MeV seen by YELTON 2016.


pdgid: B130R05
text:
Measurement of the ratio of Xi_c(2970)+ --> Xi_c(2645)0 pi+ versus Xi_c(2970)+ --> Xi_c^'()0 pi+. The last uncertainty is from possible isospin-symmetry-breaking effects. MOON 2021 determines   from an angular analysis of the Xi_c()+ pi+ pi- final state that the spin of the  Xi_{{c}}(2970)+ is strongly compatible with J = 1/2, assuming domination by the lowest partial  wave in Xi_c(2970)+ --> Xi_c(2645)0 pi+. When further combined with the size of this ratio,  MOON 2021 determines from heavy quark symmetry that the spin-parity of the  Xi_{{c}}(2970)+  is favored to be J**P = 1/2+, with light degrees of freedom in the 0**+** state.


pdgid: B147M+
text:
AAIJ 2025AI reports 3076.8+-0.7+-1.3+-0.2 MeV value where the third uncertainty is due to the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: S047M
text:
AAIJ 2024C reports this measurements as 2695.28+-0.07+-0.27+-0.30 MeV. The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the Omega- mass. Also reported is mass(Omega_{{c}}()0)-mass(Omega-) = 1022.83+-0.07+-0.27 MeV.


pdgid: S047M
text:
FRABETTI 1994H claims a signal of 42.5+-8.8 Sigma+ K- K- pi+ events. The background is about 24 events.


pdgid: S047M
text:
ALBRECHT 1992H claims a signal of 11.5+-4.3 Xi- K- pi+ pi+ events. The background is about 5 events.


pdgid: S047T
text:
Recent measurements by AAIJ 2018J, AAIJ 2022Y, and ABUDINEN 2023 obtain consistent results that are nearly four times larger than the average result of previous experiments, 69+-12E-15 s. We go with the more recent results, mostly obtained with much larger data samples, and also note the positive correlation between the measured value and the inverse of the estimated statistical uncertainty in lifetime measurements.


pdgid: S047T
text:
AAIJ 2022Y reports this measurement as 276.5+-13.4+-4.4+-0.7E-15 s. The last  uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the D0 lifetime meanlife(D0) = (410.1+-1.5) fs from PDG 2020. Measured in Omega_{{c}} produced promptly in p p collisions, using D0 --> K+ K- pi+ pi- as normalisation mode.


pdgid: S047R06
text:
This submode fraction is evaluated from a background-subtracted signal in a mass plot. Result ignores interference effects and systematic uncertainties, which YELTON 2018 claim are both small.


pdgid: S047R12
text:
ACHARYA 2024A measurement performed over p_{{T}} intervals in the range 2 < p_{{T}} < 12 GeV, from which a p_{{T}}-independent branching ratio is derived from a weighted average over p_{{T}}.


pdgid: S047R08
text:
LI 2021D reports the significance of the Omega(2012) signal is 4.2 sigma including systematic uncertainties. Also measures B(Omega_c()0 --> Omega(2012)- pi+, Omega(2012)- --> ( Kbar Xi )**-)/B(Omega_c()0 --> Xi0 K- pi+) = 0.220+-0.059+-0.035.


pdgid: S047R09
text:
LI 2021D reports the significance of the Omega(2012) signal is 4.2sigma including systematic uncertainties. Also measures B(Omega_c()0 --> Omega(2012)- pi+, Omega(2012)- --> (Kbar Xi)**-)/B(Omega_c()0 --> Xi0 K- pi+) = 0.220+-0.059+-0.035.


pdgid: S047R14
text:
AAIJ 2024C reports this measurements as (15.81+-0.87+-0.44+-0.16)%. The last uncertainty is due to branching ratios of Omega- --> Lambda K- and Xi- --> Lambda pi- decays taken as external inputs, which are taken to be 67.8+-0.7% and 99.887+-0.035%, respectively.


pdgid: B173M
text:
The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass, taken to be the PDG 2022 fit result 2467.71+-0.23 MeV.


pdgid: B173M
text:
Measured via Omega_b()- --> Omega_c^**()0 pi- --> Xi_c()+ K- pi-. The third uncertainty is due  to the uncertainty in the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: B174M
text:
Measured via Omega_b()- --> Omega_c^**()0 pi- --> Xi_c()+ K- pi-. The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: B177M
text:
The third error is the uncertainty on the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass. (AAIJ 2017AH gave +0.3 MeV here, but as of 2018 it is +-0.3.)


pdgid: S065M
text:
OCHERASHVILI 2005 claims ``an excess of 5.62 events over... 1.38+-0.13 events'' for a significance of 4.8~sigma in p D+ K- events.


pdgid: S065M
text:
MATTSON 2002 claims ``an excess of 15.9 events over an expected background of 6.1+-0.5 events, a statistical significance of 6.3 sigma'' in the Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ invariant-mass spectrum. The probability that the peak is a fluctuation increases from 1.0E-6 to 1.1E-4 when the number of bins searched is considered.


pdgid: S065M
text:
Uncertainties are statistical only. Because of undetermined systematic uncertainties in the  extraction of this result it cannot be considered a mass measurement. AAIJ 2021AE performs a  combined fit to its Xi_cc()+ --> Xi_c()+ pi+ pi- data and the   Xi_cc()+ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+  data from AAIJ 2020AX, finding a global significance  of 2.9 sigma (4.0  sigma local).


pdgid: S065R02
text:
No significant signal is seen in the mass range 3.4 -- 3.8 GeV. AAIJ 2021AE performs a combined fit to its Xi_cc()+ --> Xi_c()+ pi+ pi- data and the Xi_cc()+ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ data from AAIJ 2020AX, finding a global significance of 2.9 sigma (4.0 sigma local).


pdgid: S068M
text:
AAIJ 2020J combines mass measurements 3621.53+-0.24+-0.29 MeV from Xi_cc^++ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ pi+ and 3621.95+-0.60+-0.49 MeV from Xi_cc()++ --> Xi_c()+ pi+. Supersedes AAIJ 2018BA and AAIJ 2017BC.


pdgid: S068M
text:
The third error in AAIJ 2017BC value is from the uncertainty of the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass. The width of the signal is 6.6+-0.8 MeV, consistent with the experimental resolution.


pdgid: S068R02
text:
AAIJ 2018BA reports [G(Xi_cc()++ --> Xi_c()+ pi+, Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+)/G(Xi_cc()++ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ pi+)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 3.5+-0.9+-0.3E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S068R04
text:
The photon in the Xi_c^'()+ --> Xi_c()+ gamma process is not reconstructed.  Analysis uses two disjoint subsamples triggered on and independently from the signal.


pdgid: S068R05
text:
AAIJ 2025AO reports [G(Xi_cc()++ --> Xi_c()0 pi+ pi+, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+)/G(Xi_cc()++ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ pi+)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 0.105+-0.014+-0.007 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Dividing further by the less well-known value for B(Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+) = 0.49+-0.10E-2, AAIJ 2025AO reports B(Xi_cc()++ --> Xi_c()0 pi+ pi+)/B(Xi_cc()++ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ pi+) = 1.37+-0.18+-0.09+-0.35 in which the third uncertainty is from the external branching fractions.


pdgid: S040M
text:
Uses Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c1 p K-, Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c2 p K-, Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Lambda, Lambda_b()0 --> p psi(2S) K-, Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi pi+ pi- K-, and Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi K- decays.


pdgid: S040M
text:
Uses exclusively reconstructed final states Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-, Lambda_c()+ D()- and Bbar0 --> D+ D_s()- decays. The uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic contributions.


pdgid: S040M
text:
ABE 1997B observed 38 events with a background of 18+-1.6 events in the mass range 5.60 -- 5.65 GeV/c**2, a significance of >3.4 standard deviations.


pdgid: S040M
text:
Uses Lambda_b()0 --> p psi(2S) K-, Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi pi+ pi- K-, and Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi K- decays.


pdgid: S040M
text:
ABE 1993B states that, based on the signal claimed by ALBAJAR 1991E, CDF should have found 30+-23 Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda events. Instead, CDF found not more than 2 events.


pdgid: S040M
text:
ALBAJAR 1991E claims 16+-5 events above a background of 9+-1 events, a significance of about 5 standard deviations.


pdgid: S040DM2
text:
Uses exclusively reconstructed final states Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-, Lambda_c()+ D()- and Bbar0 --> D+ D_s()- decays.


pdgid: S040T
text:
Measured the lifetime ratio of decays Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi p K- to B0 --> J/psi pi+ K- to be 0.976+-0.012+-0.006 with meanlife(B0) = 1.519+-0.007 ps.


pdgid: S040TR
text:
Measures 1/meanlife(Lambda_{{b}}()0) - 1/meanlife(B0) and uses meanlife(B0) = 1.519+-0.007 ps to extract lifetime ratio.


pdgid: S040P12
text:
ABAZOV 2011O reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar)] = 6.01+-0.60+-0.58+-0.28E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar) = 19.8+-4.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040P12
text:
ABE 1997B reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar)] = 4.7+-2.3+-0.2E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar) = 19.8+-4.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040P12
text:
ALBAJAR 1991E reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar)] = 18+-6+-9E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar) = 19.8+-4.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R31
text:
AAIJ 2019F uses B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2 and B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.93+-0.17E-3 from PDG 2018 with assumption of lepton universality. AAIJ 2019F reports this result as 0.513+-0.023+-0.016+-0.011, where the last uncertainty is the contribution due to the external input of branching fractions used in the analysis.


pdgid: S040R31
text:
AAD 2015CH uses B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2 and B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)= 7.89+-0.17E-3 from PDG 2014 with assumption of lepton universality.


pdgid: S040R75
text:
AAIJ 2022R reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p D+ pi- pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi+ pi- pi-)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 5.35+-0.21+-0.16 % which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.31+-0.14E-2, B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R36
text:
AAIJ 2016A reported the measurement of 3.17+-0.04+-0.07+-0.34+0.45-0.28E-4 where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, the third is due to the branching fraction of B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0, and the fourth is due to the knowledge of f(Lambda_{{b}})/f(d). We combined in quadrature second to fourth uncertainties to a total systematic uncertainty.


pdgid: S040P06
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024BA reports 3.38+-1.02+-0.61+-0.03E-2 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Xi- K+)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> psi(2S) Lambda)] * [B(Xi- --> Lambda pi-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(Xi- --> Lambda pi-) = 99.887+-0.035E-2,B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.68+-0.30E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(Xi- --> Lambda pi-) = 99.887+-0.035E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R66
text:
AAIJ 2020AK reported the measurement of 0.333+-0.050+-0.019+-0.032, where the last uncertainty is due uncertainties of the used branching fractions of J/psi --> p pbar and eta_c --> p pbar decays. We combined in quadrature the systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S040R37
text:
AAIJ 2016 total systematic includes the uncertainties on f(P_{{c}}()+) and B(Lambda_b --> p J/psi K-).


pdgid: S040R44
text:
AAIJ 2017AM reports 0.242+-0.014+-0.016 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c1(1P) p K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi K-)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2.


pdgid: S040R45
text:
AAIJ 2017AM reports 0.248+-0.02+-0.017 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c2(1P) p K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi K-)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.2+-0.7E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.0+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R71
text:
The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third is related to the  uncertainties in the branching fractions of the chi_cJ --> J/psi gamma decays.


pdgid: S040R72
text:
Evidence for the Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c2 p pi- decay is obtained with a significance of 3.5  standard deviations. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third  is related to the uncertainties in the branching fractions of the chi_cJ --> J/psi gamma  decays.


pdgid: S040R39
text:
AAIJ 2016Y reports a measurement of 0.2070+-0.0076+-0.0046+-0.0037 where the third uncertainty is due to the knowledge of J/psi and psi(2S) branching fractions. We have combined both systematic uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S040R58
text:
AAIJ 2019AN reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c1(3872) p K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> p psi(2S) K-)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 5.4+-1.1+-0.2E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R27
text:
Measured relative to Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S. The last error includes both systematic and the uncertainties on B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S).


pdgid: S040R28
text:
Measured relative to Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ K-, Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S. The last error includes both systematic and the uncertainties on B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ K-, Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S).


pdgid: S040R11
text:
AAIJ 2014I reports 4.30+-0.03+0.12-0.11+-0.26+-0.21E-3 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] assuming B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.68+-0.13E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Uses information on f(baryon)/f_{{d}} from measurement in semileptonic decays by the same authors.


pdgid: S040R11
text:
The result is obtained from (f(baryon)/f(d)) (B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)/B(Bbar^0() --> D+ pi-)) = 0.82+-0.08+-0.11+-0.22, assuming f(baryon)/f(d) = 0.25+-0.04 and B(Bbar^0() --> D+ pi-) = 2.68+-0.13E-3.


pdgid: S040R21
text:
AAIJ 2014H reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 8.06+-0.23+-0.35E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2, B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R24
text:
Uses B(Bbar0 --> D+ D_s()-) = 7.2+-0.8E-3 and their measured B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-))/B(Bbar0 --> D+ pi-) values.


pdgid: S040R79
text:
AAIJ 2024X reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ Dbar0 K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] / [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] = 0.1400+0.0026-0.0025+0.0012-0.0013 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2, B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R80
text:
AAIJ 2024X reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ Dbar^*()0 K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] / [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] = 0.432+0.013-0.012+-0.013 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.936+-0.030E-2, B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R4
text:
AALTONEN 2012A reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] = 3.04+-0.33+0.70-0.55 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R82
text:
AAIJ 2024Y uses Sigma_c(2455)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, D- --> K+ pi- pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-, analyzing an integrated luminosity of 6 fb**-1.


pdgid: S040R83
text:
AAIJ 2024Y uses Sigma_c(2455)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+ and D- --> K+ pi- pi-, analyzing an integrated luminosity of 6 fb**-1.


pdgid: S040R84
text:
AAIJ 2024Y uses Sigma_c(2455)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, Sigma_c(2520)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, and D- --> K+ pi- pi-, analyzing an integrated luminosity of 6 fb**-1.


pdgid: S040R85
text:
AAIJ 2024Y uses Sigma_c(2455)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, Sigma_c(2520)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, and D- --> K+ pi- pi- analyzing an integrated luminosity of 6 fb**-1.


pdgid: S040R68
text:
AAIJ 2021B systematic uncertainty includes the contribution from the D_s()- --> K+ K- pi-  branching fraction.


pdgid: S040R6
text:
BARATE 1998D reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.0086+-0.0007+-0.0014 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Measured using Lambda_c lepton- and Lambda lepton+ lepton-.


pdgid: S040R6
text:
ABREU 1995S reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.0118+-0.0026+0.0031-0.0021 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R6
text:
BUSKULIC 1995L reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.00755+-0.0014+-0.0012 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R6
text:
BUSKULIC 1992E reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.015+-0.0035+-0.0045 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Superseded by BUSKULIC 1995L.


pdgid: S040R15
text:
Derived from a combined likelihood and event rate fit to the distribution of the Isgur-Wise variable and using HQET. The slope of the form factor is measured to be rho^2() = 2.03+-0.46+0.72-1.00.


pdgid: S040R16
text:
Derived from the fraction of Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton) / ( Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton) + Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi+ pi- lepton- nubar_lepton) ) = 0.47+0.10-0.08+0.07-0.06.


pdgid: S040R01
text:
AALTONEN 2009E assumes isospin conservation for Lambda_c(2595) --> Lambda_c pi+ pi+ and  Lambda_c(2595) --> Lambda_c pi0 pi0. Significant isospin violation from thresholds in Lambda_c(2595) --> Sigma_c(2455) pi --> Lambda_c pi pi may alter the recovered ratio.


pdgid: S040R9
text:
AALTONEN 2009C reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B0 at Z)] = 0.042+-0.007+-0.006 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2, B(bbar --> B0 at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R10
text:
AALTONEN 2009C reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B0 at Z)] = 0.066+-0.009+-0.008 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2, B(bbar --> B0 at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R77
text:
AAIJ 2023K reports this measurement as 2.56+-0.10+-0.05+-0.14E-3 where the last uncertainty is due to the branching fractions B(D_s()- --> K- K+ pi-) and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) uncertainties.


pdgid: S040R34
text:
The ratio of B(Lambda_b()0 --> p mu- nubar_mu) to B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ mu- nubar_mu) is measured within a restricted q**2 region. Combined with theoretical calculations of the form factors and the previously measured value of |V_(cb)|, the first |V_(ub)| = 3.27+-0.15+-0.16+-0.06E-3 measurement from the Lambda_{{b}} decay is obtained, consistent with the exclusively measured world averages.


pdgid: S040R35
text:
This measurement is a ratio of Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> p mu- nubar_mu)[q**2 >  15 GeV/c**2] to Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ mu- nubar_mu)[q**2 >  7 GeV/c**2] within a restricted q**2 region. Combined with theoretical calculations of the form  factors and the previously measured value of |V_(cb)|, the first |V_(ub)| =  3.27+-0.15+-0.16+-0.06E-3 measurement from the Lambda_{{b}} decay is obtained, consistent with  the exclusively measured world averages.


pdgid: S040R19
text:
Uses B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Lambda) = 6.2+-1.4E-4. This measurement comes from the sum of the differential rates in q**2 regions excluding those corresponding to J/psi and psi(2S) ([8.68,10.09] and [12.86, 14.18] GeV**2/c**4).


pdgid: S040R62
text:
The first uncertainty is the statistical uncertainty and the second is the combination of all systematic uncertainties including those related to the normalization of Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi p K-.


pdgid: S040R32
text:
AAIJ 2015AH reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda eta)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> eta^' K0)] = 0.142+0.11-0.08 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> eta^' K0) = 6.6+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. The single uncertainty quoted with the original measurement combines in quadrature statistical and systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S040R33
text:
AAIJ 2015AH reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda eta^'(958))/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> eta^' K0)] < 0.047 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> eta^' K0) = 6.6E-5.


pdgid: S040P07
text:
AAIJ 2025J reports 5.3+-0.4+-0.7E-6 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.30+-0.36E-3,B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.24+-0.08E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3, B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R41
text:
AAIJ 2016W reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda pi+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] = 7.3+-1.9+-2.2E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040P08
text:
AAIJ 2025J reports 4.6+-0.2+-0.6E-6 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.30+-0.36E-3,B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.24+-0.08E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3, B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R42
text:
AAIJ 2016W reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] = 8.9+-1.2+-1.3E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040P09
text:
AAIJ 2025J reports 10.7+-0.3+-1.2E-6 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.30+-0.36E-3,B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.24+-0.08E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3, B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R43
text:
AAIJ 2016W reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda K+ K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] = 25.3+-1.9+-1.9E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R86
text:
AAIJ 2024R reports 1.24+-0.15+-0.10+-0.28+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda D+ D-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D+ K0)] assuming B(B0 --> D- D+ K0) = 7.5+-1.7E-4. The first error is statistical, the second experimental systematic, the third due to the B0 branching fraction, and the fourth due to the cross-section ratio of Lambda_{{b}}()0 to B0 of 0.541+-0.048.


pdgid: S040R00
text:
AAIJ 2016J reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 phi)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B0 at Z)] = 0.275+-0.055+-0.020 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> K0 phi) = 7.3+-0.7E-6, B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2, B(bbar --> B0 at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S040R51
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p pi- pi+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 6.85+-0.19+-0.08+-0.32E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R52
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p K- K+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 1.32+-0.09+-0.09+-0.10E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R53
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p K- pi+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 16.4+-0.3+-0.2+-0.7E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040R54
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p K- K+ K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 4.11+-0.12+-0.06+-0.19E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.37+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S040A40
text:
Uses B( Lambda_b --> J/psi p K- ) = 3.2+-0.6E-4. The last uncertainty is due to uncertainties of B(Lambda_b()0 --> p K- J/psi) and B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) values.


pdgid: S040A38
text:
A(CP) is measured from (B(Lambda_b()0 --> [ K+ pi- ]_D p K-) -  B(Lambdabar_b()0 --> [ K- pi+ ]_D pbar K+))/ (B(Lambda_b()0 --> [ K+ pi- ]_D p K-) +  B(Lambdabar_b()0 --> [ K- pi+ ]_D pbar K+)) in the full phase space.


pdgid: S040A01
text:
Extracted using a Bayesian analysis. The most probable value is given as -0.022, with a 68% credibility interval [-0.048, 0.005]. Transverse polarizations of Lambda_{{b}}()0 of -0.004 (68% credibility interval [-0.064, 0.051]), 0.001 (68% credibility interval [-0.035, 0.045]), and 0.032 (68% credibility interval [-0.011, 0.065]) are also reported at 7 TeV, 8 TeV and 13 TeV, respectively. Note that both statistical and systematic uncertainties are included.


pdgid: S040A01
text:
An angular analysis of Lambda_b --> J/psi Lambda decay is performed. Note that the sign of alpha in CMS definition is the opposite to that used by AAIJ 2013AG and AAD 2014L. Lambda_{{b}} transverse production polarization of 0.00+-0.06+-0.06 is also reported, as well as squares of the helicity amplitudes.


pdgid: S040A01
text:
An angular analysis of Lambda_b --> J/psi Lambda decay is performed and magnitudes of all helicity amplitudes are also reported.


pdgid: S040A01
text:
An angular analysis of Lambda_b -->J/psi Lambda decay is performed and a Lambda_{{b}} transverse production polarization of 0.06+-0.07+-0.02 is also reported.


pdgid: S040A39
text:
AAIJ 2022M provides a combined measurement as well as measured alpha_{{gamma}}()- = 1.26+-0.42+-0.20 and alpha_{{gamma}}()+ = 0.55+-0.32+-0.16 for Lambda_{{b}}()0 and Lambdabar_{{b}}()0 separately.


pdgid: S040A13
text:
Indirect determination in kinematic range 2 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 <eta < 4.5 from production asymmetries of B+, B0 and B_{{s}}()0.


pdgid: B162M
text:
AAIJ 2020Q measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5912)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 292.589+-0.029+-0.010 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B162M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020K measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5912)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 292.72+-0.12+-0.01 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B162M
text:
Observed in Lambda_b(5912)0 --> Lambda_b()0 pi+ pi- decays with 17.6+-4.8 candidates with a significance of 5.2 sigma.


pdgid: B162M
text:
AAIJ 2012AL measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5912)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 292.60+-0.12+-0.04 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B163M
text:
AAIJ 2020Q measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5920)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 300.492+-0.019+-0.010 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B163M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020K measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5920)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 300.56+-0.07+-0.01 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B163M
text:
Measured in Lambda_b(5920)0 --> Lambda_b()0 pi+ pi- decays with 17.3+5.3-4.6 events, with a significance of 3.5 sigma.


pdgid: B163M
text:
AALTONEN 2013V measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5920)0)-m(Lambda_{{b}}()0)-2m(pi) = 20.68+-0.35+-0.30 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = and m(pi) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B163M
text:
Observed in Lambda_b(5920)0 --> Lambda_b()0 pi+ pi- decays with 52.5+-8.1 candidates with a significance of 10.2 sigma.


pdgid: B163M
text:
AAIJ 2012AL measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5920)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 300.40+-0.08+-0.04 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B197M
text:
AAIJ 2020Q measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(6070)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 452.7+-2.9+-0.5 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B187M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020K measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(6146)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 526.9+-1.9+-0.8 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B188M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020K measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(6152)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 533.1+-1.1+-0.4 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S026M+
text:
Measured using fully reconstructed Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- and Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: S026M+
text:
Measured using fully reconstructed Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- and Lambda_c()+ --> K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: S026M+
text:
Observed four Lambda_b()0 pi+- resonances in the fully reconstructed decay mode Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, where Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+.


pdgid: S062DM
text:
Observed four Lambda_b()0 pi+- resonances in the fully reconstructed decay mode Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, where Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+. Assumes mass(Sigma_{{b}}^*()+)-mass(Sigma_{{b}}()+) = mass(Sigma_{{b}}^*()-)-mass(Sigma_{{b}}()-)


pdgid: S069M-
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Reference Lambda_{{b}}()0 mass 5619.30+-0.34 MeV from AAIJ 2014AA.


pdgid: S069M-
text:
Observed in Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi- decays with 15.2+-4.4+1.9-0.4 candidates, a significance of 5.5 sigma.


pdgid: S069DML
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays.Reference decays Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- were used.


pdgid: S069DML
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> J/psi Lambda K- decays. Reference decays Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Lambda were used.


pdgid: S069DML
text:
Combination of the original statistically independent measurements of AAIJ 2017BE and AAIJ 2014BJ taking into account correlation between systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S069DM
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Uses m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 172.44+-0.39+-0.17 MeV from AAIJ 2014Z.


pdgid: S069DM
text:
Derived from measurements in Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi- from AALTONEN 2009AP taking correlated systematic uncertainties into account.


pdgid: S069T-
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Reference Lambda_{{b}}()0 lifetime 1.464+-0.010 ps from PDG 2022.


pdgid: S069T-
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Reference Lambda_{{b}}()0 lifetime 1.479+-0.009+-0.010 ps from AAIJ 2014U.


pdgid: S069TR1
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Used Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- for normalization.


pdgid: S069TR2
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Uses Xi_{{b}}()0 measurements from AAIJ 2014Z.


pdgid: S069R2
text:
AALTONEN 2009AP reports [G(Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi-  x b --> Xi_b()- )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda)] / [B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar)] = 0.167+0.037-0.025+-0.012 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda) = 3.0+-0.8E-4, B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar) = 19.8+-4.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S069R2
text:
ABAZOV 2007K reports [G(Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi-  x b --> Xi_b()- )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda)] / [B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar)] = 0.28+-0.09+0.09-0.08 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda) = 3.0+-0.8E-4, B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar) = 19.8+-4.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S069R09
text:
AAIJ 2017BE reports [G(Xi_b()- --> J/psi Lambda K-  x b --> Xi_b()- )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda)] / [B(bbar --> b-baryon at p p)] = 4.19+-0.29+-0.15E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda) = 3.0+-0.8E-4, B(bbar --> b-baryon at p p) = 18.7+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S069R08
text:
AAIJ 2017F reports [G(Xi_b --> p K- K-  x bbar --> Xi_b() )/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> K+ K- K+)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] = 2.65+-0.35+-0.47E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(B+ --> K+ K- K+) = 3.40+-0.14E-5, B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S069R12
text:
Obtained using the ratio of fragmentation and branching fractions relative to the B- --> K+ K- K- decay.


pdgid: S069R05
text:
Measured in the decay chain of Xi_b()- --> Lambda_b()0 pi-, Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- and Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- pi+ pi-, with Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+.


pdgid: S069R05
text:
A signal is reported with a significance of 3.2 standard deviations in the decay chain of Xi_b()- --> Lambda_b()0 pi-, Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, and Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+.


pdgid: S069R15
text:
AAIJ 2024V reports [G(Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 D_s()- x  x b --> Xi_b()-/ x b --> Lambda_b()0 )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-)] = 16.9+-1.3+-4.4E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-) = 1.10+-0.10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S069R01
text:
Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the Xi_b()- --> R K-  decay, with R --> p K-.


pdgid: S069R04
text:
Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the Xi_b()- --> R K- decay, with R --> p K-.


pdgid: S069R14
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024R value last uncertainty comes from the uncertainties in the branching fractions of the charmonium states.


pdgid: S070M0
text:
Uses Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays. The measurement comes from the mass difference of Xi_{{b}}()0 and Lambda_{{b}}()0.


pdgid: S070T0
text:
Uses Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi-, Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays. The measurement comes from the value of relative lifetimes of Xi_{{b}}()0 to Lambda_{{b}}()0.


pdgid: S070TM0
text:
Uses Xi_{{b}}^*()- and Xi_{{b}}^'()- decays to Xi_b()0 pi-, where Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi-, Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+.


pdgid: S070R01
text:
AAIJ 2014H reports [G(Xi_b --> p D0 K-  x bbar --> Xi_b() )/G(total)] / [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 K-)] = 0.44+-0.09+-0.06 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2, B(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 K-) = 4.6+-0.8E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R16
text:
Measured relative to Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, Lambda_c()+ --> p K_S()0. The last error includes systematic, the uncertainties on B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, Lambda_c()+ --> p K_S()0), and the ratio of f(Xi_b()0)/f(Lambda_b()0) obtained from AAIJ 2019AB by assuming SU(3) flavor symmetry.


pdgid: S070R17
text:
Measured relative to Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ K-, Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S. The last error includes systematic, the uncertainties on B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ K-, Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S), and the ratio of f(Xi_{{b}}()0)/f(Lambda_{{b}}()0) obtained from AAIJ 2019AB by assuming SU(3) flavor symmetry.


pdgid: S070R08
text:
AAIJ 2025J reports 11.0+-2.6+-4.1E-6 from a measurement of [G(Xi_b()0 --> Lambda pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.30+-0.36E-3,B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.24+-0.08E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3, B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S070R09
text:
AAIJ 2025J reports 10.4+-1.4+-3.7E-6 from a measurement of [G(Xi_b()0 --> Lambda K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.30+-0.36E-3,B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.24+-0.08E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3, B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S070R10
text:
AAIJ 2025J reports <2.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(Xi_b()0 --> Lambda K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] assuming B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.30+-0.36E-3,B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.24+-0.08E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9E-3, B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.32E-2.


pdgid: S070R11
text:
AAIJ 2025AA reports [G(Xi_b()0  --> J/psi Xi- pi+  x  x b --> Xi_b()0 )/G(total)] / [B(Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi- x B(b --> Xi_b()-) )] = 11.9+-1.4+-0.6E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi- x B(b --> Xi_b()-) ) = 1.0+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S070R05
text:
AAIJ 2024V reports [G(Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ D_s()- x  x b --> Xi_b()0/ x b --> Lambda_b()0 )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-)] = 15.8+-1.1+-7.7E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-) = 1.10+-0.10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S070R02
text:
AAIJ 2014H reports [G(Xi_b --> Lambda_c()+ K- x bbar --> Xi_b() )/G(Xi_b --> p D0 K-  x bbar --> Xi_b() )] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.57+-0.22+-0.21 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.946+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R12
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Xi_b --> p K- pi+ pi-  x b --> Xi_b()0/ x b --> Lambda_b()0)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] = 6.2+-0.8+-0.2+-0.8E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R13
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Xi_b --> p K- K- pi+  x b --> Xi_b()0/ x b --> Lambda_b()0)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] = 5.6+-0.6+-0.4+-0.5E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R14
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Xi_b --> p K- K+ K-  x b --> Xi_b()0/ x b --> Lambda_b()0)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] = 0.57+-0.28+-0.08+-0.10E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R14
text:
AAIJ 2018Q sees excess with a significance of 2.3sigma. Using B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 0.430+-0.036E-2 and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.46+-0.24E-2 the authors set two sided limit [0.11 -- 0.25] at 90% C.L.


pdgid: B169M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}^'(5935)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(pi-) = 3.66+-0.01+-0.00 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B169M
text:
AAIJ 2015H measures m(Xi_{{b}}^'(5935)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(pi-) = 3.653+-0.018+-0.006 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161M
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024R measures m(Xi_{{b}}(4945)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - m(pi+-) = 15.810+-0.077+-0.052 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161M
text:
Measured using Xi_b(5945)0 --> Xi_b()- pi+, Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+  decays.


pdgid: B161M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5945)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - m(pi+) = 15.80+-0.02+-0.01 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161M
text:
AAIJ 2016AE measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5945)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - m(pi+) = 15.727+-0.068+-0.023 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161M
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012S measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5945)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - m(pi+) = 14.84+-0.74+-0.28 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161W
text:
Measured using Xi_b(5945)0 --> Xi_b()- pi+, Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: B161R01
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024R measures B(Xi_b(5945)0 --> Xi_b()- pi+) x B(b --> Xi_b(5945)0X) / B(b --> Xi_b()-X) = 0.22+-0.02+-0.02.


pdgid: B170M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5955)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(pi-) = 24.27+-0.03+-0.01 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B170M
text:
AAIJ 2015H measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5955)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(pi-) = 24.96+-0.12+-0.06 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B207M
text:
Observed in Xi_b()0 pi+ pi- channel with Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- pi+ pi- and Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+. Measured as mass difference, listed separately.


pdgid: B207M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6087)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - 2m(pi+-) = 16.20+-0.20+-0.06 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi+-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B207W
text:
Observed in Xi_b()0 pi+ pi- channel with Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- pi+ pi- and  Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+


pdgid: B208M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6095)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - 2m(pi+-) = 24.32+-0.15+-0.03 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi+-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B200M
text:
Observed in Xi_b()- pi+ pi- channel with Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi- and Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi- pi+ pi- and Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+.


pdgid: B200M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6100)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - 2m(pi+-) = 23.60+-0.11+-0.12 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B200M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021F measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6100)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - 2m(pi+-) = 24.14+-0.22+-0.09 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B200W
text:
Observed in Xi_b()- pi+ pi- channel with Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi- and Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi- pi+ pi- and Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+


pdgid: B180M
text:
AAIJ 2021 measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6227)-) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 608.3+-0.8+-0.4 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B180M
text:
Measures mass difference m(Xi_{{b}}(6227)-) - m(Lambda_{{b}}^0) = 607.3+-2.0+-0.3 MeV and uses m(Lambda_{{b}}^0) = 5619.58+-0.17 MeV.


pdgid: B199M
text:
AAIJ 2021 measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6227)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) = 429.8+1.4-1.5+-0.3 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B198R01
text:
AAIJ 2020AM reports upper limits for [G(Xi_bc()0 --> D0 p K-  x x b --> Xi_bc()0/ x b --> Lambda_b )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 K-)] < 3.0E-1 -- 1.7E-2 for the considered Xi_{{bc}}()0 mass and lifetime hypotheses ranging from 6.7 to 7.2 GeV and from 100 to 500 fs. We use the 3.0E-1 limit for the quoted result.


pdgid: B198R01
text:
AAIJ 2020AM reports [G(Xi_bc()0 --> D0 p K-  x x b --> Xi_bc()0/ x b --> Lambda_b )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 K-)] < 3.0E-1 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 K-) = 4.6E-5.


pdgid: S063M
text:
Combines measurement using Omega_b()- --> J/psi Omega- decays with results from AAIJ 2016O and AAIJ 2021AC taking into account correlations amongst systematic uncertainties. Uses Xi_{{b}}()- mass 5797.33+-0.24+-029 MeV from AAIJ 2021.


pdgid: S063M
text:
Uses Omega_b()- --> J/psi Omega- and Omega_c()0 pi- decays, with the first evidence for Omega_b()- --> Omega_c()0 pi- at 3.3 sigma significance.


pdgid: S063M
text:
Uses Omega_b()- --> Xi_c()+ K- pi- and Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays. Reports the value of 6044.3+-1.2+-1.1+0.19-0.22 MeV where the last uncertainty is due to the mass of Xi_{{c}}()+. We have combined the two systematic uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S063M
text:
Reconstructed in Omega_b()- --> Omega_c()0 pi-, Omega_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Reference Xi_{{b}}()- mass 5797.72+-0.6 MeV from AAIJ 2014B.


pdgid: S063M
text:
Observed in Omega_b()- --> J/psi Omega- decays with 16+6-4 candidates, a significance of 5.5 sigma from a combined mass-lifetime fit.


pdgid: S063M
text:
Observed in Omega_b()- --> J/psi Omega- decays with 17.8+-4.9+-0.8 candidates, a significance of 5.4 sigma.


pdgid: S063A00
text:
Uses Omega_b()- --> J/psi Omega decays combined with the result from AAIJ 2016O obtained using Omega_b()- --> Omega_c()0 pi-, Omega_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ and Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays taking into account correlation of systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S063A00
text:
Uses Omega_b()- --> Omega_c()0 pi-, Omega_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ and Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: S063T
text:
Measured in Omega_b()- --> Omega_c()0 pi-, Omega_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays relative to Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays with reference Xi_{{b}}()- mean life 1.599+-0.06 ps from AAIJ 2014B.


pdgid: S063R01
text:
AAIJ 2023BD reports [G(Omega_b()- --> J/psi Omega-  x b --> Omega_b() )/G(total)] / [B(Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi- x B(b --> Xi_b()-) )] = 0.120+-0.008+-0.008 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi- x B(b --> Xi_b()-) ) = 1.0+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S063R01
text:
Reconstructing beauty baryons in the kinematic region 2 < eta < 6 and pT < 20 GeV/c with their decays to a J/psi meson and a hyperon.


pdgid: S063R01
text:
AALTONEN 2009AP reports [G(Omega_b()- --> J/psi Omega-  x b --> Omega_b() )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda)] / [B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar)] = 0.045+0.017-0.012+-0.004 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda) = 3.0+-0.8E-4, B(bbar --> b-baryon at p pbar) = 19.8+-4.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S063R01
text:
ABAZOV 2008AL reports [G(Omega_b()- --> J/psi Omega-  x b --> Omega_b() )/G(total)] / [B(Xi_b --> J/psi Xi- x B(b --> Xi_b()-) )] = 0.80+-0.32+0.14-0.22 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Xi_b --> J/psi Xi- x B(b --> Xi_b()-) ) = 1.02+0.26-0.21E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S063R00
text:
AAIJ 2021AH reports [G(Omega_b()- --> p K- K-  x bbar --> Omega_b() )/G(total)] / [B(Xi_b()- --> p K- K- x B(b --> Xi_b()-) )] < 62E-3 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Xi_b()- --> p K- K- x B(b --> Xi_b()-) ) = 3.7E-8.


pdgid: S063R00
text:
AAIJ 2017F reports [G(Omega_b()- --> p K- K-  x bbar --> Omega_b() )/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> K+ K- K+)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 18E-5 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B+ --> K+ K- K+) = 3.40E-5, B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S063R02
text:
AAIJ 2017F reports [G(Omega_b()- --> p pi- pi-  x bbar --> Omega_b() )/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> K+ K- K+)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 109E-5 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B+ --> K+ K- K+) = 3.40E-5, B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S063R03
text:
AAIJ 2017F reports [G(Omega_b()- --> p K- pi-  x bbar --> Omega_b() )/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> K+ K- K+)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 51E-5 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B+ --> K+ K- K+) = 3.40E-5, B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S063R06
text:
AAIJ 2021AC reports [G(Omega_b()- --> Xi_c()+ K- pi-)/G(Omega_b()- --> Omega_c()0 pi-, Omega_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+)] * [B(Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 1.35+-0.11+-0.05 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.2+-3.0E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: B193M
text:
AAIJ 2020T measures m(Omega_{{b}}(6316)-)-m(Xi_{{b}}()0) = 523.74+-0.31+-0.07 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B194M
text:
AAIJ 2020T measures m(Omega_{{b}}(6330)-)-m(Xi_{{b}}()0) = 538.40+-0.28+-0.07 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B195M
text:
AAIJ 2020T measures m(Omega_{{b}}(6340)-)-m(Xi_{{b}}()0) = 547.81+-0.26+-0.05 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B196M
text:
AAIJ 2020T measures m(Omega_{{b}}(6350)-)-m(Xi_{{b}}()0) = 557.98+-0.35+-0.05 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S061T
text:
This ABREU 1999W result is the combined result of the Lambda lepton-, p lepton-, and excess Lambda mu- impact parameter measurements.


pdgid: S061R8
text:
ABREU 1995S reports [G(b-baryon --> p mu- nubar anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.0049+-0.0011+0.0015-0.0011 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R9
text:
BARATE 1998V reports [G(b-baryon --> p lepton nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 4.72+-0.66+-0.44E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R5
text:
BARATE 1998D reports [G(b-baryon --> Lambda lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.00326+-0.00016+-0.00039 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Measured using the excess of Lambda lepton-, lepton impact parameter.


pdgid: S061R5
text:
AKERS 1996 reports [G(b-baryon --> Lambda lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.00291+-0.00023+-0.00025 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R5
text:
ABREU 1995S reports [G(b-baryon --> Lambda lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.0030+-0.0006+-0.0004 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R5
text:
BUSKULIC 1995L reports [G(b-baryon --> Lambda lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.0061+-0.0006+-0.0010 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R5
text:
BUSKULIC 1992I reports [G(b-baryon --> Lambda lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.0070+-0.0010+-0.0018 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Superseded by BUSKULIC 1995L.


pdgid: S061R7
text:
ABBIENDI 1999L reports [G(b-baryon --> Lambda anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.035+-0.0032+-0.0035 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R7
text:
ABREU 1995C reports 0.28+0.17-0.12 from a measurement of [G(b-baryon --> Lambda anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] assuming B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 0.08+-0.02, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R7
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1997N reports [G(b-baryon --> Lambda anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 0.0393+-0.0046+-0.0037 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R1
text:
ABDALLAH 2005C reports [G(b-baryon --> Xi- lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 3.0+-1.0+-0.3E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R1
text:
BUSKULIC 1996T reports [G(b-baryon --> Xi- lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 5.4+-1.1+-0.8E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S061R1
text:
ABREU 1995V reports [G(b-baryon --> Xi- lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z)] = 5.9+-2.1+-1.0E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> b-baryon at Z) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: B185R01
text:
Amplitude analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi p pbar. AAIJ 2022H finds evidence at just over 3 sigma for a J/psi p structure at 4337+7-4+-2 MeV.


pdgid: B204R00
text:
An analysis of Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()- K+ K- decays, AAIJ 2025AK reports B(Lambda_b()0 --> P_c_cbar_s(4338)0 K+ K-, P_c_cbar_s --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()- ) / B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()- K+ K-) < 0.12 at 95% CL.


pdgid: B186R01
text:
Search for J/psi inclusive production in association with a charged particle, assumed to be a  proton. POPOV 2021 observes a resonant signal consistent with a superposition of the  P_c_cbar(4440)+ and P_c_cbar(4457)+, using masses and widths measured by AAIJ 2019W, at  significance of 3sigma.


pdgid: B205R01
text:
An analysis of Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()- K+ K- decays, AAIJ 2025AK reports B(Lambda_b()0 --> P_c_cbar_s(4459)0 K+ K-, P_c_cbar_s --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-) / B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()- K+ K-) < 0.20 at 95% CL.


pdgid: S028C
text:
AAD 2025B searches are made for monopoles produced in ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions. Model-dependent mass exclusions between 20 -- 150 GeV are made. Limit given at the mass of 60 GeV.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ACHARYA 2025 present cross section and mass limits presented for a suite of searches covering charges between 1 and 10 Dirac charges and interpreted within various model scenarios.


pdgid: S028C
text:
AAD 2023CO limits given for monopoles pair produced via a Drell-Yan or photon-fusion mechanism. Spins 1/2 and 0 are considered. The quoted limit is representative of the lowest values that were achieved.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ACHARYA 2022A give limits for monopoles pair-produced via a Drell-Yan production. Spins 0, 1/2, and 1 are considered. The cross section limit is representative of the lowest values that were achieved. The experiment used a combination of nuclear track detectors to look evidence of passing monopoles and a SQUID magnetometer to look for stopped monopoles.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ACHARYA 2022B achieved limits on monopole (point-like included) production via the Schwinger mechanism in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV centre-of-mass energy per nucleon pair. The upper cross section limit value quoted here is representative of the lowest values achieved.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ACHARYA 2021 search for dyons at LHC. Using a production model limits (we report the lowest) are set for dyons with magnetic charge up to 5 gD, electric charges up to 200 e and spins 0, 1/2, 1. The corresponding mass limits for magnetic monopoles are in the range 870 -- 2040 GeV for magnetic charges in the same range.


pdgid: S028C
text:
AAD 2020G give limits for Drell-Yan production with spin-0 and spin-1/2 monopoles. The above limit is for spin = 0 at mass = 3 TeV.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ACHARYA 2019B limits both beta-dependent and beta-independent on monopoles with spins 0, 1/2, and 1 and with magnetic charges ranging from one to five times the Dirac charge in mass ranges between 200 GeV and 5000 GeV.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ACHARYA 2018A provide limits on monopoles with spins 0, 1/2, and 1 and with magnetic charges ranging from two to five times the Dirac charge.


pdgid: S028C
text:
The search was sensitive to monopoles which had stopped in aluminium trapping volumes. Monopoles with spins 0 and 1/2 were considered; mass-dependent spin 1/2 monopole limits are quoted here.


pdgid: S028C
text:
AAD 2016AB model-independent 95% CL limits estimated using a fiducial region of approximately constant acceptance. Limits are mass-dependent.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ACHARYA 2016 limits at 95% CL estimated using a Drell-Yan-like production mechanism for scalar monopoles.


pdgid: S028C
text:
AAD 2012CS searched for monopoles as highly ionising objects. The cross section limits are based on an assumed Drell Yan-like production process for spin 1/2 monopoles. The limits are mass- and scenario-dependent.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ABBIENDI 2008 assume production of spin 1/2 monopoles with effective charge gbeta (n=1), via e+ e- --> gamma^* --> M Mbar, so that the cross section is proportional to (1 + cos**2(theta)). There is no z information for such highly saturated tracks, so a parabolic track in the jet chamber is projected onto the xy plane. Charge per hit in the chamber produces a clean separation of signal and background.


pdgid: S028C
text:
ABULENCIA 2006K searches for high-ionizing signals in CDF central outer tracker and time-of-flight detector. For Drell-Yan M Mbar production, the cross section limit implies M > 360 GeV at 95% CL.


pdgid: S028C
text:
AKTAS 2005A model-dependent limits as a function of monopole mass shown for arbitrary mass of 60 GeV. Based on search for stopped monopoles in the H1 Al beam pipe.


pdgid: S028C
text:
KALBFLEISCH 2004 reports searches for stopped magnetic monopoles in Be, Al, and Pb samples obtained from discarded material from the upgrading of D0 and CDF. A large-aperture warm-bore cryogenic detector was used. The approach was an extension of the methods of KALBFLEISCH 2000. Cross section results moderately model dependent; interpretation as a mass lower limit depends on possibly invalid perturbation expansion.


pdgid: S028C
text:
KALBFLEISCH 2000 used an induction method to search for stopped monopoles in pieces of the D0 (FNAL) beryllium beam pipe and in extensions to the drift chamber aluminum support cylinder. Results are model dependent.


pdgid: S028C
text:
This work has also been reinterpreted in the framework of monopole production via the thermal Schwinger process (GOULD 2017); this gives rise to lower mass limits.


pdgid: S028C
text:
HE 1997 used a lead target and barium phosphate glass detectors. Cross-section limits are well below those predicted via the Drell-Yan mechanism.


pdgid: S028A
text:
ABBOTT 1998K search for heavy pointlike Dirac monopoles via central production of a pair of photons with high transverse energies.


pdgid: S028A
text:
ACCIARRI 1995C finds a limit B(Z --> gamma gamma gamma) <0.8E-5 (which is possible via a monopole loop) at 95% CL and sets the mass limit via a cross section model.


pdgid: S028F
text:
ABBASI 2022 search was based on Cherenkov light detection in an array of optical modules in the Antarctic ice cap. Limits are speed-dependent.


pdgid: S028F
text:
ALBERT 2022C search for magnetic monopoles using data taken with the ANTARES neutrino telescope over a period of 10 years. No signal observed. Velocity dependent upper limits set on the flux of magnetic monopoles.


pdgid: S028F
text:
ACERO 2021 employ NOvA experiment to set reported 90% CL upper limit on the cosmic monopoles flux for velocity 6E-4 < beta < 5E-3 and mass > 5E8 GeV.


pdgid: S028F
text:
GAPONENKO 2021 use data of NT200 two-year operation at Baikal to give speed-dependent limits for different assumed catalysis cross sections. Reported limit is for sigma = 10 mb.


pdgid: S028F
text:
ALBERT 2017 limits were estimated using a Cherenkov light in an array of optical modules under the Mediterranean Sea. The limits are for MM masses between E10 and E14 GeV. The limits are speed-dependent.


pdgid: S028F
text:
AAB 2016 search was made with a set of telescopes sampling the longitudinal profile of fluorescence light emitted by extensive air showers. Limits are speed dependent.


pdgid: S028F
text:
AARTSEN 2016B was based on a Cherenkov signature in an array of optical modules which were sunk in the Antarctic ice cap. Limits are speed-dependent.


pdgid: S028F
text:
Beyond the monopole speed, the limits of AARTSEN 2014 depend on the catalysis cross section (sigma) which corresponds to the monopole radiating lhat times the light per track length compared to the Cherenkov light from a single electrically charged, relativistic particle. The values quoted here correspond to sigma = 1 barn or lhat = 30.


pdgid: S028F
text:
ABBASI 2013 and ABBASI 2010A were based on a Cherenkov signature in an array of optical modules which were sunk in the Antarctic ice cap. Limits are speed-dependent.


pdgid: S028F
text:
ADRIAN-MARTINEZ 2012A measurements were based on a Cherenkov signature in an underwater telescope in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Limits are speed-dependent.


pdgid: S028F
text:
The limits from UENO 2012 depend on the monopole speed and are also sensitive to assumed values of monopole mass and the catalysis cross section.


pdgid: S028F
text:
HOGAN 2008 and DETRIXHE 2011 limits on relativistic monopoles are based on nonobservation of radio Cherenkov signals at the South Pole. Limits are speed-dependent.


pdgid: S028F
text:
BALESTRA 2008 exposed of nuclear track detector modules totaling 400 m**2 for 4 years at the Chacaltaya Laboratory (5230 m) in search for intermediate-mass monopoles with beta> 0.05. The analysis is mainly based on three CR39 modules. For M >5E13 GeV there can be upward-going monopoles as well, hence the flux limit is half that obtained for less massive monopoles. Previous experiments (e.g. MACRO and OHYA (ORITO 1991)) had set limits only for M > 1E9 GeV.


pdgid: S028F
text:
AMBROSIO 2002B direct search final result for m>=10**17 GeV, based upon 4.2 to 9.5 years of running, depending upon the subsystem. Limit with CR39 track-etch detector extends the limit from beta=4E-5 (3.1E-16 cm**-2 sr**-1 s**-1) to beta= 1E-4 (2.1E-16 cm**-2 sr**-1 s**-1). Limit curve in paper is piecewise continuous due to different detection techniques for different beta ranges.


pdgid: S028F
text:
AMBROSIO 2002C limit for catalysis of nucleon decay with catalysis cross section of ~~ 1 mb. The flux limit increases by ~3 at the higher beta limit, and increases to 1E-14 cm**-2 sr**-1 s**-1 if the catalysis cross section is 0.01 mb. Based upon 71193 hr of data with the streamer detector, with an acceptance of 4250 m**2 sr.


pdgid: S028F
text:
AMBROSIO 2002D result for ``more than two years of data.'' Ionization search using several subsystems. Limit curve as a function of beta not given. Included in AMBROSIO 2002B.


pdgid: S028F
text:
AMBROSIO 1997 global MACRO 90%CL is 0.78E-15 at beta=1.1E-4, goes through a minimum at 0.61E-15 near beta=(1.1 -- 2.7)*10**-3, then rises to 0.84E-15 at beta=0.1. The global limit in this region is below the Parker bound at 10**-15. Less stringent limits are established for 4E-5<beta<1E-4. Limits set by various triggers and different subdetectors are given in the paper. All limits assume a catalysis cross section smaller than a few mb.


pdgid: S028F
text:
AHLEN 1994 limit for dyons extends down to beta=0.9E-4 and a limit of 1.3E-14 extends to beta = 0.8E-4. Also see comment by PRICE 1994 and reply of BARISH 1994. One loophole in the AHLEN 1994 result is that in the case of monopoles catalyzing nucleon decay, relativistic particles could veto the events. See AMBROSIO 1997 for additional results.


pdgid: S028F
text:
Limit from combining data of CAPLIN 1986, BERMON 1985, INCANDELA 1984, and CABRERA 1983. For a discussion of controversy about CAPLIN 1986 observed event, see GUY 1987. Also see SCHOUTEN 1987.


pdgid: S028F
text:
ALVAREZ 1975, FLEISCHER 1975, and FRIEDLANDER 1975 explain as fragmenting nucleus. EBERHARD 1975 and ROSS 1976 discuss conflict with other experiments. HAGSTROM 1977 reinterprets as antinucleus. PRICE 1978 reassesses.


pdgid: S028FA
text:
KOBAYASHI 2023A found Parker-type bounds on magnetic monopoles with arbitrary magnetic charge based on the survival of galactic, seed, and primordial magnetic fields. Bounds are between 3E-21 and E-5 cm**-2sr**-1s**-1 for masses < E18 GeV. Reported bound is the most stringent one.


pdgid: S028FA
text:
ADAMS 1993 limit based on ``survival and growth of a small galactic seed field'' is 10**-16 (m/10**17 GeV) cm**-2 s**-1 sr**-1. Above 10**17 GeV, limit 10**-16 (10**17 GeV/m) cm**-2 s**-1 sr**-1 (from requirement that monopole density does not overclose the universe) is more stringent.


pdgid: S028D
text:
KOVALIK 1986 examined 498 kg of schist from two sites which exhibited clear mineralogical evidence of having been buried at least 20 km deep and held below the Curie temperature.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
AAD 2024Z searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with exactly two same-sign leptons or at least three leptons. Several signal regions, including a notET selection targeting RPC models, and selections based on b-jet multiplicities, targeting RPV models, are considered. No significant excess over the Standard Model expectation is found. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are set on the gluino or squark mass, in multi-step RPC decays via charginos, neutralinos or sleptons into quarks, leptons and neutralinos, or RPV decays of either the neutralino LSP or directly the stop produced in gtilde --> t ttilde into quarks. See their Fig. 7.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
LEES 2023C search in 398 fb^{-1} of e+ e- annihilations at 10.58 GeV for SUSY in events with a tagged B meson and one and only one charged track that must be consistent with the hypothesis of being a proton. The results are interpreted in an RPV SUSY model, where a neutralino is produced in the decay of a B meson into a neutralino and a proton with the RPV coupling lambda_{{113}}^''. A branching fraction upper limit is determined for the lambda_{{113}}^'' coupling, divided by the relevant squark mass squared as a function of the neutralino mass, see their figure 6. They also search for a new dark sector antibaryon that could be produced in decays of B mesons.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
AAD 2022E searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  supersymmetry by measuring the yield asymmetry between events containing e- mu+ and those  containing e+ mu-. This was found in agreement with the standard model prediction of 1. Limits  are set on the RPV production of t mutilde_L events with mutilde_L --> mu chitilde_1()0 for  various values of  lambda_{{231}}^', see their figures 6 and 7.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
TUMASYAN 2022S searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of electroweakino pair production in events with three or four leptons, with up to  two hadronically decaying tau leptons, or two same-sign light leptons (e or mu). No  significant  excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass  of  chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the models Tchi1n2B (in flavory-democratic and tau-enriched or -dominated scenarios), Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F, see their Figures 16 -- 20,  and  on the mass of the higgsino-triplet chitilde_{{2}}()0, chitilde_{{1}}()+-, and  chitilde_{{1}}()0   in the models Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B, and Tn1n1C, see their Figure 21.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
TUMASYAN 2022V searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  evidence of electroweakino pair production with decay to two Higgs bosons H, with H --> b bbar,  resulting either in 4 resolved b-jets or two large-radius jets, and large notET. No  significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of  chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the models Tn1n1A, see their Figures 11 and 12, or in  a model where higgsino-like nearly mass degenerate chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{3}}()0 are  pair produced and each decay to H and a bino-like chitilde_{{1}}()0, see their Figure 13. Limits are also set on the gluino mass in the model Tglu1I, see their Figure 14.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
AAD 2021AX searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for pair production of electroweakinos decaying to the LSP via the emission of Standard Model bosons (Higgs, W, Z) decaying into hadrons. The final state in all cases characterised by the presence of notET, jets, and large-R jets tagged according to the boson of interest. Different assumptions (Higgsino, Wino, Bino) are made for the pair produced electroweakinos and for the LSP multipliet. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the electroweakino masses as a function of the model parameters (in particular mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)). See Fig. 16.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
AAD 2021BF searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for pair production of gluinos, stops, electroweakinos decaying RPV either directly or indirectly via the LSP. The final state in all cases is one or two leptons, many jets (up to fifteen) and b-jets. Different models with different branching fractions of the gluino or stop follow from the assumptions on the nature of the electroweakinos. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the, ttilde_{{1}}, electroweakino masses as a function of the chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass in several scenarios of gluino, stop and electroweakino pair production.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
DREINER 2009 show that in the general MSSM with non-universal gaugino masses there exists no model-independent laboratory bound on the mass of the lightest neutralino. An essentially massless chi_{{1}}()0 is allowed by the experimental and observational data, imposing some constraints on other MSSM parameters, including M_{{2}}(), mu and the slepton and squark masses.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
ABBIENDI 2004H search for charginos and neutralinos in events with acoplanar leptons+jets and multi-jet final states in the 192 -- 209 GeV data, combined with the results on leptonic final states from ABBIENDI 2004. The results hold for a scan over the parameter space covering the region 0 < M_{{2}}() < 5000 GeV, -1000 < mu < 1000 GeV and tan(beta) from 1 to 40. This limit supersedes ABBIENDI 2000H.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
HEISTER 2004 data collected up to 209 GeV. Updates earlier analysis of selectrons from HEISTER 2002E, includes a new analysis of charginos and neutralinos decaying into stau and uses results on charginos with initial state radiation from HEISTER 2002J. The limit is based on the direct search for charginos and neutralinos, the constraints from the slepton search and the Higgs mass limits from HEISTER 02 using a top mass of 175 GeV, interpreted in a framework with universal gaugino and sfermion masses. Assuming the mixing in the stau sector to be negligible, the limit improves to 43.1 GeV. Under the assumption of MSUGRA with unification of the Higgs and sfermion masses, the limit improves to 50 GeV, and reaches 53 GeV for A_{{0}}() = 0. These limits include and update the results of BARATE 2001.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
ABDALLAH 2003M uses data from sqrt(s) = 192 -- 208 GeV. A limit on the mass of chitilde_{{1}}()0 is derived from direct searches for neutralinos combined with the chargino search. Neutralinos are searched in the production of chitilde_{{1}}()0chitilde_{{2}}()0, chitilde_{{1}}()0chitilde_{{3}}()0, as well as chitilde_{{2}}()0chitilde_{{3}}()0 and chitilde_{{2}}()0chitilde_{{4}}()0 giving rise to cascade decays, and chitilde_{{1}}()0chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()0chitilde_{{2}}()0, followed by the decay chitilde_2()0 --> tautilde tau. The results hold for the parameter space defined by values of M(2)< 1 TeV, |mu|<=2~TeV with the chitilde_{{1}}()0 as LSP. The limit is obtained for tan(beta) = 1 and large mass(0), where chitilde_{{2}}()0chitilde_{{4}}()0 and chargino pair production are important. If the constraint from Higgs searches is also imposed, the limit improves to 49.0 GeV in the m(h)**max scenario with mass(t)=174.3 GeV. These limits update the results of ABREU 2000J.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
ABDALLAH 2003M uses data from sqrt(s) = 192 -- 208 GeV. An indirect limit on the mass of chitilde_{{1}}()0 is derived by constraining the MSSM parameter space by the results from direct searches for neutralinos (including cascade decays and tautildetau final states), for charginos (for all Delta(m)_+) and for sleptons, stop and sbottom. The results hold for the full parameter space defined by values of M(2)< 1 TeV, |mu|<=2 TeV with the chitilde_{{1}}()0 as LSP. Constraints from the Higgs search in the m(h)**max scenario assuming mass(t)=174.3 GeV are included. The limit is obtained for tan(beta)>= 5 when stau mixing leads to mass degeneracy between tautilde_{{1}} and chitilde_{{1}}()0 and the limit is based on chitilde_{{2}}()0 production followed by its decay to tautilde_{{1}}tau. In the pathological scenario where mass(0) and |mu| are large, so that the chitilde_{{2}}()0 production cross section is negligible, and where there is mixing in the stau sector but not in stop nor sbottom, the limit is based on charginos with soft decay products and an ISR photon. The limit then degrades to 39 GeV. See Figs. 40 -- 42 for the dependence of the limit on tan(beta) and mass(nutilde). These limits update the results of ABREU 2000W.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
ACCIARRI 2000D data collected at sqrt(s)=189 GeV. The results hold over the full parameter space defined by 0.7<=tan(beta)<=60, 0<=M(2)<=2 TeV, m(0)<=500 GeV, |mu|<=2 TeV The minimum mass limit is reached for tan(beta)=1 and large m(0). The results of slepton searches from ACCIARRI 1999W are used to help set constraints in the region of small m(0). The limit improves to 48 GeV for m(0)~>200 GeV and tan(beta)~>10. See their Figs. 6 -- 8 for the tan(beta) and m(0) dependence of the limits. Updates ACCIARRI 1998F.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
AAD 2014K sets limits on the chi-nucleon spin-dependent and spin-independent cross sections out to mass(chi) = 10 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHA
text:
CALIBBI 2013 use the fact that if the relic abundance of chitilde_{{1}}()0 does not overclose the universe, scalar lepton and Higgsino masses must be relatively small. Using 8 TeV ATLAS constraints on the scalar tau mass and on invisible Higgs decays, they estimate a lower bound for the chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABBASI 2025A is based on 10 years of data collected with IceCube. They looked for interactions of nu's resulting from neutralino annihilations in the Earth over a background of atmospheric neutrinos and set 90% CL limits on the spin independent neutralino-proton cross section for neutralino masses in the range 10 -- 10000 GeV. This updates AARTSEN 2017.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
MCDANIEL 2024 uses 14 years of Fermi-LAT data from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidals to constrain dark matter annihilation cross sections.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABBASI 2023A sets limits on the dark matter annihilation cross section from searches of monochromatic neutrinos produced in the galactic center. They set a limit on the annihilation cross section for dark matter with masses between 10 -- 40000 GeV annihilating in the Galactic center assuming an NFW profile. The limit is of order 10E-24 cm**3s**-1 in the nu_e nubar_e channel.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABE 2023B sets limits on the dark matter annihilation cross section from line-like features  in TeV gamma-rays in the direction of the Galactic center using the MAGIC stereoscopic telescope.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ALBERT 2023 uses gamma-ray observation of the Galactic halo to constrain the dark matter annihilation cross section for annihilations for masses between 10 -- 100 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
CHENG 2023A uses 13 years of Fermi-LAT data and 5 years of DAMPE data to constrain dark matter annihilation in the Galactic halo from searches of gamma-ray spectral lines.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
FOSTER 2023 sets limits on the dark matter annihilation cross section from monochromatic  gamma-rays in the inner Milky Way using 14 years of data from Fermi-LAT.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
GUO 2023A sets limits on the dark matter annihilation cross section from 10 years of IceCube muon-track data from 18 dwarf speroidal galaxies.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
LAVIS 2023 uses a statistical analysis of the radio flux densities within galaxy clusters in data from the MeerKAT Galaxy Cluster Legacy Survey to constrain dark matter annihilations for masses less than 1 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABBASI 2022B presents 7 years of data from a search of neutrinos from dark matter  annihilations in the sun using the DeepCore sub-array of IceCube. Annihilation cross section limits applies to dark matter masses between 5 -- 100 GeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABDALLA 2022 uses gamma-ray observations in the Galactic center to constrain the dark matter annihilation cross section for annihilations into W W and tau tau for dark matter masses between 200 GeV to 70 TeV. This updates ABDALLAH 2018.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABDALLAH 2021 places constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section for annihilations into gamma-rays from the dwarf irregular galaxy WLM for masses between 0.15 to 10 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABAZAJIAN 2020 sets constraints on the dark matter annihilation from gamma-ray searches from Fermi LAT observations of the Galactic center.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABDALLAH 2020 places constraints on the dark matter annihilation cross section for annihilations into gamma-rays from Milky Way dwarf galaxy satellites for masses between 0.2 to 40 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ABE 2020G is based on SuperKamiokande data taken from 1996 to 2016 searching for neutrinos produced from dark matter annihilations in the galactic center or halo. They place constraints on the dark matter-nucleon scattering cross section for dark matter masses between 1 GeV and 10 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ALBERT 2020 sets limits on the annihilation cross section of dark matter with mass between 1 and 100 TeV from gamma-ray observations of the local dwarf spheroidal galaxies.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ALBERT 2020A set limits on the dark matter annihilation cross section from neutrinos observations in the Galactic center using 11 years of ANTARES data.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ALBERT 2020C set limits on the dark matter annihilation cross section from neutrinos observations in the Galactic center combining Antares and IceCube data.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ALVAREZ 2020 set limits on the dark matter annihilation from gamma-ray searches from Fermi LAT observations in the directions of dwarf spheroidal galaxies.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
HOOF 2020 set limits on the dark matter annihilation from gamma-ray searches from Fermi LAT observations in the directions of dwarf spheroidal galaxies.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
DI-MAURO 2019 sets limits on the dark matter annihilation from gamma-ray searches in M31 and M33 galaxies using Fermi LAT data.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
JOHNSON 2019 sets limits on p-wave dark matter annihilations in the galactic center using Fermi data.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
LI 2019D sets limits on dark matter annihilation cross sections searching for line-like signals in the all-sky Fermi data.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
AHNEN 2018 uses observations of the dwarf satellite galaxy Ursa Major II to obtain upper limits on annihilation cross sections for dark matter in various channels for masses between 0.1 -- 100 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ALBERT 2018B sets limits on the annihilation cross section of dark matter with mass between 1 and 100 TeV from gamma-ray observations of the Andromeda galaxy.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ALBERT 2018C sets limits on the spin-dependent coupling of dark matter to protons from dark matter annihilation in the Sun.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
AARTSEN 2017A is based on data collected during 532 days of livetime with the IceCube 86-string detector including the DeepCore sub-array. They looked for interactions of nu's from neutralino annihilations in the Sun over a background of atmospheric neutrinos and set 90% CL limits on the spin dependent neutralino-proton cross section for neutralino masses in the range 10 -- 10000 GeV. This updates AARTSEN 2016C.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
AARTSEN 2017C is based on 1005 days of running with the IceCube detector. They set a limit on the annihilation cross section for dark matter with masses between 10 -- 1000 GeV annihilating in the Galactic center assuming an NFW profile. The limit is of 1.2E23 cm**3s**-1 in the tau+ tau- channel. Supercedes AARTSEN 2015E.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ARCHAMBAULT 2017 performs a joint statistical analysis of four dwarf galaxies with VERITAS looking for gamma-ray emission from neutralino annihilation. They set limits on the neutralino  annihilation cross section.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ADRIAN-MARTINEZ 2016 is based on data from the ANTARES neutrino telescope. They looked for interactions of nu's from neutralino annihilations in the Sun over a background of atmospheric neutrinos and set 90% CL limits on the muon neutrino flux. They also obtain limits on the spin dependent and spin independent neutralino-proton cross section for neutralino masses in the range 50 to 5,000 GeV. This updates ADRIAN-MARTINEZ 2013.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
AHNEN 2016 combines 158 hours of Segue 1 observations with MAGIC with 6 year observations of 15 dwarf satellite galaxies by Fermi-LAT to set limits on annihilation cross sections for dark matter masses between 10 GeV and 100 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
AVRORIN 2016 is based on 2.76 years with Lake Baikal neutrino telescope. They derive 90% upper limits on the annihilation cross section from dark matter annihilations in the Galactic center.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
CIRELLI 2016 and LEITE 2016 derive bounds on the annihilation cross section from radio observations.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ACKERMANN 2015 is based on 5.8 years of data with Fermi-LAT and search for monochromatic  gamma-rays in the energy range of 0.2 -- 500 GeV from dark matter annihilations. This  updates ACKERMANN 2013A.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ACKERMANN 2015A is based on 50 months of data with Fermi-LAT and search for dark matter annihilation signals in the isotropic gamma-ray background as well as galactic subhalos in the energy range of a few GeV to a few tens of TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ACKERMANN 2015B is based on 6 years of data with Fermi-LAT observations of Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies. Set limits on the annihilation cross section from mass(chi) = 2 GeV to 10 TeV. This updates ACKERMANN 2014.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
BUCKLEY 2015 is based on 5 years of Fermi-LAT data searching for dark matter annihilation signals from Large Magellanic Cloud.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
CHOI 2015 is based on 3903 days of SuperKamiokande data searching for neutrinos produced from dark matter annihilations in the sun. They place constraints on the dark matter-nucleon scattering cross section for dark matter masses between 4 -- 200 GeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ALEKSIC 2014 is based on almost 160 hours of observations of Segue 1 satellite dwarf galaxy using the MAGIC telescopes between 2011 and 2013. Sets limits on the annihilation cross section out to mass(chi) = 10 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
AVRORIN 2014 is based on almost 2.76 years with Lake Baikal neutrino telescope. They derive 90% upper limits on the fluxes of muons and muon neutrinos from dark matter annihilations in the Sun.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
AARTSEN 2013C is based on data collected during 339.8 effective days with the IceCube 59-string detector. They looked for interactions of nu_{{mu}}'s from neutralino annihilations in nearby galaxies and galaxy clusters. They obtain limits on the neutralino annihilation cross section for neutralino masses in the range 30 -- 100 GeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
BERGSTROM 2013, JIN 2013, and KOPP 2013 derive limits on the mass and annihilation cross section using AMS-02 data. JIN 2013 also sets a limit on the lifetime of the dark matter particle.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
BOLIEV 2013 is based on data collected during 24.12 years of live time with the Bakson Underground Scintillator Telescope. They looked for interactions of nu_{{mu}}'s from neutralino annihilations in the Sun over a background of atmospheric neutrinos and set 90% CL limits on the muon flux. They also obtain limits on the spin dependent and spin independent neutralino-proton cross section for neutralino masses in the range 10 -- 1000 GeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ACKERMANN 2010 place upper limits on the annihilation cross section with b bbar or mu+ mu- final states.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ACHTERBERG 2006 is based on data collected during 421.9 effective days with the AMANDA detector. They looked for interactions of nu_{{mu}}s from the centre of the Earth over a background of atmospheric neutrinos and set 90 % CL limits on the muon flux. Their limit is compared with the muon flux expected from neutralino annihilations into W+ W- and b bbar at the centre of the Earth for MSSM parameters compatible with the relic dark matter density, see their Fig. 7.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
ACKERMANN 2006 is based on data collected during 143.7 days with the AMANDA-II detector. They looked for interactions of nu_{{mu}}s from the Sun over a background of atmospheric neutrinos and set 90 % CL limits on the muon flux. Their limit is compared with the muon flux expected from neutralino annihilations into W+ W- in the Sun for SUSY model parameters compatible with the relic dark matter density, see their Fig. 3.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
DEBOER 2006 interpret an excess of diffuse Galactic gamma rays observed with the EGRET satellite as originating from pi0 decays from the annihilation of neutralinos into quark jets. They analyze the corresponding parameter space in a supergravity inspired MSSM model with radiative electroweak symmetry breaking, see their Fig. 3 for the preferred region in the (mass(0), ) plane of a scenario with large tan(beta).


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
AMBROSIO 1999 and DESAI 2004 set new neutrino flux limits which can be used to limit the parameter space in supersymmetric models based on neutralino annihilation in the Sun and the Earth.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
LOSECCO 1995 reanalyzed the IMB data and places lower limit on mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) of 18 GeV if the LSP is a photino and 10 GeV if the LSP is a higgsino based on LSP annihilation in the sun producing high-energy neutrinos and the limits on neutrino fluxes from the IMB detector.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
MORI 1993 excludes some region in M(2)--mu parameter space depending on tan(beta) and lightest scalar Higgs mass for neutralino dark matter mass(chitilde()0)>mass(W), using limits on upgoing muons produced by energetic neutrinos from neutralino annihilation in the Sun and the Earth.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
BOTTINO 1992 excludes some region M(2)-mu parameter space assuming that the lightest neutralino is the dark matter, using upgoing muons at Kamiokande, direct searches by Ge detectors, and by LEP experiments. The analysis includes top radiative corrections on Higgs parameters and employs two different hypotheses for nucleon-Higgs coupling. Effects of rescaling in the local neutralino density according to the neutralino relic abundance are taken into account.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
BOTTINO 1991 excluded a region in M(2)-mu plane using upgoing muon data from Kamioka experiment, assuming that the dark matter surrounding us is composed of neutralinos and that the Higgs boson is not too heavy.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
KAMIONKOWSKI 1991 excludes a region in the M(2)-mu plane using IMB limit on upgoing muons originated by energetic neutrinos from neutralino annihilation in the sun, assuming that the dark matter is composed of neutralinos and that mass(H_{{1}}()0) ~< 50 GeV. See Fig. 8 in the paper.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
MORI 1991B exclude a part of the region in the M(2)-mu plane with mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) ~< 80 GeV using a limit on upgoing muons originated by energetic neutrinos from neutralino annihilation in the earth, assuming that the dark matter surrounding us is composed of neutralinos and that mass(H_{{1}}()0) ~< 80 GeV.


pdgid: S046PHB
text:
OLIVE 1988 result assumes that photinos make up the dark matter in the galactic halo. Limit is based on annihilations in the sun and is due to an absence of high energy neutrinos detected in underground experiments. The limit is model dependent.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest upper limit is 9.8E-6 pb at 40 GeV. The limit for scattering on neutrons is 5.3E-7 pb at 100 GeV and is 3.7E-7 pb at 46 GeV. This updates AALBERS 2023.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest upper limit is 8.5E-5 pb at 30 GeV. The limit for scattering on neutrons is 6.7E-6 pb at 100 GeV and is 2.8E-6 pb at 30 GeV. This updates APRILE 2023A.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest upper limit is 7.7E-5 pb at a WIMP mass of 40 GeV. The limit for scattering on neutrons is 4E-6 pb at 100 GeV and is 2.7E-6 pb at 40 GeV. The corresponding plots are found in the supplementary material on the journal webpage. This updates HUANG 2022.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest limit is < 2E-4 pb at mass(chi) = 30 GeV. For scatterings on neutrons, the strongest limit is < 6.3E-6 at mass(chi) = 30 GeV.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest limit is 5E-4 pb at mass(chi) = 35 GeV. The limit for scattering on neutrons is 3E-5 pb at 100 GeV and is 1.6E-5 pb at 35 GeV. This updates AKERIB 2016A.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest limit is 5.2E-3 pb at 50 GeV. The limit for scattering on neutrons is 2.8E-4 pb at 100 GeV and the strongest limit is 2.0E-4 pb at 50 GeV. This updates APRILE 2013.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest limit is 0.0043 pb and occurs at mass(chi) = 35 GeV. FELIZARDO 2014 also presents limits for the scattering on neutrons. At mass(chi) = 100 GeV, the upper limit is 0.13 pb and the strongest limit is 0.066 pb at mass(chi) = 35 GeV.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
This result updates LEBEDENKO 2009A. The strongest limit is 8E-3 pb at mass(chi) = 50 GeV. Limit applies to the neutralino neutron elastic cross section.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
Predictions for the spin-dependent elastic cross section based on a frequentist approach to electroweak observables in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest limit is 0.6 pb and occurs at mass(chi)= 30 GeV. The limit for scattering on neutrons is 0.01 pb at mass(chi)= 100 GeV, and the strongest limit is 0.0045 pb at mass(chi)= 30 GeV.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest upper limit is 4 pb and occurs at m_{{chi}}() ~= 60 GeV. The limit on the neutron spin-dependent elastic cross section is 0.07 pb. This latter limit is improved in AHMED 2009, where a limit of 0.02 pb is obtained at mass(chi) = 100 GeV. The strongest limit in AHMED 2009 is 0.018 pb and occurs at mass(chi) = 60 GeV.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest upper limit is 1.2 pb and occurs at mass(chi) ~= 40 GeV. The limit on the neutron spin-dependent cross section is 35 pb.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
ELLIS 2004 calculates the chi p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry, but without universal scalar masses. In the case of universal squark and slepton masses, but non-universal Higgs masses, the limit becomes 2E-4, see ELLIS 2003E.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
ELLIS 2001C calculates the chi-p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry. In models with nonuniversal Higgs masses, the upper limit to the cross section is 6E-4.


pdgid: S046DM1
text:
The strongest upper limit is 3 pb and occurs at mass(chi)~=60 GeV. The limits are for inelastic scattering X0 + ^129Xe --> X0 + ^129Xe* (39.58 keV).


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
WANG 2020G strongest limit is 2.2E-10 pb at 30 GeV using 132 ton-day full exposure of PandaX-II. This updates CUI 2017A, though the results here provide weaker constraints.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
Based on 278.8 days of data collection. The strongest limit is 4.1E-11 pb at mass(chi) = 30 GeV. This updates APRILE 2017G.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
Predictions for the spin-independent elastic cross section based on a frequentist approach to electroweak observables in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using the 20 fb**-1 8 TeV and the 5 fb**-1 7 TeV LHC data and the LUX data.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
The strongest limit is 3.6E-6 pb and occurs at mass(chi) = 35 GeV. Felizardo 2014 updates Felizardo 2012.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
Predictions for the spin-independent elastic cross section based on a Bayesian approach to electroweak observables in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using the 20 fb**-1 LHC data and LUX.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
AGNESE 2013 presents 90% CL limits on the elastic cross section for masses in the range 7 -- 100 GeV using the Si based detector. The strongest upper limit is 1.8E-6 pb at mass(chi) = 50 GeV. This limit is improved to 7E-7 pb in AGNESE 2013A.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
ANGLOHER 2012 presents results of 730 kg days from the CRESST-II dark matter detector. They find two maxima in the likelihood function corresponding to best fit WIMP masses of 25.3 and 11.6 GeV with elastic cross sections of 1.6E-6 and 3.7E-5 pb respectively, see their Table 4. The statistical significance is more than 4sigma. ANGLOHER 2012 updates ANGLOHER 2009


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
Predictions for the spin-independent elastic cross section based on a frequentist approach to electroweak observables in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using the 5 fb**-1 LHC data and XENON100.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
AHMED 2011A gives combined results from CDMS and EDELWEISS. The strongest limit is at mass(chi) = 90 GeV.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
The strongest upper limit is 5.1E-8 pb and occurs at mass(chi)~=30 GeV. The values quoted here are based on the analysis performed in ANGLE 2008 with the update from SORENSEN 2009.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
AKERIB 2006A updates the results of AKERIB 2005. The strongest upper limit is 1.6E-7 pb and occurs at mass(chi) ~~ 60 GeV.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
The strongest upper limit is also close to 1.0E-6 pb and occurs at mass(chi) ~= 70 GeV. BENOIT 2006 claim that the discrimination power of ZEPLIN-I measurement (ALNER 2005A) is not reliable enough to obtain a limit better than 1E-3 pb. However, SMITH 2006 do not agree with the criticisms of BENOIT 2006.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
AKERIB 2004 is incompatible with BERNABEI 2000 most likely value, under the assumption of standard WIMP-halo interactions. The strongest upper limit is 4E-7 pb and occurs at mass(chi)~=60 GeV.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
Predictions for the spin-independent elastic cross section in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
KIM 2002 and ELLIS 2004 calculate the chi p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry, but without universal scalar masses.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
In the case of universal squark and slepton masses, but non-universal Higgs masses, the limit becomes 2E-6 (2E-11 when constraint from the BNL g-2 experiment are included), see ELLIS 2003E. ELLIS 2005 display the sensitivity of the elastic scattering cross section to the pi-Nucleon Sigma term.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
PIERCE 2004A calculates the chi p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of models with very heavy scalar masses. See Fig. 2 of the paper.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
Under the assumption of standard WIMP-halo interactions, Akerib 03 is incompatible with BERNABEI 2000 most likely value at the 99.98% CL. See Fig. 4.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
BAER 2003A calculates the chi p elastic scattering cross section in several models including the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
ABRAMS 2002 is incompatible with the DAMA most likely value at the 99.9% CL. The strongest upper limit is 3E-6 pb and occurs at mass(chi)~=30 GeV.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
BOTTINO 2001 calculates the chi-p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of the following supersymmetric models: N=1 supergravity with the radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry, N=1 supergravity with nonuniversal scalar masses and an effective MSSM model at the electroweak scale.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
Calculates the chi-p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
ELLIS 2001C calculates the chi-p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry. ELLIS 2002B find a range 2E-8 -- 1.5E-7 at tan(beta)=50. In models with nonuniversal Higgs masses, the upper limit to the cross section is 4E-7.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
ACCOMANDO 2000 calculate the chi-p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of minimal N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry. The limit is relaxed by at least an order of magnitude when models with nonuniversal scalar masses are considered. A subset of the authors in ARNOWITT 2002 updated the limit to <9E-8 (tan(beta) <55).


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
BERNABEI 2000 search for annual modulation of the WIMP signal. The data favor the hypothesis of annual modulation at 4sigma and are consistent, for a particular model framework quoted there, with mass(X0)=44+12-9 GeV and a spin-independent X0-proton cross section of 5.4+-1.0E-6 pb. See also BERNABEI 2001 and BERNABEI 2000C.


pdgid: S046DM2
text:
FENG 2000 calculate the chi-p elastic scattering cross section in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry with a particular emphasis on focus point models. At tan(beta)=50, the range is 8E-8 -- 4E-7.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ELLIS 2000 updates ELLIS 1998. Uses LEP e+ e- data at sqrt(s)=202 and 204 GeV to improve bound on neutralino mass to 51 GeV when scalar mass universality is assumed and 46 GeV when Higgs mass universality is relaxed. Limits on tan(beta) improve to >2.7 (mu>0), >2.2 (mu<0) when scalar mass universality is assumed and >1.9 (both signs of mu) when Higgs mass universality is relaxed.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ATHRON 2017B places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using all Run I and the 13 fb**-1 13 TeV Run II LHC searches and other experimental data.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BECHTLE 2016 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using all Run I LHC searches.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BAGNASCHI 2015 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using all Run I LHC searches.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
Implications of the LHC result on the Higgs mass and on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BUCHMUELLER 2014A places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using indirect experimental searches using the 20 fb**-1 8 TeV and the 5 fb**-1 7 TeV LHC and the LUX data.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ROSZKOWSKI 2014 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using Bayesian statistics and indirect experimental searches using the 20 fb**-1 LHC and the LUX data.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
CABRERA 2013 and STREGE 2013 place constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry with and without non-universal Higgs masses using the 5.8 fb**-1, sqrt(s) = 7 TeV ATLAS supersymmetry searches and XENON100 results.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ELLIS 2013B place constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry with and without Higgs mass universality. Models with universality below the GUT scale are also considered.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BALAZS 2012 and STREGE 2012 place constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using the 1 fb**-1 LHC supersymmetry searches, the 5 fb**-1 Higgs mass constraints, both with sqrt(s) = 7 TeV, and XENON100 results.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BECHTLE 2012 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using indirect experimental searches, using the 5 fb**-1 LHC and XENON100 data.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BESKIDT 2012 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using indirect experimental searches, the 5 fb**-1 LHC and the XENON100 data.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BELANGER 2004 and BOTTINO 2012 (see also BOTTINO 2003, BOTTINO 2003A and BOTTINO 2004) do not assume gaugino or scalar mass unification.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
FENG 2012B places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry and large sfermion masses using the 1 fb**-1 LHC supersymmetry searches, the 5 fb**-1 LHC Higgs mass constraints both with sqrt(s) = 7 TeV, and XENON100 results.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BUCHMUELLER 2011 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using indirect experimental searches and including supersymmetry breaking relations between A and B parameters.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
Places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry but non-Universal Higgs masses.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ELLIS 2010 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry with universality above the GUT scale.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BUCHMUELLER 2009 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using indirect experimental searches.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BUCHMUELLER 2008 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry using indirect experimental searches.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
CALIBBI 2007 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry with universality above the GUT scale including the effects of right-handed neutrinos.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ELLIS 2007 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry with universality below the GUT scale.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ALLANACH 2006 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
DE-AUSTRI 2006 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BALTZ 2004 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N = 1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
Limit assumes a pseudo scalar mass < 200 GeV. For larger pseudo scalar masses, mass(chi) > 18(29) GeV for tan(beta) = 50(10). Bounds from WMAP, (g - 2)(mu), b --> s gamma, LEP.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ELLIS 2004B places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry including supersymmetry breaking relations between A and B parameters. See also ELLIS 2003D.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
PIERCE 2004A places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of models with very heavy scalar masses.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BAER 2003, CHATTOPADHYAY 2003, ELLIS 2003C and LAHANAS 2003 place constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry based on WMAP results for the cold dark matter density.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BOEHM 2000B and ELLIS 2003 place constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of minimal N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry. Includes the effect of chi-ttilde co-annihilations.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
LAHANAS 2002 places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of minimal N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry. Focuses on the role of pseudo-scalar Higgs exchange.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
BARGER 2001C use the cosmic relic density inferred from recent CMB measurements to constrain the parameter space in the framework of minimal N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ELLIS 2001B places constraints on the SUSY parameter space in the framework of minimal N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry. Focuses on models with large tan(beta).


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
ELLIS 1998B assumes a universal scalar mass and radiative supersymmetry breaking with universal gaugino masses. The upper limit to the LSP mass is increased due to the inclusion of chi-tautilde_{{R}} coannihilations.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
EDSJO 1997 included all coannihilation processes between neutralinos and charginos for any neutralino mass and composition.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
Notes the location of the neutralino Z resonance and h resonance annihilation corridors in minimal supergravity models with radiative electroweak breaking.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
DREES 1993, KELLEY 1993 compute the cosmic relic density of the LSP in the framework of minimal N=1 supergravity models with radiative breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
MCDONALD 1992 calculate the relic LSP density in the MSSM including exact tree-level annihilation cross sections for all two-body final states.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
GRIEST 1991 improve relic density calculations to account for coannihilations, pole effects, and threshold effects.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
NOJIRI 1991 uses minimal supergravity mass relations between squarks and sleptons to narrow cosmologically allowed parameter space.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
Mass of the bino (=LSP) is limited to mass(Btilde) ~< 350 GeV for mass(t) <=200 GeV. Mass of the higgsino (=LSP) is limited to mass(Htilde) ~< 1 TeV for mass(t) <=200 GeV.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
Mass of the bino (=LSP) is limited to mass(Btilde) ~< 550 GeV. Mass of the higgsino (=LSP) is limited to mass(Htilde) ~< 3.2 TeV.


pdgid: S046PHC
text:
KRAUSS 1983 finds mass(gammatilde) not 30 eV to 2.5 GeV. KRAUSS 1983 takes into account the gravitino decay. Find that limits depend strongly on reheated temperature. For example a new allowed region mass(gammatilde) = 4-20 MeV exists if mass(gravitino) <40 TeV. See figure 2.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2025BJ searched in 140 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for an excess of 0-lepton events with at least one hadronically decaying tau and at least 3 b-jet. The search is performed by training a neural network to separate a signal of vector-like leptons from the Standard Model background. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set also in a model of SUSY, where members of either a higgsino LSP triplet or a wino LSP doublet are produced, and decay via a RPV lambda_{{333}}^'() coupling to b, t quarks and tau, nu_{{tau}} leptons, see their Figs. 13 and 14.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2024AX searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of higgsino pair production in events with two photons and two b-tagged jets. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set in the model Tn1n1A, see their Fig. 5, and in a model similar to Tn1n1B, but with variable branching ratios of chitilde_1()0 --> h Gtilde and chitilde_1()0 --> Z Gtilde, to reflect the dependency on the neutralino mixing matrix, see their Fig. 6.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2024U searched in 126 -- 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of higgsino pair production in events with >=3 b-tagged jets and notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set in the model Tn1n1A, see their Fig. 12, which also contains upper limits on the branching ratio, reaching as low as 14% for a higgsino mass of 400 GeV. Model-independent limits are also set on the visible cross section for new physics processes.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024AP searched in 128 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of pair-produced multijet signatures probing fully hadronic final states. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set in three RPV SUSY models: higgsino pair production with decay to merged trijets, stop pair production with decay to merged dijets, and pair-produced gluinos decaying to resolved trijets, see their Fig. 4.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024N searched in up to 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of wino-like chargino-neutralino pairs, Higgsino-like neutralino pair production in a gauge-mediated SUSY breaking inspired scenario, a Higgsino-bino interpretation, and slepton pair production in a combination of a number of previously reported searches for SUSY in different final states. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass in the wino-bino models Tchi1n2E1, Tchi1n2E, and Tchi1n2I, see their Fig. 11, and on the chitilde_{{1}}()0 in the higgsino-like GMSB models Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B, and Tn1n1C, see their Fig. 13. In addition, Fig. 14 shows the mass exclusion limit as a function of the branching fraction to the H boson. Limits are also set in a Higgsino-bino interpretation as in THinoBinoA, but also including leptonic decays, see their Fig. 15. Limits are also set on slepton (etilde, mutilde) production with the decay leptontilde --> lepton chitilde_1()0, see their Fig. 16.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2023AE searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with 2  lepton with same flavour and opposite sign, plus jets and notET, defining signal region  with the dilepton invariant mass both on- and off-shell with respect to the Z boson. No  significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on models of  strong and electroweak production. In this case, limits are placed on production of  mass-degenerate, higgsino triplet NLSP with chitilde_1()0 --> Z Gtilde in a GGM-like scenario,  see figure 15.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2023AM searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events containing electron/photon pairs with invariant mass compatible with h/Z and originating from a common displaced vertex. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on a model where members of a nearly degenerate higgsino triplet are pair-produced, yielding long-lived chitilde_{{1}}()0 followed by chitilde_1()0 --> h / Z Gtilde. Limits are set on mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) as a function of its lifetime and of the B(chitilde_1()0 --> h Gtilde) assuming B(chitilde_1()0 --> h Gtilde) + B(chitilde_1()0 --> Z Gtilde) = 1, see Figure 10.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2023CP searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with 2 lepton with same charge or 3 lepton plus at least one jet and notET, defining signal region based on 'stransverse mass' of the dilepton system, notET significance and effective mass. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the mass of a mass-degenerate higgsino triplet decaying into a lepton (neutral or charged) and a W via a bilinear RPV coupling, see figure 14.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
TUMASYAN 2023AO searched in 138 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  evidence of neutralino-chargino production in events with nearly trackless and out-of-time jets  that are used to identify decays of long-lived particles. No significant excess above the Standard  Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of the long-lived chitilde_{{1}}()0 in  the model Tn1n1B, see their figures 8 -- 10.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2021Y searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for supersymmetry in events with four or more leptons (electrons, muons and tau-leptons). No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on Tchi1n12-GGM, and RPV models similar to Tchi1n2I, Tglu1A (with q = u, d, s, c, b, with equal branching fractions), and leptontilde_L / nutilde --> lepton / nu chitilde_1()0 (mass-degenerate leptontilde_{{L}} and nutilde of all 3 generations), all with chitilde_1()0 --> lepton+- lepton-+ nu via lambda_{{12k}} or lambda_{{i 33}} (where i,k in 1,2), see their Figure 11.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAIJ 2021V searched in 5.38 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for long-lived particles (LLP) decaying to e+- mu-+ nu. The LLP can be a chitilde_{{1}}()0 in RPV SUSY, or a right-handed neutrino, and can be produced in pairs, in the decay of the Higgs boson, or from charged current processes. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the cross section times branching ratio for all three production mechanisms, see their Figures 6 -- 8.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021AF searched in 140 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  supersymmetry in events with with two displaced vertices from long-lived particles decaying into  multijet or dijet final states. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is  observed. Limits are set on the gluino mass in the simplified model Tglu2RPV with  lambda_{{323}}^'' coupling, on the chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass in an RPV model with chitilde_{{1}}()0  pair production and the RPV decay chitilde_1()0 --> tbs with lambda_{{323}}^'' coupling and on  the ttilde mass in an RPV model with top squark pair production and the RPV decay ttilde --> dbar_i dbar_j with  lambda_{{3ij}}^'' coupling, see their Figure 7.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021M searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for supersymmetry in events with two opposite-sign same-flavor leptons (electrons, muons) and notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the gluino mass in the simplified model Tglu4C, see their Figure 10, on the chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass in Tchi1n2Fa, see their Figure 11, on the chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass in Tn1n1C and Tn1n1B for mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0)=mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-)=mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see their Figure 12. Limits are also set on the light squark mass for the simplified model Tsqk2A, on the sbottom mass in Tsbot3, see their Figure 13, and on the slepton mass in direct electroweak pair production of mass-degenerate left- and right-handed sleptons (selectrons and smuons), see their Figure 14.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2020AN searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with two photons and missing transverse momentum. Events are further categorised in terms of lepton or jet multiplicity. No significant excess over the expected background is observed. Limits at 95% C.L. are set on the Higgsino mass in the T1n1n1A simplified model, see their Figure 11.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019CA searched in 77.4 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events containing delayed photons in both single and diphoton plus notET final states. No excess is observed above the background expected from Standard Model processes. The results are used to set 95% C.L. exclusion limits in the context of GMSB, using the SPS8 benchmark model. For neutralino proper decay lengths of 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 m, masses up to about 320, 525, 360, and 215 GeV are excluded, respectively. See their Fig. 5. The searches involve the simplified models Tglu1D, Tglu4A,B,C, Tsqk4,4A,4B.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019CI searched in 77.5 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with one or more high-momentum Higgs bosons, decaying to pairs of photons, jets and notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the sbottom mass in the Tsbot4 simplified model, see Figure 3, and on the wino mass in the Tchi1n2E simplified model, see their Figure 4. Limits are also set on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A and Tn1n1B simplified models, see their Figure 5.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019K searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with a photon, an electron or muon, and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. In the framework of GMSB, limits are set on the chargino and neutralino mass in the Tchi1n1A simplified model, see their Figure 6. Limits are also set on the gluino mass in the Tglu4A simplified model, and on the squark mass in the Tsqk4A simplified model, see their Figure 7.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AABOUD 2018CK searched for events with at least 3 b-jets and large missing transverse energy in two datasets of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV of 36.1 fb^{-1} and 24.3 fb^{-1} depending on the trigger requirements. The analyses aimed to reconstruct two Higgs bosons decaying to pairs of b-quarks. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the Higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A simplified model, see their Figure 15(a). Constraints are also presented as a function of the BR of Higgsino decaying into an higgs boson and a gravitino, see their Figure 15(b).


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AABOUD 2018Z searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events containing four or more charged leptons (electrons, muons and up to two hadronically decaying taus). No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Limits are set on the Higgsino mass in simplified models of general gauge mediated supersymmetry Tn1n1A/Tn1n1B/Tn1n1C, see their Figure 9. Limits are also set on the wino, slepton, sneutrino and gluino mass in a simplified model of NLSP pair production with R-parity violating decays of the LSP via lambda_{{12k}} or lambda_{{i33}} to charged leptons, see their Figures 7, 8.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018AO searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in events with either two or more leptons (electrons or muons) of the same electric charge, or with three or more leptons, which can include up to two hadronically decaying tau leptons. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino/neutralino mass in the Tchi1n2A, Tchi1n2H, Tchi1n2D, Tchi1n2E and Tchi1n2F simplified models, see their Figures 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18. Limits are also set on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B and Tn1n1C simplified models, see their Figure 19.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018AP searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos by combining a number of previous and new searches. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino/neutralino mass in the Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F and Tchi1n2I simplified models, see their Figures 7, 8, 9 an 10. Limits are also set on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B and Tn1n1C simplified models, see their Figure 11, 12, 13 and 14.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018AR searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events containing two opposite-charge, same-flavour leptons (electrons or muons), jets and notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the gluino mass in the Tglu4C simplified model, see their Figure 7. Limits are also set on the chargino/neutralino mass in the Tchi1n2F simplified models, see their Figure 8, and on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1B and Tn1n1C simplified models, see their Figure 9. Finally, limits are set on the sbottom mass in the Tsbot3 simplified model, see their Figure 10.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018O searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with two Higgs bosons, decaying to pairs of b-quarks, and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the Higgsino mass in the T1n1n1A simplified model, see their Figure 9.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018X searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with one or more high-momentum Higgs bosons, decaying to pairs of photons, jets and notET. The razor variables (M_{{R}}() and R^2()) are used to categorise the events. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the sbottom mass in the Tsbot4 simplified model and on the wino mass in the Tchi1n2E simplified model, see their Figure 5. Limits are also set on the higgsino mass in the Tn1n1A and Tn1n1B simplified models, see their Figure 6.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2014L searched in 19.5 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for evidence of direct pair production of neutralinos with Higgs or Z-bosons in the decay chain, leading to H H, H Z and Z Z final states with missing transverse energy. The decays of 16 -- 20. a Higgs boson to a b-quark pair, to a photon pair, and to final states with leptons are considered in conjunction with hadronic and leptonic decay modes of the Z and W bosons. No significant excesses over the expected SM backgrounds are observed. The results are interpreted in the context of GMSB simplified models where the decays chitilde_1()0 --> H Gtilde or chitilde_1()0 --> Z Gtilde take place either 100% or 50% of the time, see Figs. 16 -- 20.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2020D searched in 32.8 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events containing an oppositely charge lepton pair (e e, mu mu or e mu) coming from long-lived neutralinos decaying through the R-parity-violating decay chitilde_1()0 --> lepton lepton nu with lambda_{{121}} not= 0 or lambda_{{122}} not= 0. No excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived for decay lengths of the neutralino between 1 mm and 10 m in a scenario where a squark-antisquark pair is produced, with the squark decaying to a quark and a chitilde_{{1}}()0, with either chitilde_1()0 --> e e nu / e mu nu (lambda_{{121}} not= 0) or chitilde_1()0 --> e mu nu / mu mu nu (lambda_{{122}} not= 0), see their Figures 4 and 5.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AABOUD 2019G searched in 32.9 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of neutralinos decaying into a Z-boson and a gravitino, in events characterized by the presence of dimuon vertices with displacements from the p p interaction point in the range of 1400 cm. Neutralinos are assumed to be produced in the decay chain of gluinos as in Tglu1A models. No significant excess is observed in the number of vertices relative to the predicted background. In GGM with a gluino mass of 1100 GeV, neutralino masses in the range 300 -- 1000 GeV are excluded for certain values of ctau, see their Figure 7.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAIJ 2017Z searched in 1 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV and in 2 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events containing a displaced vertex with one associated high transverse momentum mu. No excess is observed above the background expected from Standard Model processes. The results are used to set 95% C.L. upper limits on the cross section times branching fractions of pair-produced neutralinos decaying non-promptly into a muon and two quarks. Long-lived particles in a mass range 23 -- 198 GeV are considered, see their Fig. 5 and Fig. 6.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016BX searched in 19.5 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events containing 3 or more leptons coming from the electroweak production of wino- or higgsino-like neutralinos, assuming non-zero R-parity-violating leptonic couplings lambda_{{122}}, lambda_{{123}}, and lambda_{{233}} or semileptonic couplings lambda_{{131}}^', lambda_{{233}}^', lambda_{{331}}^', and lambda_{{333}}^'. No excess over the expected background is observed and limits are derived on the neutralino mass, see Figs. 24 and 25.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2014BH searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events containing non-pointing photons in a diphoton plus missing transverse energy final state. No excess is observed above the background expected from Standard Model processes. The results are used to set 95% C.L. exclusion limits in the contact of gauge-mediated supersymmetric breaking models, with the lightest neutralino being the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle and decaying with a lifetime in the range from 0.25 ns to about 100 ns into a photon and a gravitino. For limits on the NLSP lifetime versus Lambda plane, for the SPS8 model, see their Fig. 7.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2013AP searched in 4.8 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events containing non-pointing photons in a diphoton plus missing transverse energy final state. No excess is observed above the background expected from Standard Model processes. The results are used to set 95% C.L. exclusion limits in the context of gauge-mediated supersymmetric breaking models, with the lightest neutralino being the next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle and decaying with a lifetime in excess of 0.25 ns into a photon and a gravitino. For limits in the NLSP lifetime versus Lambda plane, for the SPS8 model, see their Fig. 8.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2013Q searched in 4.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events containing a high-pT isolated photon, at least one jet identified as originating from a bottom quark, and high missing transverse momentum. Such signatures may originate from supersymmetric models with gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking in events in which one of a pair of higgsino-like neutralinos decays into a photon and a gravitino while the other decays into a Higgs boson and a gravitino. No significant excess above the expected background was found and limits were set on the neutralino mass in a generalized GMSB model (GGM) with a higgsino-like neutralino NLSP, see their Fig. 4. Intermediate neutralino masses between 220 and 380 GeV are excluded at 95% C.L, regardless of the squark and gluino masses, purely on the basis of the expected weak production.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2013R looked in 4.4 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events containing new, heavy particles that decay at a significant distance from their production point into a final state containing a high-momentum muon and charged hadrons. No excess over the expected background is observed and limits are placed on the production cross-section of neutralinos via squarks for various mass(qtilde), mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) in an R-parity violating scenario with lambda_{{211}}^'() not= 0, as a function of the neutralino lifetime, see their Fig. 6.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AALTONEN 2013I searched in 6.3 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for events containing notET and a delayed photon that arrives late in the detector relative to the time expected from prompt production. No evidence of delayed photon production is observed.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2013AH searched in 4.9 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events containing notET and a delayed photon that arrives late in the detector relative to the time expected from prompt production. No significant excess above the expected background was found and limits were set on the pair production of chitilde_{{1}}()0 depending on the neutralino proper decay length, see Fig. 8. Supersedes CHATRCHYAN 2012BK.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2012CP searched in 4.8 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events with two photons and large notET due to chitilde_1()0 --> gamma Gtilde decays in a GMSB framework. No significant excess above the expected background was found and limits were set on the neutralino mass in a generalized GMSB model (GGM) with a bino-like neutralino NLSP, see Figs. 6 and 7. The other sparticle masses were decoupled, tan(beta) = 2 and ctau_{{NLSP}}() < 0.1 mm. Also, in the framework of the SPS8 model, limits are presented in Fig. 8.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2012CT searched in 4.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events containing four or more leptons (electrons or muons) and either moderate values of missing transverse momentum or large effective mass. No significant excess is found in the data. Limits are presented in a simplified model of R-parity violating supersymmetry in which charginos are pair-produced and then decay into a W-boson and a chitilde_{{1}}()0, which in turn decays through an RPV coupling into two charged leptons (e+- e-+ or mu+- mu-+) and a neutrino. In this model, limits are set on the neutralino mass as a function of the chargino mass, see Fig. 3a. Limits are also set in an R-parity violating mSUGRA model, see Fig. 3b.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AAD 2012R looked in 33 pb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events containing new, heavy particles that decay at a significant distance from their production point into a final state containing a high-momentum muon and charged hadrons. No excess over the expected background is observed and limits are placed on the production cross-section of neutralinos via squarks for various (mass(qtilde), mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)) in an R-parity violating scenario with lambda(211)**' not= 0, as a function of the neutralino lifetime, see their Fig. 8. Superseded by AAD 2013R.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
ABAZOV 2012AD looked in 6.2 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for events with a photon, a Z-boson, and large notET in the final state. This topology corresponds to a GMSB model where pairs of neutralino NLSPs are either pair produced promptly or from decays of other supersymmetric particles and then decay to either Z Gtilde or gamma Gtilde. No significant excess over the SM expectation is observed and a limit at 95% C.L. on the cross section is derived as a function of the effective SUSY breaking scale Lambda, see Fig. 3. Assuming N_{{mes}} = 2, M_{{mes}} = 3 Lambda, tan(beta) = 3, mu = 0.75 M_{{1}}, and C_{{grav}} = 1, the model is excluded at 95% C.L. for values of Lambda < 87 TeV.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012BK searched in 2.23 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events with two photons and large notET due to chitilde_1()0 --> gamma Gtilde decays in a GMSB framework. No significant excess above the expected background was found and limits were set on the pair production of chitilde_{{1}}()0 depending on the neutralino lifetime, see Fig. 6.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2011B looked in 35 pb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV for events with an isolated lepton (e or mu), a photon and notET which may arise in a generalized gauge mediated model from the decay of Wino-like NLSPs. No evidence for an excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived in the plane of squark/gluino mass versus Wino mass (see Fig. 4). Mass degeneracy of the produced squarks and gluinos is assumed.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
AALTONEN 2010 searched in 2.6 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for diphoton events with large notET. They may originate from the production of chitilde()+- in pairs or associated to a chitilde_{{2}}()0, decaying into chitilde_{{1}}()0 which itself decays in GMSB to gamma Gtilde. There is no excess of events beyond expectation. An upper limit on the cross section is calculated in the GMSB model as a function of the chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass and lifetime, see their Fig. 2. A limit is derived on the chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass of 149 GeV for meanlife(chitilde_{{1}}()0)<<1 ns, which improves the results of previous searches.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
ABAZOV 2010P looked in 6.3 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for events with at least two isolated gammas and large notET. These could be the signature of chitilde_{{2}}^0() and chitilde_{{1}}()+- production, decaying to chitilde_{{1}}^0() and finally chitilde_1^0() --> gamma Gtilde in a GMSB framework. No significant excess over the SM expectation is observed, and a limit at 95% C.L. on the cross section is derived for N_{{mes}}() = 1, tan(beta) = 15 and mu > 0, see their Fig. 2. This allows them to set a limit on the effective SUSY breaking scale Lambda > 124 TeV, from which the excluded chitilde_{{1}}^0() mass range is obtained.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
ABAZOV 2008F looked in 1.1 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for diphoton events with large notET. They may originate from the production of chitilde()+- in pairs or associated to a chitilde_{{2}}()0, decaying to a chitilde_{{1}}()0 which itself decays promptly in GMSB to chitilde_1()0 --> gamma Gtilde. No significant excess was found compared to the background expectation. A limit is derived on the masses of SUSY particles in the GMSB framework for M = 2Lambda, N = 1, tan(beta) = 15 and mu > 0, see Figure 2. It also excludes Lambda < 91.5 TeV. Supersedes the results of ABAZOV 2005A. Superseded by ABAZOV 2010P.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
ABULENCIA 2007H searched in 346 pb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for events with at least three leptons (e or mu) from the decay of chitilde_{{1}}()0 via LLEbar couplings. The results are consistent with the hypothesis of no signal. Upper limits on the cross-section are extracted and a limit is derived in the framework of mSUGRA on the masses of chitilde_{{1}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+-, see e.g. their Fig. 3 and Tab. II.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
ABBIENDI 2006B use 600 pb**-1 of data from sqrt(s) = 189 -- 209 GeV. They look for events with diphotons + notE final states originating from prompt decays of pair-produced neutralinos in a GMSB scenario with chitilde_{{1}}()0 NLSP. Limits on the cross-section are computed as a function of m(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see their Fig. 14. The limit on the chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass is for a pure Bino state assuming a prompt decay, with lifetimes up to 10**-9s. Supersedes the results of ABBIENDI 2004N.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
ABDALLAH 2005B use data from sqrt(s) = 180 -- 209~GeV. They look for events with single photons + notE final states. Limits are computed in the plane (m(Gtilde), m(chitilde_{{1}}()0)), shown in their Fig. 9b for a pure Bino state in the GMSB framework and in Fig. 9c for a no-scale supergravity model. Supersedes the results of ABREU 2000Z.


pdgid: S046UPH
text:
ABDALLAH 2005B use data from sqrt(s) = 130 -- 209~GeV. They look for events with diphotons + notE final states and single photons not pointing to the vertex, expected in GMSB when the chitilde_{{1}}()0 is the NLSP. Limits are computed in the plane (m(Gtilde), m(chitilde_{{1}}()0)), see their Fig. 10. The lower limit is derived on the chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass for a pure Bino state assuming a prompt decay and mass(etilde_{{R}}()) = mass(etilde_{{L}}()) = 2 mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0). It improves to 100~GeV for mass(etilde_{{R}}()) = mass(etilde_{{L}}()) = 1.1 mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0). and the limit in the plane (m(chitilde_{{1}}()0), m(etilde_{{R}}())) is shown in Fig. 10b. For long-lived neutralinos, cross-section limits are displayed in their Fig 11. Supersedes the results of ABREU 2000Z.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
CHEKHOVSKY 2025M searched in 138 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of SUSY models with compressed mass spectra in events with a high transverse momentum system from initial-state-radiation jets recoiling against a potential sparticle system with significant missing transverse momentum. These events are further categorized based on their lepton multiplicity, jet multiplicity, number of b-tagged jets, and kinematic variables sensitive to the sparticle masses and mass splittings. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. The results are interpreted in models of top squark, electroweakino and slepton pair production. Limits are set for top squark pair production in the models Tstop1 and Tstop2, see their figure 25, and in Tstop4, see their figure 26. The results are also interpreted in models describing the production of mass-degenerate chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- with decays chitilde_2()0 --> Z chitilde_1()0 and chitilde_1()+- --> W chitilde_1()0, applying both a wino-like and higgsino-like chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 production cross section, see their figure 27. Limits are also set for wino-like chitilde_{{1}}()+- pair production, either with chitilde_1()+- --> W chitilde_1()0 or in the model Tchi1chi1C. This paper also addresses direct slepton production, taking into account pure right-handed, pure left-handed and combined production of either selectrons, smuons, or mass-degenerate sleptons of the first and second generation, see their figures 30 and 31.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2025AH searched in 138 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for new physics in jet multiplicity patterns in three-lepton events with and without b quarks. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. The results are interpreted in a model similar to Tchi1n2E, but with additional prompt hadronic R-parity violating decay of chitilde_{{1}}()0 to three quarks, either as chitilde_1()0 --> u d s or chitilde_1()0 --> u d b, see their figure 3.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2024AJ searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of direct stau pair production, or electroweakino pair production with decay via an intermediate stau, in events with two taus decaying hadronically (including a same-charge channel), no b-jets and moderate notET, using a BDT for the direct stau search and a more traditional cut-and-count selection for the electroweakino search. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set in models of direct stau production tautilde --> tau chitilde_1()0, tautilde_{{L}}, tautilde_{{R}} or degenerate production. Limits are also set in models of pair production of charginos (Tchichi1D) or of charginos and neutralinos (Tchi1n2D) followed by the decay via intermediate staus, or (for the latter) via W h (Tchi1n2E). See their figures 12, 14 and 16.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2024G searched in 140 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of higgsino pair production in events with low-momentum mildly displaced tracks. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set in the model Tn1n1D, see their Fig. 3, assuming that the chitilde_{{1}}()+- has a flight length of about 0.11 mm from the p p interaction point and decays to chitilde_{{1}}()0 and a charged particle (usually a soft pion) that is measured as low-momentum track.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2024I provides a statistical combination of the results of a number of analyses targeting electroweak production performed using 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV. The combination was used to set limits on the pair-produced particle masses as a function of the LSP mass for wino-like chitilde_{{1}}()+- chitilde_{{1}}()+- followed by chitilde_1()+- --> W chitilde_1()0, wino-like chitilde_{{2}}()0 chitilde_{{1}}()+- followed by chitilde_1()+- --> W chitilde_1()0 and either chitilde_2()0 --> Z chitilde_1()0 or chitilde_2()0 --> h chitilde_1()0, or a GGM-like model with a full higgsino triplet decaying to a gravitino. See their Fig. 2.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2023AE searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with 2 lepton with same flavour and opposite sign, plus jets and notET, defining signal region with the dilepton invariant mass both on- and off-shell with respect to the Z boson. No  significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on models of  strong and electroweak production. For electroweak production, limits are placed on production of  mass-degenerate, wino-like chitilde_{{2}}()0 with chitilde_2()0 --> Z chitilde_1()0  and chitilde_1()pm --> W chitilde_1()0, see figure 15.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2023CI searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions for events containing 1 lepton (e or mu), jets, and notET. Final states consistent with the production of a diboson system plus notET were identified also by making use of large-R jet tagging techniques. No excess on top of the Standard Model background was observed. Limits were set on the production of chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 and chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()+- (assuming wino cross sections) decaying to W Z chitilde_1()0 chitilde_1()0 or W W chitilde_1()0 chitilde_1()0. See their figure 9.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2023CI searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions for events containing 1 lepton (e or mu), jets, and notET. Final states consistent with the production of a boson + Higgs system plus notET were identified via a BDT. No excess on top of the Standard Model background was observed. Limits were set on the production of degenerate chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 (assuming wino cross sections) decaying into W h chitilde_1()0 chitilde_1()0. See their figure 10.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2023CP searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with 2 lepton with same charge plus at least one jet and notET, defining signal region based on 'stransverse mass' of the dilepton system, notET significance and effective mass. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the mass of mass-degenerate chitilde_{{1}}()+- and chitilde_{{2}}()0 for the wino-like production of chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 followed by the decay into either W Z chitilde_1()0 chitilde_1()0 or  W h chitilde_1()0 chitilde_1()0, see figure 13.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2023CR searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for RPV SUSY in final states with multiple leptons and b-tagged jets. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the production of electroweakinos (wino or higgsino) that decay via RPV coupling lambda_{{i33}}^' to a charged lepton or a neutrino, a b quark, and an additional t or b quark, see their figure 16. A second model addresses direct mutilde_{{L,R}} production and decay to a muon and a bino-like neutralino, which decays in the same way as in the first model, see their figure 17.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2023E searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of gluino, top squark and electroweakino pair production in events with at least one photon, multiple jets, and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set in models for strong production, Tglu4D, Tglu4E, Tglu4F and Tstop13, see their figure 9. They also interpret the results in the models for electroweak production, shown in their figure 10. Tchi1n1A assumes wino-like chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()0 production, while Tchi1chi1A assumes higgsino-like cross sections and includes chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()+-, chitilde_1()0 chitilde_2()0 and chitilde_1,2()0 chitilde_1()+- production. For chitilde_1()0 chitilde_2()0 alone no mass point can be excluded in the model Tchi1chi1A, but in another model for chitilde_1()0 chitilde_2()0 production, Tn1n2A.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
TUMASYAN 2023B searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  evidence of electroweakino pair production with decays including hadronically decaying bosons, W W, W Z, W H, or Z H, identified with a DNN classifying large-area (AK8) jets. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of the nearly mass degenerate wino-like chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the models Tchi1chi1I, Tchi1n2Fb, and Tchi1n2Fc, see their figure 4. They also consider a model that contains both  chitilde_2()0 chitilde_1()+- and chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()+- production, see their figure 5 (upper). Results are also interpreted in the model THinoBinoA with nearly mass-degenerate higgsino-like chitilde_{{3}}()0, chitilde_{{2}}()0, chitilde_{{1}}()+-, and a lighter bino-like chitilde_{{1}}()0, see their figure 5 (lower).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
TUMASYAN 2022Q searched in up to 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of electroweakino and top squark pair production with a small mass difference between the produced supersymmetric particles and the lightest neutralino in events with two or three  low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. No significant excess above the Standard  Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of chitilde_{{2}}()0 and  chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the model Tchi1n2F, see their Figure 8. Limits are also set in a higgsino  simplified model with both chitilde_2()0 chitilde_1()+- and chitilde_2()0 chitilde_1()0  production, where chitilde_2()0 --> Z chitilde_1()0 and mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) =  1/2(mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0)+mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)). A model inspired by the pMSSM is used for further  interpretations in the case of a higgsino LSP, see their Figure 9. Limits are also set on the mass  of the top squark in the models Tstop2 and Tstop3, see their Figure 10.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
TUMASYAN 2022S searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for   evidence of electroweakino pair production in events with three or four leptons, with up to two  hadronically decaying tau leptons, or two same-sign light leptons (e or mu). No  significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass  of chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the models Tchi1n2B (in flavory-democratic and  tau-enriched or -dominated scenarios), Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F, see their Figures 16 -- 20, and on the  mass of the higgsino-triplet chitilde_{{2}}()0, chitilde_{{1}}()+-, and chitilde_{{1}}()0  in the  models Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B, and Tn1n1C, see their Figure 21.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
TUMASYAN 2022V searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of electroweakino pair production with decay to two Higgs bosons H, with H --> b bbar, resulting either in 4 resolved b-jets or two large-radius jets, and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the models Tn1n1A, see their Figures 11 and 12, or in a model where higgsino-like nearly mass degenerate chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{3}}()0 are pair produced and each decay to H and a bino-like chitilde_{{1}}()0, see their Figure 13. Limits are also set on the gluino mass in the model Tglu1I, see their Figure 14.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2021BG searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for pair  production chitilde_2()0 chitilde_1()+- in final states with three leptons, with and without  assuming the presence of a Z --> lepton lepton decay. No significant excess above the Standard  Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass  in Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F and Tchi1n2Ga. See their Fig. 16.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
TUMASYAN 2021C searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  supersymmetry in events with with one lepton, a Higgs boson decaying to a pair of bottom quarks,  and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed.  Lower limits are set on the masses of chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the simplified model Tchi1n2E, see their Figure 6.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2020I reported on ATLAS searches for electroweak production in models with compressed mass spectra as Tchi1n2Ga. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Events with notET, two same-flavour, opposite-charge, low-transverse-momentum leptons, and jets from initial-state radiation or characteristic of vector-boson fusion production are selected. Constraints at 95% C.L. are placed in Higgsino models on the mass of the chitilde_{{2}}()0 (the chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass is halfway between the chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()0 masses) at 193 GeV for a mass splitting between chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 9.3 GeV and extend down to a mass splitting of 2.4 GeV at the LEP chargino mass limit. See their Fig. 14(a).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2020I reported on ATLAS searches for electroweak production in models with compressed mass spectra as Tchi1n2Fa. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Events with notET, two same-flavour, opposite-charge, low-transverse-momentum leptons, and jets from initial-state radiation or characteristic of vector-boson fusion production are selected. Constraints at 95% C.L. are placed in Wino-Bino models on the mass of the chitilde_{{2}}()0 (degenerate with chitilde_{{1}}()+-) at 240 GeV for a mass splitting between chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 7 GeV and extend down to a mass splitting of 1.5 GeV at the LEP chargino mass limit of 92.4 GeV. See their Fig. 14(b,c).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2020K reported on a search for electroweak production in models with mass splittings near the electroweak scale as Tchi1n2F and exploiting three-lepton final state events with an emulated recursive jigsaw reconstruction method. The analysis uses a dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1}. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are derived on next-to-lightest neutralinos and charginos with masses up to 345 GeV for a massless lightest neutralino, see their Fig. 7.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2020R searched for electroweak production in the model Tchi1n2E, selecting events with a pair of b-tagged jets consistent with those from a Higgs boson decay, either an electron or a muon from the W boson decay and notET. The analysis uses a dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1}. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are derived on next-to-lightest neutralinos and charginos with masses up to 740 GeV for a massless lightest neutralino, assuming pure wino cross-sections. See their Fig. 6.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020AU searched in 77.2 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events containing one soft, hadronically decaying tau lepton, one energetic jet from initial-state radiation, and large notET. No excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived on the wino mass in the Tchi1n2D simplified model, see their Figure 2.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2019AU searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and next-to-lightest neutralinos decaying into lightest neutralinos and a W and a Higgs boson, respectively. Fully hadronic, semileptonic, diphoton, and multilepton (electrons, muons) final states with missing transverse momentum are considered in this search. Observations are consistent with the Standard Model expectations, and 95% confidence-level limits of up to 680 GeV on the chargino/next-to-lightest neutralino masses are set (Tchi1n2E model). See their Figure 14 for an overlay of exclusion contours from all searches.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019BU searched for pair production of gauginos via vector boson fusion assuming the gaugino spectrum is compressed, in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV. The final states explored included zero leptons plus two jets, one lepton plus two jets, and one hadronic tau plus two jets. A similar bound is obtained in the light slepton limit.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2018AY searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos as in Tchi1n2D models, in events characterised by the presence of at least two hadronically decaying tau leptons and large missing transverse energy. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Assuming decays via intermediate tautilde_{{L}} and mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) = mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0), the observed limits rule out chitilde_{{2}}()0 masses up to 760 GeV for a massless chitilde_{{1}}()0. See their Fig.7 (right). Interpretations are also provided in Fig 8 (bottom) for different assumptions on the ratio between mass(tautilde) and mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0) + mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the next-to-lightest neutralino mass up to 1100 GeV for massless chitilde_{{1}}()0 in the Tchi1n2C simplified model exploiting the 3lepton signature, see their Figure 8(c).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the next-to-lightest neutralino mass up to 580 GeV for massless chitilde_{{1}}()0 in the Tchi1n2F simplified model exploiting the 2lepton+2 jets and 3lepton signatures, see their Figure 8(d).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2018CK searched for events with at least 3 b-jets and large missing transverse energy in two datasets of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV of 36.1 fb^{-1} and 24.3 fb^{-1} depending on the trigger requirements. The analyses aimed to reconstruct two Higgs bosons decaying to pairs of b-quarks. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the Higgsino mass in the T1n1n1A simplified model, see their Figure 15(a). Constraints are also presented as a function of the BR of Higgsino decaying into an higgs boson and a gravitino, see their Figure 15(b).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2018CO searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of mass-degenerate charginos and next-to-lightest neutralinos in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. The search channels are based on recursive jigsaw reconstruction. Limits are set on the next-to-lightest neutralinos mass up to 600 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1n2F simplified model exploiting the statistical combination of 2lepton+2 jets and 3lepton channels. Next-to-lightest neutralinos masses below 220 GeV are not excluded due to an excess of events above the SM prediction in the dedicated regions. See their Figure 13(d).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2018R searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for electroweak production in scenarios with compressed mass spectra in final states with two low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. The data are found to be consistent with the SM prediction. Results are interpreted in Tchi1n2G higgsino models, and chitilde_{{2}}()0 masses are excluded up to 145 GeV for mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 5 GeV. The exclusion limits extend down to mass splittings of 2.5 GeV, see their Fig. 10 (top). Results are also interpreted in terms of exclusion bounds on the production cross-sections for the NUHM2 scenario as a function of the universal gaugino mass mass(1/2) and mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see their Fig. 12.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2018R searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for electroweak production in scenarios with compressed mass spectra in final states with two low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. The data are found to be consistent with the SM prediction. Results are interpreted in Tchi1n2F wino models, and chitilde_{{2}}()0 masses are excluded up to 175 GeV for mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 10 GeV. The exclusion limits extend down to mass splittings of 2 GeV, see their Fig. 10 (bottom). Results are also interpreted in terms of exclusion bounds on the production cross-sections for the NUHM2 scenario as a function of the universal gaugino mass mass(1/2) and mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see their Fig. 12.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AABOUD 2018U searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV in events with at least one isolated photon, possibly jets and significant transverse momentum targeting generalised models of gauge-mediated SUSY breaking. No significant excess of events is observed above the SM prediction. Results of the diphoton channel are interpreted in terms of lower limits on the masses of gauginos Tchi1chi1A models, which reach as high as 1.3 TeV. Gaugino masses below 1060 GeV are excluded for any NLSP mass, see their Fig. 10.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018AJ searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events containing two low-momentum, oppositely charged leptons (electrons or muons) and notET. No excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived on the wino mass in the Tchi1n2F simplified model, see their Figure 5. Limits are also set on the stop mass in the Tstop10 simplified model, see their Figure 6. Finally, limits are set on the Higgsino mass in the Tchi1n2G simplified model, see Figure 8 and in the pMSSM, see Figure 7.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018DP searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos or of chargino pairs in events with a tau lepton pair and significant missing transverse momentum. Both hadronic and leptonic decay modes are considered for the tau lepton. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass in the Tchi1chi1D and Tchi1n2 simplified models, see their Figures 14 and 15. Also, excluded stau pair production cross sections are shown in Figures 11, 12, and 13.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
SIRUNYAN 2017AW searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with a charged lepton (electron or muon), two jets identified as originating from a b-quark, and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of the chargino and the next-to-lightest neutralino in the Tchi1n2E simplified model, see their Figure 6.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2016AA summarized and extended ATLAS searches for electroweak supersymmetry in final states containing several charged leptons, notET, with or without hadronic jets, in 20 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV. The paper reports the results of new interpretations and statistical combinations of previously published analyses, as well as new analyses. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are set on mass-degenerate chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{3}}()0 masses in the Tn2n3A and Tn2n3B simplified models. See their Fig. 15.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2015BA searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for  electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final state containing a W boson and a 125 GeV Higgs boson, plus missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard  Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of direct chargino  and next-to-lightest neutralino production, with the decays chitilde_1()+- --> W+- chitilde_1()0 and  chitilde_2()0 --> H chitilde_1()0 having 100% branching fraction, see Fig. 8. A combination of the multiple final states for the Higgs decay yields the best limits (Fig. 8d).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2014H searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final sate with three leptons and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of direct chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino production, with decays to the lightest neutralino via either all three generations of leptons, staus only, gauge bosons, or Higgs bosons, see Fig. 7. An interpretation in the pMSSM is also given, see Fig. 8.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2014X searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with at least four leptons (electrons, muons, taus) in the final state. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the neutralino mass in an R-parity conserving simplified model where the decay chitilde_2,3()0 --> lepton+- lepton-+ chitilde_1()0 takes place with a branching ratio of 100%, see Fig. 10.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2013 searched in 4.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final state with three leptons (e and mu) and missing transverse energy. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in the phenomenological MSSM, see Fig. 2 and 3, and in simplified models, see Fig. 4. For the simplified models with intermediate slepton decays, degenerate chitilde_{{1}}()+- and chitilde_{{2}}()0 masses up to 500 GeV are excluded at 95% C.L. for very large mass differences with the chitilde_{{1}}()0. Supersedes AAD 2012AS.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012BJ searched in 4.98 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in events with at least two leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum. No significant excesses over the expected SM backgrounds are observed and 95% C.L. limits on the production cross section of chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 pair production were set in a number of simplified models, see Figs. 7 to 12. Most limits are for exactly 3 jets.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
ABREU 2000W combines data collected at sqrt(s)=189 GeV with results from lower energies. The mass limit is obtained by constraining the MSSM parameter space with gaugino and sfermion mass universality at the GUT scale, using the results of negative direct searches for neutralinos (including cascade decays and tautilde tau final states) from ABREU 2001, for charginos from ABREU 2000J and ABREU 2000T (for all Delta(m)_+), and for charged sleptons from ABREU 2001B. The results hold for the full parameter space defined by all values of M(2) and |mu|<=2 TeV with the chitilde_{{1}}()0 as LSP.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2020AN searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with two photons and missing transverse momentum. Events are further categorised in terms of lepton or jet multiplicity. No significant excess over the expected background is observed. Limits at 95% C.L. are derived in Tchi1n2E simplified models. Next-to-lightest neutralinos and charginos with masses up to 310 GeV for a massless lightest neutralino are excluded. See their Fig. 10.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2014G searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for electroweak production of chargino-neutralino pairs, decaying to a final sate with two leptons (e and mu) and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino production, with decays to the lightest neutralino via gauge bosons, see Fig. 7. An interpretation in the pMSSM is also given, see Fig. 10.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2014I searched in 19.5 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final state with three leptons (e or mu) and missing transverse momentum, or with a Z-boson, dijets and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models, see Figs. 12 -- 16.


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2012AS searched in 2.06 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final state with three leptons (e and mu) and missing transverse energy. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in the phenomenological MSSM, see Fig. 2 (top), and in simplified models, see Fig. 2 (bottom).


pdgid: S046ZNO
text:
AAD 2012T looked in 1 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for the production of supersymmetric particles decaying into final states with missing transverse momentum and exactly two isolated leptons (e or mu). Same-sign dilepton events were separately studied. Additionally, in opposite-sign events, a search was made for an excess of same-flavor over different-flavor lepton pairs. No excess over the expected background is observed and limits are placed on the effective production cross section of opposite-sign dilepton events with notET > 250 GeV and on same-sign dilepton events with notET > 100 GeV. The latter limit is interpreted in a simplified electroweak gaugino production model.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2025M searched for an excess of displaced leptons (e or mu) in p p collisions (140 fb**-1 at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV and 56.3 at fb**-1 at sqrt(s) = 13.6 TeV). The models considered were long-lived slepton (electron or muon) pair production followed by leptontilde --> lepton Gtilde, and long-lived chargino pair production in a dark sector model, followed by chitilde_1()+- --> chitilde_1()0 W. Displaced leptons were reconstructed thanks to an improved large radius tracking and to the pointing capabilities of the electromagnetic calorimeter. Two different analyses (ABCD and EM-BDT) are combined to obtain limits on etilde pair production, while the ABCD analysis only is used for mutilde, tautilde and chitilde_{{1}}()+- pair production. No significant excess of events is observed over the background prediction. 95% CL limits are extracted in the lifetime vs mass plane, see their figures 6 and 8.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2024CE searched for VBF production of a wino pair almost mass-degenerate with a bino-like LSP, in events with two jets with a large rapidity gap between them and no leptons in 140 fb^{-1} of p p collisions. Care was taken into including interference effects between VBF QCD and electroweak diagrams for the cross section estimate. A BDT was trained based on the two jet kinematics and the missing transverse momentum. Results are interpreted in a scenario where wino-like degenerate charginos and neutralinos are pair produced and decay into a nearly degenerate bino-like neutralino LSP, see their Figure 8.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024M searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of wino- and Higgsino-like charginos in final states with one or more disappearing tracks from the decay chitilde_1()+- --> pi+- chitilde_1()0 where the soft pion is not reconstructed, notET, and varying numbers of jets, b-tagged jets, electrons, and muons. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the btilde mass in the model Tbot1LL for various proper decay lengths ctau of the chitilde_{{1}}()+- as well as on the ttilde mass in the model Tstop1LL, see their Fig. 10. Limits are also set in the model Tglu1LL, see their Fig. 11. In addition, limits are set in specific pure wino as well as pure higgsino dark matter models, in which the relationships among the electroweakino masses, the chitilde_{{1}}()+- lifetime, and the chitilde_{{1}}()+- decay width are constrained by radiative corrections that account for a large difference between the LSP mass and the SUSY-breaking scale, see their Fig. 12.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2023AE searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with 2  lepton with same flavour and opposite sign, plus jets and notET, defining signal region  with the dilepton invariant mass both on- and off-shell with respect to the Z boson. No  significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on models of  strong and electroweak production. For electroweak production, limits are placed on production of  mass-degenerate, wino-like chitilde_{{2}}()0 with chitilde_2()0 --> Z chitilde_1()0  and chitilde_1()pm --> W chitilde_1()0, see figure 15.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2023CP searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with 2 lepton with same charge plus at least one jet and notET, defining signal region based on 'stransverse mass' of the dilepton system, notET significance and effective mass. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the mass of mass-degenerate chitilde_{{1}}()+- and chitilde_{{2}}()0 for the wino-like production of chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 followed by the decay into either W Z chitilde_1()0 chitilde_1()0 or W h chitilde_1()0 chitilde_1()0, see figure 13.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2023M searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for   chitilde_{{1}}()+- pair production, followed by chitilde_1()+- --> W+- chitilde_1()0 --> lepton+- nu chitilde_1()0 in  events with two leptons. The focus is on models where mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) -  mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) is close to the W mass. No significant excess above the Standard Model  predictions is observed. Limits are set on the chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass as a function of  mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see Figure 9.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
TUMASYAN 2022Q searched in up to 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for evidence of electroweakino and top squark pair production with a small mass difference between the produced supersymmetric particles and the lightest neutralino in events with two or three  low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. No significant excess above the Standard  Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of chitilde_{{2}}()0 and  chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the model Tchi1n2F, see their Figure 8. Limits are also set in a higgsino  simplified model with both chitilde_2()0 chitilde_1()+- and chitilde_2()0 chitilde_1()0  production, where chitilde_2()0 --> Z chitilde_1()0 and mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) =  1/2(mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0) + mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)). A model inspired by the pMSSM is used for further  interpretations in the case of a higgsino LSP, see their Figure 9. Limits are also set on the mass  of the top squark in the models Tstop2 and Tstop3, see their Figure 10.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
TUMASYAN 2022S searched in 137 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for   evidence of electroweakino pair production in events with three or four leptons, with up to two   hadronically decaying tau leptons, or two same-sign light leptons (e or mu). No  significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass  of chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- in the models Tchi1n2B (in flavory-democratic and  tau-enriched or -dominated scenarios), Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F, see their Figures 16 -- 20, and on the  mass of the higgsino-triplet chitilde_{{2}}()0, chitilde_{{1}}()+-, and chitilde_{{1}}()0  in the  models Tn1n1A, Tn1n1B, and Tn1n1C, see their Figure 21.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2021AX searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for pair production of electroweakinos decaying to the LSP via the emission of Standard Model bosons (Higgs, W, Z) decaying into hadrons. The final state in all cases characterised by the presence of notET, jets, and large-R jets tagged according to the boson of interest. Different assumptions (Higgsino, Wino, Bino) are made for the pair produced electroweakinos and for the LSP multipliet. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the electroweakino masses as a function of the model parameters (in particular mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)). See Figs. 12, 14, 15.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2021BG searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for pair production chitilde_2()0 chitilde_1()+- in final states with three leptons, with and without assuming the presence of a Z --> lepton lepton decay. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the chitilde_{{2}}()0 and chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass in Tchi1n2E, Tchi1n2F and Tchi1n2Ga. See their Fig. 16.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2021E searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for production of wino-like chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()+- and chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()0, followed by the RPV decay of chitilde_{{1}}()+- into Z lepton, H lepton or W nu and of chitilde_{{1}}()0 into Z nu, H nu or W lepton, in events with three leptons, looking for Z lepton resonances. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits are set on the common mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-)/mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) mass in the TwinoLSPRPV simplified model, as a function of the common chitilde_{{1}}()+-/chitilde_{{1}}()0 branching fraction to a Z boson. See Figure 9.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2020I reported on ATLAS searches for electroweak production in models with compressed mass spectra as Tchi1n2Fa. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Events with notET, two same-flavour, opposite-charge, low-transverse-momentum leptons, and jets from initial-state radiation or characteristic of vector-boson fusion production are selected. Constraints at 95% C.L. are placed on the mass of the chitilde_{{1}}()+- (degenerate with chitilde_{{2}}()0) at 240 GeV for a mass splitting between chitilde_{{1}}()+- and chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 7 GeV and extend down to a mass splitting of 1.5 GeV at the LEP chargino mass limit of 92.4 GeV. See their Fig. 14(b,c).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2020O reported on a search for electroweak production in models with charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with exactly two oppositely charged leptons and missing transverse momentum. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are derived on mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) decaying according to the Tchi1chi1H simplified model. Chargino masses up to 420 GeV are excluded for a massless lightest neutralino, see their Fig. 7(a).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2020O reported on a search for electroweak production in models with charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with exactly two oppositely charged leptons and missing transverse momentum. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are derived on mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) decaying according to the Tchi1chi1C simplified model. Chargino masses up to 1000 GeV are excluded for a massless lightest neutralino, see their Fig. 7(b).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020B searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with at least one photon and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on chargino masses in a general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking (GGM) scenario Tchi1n12-GGM, see Figure 4. Limits are also set on the NLSP mass in the Tchi1chi1F and Tchi1chi1G simplified models, see their Figure 5. Finally, limits are set on the gluino mass in the Tglu4A simplified model, see Figure 6.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2019AU searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and next-to-lightest neutralinos decaying into lightest neutralinos and a W, and a Higgs boson, respectively. Fully hadronic, semileptonic, diphoton, and multilepton (electrons, muons) final states with missing transverse momentum are considered in this search. Observations are consistent with the Standard Model expectations, and 95% confidence-level limits of up to 680 GeV on the chargino/next-to-lightest neutralino masses are set (Tchi1n2E model). See their Figure 14 for an overlay of exclusion contours from all searches.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2018AY searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos as in Tchi1chi1D models in events characterised by the presence of at least two hadronically decaying tau leptons and large missing transverse energy. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. In the Tchi1chi1D model, assuming decays via intermediate tautilde_{{L}}, the observed limits rule out chitilde_{{1}}()+- masses up to 630 GeV for a massless chitilde_{{1}}()0. See their Fig.7 (left). Interpretations are also provided in Fig 8 (top) for different assumptions on the ratio between mass(tautilde) and mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) + mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2018AY searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos as in Tchi1n2D models, in events characterised by the presence of at least two hadronically decaying tau leptons and large missing transverse energy. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Assuming decays via intermediate tautilde_{{L}} and mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) = mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0), the observed limits rule out chitilde_{{1}}()+- masses up to 760 GeV for a massless chitilde_{{1}}()0. See their Fig.7 (right). Interpretations are also provided in Fig 8 (bottom) for different assumptions on the ratio between mass(tautilde) and mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) + mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass up to 750 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1chi1C simplified model exploiting 2lepton + 0 jets signatures, see their Figure 8(a).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass up to 1100 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1n2C simplified model exploiting 3lepton signature, see their Figure 8(c).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass up to 580 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1n2F simplified model exploiting 2lepton+2 jets and 3lepton signatures, see their Figure 8(d).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2018CO searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of mass-degenerate charginos and next-to-lightest neutralinos in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. The search channels are based on recursive jigsaw reconstruction. Limits are set on the chargino mass up to 600 GeV for massless neutralinos in the Tchi1n2F simplified model exploiting the statistical combination of 2lepton+2 jets and 3lepton channels. Chargino masses below 220 GeV are not excluded due to an excess of events above the SM prediction in the dedicated regions. See their Figure 13(d).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2018R searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for electroweak production in scenarios with compressed mass spectra in final states with two low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. The data are found to be consistent with the SM prediction. Results are interpreted in Tchi1n2G wino models and chitilde_{{1}}()+- masses are excluded up to 175 GeV for mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 10 GeV. The exclusion limits extend down to mass splittings of 2 GeV, see their Fig. 10 (bottom).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AABOUD 2018R searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for electroweak production in scenarios with compressed mass spectra in final states with two low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. The data are found to be consistent with the SM prediction. Results are interpreted in Tchi1n2G higgsino models and chitilde_{{1}}()+- masses are excluded up to 145 GeV for mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 5 GeV. The exclusion limits extend down to mass splittings of 2.5 GeV, see their Fig. 10 (top).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018AA searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with at least one photon and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on wino masses in a general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking (GGM) scenario with bino-like chitilde_{{1}}()0 and wino-like chitilde_{{1}}()+- and chitilde_{{2}}()0, see Figure 7. Limits are also set on the NLSP mass in the Tchi1n1A and Tchi1chi1A simplified models, see their Figure 8. Finally, limits are set on the gluino mass in the Tglu4A and Tglu4B simplified models, see their Figure 9, and on the squark mass in the Tskq4A and Tsqk4B simplified models, see their Figure 10.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018DN searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and for pair production of top squarks in events with two leptons (electrons or muons) of the opposite electric charge. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass in the Tchi1chi1C and Tchi1chi1E simplified models, see their Figure 8. Limits are also set on the stop mass in the Tstop1 and Tstop2 simplified models, see their Figure 9.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2017L searched in about 19 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with two tau (at least one decaying hadronically) and notET. In the Tchi1chi1C model, assuming decays via intermediate tautilde or nutilde_{{tau}} with equivalent mass, the observed limits rule out chitilde_{{1}}()+- masses up to 420 GeV for a massless chitilde_{{1}}()0. See their Fig.5.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2016AA summarized and extended ATLAS searches for electroweak supersymmetry in final states containing several charged leptons, notET, with or without hadronic jets, in 20 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV. The paper reports the results of new interpretations and statistical combinations of previously published analyses, as well as new analyses. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are set on the chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass in the Tchi1chi1B and Tchi1chi1C simplified models. See their Fig. 13.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2016AA summarized and extended ATLAS searches for electroweak supersymmetry in final states containing several charged leptons, notET, with or without hadronic jets, in 20 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV. The paper reports the results of new interpretations and statistical combinations of previously published analyses, as well as new analyses. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are set on mass-degenerate chitilde_{{1}}()+- and chitilde_{{2}}()0 masses in the Tchi1n2B, Tchi1n2C, and Tchi1n2D simplified models. See their Figs. 16, 17, and 18. Interpretations in phenomenological-MSSM, two-parameter Non Universal Higgs Masses (NUHM2), and gauge-mediated symmetry breaking (GMSB) models are also given in their Figs. 20, 21 and 22.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016R searched in 19.7 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with one or more photons, one electron or muon, and notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on wino masses in a general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking model (GGM), for a wino-like neutralino NLSP scenario, see Fig. 5. Limits are also set in the Tglu1D and Tchi1n1A simplified models, see Fig. 6. The Tchi1n1A limit is reduced to 340 GeV for a branching ratio reduced by the weak mixing angle.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2015BA searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos decaying to a final state containing a W boson and a 125 GeV Higgs boson, plus missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of direct chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino production, with the decays chitilde_1()+- --> W+- chitilde_1()0 and chitilde_2()0 --> H chitilde_1()0 having 100% branching fraction, see Fig. 8. A combination of the multiple final states for the Higgs decay yields the best limits (Fig. 8d).


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2015CA searched in 20.3 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with one or more photons and notET, with or without leptons (e, mu). No significant  excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on wino masses in the  general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking model (GGM), for wino-like NLSP, see Fig. 9, 12


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2014X searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with at least four leptons (electrons, muons, taus) in the final state. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the wino-like chargino mass in an R-parity violating simplified model where the decay chitilde_1()+- --> W^(*)()+- chitilde_1()0, with chitilde_1()0 --> lepton+- lepton-+ nu, takes place with a branching ratio of 100%, see Fig. 8.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2014L searched in 19.5 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for evidence of chargino-neutralino chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 pair production with Higgs or W-bosons in the decay chain, leading to H W final states with missing transverse energy. The decays of a Higgs boson to a photon pair are considered in conjunction with hadronic and leptonic decay modes of the W bosons. No significant excesses over the expected SM backgrounds are observed. The results are interpreted in the context of simplified models where the decays chitilde_2()0 --> H chitilde_1()0 and chitilde_1()+- --> W+- chitilde_1()0 take place 100% of the time, see Figs. 22 -- 23.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2013B searched in 4.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for gauginos decaying to a final state with two leptons (e and mu) and missing transverse energy. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Limits are derived in a simplified model of wino-like chargino pair production, where the chargino always decays to the lightest neutralino via an intermediate on-shell charged slepton, see Fig. 2(b). Chargino masses between 110 and 340 GeV are excluded at 95% C.L. for mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 10 GeV. Exclusion limits are also derived in the phenomenological MSSM, see Fig. 3.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2012CT searched in 4.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events containing four or more leptons (electrons or muons) and either moderate values of missing transverse momentum or large effective mass. No significant excess is found in the data. Limits are presented in a simplified model of R-parity violating supersymmetry in which charginos are pair-produced and then decay into a W-boson and a chitilde_{{1}}()0, which in turn decays through an RPV coupling into two charged leptons (e+- e-+ or e+- mu-+) and a neutrino. In this model, chargino masses up to 540 GeV are excluded at 95% C.L. for mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) above 300 GeV, see Fig. 3a. The limit deteriorates for lighter chitilde_{{1}}()0. Limits are also set in an R-parity violating mSUGRA model, see Fig. 3b.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012BJ searched in 4.98 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in events with at least two leptons, jets and missing transverse momentum. No significant excesses over the expected SM backgrounds are observed and 95% C.L. limits on the production cross section of chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 pair production were set in a number of simplified models, see Figs. 7 to 12.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
ABDALLAH 2003M uses data from sqrt(s) = 192 -- 208 GeV to obtain limits in the framework of the MSSM with gaugino and sfermion mass universality at the GUT scale. An indirect limit on the mass of charginos is derived by constraining the MSSM parameter space by the results from direct searches for neutralinos (including cascade decays), for charginos and for sleptons. These limits are valid for values of M(2)< 1 TeV, |mu|<=2 TeV with the chitilde_{{1}}()0 as LSP. Constraints from the Higgs search in the m(h)**max scenario assuming mass(t)= 174.3 GeV are included. The quoted limit applies if there is no mixing in the third family or when mass(tautilde_{{1}})-mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)> 6 GeV. If mixing is included the limit degrades to 90 GeV. See Fig.~43 for the mass limits as a function of tan(beta). These limits update the results of ABREU 2000W.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016AA searched in 7.4 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with one or more photons, hadronic jets and notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on wino masses in the general gauge-mediated SUSY breaking model (GGM), for a wino-like neutralino NLSP scenario and with the wino mass fixed at 10 GeV above the bino mass, see Fig. 4. Limits are also set in the Tchi1chi1A and Tchi1n1A simplified models, see Fig. 3.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016R searched in 19.7 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with one or more photons, one electron or muon, and notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are also set in the Tglu1F simplified model, see Fig. 6.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016Y searched in 19.7 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with one or two soft isolated leptons, hadronic jets, and notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass (which is degenerate with the chitilde_{{2}}()0) in the Tchi1n2A simplified model, see Fig. 4.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2014AV searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for the direct production of charginos, neutralinos and staus in events containing at last two hadronically decaying tau-leptons, large missing transverse momentum and low jet activity. The quoted limit was derived for direct chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 and chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()-+ production with chitilde_2()0 --> tautilde tau --> tau tau chitilde_1()0 and chitilde_1()+- --> tautilde nu ( nutilde_tau tau ) --> tau nu chitilde_1()0, mass(chitilde_{{2}}()0) = mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-), mass(tautilde) = 0.5 (mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) + mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)), mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 0 GeV. No excess over the expected SM background is observed. Exclusion limits are set in simplified models of chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()-+ and chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 pair production, see their Figure 7. Upper limits on the cross section and signal strength for direct di-stau production are derived, see Figures 8 and 9. Also, limits are derived in a pMSSM model where the only light slepton is the tautilde_{{R}}(), see Figure 10.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2014AV searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for the direct production of charginos, neutralinos and staus in events containing at last two hadronically decaying tau-leptons, large missing transverse momentum and low jet activity. The quoted limit was derived for direct chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()-+ production with chitilde_1()+- --> tautilde nu ( nutilde_tau tau ) --> tau nu chitilde_1()0, mass(tautilde) = 0.5 (mass(chitilde_{{1}}()+-) + mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)), mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 0 GeV. No excess over the expected SM background is observed. Exclusion limits are set in simplified models of chitilde_1()+- chitilde_1()-+ and chitilde_1()+- chitilde_2()0 pair production, see their Figure 7. Upper limits on the cross section and signal strength for direct di-stau production are derived, see Figures 8 and 9. Also, limits are derived in a pMSSM model where the only light slepton is the tautilde_{{R}}(), see Figure 10.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2014G searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for electroweak production of chargino pairs, or chargino-neutralino pairs, decaying to a final sate with two leptons (e and mu) and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of chargino pair production, with chargino decays to the lightest neutralino via either sleptons or gauge bosons, see Fig 5.; or in simplified models of chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino production, with decays to the lightest neutralino via gauge bosons, see Fig. 7. An interpretation in the pMSSM is also given, see Fig. 10.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AALTONEN 2014 searched in 5.8 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for evidence of chargino and next-to-lightest neutralino associated production in final states consisting of three leptons (electrons, muons or taus) and large missing transverse momentum. The results are consistent with the Standard Model predictions within 1.85 sigma. Limits on the chargino mass are derived in an mSUGRA model with mass(0) = 60 GeV, tan(beta) = 3, A_{{0}}() = 0 and mu >0, see their Fig. 2.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2014I searched in 19.5 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for electroweak production of chargino pairs decaying to a final state with opposite-sign lepton pairs (e or mu) and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models, see Fig. 18.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AALTONEN 2013Q searched in 6.0 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for evidence of chargino-neutralino associated production in like-sign dilepton final states. One lepton is identified as the hadronic decay of a tau lepton, while the other is an electron or muon. Good agreement with the Standard Model predictions is observed and limits are set on the chargino-neutralino cross section for simplified gravity- and gauge-mediated models, see their Figs. 2 and 3.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
AAD 2012T looked in 1 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for the production of supersymmetric particles decaying into final states with missing transverse momentum and exactly two isolated leptons (e or mu). Opposite-sign and same-sign dilepton events were separately studied. Additionally, in opposite-sign events, a search was made for an excess of same-flavor over different-flavor lepton pairs. No excess over the expected background is observed and limits are placed on the effective production cross section of opposite-sign dilepton events with notET > 250 GeV and on same-sign dilepton events with notET > 100 GeV. The latter limit is interpreted in a simplified electroweak gaugino production model as a lower chargino mass limit.


pdgid: S046WNO
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2011V looked in 35 pb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events with >=3 isolated leptons (e, mu or tau), with or without jets and notET. No evidence for an excess over the expected background is observed. Limits are derived in the CMSSM (m_{{0}}(), m_{{1/2}}()) plane for tan(beta) = 3 (see Fig. 5).


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AAD 2025AE searched for massive, charged long-lived particles in 140 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV. Two analyses are conducted: one looking for a single track, with high specific ionisation losses in the pixel detector and long time of flight to the hadron calorimeter, and one looking for two tracks, both with high specific ionisation in the pixel detector. No excess above the expected background is found. Limits are set in scenarios of long-lived R-hadrons (gluino) production, chargino production or stau pair production, see their figures 13 and 14.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AAD 2023G searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  chargino/neutralino pair production (wino-like LSP) in events with high-pt tracks with large  ionisation in the pixel detector. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is  observed. Limits are set on the chargino mass as a function of its lifetime, see Figure 19.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AAD 2022U searched for the signature of disappearing track from a long-lived chargino in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV. Long-lived charginos decay into  quasi-degenerate neutralino emitting a low-momentum particle whose identification is not  attempted. The signal is identified by requiring short tracklets in the four pixel layers with no continuation in the SCT (strip) detector. The main  background from fake  tracklets is estimated directly with the data. No significant excess  above the background prediction is found. The results are interpreted in an AMSB scenario (wino LSP), on p p --> chitilde+- chitilde+- and p p --> chitilde+- chitilde_1()0, assuming B(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 pi+-) = 100%, see their figure 7. Results are also interpreted in a higgsino-LSP model, with p p --> chitilde+- chitilde-+, and p p --> chitilde+- chitilde_1,2()0, assuming B(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 pi+-) =  95.5%, B(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 e+-)  = 3%, B(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 mu+-) =  1.5%, see their figure 8. Finally,  results are interpreted in a simplified model of gluino  pair production, with p p --> gtilde gtilde and  B(gtilde --> q q chitilde_1()0) =  B(gtilde --> q q chitilde+) = B(gtilde --> q q chitilde-) = 1/3, see their figure 9.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020N searched in 101 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of long-lived charginos in events containing isolated tracks with missing hits in the outer layer of the silicon tracker and little or no associated calorimetric energy deposits (disappearing tracks). No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. In an AMSB context and assuming a wino LSP, limits are set on the cross section of direct chargino production through p p --> chitilde+- chitilde-+ and p p --> chitilde+- chitilde_1()0, assuming B(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 pi+-) = 100%, as a function of the chargino mass and mean proper lifetime, see Figure 2. In the case of a Higgsino LSP, limits are set on the cross section of direct chargino production through p p --> chitilde+- chitilde-+ and p p --> chitilde+- chitilde_1,2()0, assuming B(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 pi+-) = 95.5%, B(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 e+-) = 3%, B(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 mu+-) = 1.5%, as a function of the chargino mass and mean proper lifetime, see Figure 3.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AABOUD 2019AT searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for metastable R-hadrons. Multiple search strategies for a wide range of lifetimes, corresponding to path lengths of a few meters, are defined. No significant deviations from the expected Standard Model background are observed. Results are interpreted in terms of direct electroweak production of long-lived charginos in the context of mAMSB scenarios. Chargino masses are excluded at 95% C.L. below 1090 GeV. See their Figure 10 (right).


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AABOUD 2018AS searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of long-lived charginos in the context of AMSB or phenomenological MSSM scenarios with wino-like LSP. Events with a disappearing track due to a low-momentum pion accompanied by at least one jet with high transverse momentum from initial-state radiation are considered. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Exclusion limits are set at 95% confidence level on the mass of charginos for different chargino lifetimes. For a pure wino with a lifetime of about 0.2 ns, corresponding to a mass-splitting between the charged and neutral wino of around 160 MeV, chargino masses up to 460 GeV are excluded, see their Fig. 8.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018BR searched in 38.4 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of long-lived charginos in events containing isolated tracks with missing hits in the outer layer of the silicon tracker and little or no associated calorimetric energy deposits (disappearing tracks). No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. In an AMSB context, limits are set on the cross section of direct chargino production through p p --> chitilde+- chitilde-+ and p p --> chitilde+- chitilde_1()0, assuming BR(chitilde+- --> chitilde_1()0 pi+-) = 100%, as a function of the chargino mass and mean proper lifetime, see Figures 3, 4 and 5.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AAD 2015AE searched in 19.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for heavy  long-lived charged particles, measured through their specific ionization energy loss in the ATLAS  pixel detector or their time-of-flight in the ALTAS muon system. In the absence of an excess of  events above the expected backgrounds, limits are set on stable charginos, see Fig. 10.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AAD 2015BM searched in 18.4 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for stable and metastable non-relativistic charged particles through their anomalous specific ionization energy loss in the ATLAS pixel detector. In absence of an excess of events above the expected backgrounds, limits are set on stable charginos (see Table 5) and on metastable charginos decaying to chitilde_1()0 pi+-, see Fig. 11.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AAD 2013H searched in 4.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for direct electroweak production of long-lived charginos in the context of AMSB scenarios. The search is based on the signature of a high-momentum isolated track with few associated hits in the outer part of the tracking system, arising from a chargino decay into a neutralino and a low-momentum pion. The pT spectrum of the tracks was found to be consistent with the SM expectations. Constraints on the lifetime and the production cross section were obtained, see Fig. 6. In the minimal AMSB framework with tan(beta) = 5, and mu > 0, a chargino having a mass below 103 (85) GeV for a chargino-neutralino mass splitting Deltamass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) of 160 (170) MeV is excluded at the 95% C.L. See Fig. 7 for more precise bounds.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AAD 2012BJ looked in 1.02 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for signatures of decaying charginos resulting in isolated tracks with few associated hits in the outer region of the tracking system. The pT spectrum of the tracks was found to be consistent with the SM expectations. Constraints on the lifetime and the production cross section were obtained. In the minimal AMSB framework with mass(3/2) < 32 TeV, mass(0) < 1.5 TeV, tan(beta) = 5, and mu > 0, a chargino having a mass below 92 GeV and a lifetime between 0.5 ns and 2 ns is excluded at the 95% C.L. See their Fig. 8 for more precise bounds.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
ABAZOV 2009M searched in 1.1 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for events with direct production of a pair of charged massive stable particles identified by their TOF. The number of the observed events is consistent with the predicted background. The data are used to constrain the production cross section as a function of the chitilde_{{1}}()+- mass, see their Fig. 2. The quoted limit improves to 206 GeV for gaugino-like charginos.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
ABBIENDI 2003L used e+ e- data at sqrt(s) = 130 -- 209 GeV to select events with two high momentum tracks with anomalous dE/dx. The excluded cross section is compared to the theoretical expectation as a function of the heavy particle mass in their Fig.~3. The bounds are valid for colorless fermions with lifetime longer than 10**-6 s. Supersedes the results from ACKERSTAFF 1998P.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
ABREU 2000T searches for the production of heavy stable charged particles, identified by their ionization or Cherenkov radiation, using data from sqrt(s)= 130 to 189 GeV. These limits include and update the results of ABREU 1998P.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2015AB searched in 19.5 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events containing tracks with little or no associated calorimeter energy deposits and with missing hits in the outer layers of the tracking system (disappearing-track signature). Such disappearing tracks can result from the decay of charginos that are nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino. The number of observed events is in agreement with the background expectation. Limits are set on the cross section of electroweak chargino production in terms of the chargino mass and mean proper lifetime, see Fig. 4. In the minimal AMSB model, a chargino mass below 260 GeV is excluded at 95% C.L., see their Fig. 5.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2015O searched in 18.8 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for evidence of long-lived charginos in the context of AMSB and pMSSM scenarios. The results are based on a previously published search for heavy stable charged particles at 7 and 8 TeV. In the minimal AMSB framework with tan(beta) = 5 and mu >= 0, constraints on the chargino mass and lifetime were placed, see Fig. 5. Charginos with a mass below 800 (100) GeV are excluded at the 95% C.L. for lifetimes above 100 ns (3 ns). Constraints are also placed on the pMSSM parameter space, see Fig. 3.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2015W searched in up to 20.5 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for evidence of long-lived neutralinos produced through qtilde-pair production, with qtilde --> q chitilde()0 and chitilde0 --> lepton+ lepton- nu (RPV: lambda(121), lambda(122)not= 0). 95% C.L. exclusion limits on cross section times branching ratio are set as a function of mean proper decay length of the neutralino, see Figs. 6 and 9.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
AAD 2013BD searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events containing tracks with no associated hits in the outer region of the tracking system resulting from the decay of charginos that are nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino, as is often the case in AMSB scenarios. No significant excess above the background expectation is observed for candidate tracks with large transverse momentum. Constraints on chargino properties are obtained and in the minimal AMSB model, a chargino mass below 270 GeV is excluded at 95% C.L., see their Fig. 7.


pdgid: S046SWN
text:
ABAZOV 2013B looked in 6.3 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for charged massive long-lived particles in events with muon-like particles that have both speed and ionization energy loss inconsistent with muons produced in beam collisions. In the absence of an excess, limits are set at 95% C.L. on gaugino- and higgsino-like charginos, see their Table 20 and Fig. 23.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AAD 2025L searched for an excess of three-lepton events in 140 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV. The search targets scenarios connected with potential anomalous muon magnetic moment: pair-produced sleptons (either charged or neutral) are assumed to decay to a bino-like chitilde_{{3}}()0, decaying to a mass-degenerate higgsino triplet LSP via the emission of a W, Z or h boson (with branching ratio 50%, 25% and 25% respectively). Three sets of signal regions are defined (with a SFOS pair on- and off-shell of the Z boson, and with three SS leptons). No significant excess is observed over the background prediction. 95% CL limits are extracted assuming degenerete etilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{e}}, mutilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{mu}}, degenerete etilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{e}}, and degenerete mutilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{mu}}, see their figures 15, 16a, and 16b.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AAD 2023CB searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for heavy particles decaying into an e mu, e tau, mu tau final state. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Limits are set on the mass of a stau neutrino with R-parity-violating couplings, with decays nutilde_tau --> e mu, nutilde_tau --> e tau, nutilde_tau --> mu tau, see figures 4b, 5b, 6b.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
TUMASYAN 2023H searched in 138 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  evidence of resonant nutilde_{{tau}} production in events with two charged leptons, e mu,  e tau, or mu tau. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is  observed. Limits are set on the mass of nutilde_{{tau}} in an RPV model for resonant sneutrino  production, where all RPV couplings vanish, except for those that are connected to the production  and decay of the nutilde_{{tau}}, considering a SUSY mass hierarchy with nutilde_{{tau}} as the  LSP. The nutilde_{{tau}} is produced resonantly through lambda_{{311}}^' coupling, and decays via  lambda_{{i3k}} coupling to two leptons, see their figure 3 for couplings of 0.1 and 0.01. Exclusion  limits are also shown in the plane of nutilde_{{tau}} mass and lambda^' coupling, for four  values of lambda couplings, see their figure 6. In addition, limits are set on heavy Z^'  gauge bosons with lepton flavor violating decays, see their figure 4, and on nonresonant quantum  black hole production in models with extra spatial dimensions, see their figure 5.  Model-independent upper limits on the product of the cross section, the branching fraction,  acceptance, and efficiency are given as well, see their figure 7.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AABOUD 2018CM searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for heavy particles decaying into an e mu, e tau, mu tau final state. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Limits are set on the mass of a stau neutrino with R-parity-violating couplings. For nutilde_tau --> e mu, masses below 3.4 TeV are excluded at 95% CL, see their Figure 4(b). Upper limits on the RPV couplings |lambda_{{312}}| versus |lambda_{{311}}^'| are also performed, see their Figure 8(a-b).


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AABOUD 2018CM searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for heavy particles decaying into an e mu, e tau, mu tau final state. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Limits are set on the mass of a stau neutrino with R-parity-violating couplings. For nutilde_tau --> e tau, masses below 2.9 TeV are excluded at 95% CL, see their Figure 5(b). Upper limits on the RPV couplings |lambda_{{313}}| versus |lambda_{{311}}^'| are also performed, see their Figure 8(c).


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AABOUD 2018CM searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for heavy particles decaying into an e mu, e tau, mu tau final state. No significant deviation from the expected SM background is observed. Limits are set on the mass of a stau neutrino with R-parity-violating couplings. For nutilde_tau --> mu tau, masses below 2.6 TeV are excluded at 95% CL, see their Figure 6(b). Upper limits on the RPV couplings |lambda_{{323}}| versus |lambda_{{311}}^'| are also performed, see their Figure 8(d).


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
SIRUNYAN 2018AT searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for heavy resonances decaying into e mu final states. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed and 95% C.L. exclusions are placed on the cross section times branching ratio for the R-parity-violating production and decay of a supersymmetric tau sneutrino, see their Fig. 3.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AABOUD 2016P searched in 3.2 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events with different flavour dilepton pairs (e mu, e tau, mu tau) from the production of nutilde_{{tau}} via an RPV lambda_{{311}}^' coupling and followed by a decay via lambda_{{312}} = lambda_{{321}} = 0.07 for e + mu, via lambda_{{313}} = lambda_{{331}} = 0.07 for e + tau and via lambda_{{323}} = lambda_{{332}} = 0.07 for mu + tau. No evidence for a dilepton resonance over the SM expectation is observed, and limits are derived on mass(nutilde) at 95% CL, see their Figs. 2(b), 3(b), 4(b), and Table 3.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AAD 2014X searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with at least four leptons (electrons, muons, taus) in the final state. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the sneutrino mass in an R-parity violating simplified model where the decay nutilde --> nu chitilde_1()0, with chitilde_1()0 --> lepton+- lepton-+ nu, takes place with a branching ratio of 100%, see Fig. 9.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AAD 2011Z looked in 1.07 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events with one electron and one muon of opposite charge from the production of nutilde_{{tau}} via an RPV lambda^'()(311) coupling and followed by a decay via lambda(312) into e + mu. No evidence for an (e, mu) resonance over the SM expectation is observed, and a limit is derived in the plane of lambda^'()(311) versus mass(nutilde) for three values of lambda(312), see their Fig. 2. Masses mass(nutilde) < 1.32 (1.45) TeV are excluded for lambda^'()(311) = 0.10 and lambda(312) = 0.05 (lambda^'()(311) = 0.11 and lambda(312) = 0.07).


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
ABDALLAH 2003M uses data from sqrt(s) = 192 -- 208 GeV to obtain limits in the framework of the MSSM with gaugino and sfermion mass universality at the GUT scale. An indirect limit on the mass is derived by constraining the MSSM parameter space by the results from direct searches for neutralinos (including cascade decays) and for sleptons. These limits are valid for values of M(2)< 1 TeV, |mu|<=1 TeV with the chitilde_{{1}}()0 as LSP. The quoted limit is obtained when there is no mixing in the third family. See Fig.~43 for the mass limits as a function of tan(beta). These limits update the results of ABREU 2000W.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
HEISTER 2002N derives a bound on mass(nutilde_{{e}}) by exploiting the mass relation between the nutilde_{{e}} and etilde, based on the assumption of universal GUT scale gaugino and scalar masses m(1/2) and m(0) and the search described in the etilde section. In the MSUGRA framework with radiative electroweak symmetry breaking, the limit improves to mass(nutilde_{{e}})>130 GeV, assuming a trilinear coupling A(0)=0 at the GUT scale. See Figs. 5 and 7 for the dependence of the limits on tan(beta).


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019AO searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for events containing two same-sign muons and at last two jets, originating from resonant production of second-generation sleptons (mutilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{mu}}) via the R-parity violating coupling lambda_{{211}}^' to quarks. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Upper limits on cross sections are derived in the context of two simplified models, see their Figure 4. The cross section limits are translated into limits on lambda_{{211}}^' for a modified CMSSM, see their Figure 5.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016BE searched in 19.7 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for evidence of narrow resonances decaying into e mu final states. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed and 95% C.L. exclusions are placed on the cross section times branching ratio for the production of an R-parity-violating supersymmetric tau sneutrino, see their Fig. 3.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AAD 2015O searched in 20.3 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for evidence of heavy particles decaying into e mu, e tau or mu tau final states. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed, and 95% C.L. exclusions are placed on the cross section times branching ratio for the production of an R-parity-violating supersymmetric tau sneutrino, applicable to any sneutrino flavour, see their Fig. 2.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AAD 2013AI searched in 4.6 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for evidence of heavy particles decaying into e mu, e tau or mu tau final states. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed, and 95% C.L. exclusions are placed on the cross section times branching ratio for the production of an R-parity-violating supersymmetric tau sneutrino, see their Fig. 2. For couplings lambda^'(311) = 0.10 and lambda_{{i3k}}() = 0.05, the lower limits on the nutilde_{{tau}} mass are 1610, 1110, 1100 GeV in the e mu, e tau, and mu tau channels, respectively.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AAD 2011H looked in 35 pb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for events with one electron and one muon of opposite charge from the production of nutilde_{{tau}} via an RPV lambda^'(311) coupling and followed by a decay via lambda(312) into e + mu. No evidence for an excess over the SM expectation is observed, and a limit is derived in the plane of lambda^'(311) versus mass(nutilde) for several values of lambda(312), see their Fig. 2. Superseded by AAD 2011Z.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
AALTONEN 2010Z searched in 1 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for events from the production d dbar --> nutilde_tau with the subsequent decays nutilde_tau --> e mu, mu tau, e tau in the MSSM framework with RPV. Two isolated leptons of different flavor and opposite charges are required, with taus identified by their hadronic decay. No statistically significant excesses are observed over the SM background. Upper limits on lambda_{{311}}^'2() times the branching ratio are listed in their Table III for various nutilde_{{tau}} masses. Limits on the cross section times branching ratio for lambda_{{311}}^'() = 0.10 and lambda_{{i3k}}() = 0.05, displayed in Fig. 2, are used to set limits on the nutilde_{{tau}} mass of 558 GeV for the e mu, 441 GeV for the mu tau and 442 GeV for the e tau channels.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
ABAZOV 2010M looked in 5.3 fb**-1 of p pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV for events with exactly one pair of high p_{{T}} isolated e mu and a veto against hard jets. No evidence for an excess over the SM expectation is observed, and a limit at 95% C.L. on the cross section times branching ratio is derived, see their Fig. 3. These limits are translated into limits on couplings as a function of mass(nutilde_{{tau}}) as shown on their Fig. 4. As an example, for mass(nutilde_{{tau}}) = 100 GeV and lambda_{{312}}() <= 0.07, couplings lambda_{{311}}^'() > 7.7E-4 are excluded.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
ABDALLAH 2004H use data from LEP~1 and sqrt(s) = 192 -- 208~GeV. They re-use results or re-analyze the data from ABDALLAH 2003M to put limits on the parameter space of anomaly-mediated supersymmetry breaking (AMSB), which is scanned in the region 1<m(3/2)<50~TeV, 0<m_{{0}}()<1000~GeV, 1.5<tan(beta)<35, both signs of mu. The constraints are obtained from the searches for mass degenerate chargino and neutralino, for SM-like and invisible Higgs, for leptonically decaying charginos and from the limit on non-SM Z width of 3.2~MeV. The limit is for mass(t) = 174.3~GeV (see Table 2 for other mass(t) values). The limit improves to 114 GeV for mu < 0.


pdgid: S046SNU
text:
ALEXANDER 1991F limit is for one species of nutilde and is derived from Gamma(invisible, new)/Gamma(lepton lepton) < 0.38.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AAD 2025AH searched for an excess in same-flavour dilepton production events in 140 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV using a BDT selection optimised on simplified models including sleptons and neutralinos with mass(etilde)-mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) < mass(W): pair-produced sleptons decay to a lepton and a neutralino. Several signal regions are defined, depending on the BDT score. Despite some local excess at the level of 2.4 sigma, the data agree with the background prediction. 95% CL limits are extracted a s a function of mass(etilde)-mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see their figure 13.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AAD 2025L searched for an excess of three-lepton events in 140 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV. The search targets scenarios connected with potential anomalous muon magnetic moment: pair-produced sleptons (either charged or neutral) are assumed to decay to a bino-like chitilde_{{3}}()0, decaying to a mass-degenerate higgsino triplet LSP via the emission of a W, Z or h boson (with branching ratio 50%, 25% and 25% respectively). Three sets of signal regions are defined (with a SFOS pair on- and off-shell of the Z boson, and with three SS leptons). No significant excess is observed over the background prediction. 95% CL limits are extracted assuming degenerete etilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{e}}, mutilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{mu}}, degenerate etilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{e}}, and degenerete mutilde_{{L}}, nutilde_{{mu}}, see their figures 15, 16a, and 16b.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AAD 2023M searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for leptontilde+- pair production, followed by leptontilde+- --> lepton+- chitilde_1()0 in events with two leptons. The focus is on models where mass(leptontilde+-) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) is close to the W mass. No significant excess above the Standard Model predictions is observed. Limits were set on the leptontilde mass (assuming etilde-mutilde and L-R degeneracy), as a function of mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see  Figure 6. Limits were also derived for single etilde or mutilde, and for L and R independently, see Figure 7.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AAD 2020O reported on a search for electroweak production in models with charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with exactly two oppositely charged leptons and missing transverse momentum. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Light-flavour sleptons etilde and mutilde are constrained at 95% C.L. to have masses above 700 GeV for massless lightest neutralino, see their Fig. 7(c). Exclusion limits are also set for selectrons and smuons separately, considering either right- or left-handed components, by including only the di-electron and di-muon same-flavour signal regions defined in the search, see their Fig. 8.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019AW searched in 35.9 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak pair production of selectrons or smuons in events with two leptons (electrons or muons) of the opposite electric charge and same flavour, no jets and large notET. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the selectron mass assuming left-handed, right-handed or both left- and right-handed (mass degenerate) production, see their Figure 6. Similarly, limits are set on the smuon mass, see their Figure 7.  Limits are also set on slepton masses under the assumption that the selectron and smuon are mass degenerate, see their Figure 5.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AABOUD 2018BT searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct electroweak production of charginos, chargino and next-to-lightest neutralinos and sleptons in events with two or three leptons (electrons or muons), with or without jets, and large missing transverse energy. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the slepton mass up to 500 GeV for massless chitilde_{{1}}()0, assuming degeneracy of etilde, mutilde, and tautilde and exploiting the 2lepton signature, see their Figure 8(b).


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AABOUD 2018R searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for electroweak production in scenarios with compressed mass spectra in final states with two low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. The data are found to be consistent with the SM prediction. Results are interpreted in slepton pair production models with a fourfold degeneracy assumed in selectron and smuon masses. The etilde masses are excluded up to 190 GeV for mass(etilde) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 5 GeV. The exclusion limits extend down to mass splittings of 1 GeV, see their Fig. 11.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2014R searched in 19.5 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with at least three leptons (electrons, muons, taus) in the final state. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the slepton mass in a stau (N)NLSP simplified model (GMSB) where the decay leptontilde --> lepton+- tau+- tau-+ Gtilde takes place with a branching ratio of 100%, see Fig. 8.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AAD 2013B searched in 4.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV for sleptons decaying to a final state with two leptons (e and mu) and missing transverse energy. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Limits are derived in a simplified model of direct left-handed slepton pair production, where left-handed slepton masses between 85 and 195 GeV are excluded at 95% C.L. for mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 20 GeV. See also Fig. 2(a). Exclusion limits are also derived in the phenomenological MSSM, see Fig. 3.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
ABBIENDI 2004 search for etilde_R etilde_R production in acoplanar di-electron final states in the 183 -- 208~GeV data. See Fig. 13 for the dependence of the limits on mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) and for the limit at tan(beta)=35 This limit supersedes ABBIENDI 2000G.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
ACHARD 2004 search for etilde_{{R}}etilde_{{L}} and etilde_{{R}}etilde_{{R}} production in single- and acoplanar di-electron final states in the 192 -- 209 GeV data. Absolute limits on mass(etilde_{{R}}) are derived from a scan over the MSSM parameter space with universal GUT scale gaugino and scalar masses and mass(0), 1<=tan(beta)<=60 and -2<=mu<=2 TeV. See Fig.~4 for the dependence of the limits on mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0). This limit supersedes ACCIARRI 1999W.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
ABDALLAH 2003M looked for acoplanar dielectron +notE final states at sqrt(s) = 189 -- 208 GeV. The limit assumes mu=-200 GeV and tan(beta)=1.5 in the calculation of the production cross section and B(etilde --> e chitilde_1()0). See Fig.~15 for limits in the (mass(etilde_{{R}}), mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)) plane. These limits include and update the results of ABREU 2001


pdgid: S046SE
text:
ABDALLAH 2003M uses data from sqrt(s) = 192 -- 208 GeV to obtain limits in the framework of the MSSM with gaugino and sfermion mass universality at the GUT scale. An indirect limit on the mass is derived by constraining the MSSM parameter space by the results from direct searches for neutralinos (including cascade decays) and for sleptons. These limits are valid for values of M(2)<1 TeV, |mu|<=1 TeV with the chitilde_{{1}}()0 as LSP. The quoted limit is obtained when there is no mixing in the third family. See Fig.~43 for the mass limits as a function of tan(beta). These limits update the results of ABREU 2000W.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
HEISTER 2002E looked for acoplanar dielectron + notET final states from e+ e- interactions between 183 and 209 GeV. The mass limit assumes mu<-200 GeV and tan(beta)=2 for the production cross section and B(etilde --> e chitilde_1()0)=1. See their Fig. 4 for the dependence of the limit on Delta(m). These limits include and update the results of BARATE 2001.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
HEISTER 2002N search for etilde_R etilde_L and etilde_R etilde_R production in single- and acoplanar di-electron final states in the 183 -- 208 GeV data. Absolute limits on mass(etilde_{{R}}) are derived from a scan over the MSSM parameter space with universal GUT scale gaugino and scalar masses m(1/2) and m(0), 1<=tan(beta)<=50 and -10<=mu<=10 TeV. The region of small |mu|, where cascade decays are important, is covered by a search for chitilde_1()0 chitilde_3()0 in final states with leptons and possibly photons. Limits on mass(etilde_{{L}}) are derived by exploiting the mass relation between the etilde_{{L}} and etilde_{{R}}, based on universal m(0) and m(1/2). When the constraint from the mass limit of the lightest Higgs from HEISTER 2002 is included, the bounds improve to mass(etilde_{{R}})>77(75) GeV and mass(etilde_{{L}})>115(115) GeV for a top mass of 175(180) GeV. In the MSUGRA framework with radiative electroweak symmetry breaking, the limits improve further to mass(etilde_{{R}})>95 GeV and mass(etilde_{{L}})>152 GeV, assuming a trilinear coupling A_{{0}}()=0 at the GUT scale. See Figs. 4, 5, 7 for the dependence of the limits on tan(beta).


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AAD 2020I reported on ATLAS searches for slepton pair production in models with compressed mass spectra. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Events with notET, two same-flavour, opposite-charge, low-transverse-momentum leptons, and jets from initial-state radiation or characteristic of vector-boson fusion production are selected. Light-flavour sleptons etilde and mutilde are constrained at 95% C.L. to have masses above 251 GeV for a mass splitting slepton-chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 10 GeV, with constraints extending down to mass splittings of 550 MeV at the LEP slepton limits (73 GeV), see their Fig. 16(a). If only selectrons are considered, and etilde = etilde_{{R}}, masses below 101 GeV are excluded for mass splitting etilde_{{R}}, chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 7.5 GeV. See their Fig. 16(b).


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AAD 2020I reported on ATLAS searches for slepton pair production in models with compressed mass spectra. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Events with notET, two same-flavour, opposite-charge, low-transverse-momentum leptons, and jets from initial-state radiation or characteristic of vector-boson fusion production are selected. Light-flavour sleptons etilde and mutilde are constrained at 95% C.L. to have masses above 251 GeV for a mass splitting slepton-chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 10 GeV, with constraints extending down to mass splittings of 550 MeV at the LEP slepton limits (73 GeV). See their Fig. 16(a). If only selectron are considered, and etilde = etilde_{{L}}, masses below 169 GeV are excluded for mass splitting etilde_{{L}}, chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 7.1 GeV. See their Fig. 16(b).


pdgid: S046SE
text:
AAD 2014G searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for electroweak production of slepton pairs, decaying to a final sate with two leptons (e and mu) and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models of slepton pair production, see Fig. 8. An interpretation in the pMSSM is also given, see Fig. 10.


pdgid: S046SE
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2014I searched in 19.5 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for electroweak production of slepton pairs decaying to a final state with opposite-sign lepton pairs (e or mu) and missing transverse momentum. No excess beyond the Standard Model expectation is observed. Exclusion limits are derived in simplified models, see Fig. 18.


pdgid: S046SEV
text:
AAD 2014X searched in 20.3 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV for events with at least four leptons (electrons, muons, taus) in the final state. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the slepton mass in an R-parity violating simplified model where the decay leptontilde --> lepton chitilde_1()0, with chitilde_1()0 --> lepton+- lepton-+ nu, takes place with a branching ratio of 100%, see Fig. 9.


pdgid: S046SEV
text:
ABBIENDI 2004F use data from sqrt(s) = 189 -- 209~GeV. They derive limits on sparticle masses under the assumption of RPV with L L Ebar or L Q Dbar couplings. The results are valid for tan(beta) = 1.5, mu = -200~GeV, with, in addition, Delta(m) > 5~GeV for indirect decays via L Q Dbar. The limit quoted applies to direct decays via L L Ebar or L Q Dbar couplings. For indirect decays, the limits on the etilde_{{R}} mass are respectively 99 and 92~GeV for L L Ebar and L Q Dbar couplings and mass(chitilde()0) = 10~GeV and degrade slightly for larger chitilde_{{1}}()0 mass. Supersedes the results of ABBIENDI 2000.


pdgid: S046SEV
text:
ABDALLAH 2004M use data from sqrt(s) = 192 -- 208~GeV to derive limits on sparticle masses under the assumption of RPV with L L Ebar or Ubar Dbar Dbar couplings. The results are valid for mu = -200~GeV, tan(beta) = 1.5, Delta(m) > 5~GeV and assuming a BR of 1 for the given decay. The limit quoted is for indirect Ubar Dbar Dbar decays using the neutralino constraint of 39.5 GeV for L L Ebar and of 38.0 GeV for Ubar Dbar Dbar couplings, also derived in ABDALLAH 2004M. For indirect decays via L L Ebar the limit improves to 95 GeV if the constraint from the neutralino is used and to 94 GeV if it is not used. For indirect decays via Ubar Dbar Dbar couplings it remains unchanged when the neutralino constraint is not used. Supersedes the result of ABREU 2000U.


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
AAD 2025AH searched for an excess in same-flavour dilepton production events in 140 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV using a BDT selection optimised on simplified models including sleptons and neutralinos with mass(mutilde)-mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) < mass(W): pair-produced sleptons decay to a lepton and a neutralino. Several signal regions are defined, depending on the BDT score. Despite some local excess at the level of 2.4 sigma, the data agree with the background prediction. 95% CL limits are extracted a s a function of mass(mutilde)-mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see their figure 13.


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
AAD 2023M searched in 139 fb**-1 of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  leptontilde+- pair production, followed by leptontilde+- --> lepton+- chitilde_1()0 in  events with two leptons. The focus is on models where mass(leptontilde+-) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) is close to the W mass. No significant excess above the Standard Model  predictions is observed. Limits were set on the leptontilde mass (assuming   etilde-mutilde and L-R degeneracy), as a function of mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0), see  Figure 6. Limits were also derived for single etilde or mutilde, and for L and R independently, see Figure 7.


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
AAD 2020I reported on ATLAS searches for slepton pair production in models with compressed mass spectra. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Events with notET, two same-flavour, opposite-charge, low-transverse-momentum leptons, and jets from initial-state radiation or characteristic of vector-boson fusion production are selected. Light-flavour sleptons etilde and mutilde are constrained at 95% C.L. to have masses above 251 GeV for a mass splitting slepton-chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 10 GeV, with constraints extending down to mass splittings of 550 MeV at the LEP slepton limits (73 GeV). See their Fig. 16(a). If only smuon are considered, and mutilde = mutilde_{{R}}, masses below 150 GeV are excluded for mass splitting mutilde_{{R}}, chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 8.2 GeV. See their Fig. 16(b).


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
AAD 2020I reported on ATLAS searches for slepton pair production in models with compressed mass spectra. A dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1} was used. Events with notET, two same-flavour, opposite-charge, low-transverse-momentum leptons, and jets from initial-state radiation or characteristic of vector-boson fusion production are selected. Light-flavour sleptons etilde and mutilde are constrained at 95% C.L. to have masses above 251 GeV for a mass splitting slepton-chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 10 GeV, with constraints extending down to mass splittings of 550 MeV at the LEP slepton limits (73 GeV). See their Fig. 16(a). If only smuon are considered, and mutilde = mutilde_{{L}}, masses below 216 GeV are excluded for mass splitting mutilde_{{L}}, chitilde_{{1}}()0 of 10 GeV. See their Fig. 16(b).


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
AABOUD 2018R searched in 36.1 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for electroweak production in scenarios with compressed mass spectra in final states with two low-momentum leptons and missing transverse momentum. The data are found to be consistent with the SM prediction. Results are interpreted in slepton pair production models with a fourfold degeneracy assumed in selectron and smuon masses. The mutilde masses are excluded up to 190 GeV for mass(mutilde) - mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0) = 5 GeV. The exclusion limits extend down to mass splittings of 1 GeV, see their Fig. 11.


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
ABBIENDI 2004 search for mutilde_R mutilde_R production in acoplanar di-muon final states in the 183 -- 208~GeV data. See Fig. 14 for the dependence of the limits on mass(chitilde_{{1}}^0()) and for the limit at tan(beta)=35. Under the assumption of 100% branching ratio for mutilde_R --> mu~chitilde_{{1}}()0, the limit improves to 94.0 GeV for Delta(m)> 4 GeV. See Fig.~11 for the dependence of the limits on m(chitilde_{{1}}()0) at several values of the branching ratio. This limit supersedes ABBIENDI 2000G.


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
ACHARD 2004 search for mutilde_{{R}}mutilde_{{R}} production in acoplanar di-muon final states in the 192 -- 209 GeV data. Limits on mass(mutilde_{{R}}) are derived from a scan over the MSSM parameter space with universal GUT scale gaugino and scalar masses and mass(0), 1<=tan(beta)<=60 and -2<=mu<=2 TeV. See Fig.~4 for the dependence of the limits on mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0). This limit supersedes ACCIARRI 1999W.


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
ABDALLAH 2003M looked for acoplanar dimuon +notE final states at sqrt(s) = 189 -- 208 GeV. The limit assumes B(mutilde --> mu chitilde_1()0) = 100%. See Fig.~16 for limits on the (mass(mutilde_{{R}}), mass(chitilde_{{1}}()0)) plane. These limits include and update the results of ABREU 2001.


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
HEISTER 2002E looked for acoplanar dimuon + notET final states from e+ e- interactions between 183 and 209 GeV. The mass limit assumes B(mutilde --> mu chitilde_1()0)=1. See their Fig. 4 for the dependence of the limit on Delta(m). These limits include and update the results of BARATE 2001.


pdgid: S046SMU
text:
ABREU 2000V use data from sqrt(s)= 130 -- 189 GeV to search for tracks with large impact parameter or visible decay vertices. Limits are obtained as function of mass(Gtilde), after combining these results with the search for slepton pair production in the SUGRA framework from ABREU 2001 to cover prompt decays and on stable particle searches from ABREU 2000Q. For limits at different mass(Gtilde), see their Fig. 12.


pdgid: S046SMV
text:
AAD 2022E searched in 139 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for  supersymmetry by measuring the yield asymmetry between events containing e- mu+ and those  containing e+ mu-. This was found in agreement with the standard model prediction of 1. Limits are set on the RPV production of t mutilde_L events with mutilde_L --> mu chitilde_1()0 for  various values of  lambda_{{231}}^', see their figures 6 and 7.


pdgid: S046SMV
text:
ABDALLAH 2004M use data from sqrt(s) = 192 -- 208~GeV to derive limits on sparticle masses under the assumption of RPV with L L Ebar or Ubar Dbar Dbar couplings. The results are valid for mu = -200~GeV, tan(beta) = 1.5, Delta(m) > 5~GeV and assuming a BR of 1 for the given decay. The limit quoted is for indirect Ubar Dbar Dbar decays using the neutralino constraint of 39.5 GeV for L L Ebar and of 38.0 GeV for Ubar Dbar Dbar couplings, also derived in ABDALLAH 2004M. For indirect decays via L L Ebar the limit improves to 90 GeV if the constraint from the neutralino is used and remains at 87 GeV if it is not used. For indirect decays via Ubar Dbar Dbar couplings it degrades to 85 GeV when the neutralino constraint is not used. Supersedes the result of ABREU 2000U.


pdgid: S046SMV
text:
HEISTER 2003G searches for the production of smuons in the case of RPV prompt decays with LLEbar, LQDbar or UbarDbarDbar couplings at sqrt(s) = 189 -- 209 GeV. The search is performed for direct and indirect decays, assuming one coupling at a time to be non-zero. The limit holds for direct decays mediated by RPV LQDbar couplings and improves to 90 GeV for indirect decays (for Delta(m)> 10 GeV). Limits are also given for LLEbar direct (mass(mutildeR) > 87~GeV) and indirect decays (mass(mutildeR) > 96 GeV for m(chitilde_{{1}}()0) > 23 GeV from BARATE 1998S) and for UbarDbarDbar indirect decays (mass(mutildeR) > 85 GeV for Delta(m)> 10 GeV). Supersedes the results from BARATE 2001B.


pdgid: S046STA
text:
TUMASYAN 2023AG searched in 138 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for or direct pair production of tau sleptons in events with two hadronically decaying tau leptons. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the mass of the tau slepton in models with tautilde --> tau chitilde_1()0 for mass-degenerate, pure left-handed and pure right-handed tau sleptons, see their figures 4 -- 7. Limits are also set for the maximally mixed scenario with long-lived tau sleptons and tautilde lifetimes of 0.01 mm to 2.5 mm, see their figure 8.


pdgid: S046STA
text:
AAD 2020H presented ATLAS searches for direct production for tautilde in final states with two hadronically decaying leptons and notET. The analysis uses a dataset of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb^{-1}. Exclusion limits at 95% C.L. are derived in scenarios of direct production of tautilde pairs with each tautilde decaying into a tau and the lightest neutralino chitilde_{{1}}()0 in simplified models where the tautilde_{{R}} and tautilde_{{L}} mass eigenstates are degenerate. Stau masses from 120GeV to 390GeV are excluded for a massless lightest neutralino, see their Fig. 7(a). If tautilde_{{L}}-only pair production is considered, the exclusion region extends between 155 GeV to 310 GeV, see their Fig. 7(b).


pdgid: S046STA
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020P searched in 77.2 fb^{-1} of p p collisions at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV for direct pair production of tau sleptons in events with a tau lepton pair and significant missing transverse momentum. Final states with two double hadronic decay of the tau leptons are considered, as well as where one of the tau leptons decays into an electron or a muon. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set on the stau mass in a simplified models where two tau sleptons are pair produced and decay to a tau lepton and the lightest neutralino, assuming either only left-handed stau production, see Figure 8, or assuming degenerate left- and right-handed stau production, see Figure 9.


pdgid: S046STA
text:
ABBIENDI 2004 search for tautilde tautilde production in acoplanar di-tau final states in the 183 -- 208~GeV data. See Fig. 15 for the dependence of the limits on mass(chitilde_{{1}}^0()) and for the limit at tan(beta)=35. Under the assumption of 100% branching ratio for tautilde_R --> tau~chitilde_{{1}}()0, the limit improves to 89.8~GeV for Delta(m)> 8 GeV. See Fig.~12 for the dependence of the limits on m(chitilde_{{1}}()0) at several values of the branching ratio and for their dependence on theta(tau). This limit supersedes ABBIENDI 2000G.


