# pdgfootnote

pdgid: S086R03
text:
AAIJ 2012AM reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-)] = 0.90+-0.27+-0.20 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) = 6.1+-0.5E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P39
text:
AAIJ 2023AZ result's last uncertainty includes the uncertainty of the branching fraction of B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and of f(s)/f(d) ratio.


pdgid: S086P39
text:
AAIJ 2018AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar0 phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 3.4+-0.4+-0.3E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P38
text:
AAIJ 2023AZ result's last uncertainty includes the uncertainties of the branching fraction of B(B0 --> Dbar0 K+ K-) and of f(s)/f(d) ratio.


pdgid: S086P38
text:
AAIJ 2018AY reports [G(B_s()0 --> Dbar^*()0 phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-)] = 4.2+-0.5+-0.4E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> Dbar0 pi+ pi-) = 8.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P28
text:
The last uncertainty includes the limited knowledge of the external branching fractions where the eta_{{c}} is reconstructed in the p pbar,K+ K- pi+ pi-, pi+ pi- pi+ pi-, and K+ K- K+ K- decays and phi(1020) --> K+ K-.


pdgid: S086P29
text:
The last uncertainty includes the limited knowledge of the external branching fractions where the eta_{{c}} is reconstructed in the p pbar,K+ K- pi+ pi-, pi+ pi- pi+ pi-, and K+ K- K+ K- decays. The significance of the signal, including systematic uncertainties, is 4.6 standard deviations.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
AAIJ 2021Y reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 5.01+-0.16+-0.17E-4 from a measurement of [[G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.003+-0.035E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
THORNE 2013 uses f(s) = (17.2+-3.0)% as the fraction of Upsilon(5S) decaying to B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)().


pdgid: S086R6
text:
ABE 1996Q reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)/G(total)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z)]/[G(bbar --> B+ at Z)+ G(bbar --> B0 at Z)]] = 0.185+-0.055+-0.020E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z)]G(bbar --> B+ at Z)+ G(bbar --> B0 at Z)] = 0.1230+-0.0115. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
AKERS 1994J sees one event and measures the limit on the product branching fraction f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) < 7E-4 at CL = 90%. We divide by B(bbar --> B_s()0) = 0.112.


pdgid: S086R6
text:
In ACTON 1992N a limit on the product branching fraction is measured to be f(bbar --> B_s()0).B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) <=0.22E-2.


pdgid: S086R19
text:
KUMAR 2024 uses f(s) = (22.0+2.0-2.1)% as the fraction of Upsilon(5S) decaying to B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)().


pdgid: S086R20
text:
AAIJ 2025AN reports B(B0 --> J/psi eta)/B(B_s()0 --> J/psi eta) = 2.16+-0.16+-0.05+-0.07E-2 where the last uncertainty is due to f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} ratio. We use the inverse of this branching ratio to obtain the listed value.


pdgid: S086R20
text:
AAIJ 2025AN reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)] = 46.3+-3.4+-1.8 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) eta) = 1.23+-0.19E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R20
text:
AAIJ 2013A reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] = 14.0+-1.2+1.1-1.5+1.1-1.0 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0) = 2.55+0.18-0.16E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R20
text:
Observed for the first time with significances over 10 sigma. The second error are total systematic uncertainties including the error on N(B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()).


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2015AL reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)] = 4.31+-0.17+-0.12+-0.25E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S) = 4.45+-0.11E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AALTONEN 2011A reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B0 at Z)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)] = 1.09+-0.19+-0.11E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z) =, B(bbar --> B0 at Z) =, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S) = 1/2 * B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 1/2 *. Our firs t error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2013AB reports 1.97+-0.14+-0.07+-0.15+-0.08E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]/G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.98+-0.35E-4,[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.256+-0.020, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.91+-0.21E-4, [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.251+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R46
text:
AAIJ 2012O reports 1.83+-0.21+-0.10+-0.14+-0.07E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0S)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]/G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.71+-0.32E-4,[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.267+0.021-0.02, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0) = 8.91+-0.21E-4, [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.251+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AAIJ 2025AQ reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] = 3.12+-0.09+-0.06+-0.10E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AAIJ 2025AQ reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] = 3.08+-0.11+-0.06+-0.10E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AAIJ 2015AV result combines two measurements with different normalizing modes of B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 and  B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AAIJ 2012AP reports B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) Kbar^*(892)0)/B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 3.43+0.34-0.36+-0.50E-2 and B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.29+-0.05+-0.13E-3 after correcting for the contribution from K pi S-wave beneath the K^*() peak.


pdgid: S086R47
text:
AALTONEN 2011A reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B0 at Z)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] = 0.0168+-0.0024+-0.0068 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z) = 10.0+-0.8E-2, B(bbar --> B0 at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2, B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R01
text:
AAIJ 2013A reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) eta^')/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0)] = 12.7+-1.1+0.5-1.3+1.0-0.9 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) rho()0) = 2.55+0.18-0.16E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R02
text:
Strongly correlated with measurements of Gamma()/Gamma and Gamma()/Gamma reported in the same reference.


pdgid: S086R04
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 19.79+-0.47+-0.52E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R44
text:
The second error includes both the detector systematic and the uncertainty in the number of produced Y(5S) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)() pairs.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016Q reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980), f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.140+-0.008+-0.023 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 13.9+-0.6+2.5-1.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980), f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
ABAZOV 2012C reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980), f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.275+-0.041+-0.061 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AALTONEN 2011AB reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980), f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.257+-0.020+-0.014 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R53
text:
AAIJ 2011 reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(980), f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.252+0.046-0.032+0.027-0.033 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R05
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 0.098+-0.033+0.006-0.015E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2(1270), f_2() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R05
text:
Measured in Dalitz plot like analysis of B_s --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays for the f_{{2}} helicity state lambda = 0.


pdgid: S086R07
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 4.19+-0.53+0.12-3.7E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_0(1370), f_0() --> pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R06
text:
AAIJ 2012AO reports 1.66+-0.31+0.96-0.08E-2 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi- (nonresonant))/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R82
text:
Measured with B(B_s()0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) / B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S086R80
text:
AAIJ 2014L reports [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 K- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+ pi-)] = 2.12+-0.15+-0.18 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.5+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. This is an observation of B_s()0 --> J/psi K0S K+- pi-+ with more than 10 standard deviations.


pdgid: S086R81
text:
Measured with B(B_s()0 --> J/psi K0S K+ K-)/B(B0 --> J/psi K0S pi+ pi-) using PDG 2012 values for the involved branching fractions.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
ABAZOV 2012AF reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 0.19+-0.05+-0.04 which we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R09
text:
AAIJ 2012S reports [26.4+-2.7+-2.4E-2 from a measurement of Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_2^'(1525))/Gamma(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) assuming B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 44.4+-1.1E-2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 48.9+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086R60
text:
Measured relative to B_s()0 --> J/psi phi assuming B( B_s()0 --> J/psi phi) = 10.5+-0.13+-0.64E-4 and taking into account small K+ K- S-wave contribution.


pdgid: S086R00
text:
Branching fractions of normalization modes B_s()0 --> J/psi gamma X taken from PDG 2014. Uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R79
text:
AAIJ 2014Y reports 7.14+-0.99+0.83-0.91+-0.41E-5 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-)] assuming B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 0.11+0.007-0.006, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(f_1(1285) --> 2pi+ 2pi-) = 10.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R37
text:
AAIJ 2012L reports 0.489+-0.026+-0.021+-0.012 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.94+-0.06E-2,B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.72+-0.17E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.971+-0.032E-2, B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.95+-0.22E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086P63
text:
TUMASYAN 2022AI reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) K0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0)] = 3.33+-0.69+-0.11+-0.34E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K0) = 5.8+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086S02
text:
AAIJ 2015U reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) K- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K+ pi-)] = 5.38+-0.36+-0.22+-0.31E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K+ pi-) = 5.8+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086S03
text:
AAIJ 2015U reports [G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0)] = 5.58+-0.57+-0.40+-0.32E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> psi(2S) K^*(892)0) = 5.9+-0.4E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P52
text:
AAIJ 2021C reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 2.42+-0.23+-0.07E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086P52
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020BB reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 2.21+-0.29+-0.17E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086P70
text:
AAIJ 2023AP reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) pi+ pi-)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) pi+ pi-)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 6.8+-1.1+-0.2E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086P59
text:
AAIJ 2021C reports G(B_s()0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi) B**2(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-)/B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-)/B(phi --> K+ K-) = 1.22+-0.03+-0.04 which we adjust with PDG 2020 values of B(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-) = 99.902+-0.009E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = 34.68+-0.30E-2, and B(phi --> K+ K-) = 49.2+-0.5E-2. The first uncertainty is the total experiment's one and the second is due to the adjustment branching fractions.


pdgid: S086P58
text:
AAIJ 2021C reports [G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) ( K+ K- )_non-phi)/G(B_s()0 --> chi_c1(3872) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.57+-0.32+-0.12 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AAIJ 2017G reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]/G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 9.15+-0.71+-0.83E-3 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.251+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AALTONEN 2012L reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]/G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.008+-0.002+-0.001 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.251+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> pi+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]/G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.050+0.011-0.009+-0.004 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> pi+ pi-) = 5.37+-0.20E-6, [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.251+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*() and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (19.3+-2.9)% and Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / Gamma(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (90.1+3.8-4.0)%.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
Obtains this result from (f_s/f_d). B(B_s --> pi+ pi-)/B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 0.007+-0.004+-0.005, assuming f_s/f_d = 0.276+-0.034 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6.


pdgid: S086R15
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from B(B_s --> pi+ pi- ) / B(B_s --> K+ K-) < 0.05 at 90% CL, assuming B(B_s --> K+ K-) = 33+-6+-7E-6.


pdgid: S086P66
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)() decays and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) =   (20.1+-3.1)%.


pdgid: S086P53
text:
Uses Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^* Bbar_s^* decays and assumes B(Upsilon(10860) --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) = (20.1+-3.1)%.


pdgid: S086S05
text:
AAIJ 2015O reports [G(B_s()0 --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> eta^' K+)] = 0.47+-0.09+-0.04 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> eta^' K+) = 7.04+-0.25E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P26
text:
Corresponds to the 95% CL upper limit 1.01E-6. Uses the normalization mode B+ --> eta^' K+ with branching fraction 70.6+-2.5E-6 and the ratio of hadronisation fractions f(s)/f(d) =0.259+-0.015, which is assumed equal to f(s)/f(u).


pdgid: S086R29
text:
AAIJ 2015AS reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 1.84+-0.05+-0.13 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R29
text:
Uses B(B0 --> J/psi phi) = 1.38+-0.49E-3 and production cross-section ratio of CS(B_{{s}})/CS(B0) = 0.26+-0.04.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]/G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.074+-0.006+-0.006 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.251+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
AALTONEN 2009C reports [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [B(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B0 at Z)] = 0.071+-0.010+-0.007 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, B(bbar --> B_s()0 at Z) = 10.0+-0.8E-2, B(bbar --> B0 at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R7
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s --> pi+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) < 0.08 at 90% CL, assuming f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.260+-0.039 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
AAIJ 2012AR reports [G(B_s()0 --> K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [[G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)]/G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.316+-0.009+-0.019 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, [G(bbar --> B_s()0 at p p)G(bbar --> B0 at p p)] = 0.251+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
AALTONEN 2011N reports (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s()0 --> K+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) = 0.347+-0.020+-0.021. We multiply this result by our best value of B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = and divide by our best value of f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}, where 1/2 f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} =. Our first quoted uncertainty is the combined experiment's uncertainty and our second is the systematic uncertainty from using out best values.


pdgid: S086R8
text:
ABULENCIA,A 2006D obtains this from (f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) (B(B_s --> K+ K- ) / B(B0 --> K+ pi-)) = 0.46+-0.08+-0.07, assuming f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.260+-0.039 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 18.9+-0.7E-6.


pdgid: S086R39
text:
AAIJ 2020F reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 Kbar0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 phi)] = 2.3+-0.4+-0.2+-0.1 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K0 phi) = 7.3+-0.7E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R39
text:
Observed in B_s()0 --> K0S K0S with significance of 5.1 sigma. The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the total number of B_s()0 Bbar_s()0 pairs.


pdgid: S086R61
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.191+-0.027+-0.033 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R61
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.29+-0.06+-0.04 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R62
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+- pi-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.70+-0.07+-0.15 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R62
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+- pi-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 1.48+-0.12+-0.14 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R96
text:
AAIJ 2014BM reports [G(B_s()0 --> K^*(892)- pi+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-)] = 0.39+-0.13+-0.05 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-) = 7.5+-0.4E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R97
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 18.6+-1.2+-0.8+-4.0+-2.0E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086R97
text:
AAIJ 2014BM reports [G(B_s()0 --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-)] = 1.49+-0.22+-0.18 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K^*(892)+ pi-) = 7.5+-0.4E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P43
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 31.3+-2.3+-0.7+-25.1+-3.3E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P44
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 10.3+-2.5+-1.1+-16.3+-1.1E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P45
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 19.8+-2.8+-1.2+-4.4+-2.1E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P46
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 33.0+-2.5+-0.9+-9.1+-3.5E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086P47
text:
AAIJ 2019K reports 16.8+-4.5+-1.7+-21.2+-1.8E-6 as the measured value. We have combined in quadrature all systematic uncertainties into a single one.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2017BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] = 0.026+-0.011+-0.007 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97+-0.18E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2017BP also set the limit range 4 -- 25E-7 at 90% CL using the world average value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.96+-0.20E-5.


pdgid: S086R63
text:
AAIJ 2013BP reports [G(B_s()0 --> K0 K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-)] < 0.068 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K0 pi+ pi-) = 4.97E-5.


pdgid: S086R26
text:
AAIJ 2015AF reports [G(B_s()0 --> Kbar^*(892)0 K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 1.11+-0.22+-0.12+-0.06 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R26
text:
Uses B0 --> J/psi K^*()0 for normalization and assumes B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) B(K^*()0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.33+-0.06E-3 and f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.253+-0.031. The second quoted error is total uncertainty including the error of 0.34 on f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}.


pdgid: S086R28
text:
AAIJ 2013BW reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi K^*(892)0)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi)] = 0.113+-0.024+-0.016 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 phi) = 1.00+-0.05E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.2539+-0.0079.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R16
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.55+-0.54E-6 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020.


pdgid: S086P90
text:
The last error includes the systematic uncertainties due to the uncertainties of the branching fraction of the normalisation channel, and f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}.


pdgid: S086P30
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 1.67+-0.12+-0.11 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.896+-0.010E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values. Reported value assumes f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086P31
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.52+-0.08+-0.05 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.896+-0.010E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values. Reported value assumes f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086P33
text:
Reports B(B_s()0 --> p pbar K+ pi-) / B(B0 --> p pbar K+ pi-) = 0.22+-0.04+-0.02+-0.01, where the third error is due to f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}.


pdgid: S086P32
text:
AAIJ 2017BD reports [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] / [B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-)] = 0.16+-0.07+-0.02 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3, B(K^*(892) --> (K pi)+-) = 99.896+-0.010E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values. Reported value assumes f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086P75
text:
AAIJ 2023AD reports 2.3+-1.0+-0.2+-0.1E-8 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> p pbar p pbar)/G(total)] / [B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)] assuming B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.04+-0.04E-3,B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 0.491+-0.005,B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.120+-0.029E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(B_s()0 --> J/psi(1S) phi) = 1.01+-0.04E-3, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2, B(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar) = 2.121+-0.029E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S086P25
text:
AAIJ 2017AL reports 5.46+-0.61+-0.82E-6 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> p Lambdabar K- + c.c.)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-)] assuming B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-) = 3.14+-0.29E-6, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> p Lambdabar pi-) = 3.16+-0.24E-6. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P25
text:
AAIJ 2017AL value represents the sum of B_s()0 --> p Lambdabar K- and B_s()0 --> pbar Lambda K+ and assumes the fraction f(s)/f(d) = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R69
text:
The second error is the total systematic uncertainty including the Lambda_{{c}} absolute branching fractions and the normalizion number of B_{{s}} events.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
Assumes the fraction of B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)() in b bbar events is f_{{s}} = (17.2+-3.0)%. The systematic uncertainty from f_{{s}} is 0.6E-5.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
AAIJ 2013 reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma)] = 0.81+-0.04+-0.07 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> K^*(892)0 gamma) = 4.21+-0.24E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R17
text:
Measures B(B0 --> K^*()0 gamma)/B(B_s --> phi gamma) = 1.12+-0.08(stat)+0.06(sys)+0.09(f_{{s}}/f_{{d}}) and uses current world-average value of B(B0 --> K^*()0 gamma) = 4.33+-0.15E-5.


pdgid: S086P84
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> f_2(1270) gamma)/Gamma(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] x B(f_2(1270) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 1.2+0.4-0.3+0.3-0.5% which we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2(1270) --> K+ K-) = 1/2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P85
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [Gamma(B_s()0 --> f_2^'(1525) gamma)/Gamma(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] x B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) / B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 17.3+0.8-0.7+1.3-0.5% which we divide and multiply by our best values B(f_2^'(1525) --> K+ K-) = 1/2, B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S086P86
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi(1680) gamma, phi --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 5.4+0.9-0.6+1.0-1.1 % which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P87
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [G(B_s()0 --> phi_3(1850) gamma, phi_3 --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.4+0.3-0.2+0.2-0.2 % which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086P88
text:
AAIJ 2024S reports [G(B_s()0 --> f_2(2010) gamma, f_2 --> K+ K-)/G(B_s()0 --> phi gamma)] / [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.6+0.3-0.2+0.3-0.2 % which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.020+-0.019E-3, B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2 and B production ratio f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B+) = 0.231+-0.008.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.01+-0.03E-3 and B production ratio f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B+) = 0.252+-0.012+-0.015.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.010+-0.029E-3 and B production ratio  f(b --> B_s()0)/f(b --> B0) = 0.256+-0.013.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
This value corresponds to an upper limit of < 3.0E-9 at 95% C.L. It uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.24+-0.02.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Determined from the joint fit to CMS and LHCb data. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic component.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020 and two normalization modes: B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.259+-0.015 and normalization modes B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+ and B0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 10.22+-0.35E-4 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.28+-0.04.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.263+-0.017.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5 for normalization.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.75+-0.29 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.267+0.021-0.020 and three normalization modes B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5, B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 1.94+-0.06E-5, and B(B_s()0 --> J/psi phi--> mu+ mu- K+ K-) = 3.4+-0.9E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.267+0.021-0.020 and three normalization modes of B+ --> J/psi K+, B0 --> K+ pi-, and B_s()0 --> J/psi phi.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.55+-0.47 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.01+-0.21E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.55+-0.42 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+--> mu+ mu- K+) = 6.0+-0.2E-5.


pdgid: S086R14
text:
Uses B production ratio f(bbar --> B+)/f(bbar --> B_s()0) = 3.86+-0.59, and the number of B+ --> J/psi K+ decays.


pdgid: S086P67
text:
The exclusion limit is quoted at 95% CL for the dimuon mass region [3.92 - mass(B_{{s}}()0)] GeV/c**2. The limits are also reported for other dimuon mass regions: <4.2E-8 in [2mass(mu) - 1.7] GeV/c**2; <7.7E-8 in [1.70 -- 2.88] GeV/c**2; <2.8E-8 in [2mass(mu) - 1.7] GeV/c**2 and excluding phi mass.


pdgid: S086P36
text:
Normalizes to B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) = 1.19+-0.01+-0.08% and B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.96+-0.03%, and uses f_{{s}}/f_{{d}} = 0.259+-0.015.


pdgid: S086P16
text:
AAIJ 2015S reports 8.6+-1.5+-0.7+-0.7E-8 from a measurement of [G(B_s()0 --> pi+ pi- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0)] assuming B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.3+-0.1E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> J/psi(1S) K^*(892)0) = 1.27+-0.05E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S086R22
text:
AAIJ 2018T uses normalization modes B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.6+-0.5E-6 and B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.026+-0.031E-3 with B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.259+-0.015. The upper limit increases to 6E-9 with the assumption of B_{{L}}-dominated decay amplitude.


pdgid: S086R22
text:
Uses normalization mode B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 19.4+-0.6E-6 and B production ratio f(bbar --> B_s()0)/f(bbar --> B_d()0) = 0.256+-0.020.


pdgid: S086P1
text:
AFFOLDER 2000N measurements are based on 40 B_{{s}}()0 candidates obtained from a data sample of 89 pb**-1. The P-wave fraction is found to be 0.23+-0.19+-0.04.


pdgid: S086P13
text:
The difference between the P- and S-wave phases is also reported phi(S((perp))) = phi(S) - phi((perp)) = 0.48+0.11-0.16+-0.07 rad.


pdgid: S086PK1
text:
The non-resonant K pi background contributions are subtracted. Also reports an S-wave amplitude |A(S)|**2 = 0.07+0.15-0.07.


pdgid: S086P06
text:
Note: in the summary of AAIJ 2019AP the systematic uncertainty is 0.007. We take the systematic uncertainty as given in Table 5 in the paper.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AAIJ 2014AE reports measurement of phi((perp)) and phi((perp))-phi((parallel)), which we convert into phi((parallel)). Statistical uncertainty includes correlation between measured parameters, while systematic uncertainties are assumed uncorrelated.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AALTONEN 2011AN quotes cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.91+0.15-0.13+-0.09 which we convert to phi((parallel)) taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086P07
text:
AAIJ 2012P quotes cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.844+-0.068+-0.029 which we convert to phi((parallel)), taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086P11
text:
Measures cos(phi((parallel))) = -0.18+-0.52+-0.29, which we convert to phi((parallel)) by taking the smaller solution.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Significance of oscillation signal is 5.4 sigma. Also reports |V_td / V_ts| = 0.2060+-0.0007+0.0081-0.0060.


pdgid: S086D
text:
A likelihood scan over the oscillation frequency, Delta(m)(s), gives a most probable value of 19 ps**-1 and a range of 17<Delta(m)(s)<21 (ps**-1) at 90% C.L. assuming Gaussian uncertainties. Also excludes Delta(m)(s)<14.8 ps**-1 at 95% C.L


pdgid: S086D
text:
Significance of oscillation signal is 0.2%. Also reported the value |V_td / V_ts| = 0.208+0.001-0.002+0.008-0.006.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Uses leptons emitted with large momentum transverse to a jet and improved techniques for vertexing and flavor-tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
ABE 2003 uses the novel ``charge dipole'' technique to reconstruct separate secondary and tertiary vertices originating from the B --> D decay chain. The analysis excludes Deltamass(s)<4.9 ps**-1 and 7.9<Deltamass(s)<10.3 ps**-1.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Three analyses based on complementary event selections: (1) fully-reconstructed hadronic decays; (2) semileptonic decays with D_{{s}} exclusively reconstructed; (3) inclusive semileptonic decays.


pdgid: S086D
text:
ABE 2002V uses exclusively reconstructed D_{{s-}} mesons and excludes Deltamass(s)<1.4 ps**-1 and 2.4<Deltamass(s)<5.3 ps**-1 at 95%CL.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Replaced by ABDALLAH 2004A. Uses D_s()- lepton+, and phi lepton+ vertices, and a multi-variable discriminant as a flavor tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
Uses inclusive D_{{s}} vertices and fully reconstructed B_{{s}} decays and a multi-variable discriminant as a flavor tagging.


pdgid: S086D
text:
BARATE 1998C combines results from D_s h-lepton/Q(hem), D_s h-K in the same side, D_s lepton-lepton/Q(hem) and D_s lepton-K in the same side.


pdgid: S086D
text:
BUSKULIC 1995J uses lepton-Q(hem). They find Deltamass(s)>5.6 [>6.1] for f_{{s}}=10% [12%]. We interpolate to our central value f_{{s}}=10.5%.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
AAIJ 2016G reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X decays, A_{{SL}}^s() = (0.39+-0.26+-0.20)%, which is approximately equal to 4 x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2014 uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^s() = -0.86+-0.74E-2.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2013 reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in mixed semileptonic B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X decays A_{{SL}}^s() = (-1.12+-0.74+-0.17)% which is approximately equal to 4 x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)|**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
AAIJ 2014D reports a measurement of time-integrated flavor-specific asymmetry in B_s()0 --> mu+ D_s()- X decays, A_{{SL}}^s() = (-0.06+-0.50+-0.36)%, which is approximately equal to4 x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2011U uses the dimuon charge asymmetry with different impact parameters from which it reports A_{{SL}}^s() = -18.1+-10.6E-3.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010E reports a measurement of flavor-specific asymmetry in B_(s)()0 --> mu+ D_(s)^*()- X decays with a decay-time analysis including initial-state flavor tagging, A_{{SL}}^s() = -1.7+-9.1+1.4-1.5E-3 which is approximately equal to 4 x Re(epsilon(B_{{s}}()0)) / (1 + |epsilon(B_{{s}}()0) |**2).


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
ABAZOV 2010H reports a measurement of like-sign dimuon charge asymmetry of A_{{SL}}^s() = -9.57+-2.51+-1.46E-3 in semileptonic b-hadron decays. Using the measured production ratio of B_{{d}}()0 and B_{{0}}()0, and the asymmetry of B_{{d}}()0 A_{{SL}}^s() = -4.7+-4.6E-3 measured from B-factories, they obtain the asymmetry for B_{{s}}()0.


pdgid: S086EPS
text:
The first direct measurement of the time integrated flavor untagged charge asymmetry in semileptonic B_{{s}}()0 decays is reported as 2xA_{{SL}}^s()(untagged) = A_{{SL}}^s() = 2.45+-1.93+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: S086ARX
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = -0.030+-0.033 from HFLAV.


pdgid: S086ARX
text:
Measured in B_s()0 --> D_s()-+ K+- decays, constraining -2beta_{{s}} by the measurement of phi_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.0 from AAIJ 2013AR. At 68% CL.


pdgid: S086A28
text:
Measured in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-) < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-) < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV.


pdgid: S086A28
text:
A model-independent coherence factor for the decay B_s --> D_s K pi pi (in the restricted phase space region) is also reported.


pdgid: S086A29
text:
Measured in restricted phase space with m(K+ pi+ pi-) < 1950 MeV, m(K+ pi-) < 1200 MeV and m(pi+ pi-) < 1200 MeV. The value is modulo 180degree.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2026A measured phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -7.3+-2.2+-1.0E-2 rad. using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays with the ML-improved flavor-tagging algorithm.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2025A reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.086+-0.106+-0.028 rad. in a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-, while allowing CP violation in decay.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019Q reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.039+-0.022+-0.006 rad. measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2021AE measured phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.087+-0.036+-0.021 rad. using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2021AN measured phi_{{s}} = -2beta_{{s}} = 0.00+-0.28+-0.07 rad, using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays with J/psi --> e+ e-.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019AF reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.002+-0.044+-0.012 rad. and |lambda|= 0.949+-0.036+-0.019, when direct CP violation is allowed. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Measured phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.119+-0.107+-0.034 rad using time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) > 1.05 GeV.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2016AP reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.090+-0.078+-0.041 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2016AK reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.23+0.29-0.28+-0.02 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> psi(2S) phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2016S reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.075+-0.097+-0.031 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2015I reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.058+-0.049+-0.006 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays. It also combines this result with that of AAIJ 2014S and quotes phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.010+-0.039 rad.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2014U reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.12+-0.25+-0.05 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2014AY reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.02+-0.17+-0.02 rad. in a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> D_s()+ D_s()-, while allowing CP violation in decay.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2014S reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.070+-0.068+-0.008 rad. and |lambda|= 0.89+-0.05+-0.01, when direct CP violation is allowed. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AALTONEN 2012AJ reports -pi/2 <beta_{{s}}<-1.51 or -0.06<beta_{{s}}< 0.30, or 1.26 <beta_{{s}}<pi/2 rad. at 68% CL. Measured using the time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
ABAZOV 2012D reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.55+0.38-0.36 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays. A single error includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021E measured phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.021+-0.044+-0.010 rad. using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2019Q reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.083+-0.041+-0.006 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2018S reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.10+-0.13+-0.14 rad measured in B_s()0 --> (K+ pi-) (K- pi+) in the region 0.75 < m(K+- pi-+) < 1.6 GeV. This is a b --> d dbar s transition with a decay amplitude phase different from that of b --> c cbar s transition.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2015K reports -2beta_{{s}} = -0.12+0.14-0.16 rad. The value was obtained by  measuring time-dependent CP asymmetry in B_s()0 --> K+ K- and using a U-spin relation  between B_s()0 --> K+ K- and B0 --> pi+ pi-.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAIJ 2013AR reports phi_{{s}} = -2beta_{{s}} = 0.01+-0.07+-0.01 rad. obtained from combined fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- and B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- data sets. Also reports separate results of phi_{{s}} = 0.07+-0.09+-0.01 rad. from B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- decays and phi_{{s}} = -0.14+0.17-0.16+-0.01 rad. from B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
AAD 2012CV reports phi(s) = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.22+-0.41+-0.10 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.44+-0.44+-0.02 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi f_0(980) decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = 0.15+-0.18+-0.06 rad. that was measured using a time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports phi_{{s}} = -2 beta_{{s}} = -0.019+0.173-0.174+0.004-0.003 rad. which was measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> J/psi pi+ pi- decays, with the pi+ pi- mass within 775 -- 1550 MeV. Searches for, but finds no evidence, for direct CP violation in B_s()0 --> J/psi pi pi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports 0.02 < phi_{{s}}< 0.52 or 1.08 < phi_{{s}}< 1.55 rad. at 68% C.L. confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of phi_{{s}} and Deltawidth(B_{{s}}()0) from B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Reports 0.32 < 2beta_{{s}}< 2.82 rad. at 68% C.L. and confidence regions in the two-dimensional space of 2beta_{{s}} and DeltaGamma from the first measurement of B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays using flavor tagging. The probability of a deviation from SM prediction as large as the level of observed data is 15%.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
The first direct measurement of the CP-violating mixing phase is reported from the time-dependent analysis of flavor untagged B_s()0 --> J/psi phi decays.


pdgid: S086PHS
text:
Combines D0 collaboration measurements of time-dependent angular distributions in B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and charge asymmetry in semileptonic decays. There is a 4-fold ambiguity in the solution.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2023AT also reports polarisation-dependent results assuming that the longitudinal weak phase is CP-conserving and that there is no direct CP violation.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2023AT reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.074+-0.069 rad and |lambda| = 1.009+-0.030. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2019AP reports also polarisation-dependent results assuming that the longitudinal weak phase is CP-conserving and that there is no direct CP violation, giving phi( s,(parallel))**s sbar s = 0.014+-0.055+-0.011 rad and phi( s,(perp))**s sbar s = 0.044+-0.059+-0.019 rad.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2019AP reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.073+-0.115+-0.027 rad and |lambda|= 0.99+-0.05+-0.01. Measured using a time-dependent fit to B_s()0 --> phi phi decays, assuming independence of the helicity of the phi phi decay.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2014AE value measured in B_s()0 --> phi phi decays. Also reports phi(s)**s sbar s = -0.17+-0.15+-0.03 rad.


pdgid: S086PBS
text:
AAIJ 2013AY uses B_s()0 --> phi phi mode, and reports the 68% CL interval of phi(s)**s sbar s = -2 beta(s)**s sbar s as [-2.46, -0.76] rad.


pdgid: S086LAM
text:
Measured using time-dependent angular analysis of B_s()0 --> J/psi K+ K- in the region m(K K) in the vicinity of the phi(1020) resonance.


pdgid: S086A07
text:
Measured in flavor tagged time dependent analysis, using tagged and un-tagged events. This result updates AAIJ 2017B with better selection efficiency and other analysis improvements.


pdgid: S086CT1
text:
Measured in semileptonic B_s()0 --> D_s()- mu+ X decays. Also extracts limit on time and longitudinal components ( -0.8 < Deltaa(T) - 0.396 Deltaa_{{Z}} < 3.9 ) E-13 GeV.


pdgid: S086A45
text:
The second uncertainty includes the systematic, the uncertainties on the ratio of dB(B_s()0 --> phi mu+ mu-)/dq**2/B(B_s()0 --> J/psi phi), and B(B_s()0 --> J/psi phi).


pdgid: S086PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ in kinematic range 2 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S086PAX
text:
Based on time-dependent analysis of B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+ in kinematic range 4 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.5 <eta < 4.5.


pdgid: S086A27
text:
The B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu decay is reconstructed through the decays of D_s^*()- --> D_s()- gamma, D_s()- --> K- K+ pi-.


pdgid: S086A27
text:
The B_s()0 --> D_s^*()- mu+ nu_mu decay is reconstructed inclusively without gamma from the decays of D_s^*()- --> D_s()- gamma, D_s()- --> K- K+ pi-.


pdgid: S087M
text:
Utilized the beam constrained invariant mass peak positions for B^* and B^*_s to extract the measurement.


pdgid: S087M
text:
Uses 14 candidates consistent with B_{{s}} decays into final states with a J/psi and a D_{{s}}^{(*)-}().


pdgid: S087DM
text:
Utilized the beam constrained invariant mass peak positions for B^* and B_{{s}}^* to extract the measurement.


pdgid: S087DM
text:
LEE-FRANZINI 1990 measure 46.7+-0.4+-0.2 MeV for an admixture of B0, B+, and B_{{s}}. They use the shape of the photon line to separate the above value for B_{{s}}.


pdgid: M187M
text:
Uses two-body decays into K- and B+ mesons reconstructed as B+ --> J/psi K+, J/psi --> mu+ mu- or B+ --> Dbar0 pi+, Dbar0 --> K+ pi-.


pdgid: M187DM
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{s1}}(5830)0) - mass(B^*()+) - mass(K-) = 10.35+-0.12+-0.15 MeV which we adjusted by the K- mass.


pdgid: M187R00
text:
With the branching fractions B(B+ --> J/psi K+) = 1.026+-0.031E-3 and B(B0 --> J/psi K^*()0) = 1.28+-0.05E-3.


pdgid: M186M
text:
Observed in B_s2^*()0 --> B+ K-. Measured production rate of B_{{s2}}^*()0 relative to B+ to be (1.15+-0.23+-0.13)%.


pdgid: M186DM2
text:
AALTONEN 2014I reports mass(B_{{s2}}(5840)0) - mass(B+) - mass(K-) = 66.73+-0.13+-0.14 MeV which we adjusted by the K- mass.


pdgid: S091M
text:
AAIJ 2020R uses the B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+, J/psi pi+ pi- pi+, J/psi p pbar pi+, J/psi D_s()+, J/psi D0 K+ and B_s()0 pi+ modes.


pdgid: S091M
text:
AAIJ 2012AV uses the B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+ mode and also measures the mass difference M(B_{{c}}()+) - M(B+) = 994.6+-1.3+-0.6 MeV/c**2.


pdgid: S091M
text:
ABE 1998M observed 20.4+6.2-5.5 events in the B_c()+ --> J/psi(1s) lepton nu_lepton with a significance of >4.8 standard deviations. The mass value is estimated from m(J/psi(1S) lepton).


pdgid: S091M
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O observed 2 candidate events in the B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) pi+ channel with an estimated background of 0.63+-0.20 events.


pdgid: S091T
text:
Also measures the width difference DeltaGamma = width(B_{{c}}()+)- width(B+) = 4.46+-0.14+-0.07 mm**-1 c.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
AALTONEN 2016A reports [G(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) lepton+ nu_lepton anything)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.211+-0.012+0.021-0.020 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2, B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
AALTONEN 2016A also measures the cross-section CS(B_{{c}}) *B(B_c --> J/psi mu nu_mu) = 0.60+-0.09 nb and estimates the total cross-section CS(B_{{c}}) to be in the range 25+-4 to 52+-8 nb for p_{{T}}(B_{{c}}) > 6 GeV/c and |y(B_{{c}})| < 1.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ABE 1998M result is derived from the measurement of [sigma(B_{{c}})*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton)] / [sigma(B+)*B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 0.132+0.041-0.037(stat)+-0.031(sys)+0.032(lifetime) by using PDG 1998 values of B(b --> B+) and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+).


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton) <6.95E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R1
text:
ABREU 1997E value listed is for an assumed tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.4 ps and improves to 1.6E-4 for tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.4 ps.


pdgid: S091R1
text:
BARATE 1997H reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q).B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) lepton nu_lepton) <5.2E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(Z --> b bbar). A B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) mu+ nu_mu candidate event is found, compared to all the known background sources 2E-3, which gives mass(B_{{c}}) = 5.96+0.25-0.19 GeV and tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.77+-0.17 ps.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AABOUD 2021 reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+) . f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.34+-0.04+0.06-0.02+-0.01) %, at pT > 13 GeV and |y| < 2.3.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AAIJ 2015M reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+). f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.683+-0.018+-0.009)% at p_{{T}}(B) < 20 GeV and 2.0 < y(B) < 4.5.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
KHACHATRYAN 2015AA reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B+ --> J/psi K+). f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.48+-0.05+-0.03+-0.05)%, at pT > 15 GeV and |eta(B)| < 1.6.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
AAIJ 2012AV reports a measurement of B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+) f_{{c}}/f_{{u}} = (0.68+-0.10+-0.03+-0.05)% at pT(B) > 4 GeV and 2.5 < eta(B) < 4.5.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) pi+) <1.06E-4 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ABREU 1997E value listed is for an assumed tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.4 ps and improves to 2.7E-4 for tau(B_{{c}}) = 1.4 ps.


pdgid: S091R2
text:
BARATE 1997H reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q).B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) pi) <3.6E-5 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R2
text:
ABE 1996R reports B(b --> B_c X)/B(b --> B+ X).B(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) pi+)/B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) <0.053 at 95%CL for tau(B_{{c}}) = 0.8 ps. It changes from 0.15 to 0.04 for 0.17 ps<tau(B_{{c}})<1.6 ps. We rescale to our PDG 1996 values of B(b --> B+) = 0.378+-0.022 and B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 0.00101+-0.00014.


pdgid: S091R17
text:
AAIJ 2014W reports also a measurement B(B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) / B(B_c()+ --> J/psi mu+ nu_mu) = 0.271+-0.016+-0.016 in the region mass(J/psi mu+) > 5.3 GeV.


pdgid: S091R4
text:
ACKERSTAFF 1998O reports B(Z --> B_c X)/B(Z --> q q)*B(B_c --> J/psi(1S) a_1(1260)) <5.29E-4 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R03
text:
A signal yield of 78+-14 decays is reported with a significance of 6.2 standard deviations using an integrated luminosity of 3 fb**-1 data.


pdgid: S091R11
text:
The last uncertainty includes the uncertainties on the branching fractions of the leptonic J/psi and psi(2S) decays (+-0.005).


pdgid: S091R11
text:
The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty of the B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)/B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) ratio measurement.


pdgid: S091R69
text:
AAIJ 2024F reports [G(B_c()+ --> J/psi(1S) D_s()+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] = 1.63+-0.15+-0.13E-5 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S091R23
text:
AAIJ 2016AT reports [G(B_c()+ --> chi_c0() pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] * [[G(bbar --> B+ at Z)/G(total)] = 9.8+3.4-3.0+-0.8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(bbar --> B+ at Z)/G(total) = 0.408+-0.007. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S091R66
text:
The last uncertainty includes the knowledge of the chi_c2 --> J/psi gamma branching fraction (+-0.01).


pdgid: S091R00
text:
Measures the ratio (f_{{c}}/f_{{u}}) x B(B_c()+ --> p pbar pi+) < 3.6E-8 at 95% CL, in the region m(p pbar) < 2.85 GeV/c**2, where f_{{c}} (f_{{u}}) represents the fragmentation fraction of the b-quark into the B_{{c}}()+ (B_{{u}}()+) meson.


pdgid: S091R25
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D0 K+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] = 9.3+2.8-2.5+-0.6E-7 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: S091R26
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D0 pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 3.9E-7 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R27
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*()0 pi+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R28
text:
AAIJ 2017AG reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*()0 K+)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R30
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Dbar0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 0.9E-3 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R31
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ D0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 3.7E-4 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R32
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ Dbar0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.9E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R33
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ D0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.2E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R34
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ Dbar0)+ G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Dbar^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.8E-3 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R35
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ D0)+ G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ D^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 3.0E-3 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R5
text:
BARATE 1998Q reports B(Z --> B_c X)*B(B_c --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar0) <1.9E-3 at 90%CL. We rescale to our PDG 1998 values of B(Z --> b bbar).


pdgid: S091R36
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar0, D^*()+ --> D+ pi0 / gamma)+ G(B_c()+ --> D+ Dbar^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 5.5E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R37
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [[G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ D0, D^*()+ --> D+ pi0 / gamma)+ G(B_c()+ --> D+ D^*(2007)0)]/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.2E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R38
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.1E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R39
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s^*()+ D^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 2.0E-2 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R40
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ Dbar^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 6.5E-1 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R41
text:
AAIJ 2018P reports [G(B_c()+ --> D^*(2010)+ D^*(2007)0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] / [B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+)] < 1.3E-1 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) values B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2, B(B+ --> Dbar0 D+) = 3.8E-4.


pdgid: S091R06
text:
AAIJ 2013R reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ K^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 0.5E-6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R07
text:
AAIJ 2013R reports [G(B_c()+ --> D+ Kbar^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 0.4E-6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R08
text:
AAIJ 2013R reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ K^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 0.7E-6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R09
text:
AAIJ 2013R reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ Kbar^*()0)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 1.1E-6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R10
text:
AAIJ 2013R reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ phi)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 0.8E-6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: S091R02
text:
Derived from Gamma(K+ K0)/GammaxB(bbar --> B_c) / (B(B+ --> K0 pi+) B(bbar --> B+)) < 5.8% at 90% CL using normalization mode B(B+ --> K0 pi+) = 23.97+-0.53+-0.71E-6 and assuming a B production ratio f(bbar --> B_u()+) = 0.33.


pdgid: S091R64
text:
The B_{{s}}()0 mesons are reconstructed via the decays B_s()0 --> J/psi phi and B_s()0 --> D_s()- pi+. The  third uncertainty includes systematic (+-8) and imprecise knowledge of the branching fractions  (+-3).


pdgid: S091R70
text:
AAIJ 2024F reports [G(B_c()+ --> D_s()+ mu+ mu-)/G(total)*B(bbar --> B_c at Z)] / [B(bbar --> B+ at Z)] < 7.5E-8 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(bbar --> B+ at Z) = 40.8E-2.


pdgid: M271M
text:
The observed structure in B_c()+- gamma is described by two Gaussian functions with power-law tails, the other one is at 6752.4 MeV.


pdgid: M271M
text:
Consistent with unresolved contributions from 3P0, 3P2, mixed 3P1 and 1P1 (both decaying radiatively to B_{{c}}()+- and B_{{c}}^*()+-) (see AAIJ 2025AF).


pdgid: M271M
text:
The observed structure in B_c()+- gamma is described by two Gaussian functions with power-law tails, the other one is at 6704.8 MeV.


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2019Y observed B_{{c}}(2S)+ in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi- (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) with 2.2 (3.2) global (local) standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2019Y reports mass difference measurement of M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) - M(B_{{c}}()+) = 597.2+-1.3+-0.1 MeV. We have adjusted this measurement with our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+) =. The first uncertainty of the M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) value is a total of uncertainties reported by the experiment and the second one comes from our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+).


pdgid: M217M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019M observed B_{{c}}(2S)+ in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi- (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) with 6.5 standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M217M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2019M reports mass difference measurement of M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) - M(B_{{c}}()+) = 596.1+-1.2+-0.8 MeV. We have adjusted this measurement with our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+) =. The first uncertainty of the M(B_{{c}}(2S)+) value is a total of uncertainties reported by the experiment and the second one comes from our best value of M(B_{{c}}()+).


pdgid: M217M
text:
AAIJ 2018AL reports an upper limit on the ratio of production cross sections for [CS(B_{{c}}(2S)+)/CS(B_{{c}}()+)].B(B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi-) < 0.04 -- 0.09 at 95% CL for the mass value reported by AAD 2014AQ.


pdgid: M217M
text:
Observed in the decay mode B_c(2S)+ --> B_c()+ pi+ pi- (B_c()+ --> J/psi pi+) with 5.2 standard deviations significance.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2020H report mass(J/psi)-mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 113.0+-0.7+-0.1 MeV. We use the current value mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report mass(J/psi)-mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 110.2+-0.5+-0.9 MeV. We use the current value mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M026M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the mass and width of eta_{{c}}(1S) as free parameters.


pdgid: M026M
text:
AAIJ 2015BI reports mass(J/psi) - mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) = 114.7+-1.5+-0.1 MeV from a sample of eta_{{c}}(1S) and J/psi produced in b-hadron decays. We have used current value of mass(J/psi) = 3096.900+-0.006 MeV to arrive at the quoted mass(eta_{{c}}(1S)) result.


pdgid: M026M
text:
MITCHELL 2009 observes a significant asymmetry in the lineshapes of psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c and J/psi --> gamma eta_c transitions. If ignored, this asymmetry could lead to significant bias whenever the mass and width are measured in psi(2S) or J/psi radiative decays.


pdgid: M026W
text:
From a fit to the 4-prong invariant mass in psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c and J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c decays.


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Calculated by us using Gamma(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) x Gamma(eta_c --> gamma gamma) / Gamma = 0.44+-0.05 keV from PDG 2006 and B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = (8.5+-1.8)% from AUBERT 2006E.


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Normalized to the sum of B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+), B(eta_c --> phi phi), B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi+ pi-), and B().


pdgid: M026W1
text:
Normalized to the sum of B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+), B(eta_c --> 2K+ 2K-), B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi+ pi-), and B().


pdgid: M026G14
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ASNER 2004 that assumes B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi) = 5.5+-1.7%


pdgid: M026G14
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = (1.5+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M026G15
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> pi+ pi- K+ K-) = (2.0+-0.7)%.


pdgid: M026G27
text:
Calculated by us from the value reported in ABDALLAH 2003J, which uses B(eta_c --> ) 2(K+ K-) = (2.1+-1.2)%.


pdgid: M026R55
text:
Based on Dalitz-plot analysis of the eta_c --> eta^' K+ K-, eta^' pi+ pi- final states where the fit fractions and relative phases are determined for numerous two-body intermediate states.


pdgid: M026R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2021C reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta^'(958) eta eta)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.86+-0.62+-0.45E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
ABLIKIM 2005L reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.6+-0.6+-0.4E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.30+-0.30+-0.60E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R9
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> rho rho)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.0+-1.3+-0.6E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R16
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K^*(892)0 K- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 2.6+-0.6E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.91+-0.64+-0.48E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R21
text:
Not used since the same experimental measurement has been used in another related quantity included elsewhere in the fit.


pdgid: M026R21
text:
Using B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.25+-0.12+0.10-0.12E-3 from FANG 2003 and B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 5.5+-1.7E-2.


pdgid: M026R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> phi 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.603E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82E-2.


pdgid: M026R22
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AC reports 3.86+-0.92+-0.62E-5 from a measurement of [G(eta_c(1S) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] assuming B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.41+-0.14E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AP quotes B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 1.15+-0.12+-0.10E-2 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AP quotes B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 2.60+-0.21+-0.20E-2 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 27.24+-4.56+-2.88E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c). B(h_c --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 4.54+-0.76+-0.48E-6 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 34.05+-3.75+-4.50E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c). B(h_c --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 11.35+-1.25+-1.50E-6 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
Determined from the ratio of B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) B(eta_c --> K Kbar pi) = 7.4+-0.5+-0.7E-5 reported in AUBERT,B 2004B and B(B+- --> K+- eta_c) = 8.7+-1.5E-3 reported in AUBERT 2006E.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BAI 2004 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 6.6+-0.9+-1.5E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BAI 2004 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =  2.2+-0.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8.76+-1.80+-1.68E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =   1.46+-0.30+-0.28E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =  2.3+-0.4+-0.4E-4   which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 6.9+-1.2+-1.2E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
The quoted branching ratios use B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 0.0127+-0.0036. Where relevant, the error in this branching ratio is treated as a common systematic in computing averages.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) =   1.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 7.8+-3.0E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) =  1.9+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 5.7+-1.5E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R4
text:
HIMEL 1980B reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.5+2.4-1.8E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c). B(h_c --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+ K- eta) = 2.11+-1.01+-0.32E-6 which we multiply by 2 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.22+-2.02+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R40
text:
LEES 2014E reports B(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- eta)/B(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 0.571+-0.025+-0.051, which we divide by 3 to account for isospin symmetry. It uses both eta --> gamma gamma and eta --> pi+ pi- pi0 decays.


pdgid: M026R6
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 7.22+-1.47+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R05
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 19.17+-3.77+-3.72E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R01
text:
We have multiplied the value of Gamma(K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/Gamma(K0S K()+- pi()-+) reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M by a factor 1/3 to obtain. Not independent from other measurements reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M.


pdgid: M026R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N quotes B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c). B(h_c --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K0S K- pi- 2pi+) = 12.01+-2.22+-2.04E-6 which we multiply by 2 to take c.c. into account.


pdgid: M026R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0 K- pi+ pi- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 24.02+-4.44+-4.08E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.60+-1.71+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.21+-0.32+-0.24E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AJ reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6E-3.


pdgid: M026R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 20.31+-2.20+-3.33E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi- pi0))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 75.13+-7.42+-9.99E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8.82+-1.57+-1.59E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2006A reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 2.59+-0.32+-0.47E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 0.65+-0.19+-0.10E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
WU 2006 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 1.42+-0.11+0.16-0.20E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.20+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BAI 2004 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.9+-0.3+-0.3E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 0.13+-0.04+-0.03E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.4+-0.7E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R2
text:
HIMEL 1980B reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 8+8-4E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 3.6+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] * [B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.53+-0.49+-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4, B(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 64+-5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M026R53
text:
LU 2019 reports 2.83+0.36-0.34+-0.35E-3 from a measurement of [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] assuming B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 9.6+-1.1E-4, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.20+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R54
text:
LU 2019 reports 3.48+-1.48+-0.46E-3 from a measurement of [G(eta_c(1S) --> Lambdabar(1520) Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] assuming B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 9.6+-1.1E-4, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.20+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2013C reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 3.60+-0.48+-0.31E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2013C reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.51+-0.27+-0.14E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2013I reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 4.5+-1.2+-0.6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
ADAMS 2008 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 1.2+2.7-1.1+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R31
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c K+)] = 2.2+0.9-0.7+0.4-0.2E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> eta_c K+) = 1.20+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026P15
text:
ABLIKIM 2025P reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] = 2.1+-0.3+0.5-0.7E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82+-0.15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2011G reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.82E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82E-2.


pdgid: M026R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 1.1E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82E-2.


pdgid: M026R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2011G reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 6.0E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82E-2.


pdgid: M026R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.71E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82E-2.


pdgid: M026R36
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.96E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82E-2.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
ABLIKIM 2006B reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] < 0.53E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S)) = 1.82E-2.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
Using Gamma(gamma gamma)(eta_{{c}}) = 5.3+-0.5 keV. UEHARA 2013 reports Gamma(gamma gamma)xB(K0S K0S) < 1.6 eV.


pdgid: M026R37
text:
Using Gamma(gamma gamma)(eta_{{c}}) = 5.3+-0.5 keV. UEHARA 2013 reports Gamma(gamma gamma)xB(K0S K0S) < 0.29 eV.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BAI 2004 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) = 2.2+-0.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 1.46+-0.30+-0.28E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BISELLO 1991 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) = 2.3+-0.4+-0.4E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 1.3+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 6 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R73
text:
BALTRUSAITIS 1986 reports B(J/psi --> gamma eta_c). B(eta_c --> K+- K0S pi-+) = 1.9+-0.5E-4 which we multiply by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R74
text:
VINOKUROVA 2011 reports B(B+ --> eta_c K+, eta_c --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 26.7+-1.4+2.9-2.6+-4.9E-6, where the first uncertainty is  statistical, the second is due to systematics, and the third comes from interference of  eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+ with nonresonant K0S K+- pi-+. We combined both systematic uncertainties to single values. We multiply the reported result by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 27.24+-4.56+-2.88E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 34.05+-3.75+-4.50E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar eta)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.22+-2.02+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 7.22+-1.47+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 19.17+-3.77+-3.72E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.16+-0.76+-0.59E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K0 K- pi+ pi- pi+ + c.c.)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 24.02+-4.44+-4.08E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> K+ K- 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 3.60+-1.71+-0.64E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(K+ K-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 0.94+-0.37+-0.14E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R91
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 20.31+-2.20+-3.33E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026P14
text:
Destructive interference with background. The constructive interference solution is 0.95+-0.17+-0.44E-5.


pdgid: M026R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 7.51+-0.85+-1.11E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R95
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi- pi0))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 75.13+-7.42+-9.99E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R96
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 8.82+-1.57+-1.59E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 0.65+-0.19+-0.10E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.53+-0.49+-0.23E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M026P07
text:
ABLIKIM 2012N reports [G(eta_c(1S) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total) * G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.30+-0.65+-0.36E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070M
text:
Reanalysis of ZHOLENTZ 1980 using new electron mass (COHEN 1987) and radiative corrections (KURAEV 1985).


pdgid: M070M
text:
Mass central value and systematic error recalculated by us according to Eq. (16) in ARMSTRONG 1993B, using the value for the psi(2S) mass from AULCHENKO 2003.


pdgid: M070M
text:
From a sample of eta_{{c}}(1S) and J/psi produced in b-hadron decays. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.


pdgid: M070M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu- and hadronic channels assuming Gamma(e+ e-) = Gamma(mu+ mu-).


pdgid: M070W
text:
Calculated by us from the reported values of Gamma(e+ e-)xB(mu+ mu-) using B(e+ e-) = (5.94+-0.06)% and B(mu+ mu-) = (5.93+-0.06)%.


pdgid: M070W1
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu-, and hadronic channels assuming Gamma(e+ e-) = Gamma(mu+ mu-).


pdgid: M070W1
text:
Calculated by us from the reported values of Gamma(e+ e-)xB(mu+ mu-) using B(mu+ mu-) = (5.93+-0.06)%.


pdgid: M070G25
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.51+-0.22+-0.03 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 23.02+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070Q20
text:
LEES 2021C reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi- pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] = 21.1+-1.7+-3.2 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070Q19
text:
LEES 2021C reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta pi+ pi- 3pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 10.6+-1.6+-1.6 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070Q54
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> eta K+ K-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] = 1.55+-0.51+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G24
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 47.8+-3.1+-3.2 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070P54
text:
LEES 2018E reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 24.8+-1.8+-2.5 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070Q18
text:
LEES 2021C reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega 3pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 9.4+-2.3+-1.5 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070Q21
text:
Different final state as in AUBERT 2006. LEES 2021C reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 4.9+-2.1+-0.7 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2, B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M070P58
text:
LEES 2018E reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi0 eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 1.7+-0.8+-0.3 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070Q11
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi+ pi- 2pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 165+-9+-25 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G29
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega K Kbar) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 3.3+-1.3+-1.2 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070GY6
text:
LEES 2014H reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> K_2^*(1430)+ K0S pi- + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 10.0+-4.8+-0.8 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G02
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> Kbar_2^*(1430)0 K^*(892)0 + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 12.89+-0.54+-0.41 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G02
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> Kbar_2^*(1430)0 K^*(892)0 + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 16.4+-1.1+-1.4 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070GY9
text:
Dividing by (1/4)**2 to take into account B(K^*(892) --> K0S pi) = 1/4 and B(K^*(1430) --> K0S pi) = 1/4 B(K^*(1430) --> K pi).


pdgid: M070GY9
text:
LEES 2014H reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> K_2^*(1430)- K^*(892)+ + c.c.) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi)] = 9.28+-8.0+-0.32 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(K_2^*(1430) --> K pi) = 49.9+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.19+-0.23+-0.07 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
SHEN 2009 reports 4.50+-0.41+-0.26 eV from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] assuming B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.2+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G14
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT,BE 2006D reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.61+-0.30+-0.18 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G15
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.36+-0.27+-0.07 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G15
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT,BE 2006D reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.54+-0.40+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G10
text:
AUBERT 2006D reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.47+-0.09+-0.03E-2 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G28
text:
LEES 2023 quotes Gamma(e e)**J/psi.B(J/psi --> phi eta). B(phi --> K+ K-). B(eta --> 3pi0) = 0.64+-0.26+-0.06 eV.


pdgid: M070G28
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma(e e)**J/psi.B(J/psi --> phi eta). B(phi --> K+ K-). B(eta --> 3pi) = 0.84+-0.37+-0.05 eV.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.69+-0.11+-0.05 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
Multiplied by 2/3 to take into account the phi pi+ pi- mode only. Using B(phi --> K+ K-) = (49.2+-0.6)%.


pdgid: M070G05
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.50+-0.11+-0.04 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G06
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.48+-0.12+-0.05 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G06
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi0 pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.47+-0.19+-0.05 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G07
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_2(1270)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.51+-0.25+-0.10 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G07
text:
Using pi+ pi- invariant mass between 1.1 and 1.5 GeV. May include other sources such as f_{{0}}(1370).


pdgid: M070G07
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_2(1270)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 3.44+-0.55+-0.28 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070GZ2
text:
Dividing by 1/4 to take into account B(f_2^'(1525) --> K0S K0S) = 1/4 B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) and using B(phi --> K+ K-) = (48.9+-0.5)%.


pdgid: M070GZ2
text:
LEES 2014H reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_2^'(1525)) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 7.2+-2.8+-0.3 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G09
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi K+ K-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 2.26+-0.26+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070GZ1
text:
LEES 2014H reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi K0S K0S) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 1.6+-0.4+-0.1 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070GZ4
text:
LEES 2014H reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> f_2^'(1525) K+ K-) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 5.12+-1.68+-0.20 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070P53
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- 3pi0) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] = 19.2+-4.5+-3.2 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total) = 0.3478+-0.0033. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G26
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> 2( pi+ pi- ) eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 5.16+-0.85+-0.39 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070P57
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0 eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 6+-4+-1 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 23.02+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070G30
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- eta) * G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 10.2+-1.3+-0.8 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R4
text:
Using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (5.967+-0.023)% and R = 2.26+-0.01 determined by a fit to data from Mark-I, DM2, BESII, KEDR, and BESIII.


pdgid: M070R4
text:
Using B(J/psi --> lepton+ lepton-) = (5.90+-0.09)% from RPP-2002 and R = 2.28+-0.04 determined by a fit to data from BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. Superseded by LIAO 2023.


pdgid: M070S65
text:
Calculated using the value Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.137+-0.001+-0.016+-0.004 from BESSON 2008 and the PDG 2008 values of B(lepton+ lepton-), B(virtual gamma --> hadrons), and B(gamma eta_c()). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2008.


pdgid: M070S66
text:
Calculated using the value Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.137+-0.001+-0.016+-0.004 from BESSON 2008 and the value of Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2008.


pdgid: M070R5
text:
Not independent of the corresponding measurements of Gamma(e+ e-)/Gamma(total) and Gamma(mu+ mu-)/Gamma(total).


pdgid: M070R5
text:
Not independent of the corresponding measurements of Gamma(e+ e-) x Gamma(e+ e-)/Gamma(total) and Gamma(mu+ mu-) x Gamma(e+ e-)/Gamma(total).


pdgid: M070Q74
text:
AAIJ 2024AE reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.89+-0.17+-0.09E-5 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070Q74
text:
Measured with psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi, J/psi --> mu+ mu- mu+ mu-. B(psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) = (34.68+-0.30)% from PDG 2020 was used.


pdgid: M070Q74
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024A reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu- mu+ mu-)/G(total)] / [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 16.9+5.5-4.6+-0.6E-6 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R20
text:
By a simultaneous fit of the pi pi invariant mass distribution over the decay modes J/psi --> rho0 pi0, J/psi --> rho+ pi-, J/psi --> rho- pi+. In the fit only the intermediate states rho(770) pi and rho(1450) pi are considered.


pdgid: M070R20
text:
Obtained comparing the rates for pi+ pi- pi0 and mu+ mu-, using J/psi events produced via psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi and with B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.88+-0.10%.


pdgid: M070P81
text:
From an energy scan of e+ e- --> J/psi --> eta pi+ pi- assuming PDG 2016 values for Gamma(e+ e-), Gamma(mu+ mu-), and Gamma(total).


pdgid: M070R24
text:
ANASHIN 2022 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.946+-0.016+-0.108E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R30
text:
Using B(eta --> 2gamma) = (39.43+-0.26)%, B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 22.6+-0.4%, B(eta --> pi+ pi- gamma) = 4.68+-0.11%, and B(omega --> pi+ pi- pi0) = (89.1+-0.7)%.


pdgid: M070R31
text:
Using B(eta^'() --> pi+ pi- eta) = (44.3+-1.5)%, B(eta^'() --> pi+ pi- gamma) = 29.5+-1.0%, B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.43+-0.26%, and B(omega --> pi+ pi- pi0) = (89.1+-0.7)%.


pdgid: M070Q38
text:
ANASHIN 2022 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> omega K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.136+-0.008+-0.026E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070S52
text:
Obtained from J/psi --> K^*(892) K- pi+ + c.c. --> K+ K- pi+ pi- taking the value 2/3 for the probability of the K^*(892)0 --> K+ pi- decay.


pdgid: M070S52
text:
A K_{{0}}^*(700) is observed by ABLIKIM 2006C in the K+ pi- mass spectrum of the Kbar^*(892)0 K+ pi- final state against the Kbar^*(892). A corresponding branching fraction of the J/psi(1S) is not presented.


pdgid: M070R33
text:
Corresponding to one of the two fit solutions with delta = (-95.9+-1.5)degree for the phase angle between the resonant J/psi --> phi pi0 and non-phi J/psi --> K+ K- pi0 contributions.


pdgid: M070R33
text:
Corresponding to one of the two fit solutions with delta = (-152.1+-7.7)degree for the phase angle between the resonant J/psi --> phi pi0 and non-phi J/psi --> K+ K- pi0 contributions.


pdgid: M070R37
text:
From a fit to the combined phi eta invariant mass spectrum with a Gaussian function for the J/psi signals and a second-order polynomial function for the backgrounds.


pdgid: M070P85
text:
Including contributions from intermediate resonances. Evidence for an intermediate resonance at M ~~ 2 GeV and Gamma ~~ 150 MeV decaying to phi eta^' with J**P = 1+ or J**P = 1-, and B(J/psi --> eta X) x B(X --> phi eta^') ~~ E-4.


pdgid: M070S75
text:
Assuming constructive interference between a_{{0}}(980)-f_{{0}}(980) mixing and electromagnetic decay. Destructive interference gives a value of 4.93+-1.77E-6 for this branching fraction.


pdgid: M070S6
text:
ABLIKIM 2015H reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> phi f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-)] = 1.20+-0.6+-0.14E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-) = 35+-15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070S6
text:
We attribute to the f_{{1}}(1285) the signal observed in the pi+ pi- eta invariant mass distribution at 1297 MeV.


pdgid: M070R9
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> 2(pi+ pi-) pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0)] = 14.8+-2.6+-2.2E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) = 18.3+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M070R9
text:
From an energy scan of e+ e- --> J/psi --> 2(pi+ pi-) pi0, assuming PDG 2016 values for Gamma(e+ e-), Gamma(mu+ mu-), and Gamma(total), and for a phase difference between strong and electromagnetic amplitudes of (84.9+-3.6)degrees. An alternative solution is (4.85+-0.45)% with a phase of (-84.7+-3.1)degrees.


pdgid: M070R7
text:
The quoted systematic error includes a contribution of 1.23% (added in quadrature) from the uncertainty on the number of J/psi events.


pdgid: M070R7
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] = 18.6+-1.2+-1.1E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] = 0.809+-0.014 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070S42
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> 2( pi+ pi- ) eta)/G(total)] * [[G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] = 5.6+-2.6+-0.8E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) values [G(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 5.53+-0.10 keV, B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M070R50
text:
WU 2006 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 2.21+-0.13+-0.10E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R59
text:
From the combination of p pbar eta^' --> p pbar pi+ pi- eta and p pbar eta^' --> p pbar pi+ pi- gamma channels.


pdgid: M070R59
text:
From the combination of p pbar eta^'() --> p pbar pi+ pi- eta and p pbar eta^'() --> p pbar gamma rho0 channels.


pdgid: M070R60
text:
WU 2006 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> Lambda Lambdabar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] = 2.00+0.34-0.29+-0.34E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R72
text:
LU 2019 reports 8.32+1.63-1.45+-0.49E-4 from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> p K- Lambdabar +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.026+-0.031E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019+-0.019E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070Q73
text:
The branching fractions for the charge-conjugate channels are measured separately as 1.361+-0.006+-0.025E-4 for pbar K0S Sigma+ and 1.352+-0.006+-0.025E-4 for p K0S Sigmabar-.


pdgid: M070R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2012B and HENRARD 1987 quote results for B(J/psi --> Lambdabar Sigma0) which we multiply by 2.


pdgid: M070R85
text:
MITCHELL 2009 reports 1.98+-0.09+-0.30E-2 from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 35.04+-0.07+-0.77E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2018O reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma pi0)/G(total)] * [B(pi0 --> 2gamma)] = 3.57+-0.12+-0.16E-5 from a measurement of [[G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma pi0)/G(total)] * [B(pi0 --> 2gamma)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.49+-0.30E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(pi0 --> 2gamma) = 98.823+-0.034E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M070R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2018O reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 4.42+-0.04+-0.18E-4 from a measurement of [[G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.49+-0.30E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M070R84
text:
ABLIKIM 2018O reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma)] = 1.26+-0.02+-0.05E-4 from a measurement of [[G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.49+-0.30E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(eta^'(958) --> gamma gamma) = 2.307+-0.033E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M070R84
text:
ABLIKIM 2011 reports 4.84+-0.03+-0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] / [B(eta^'(958) --> pi+ pi- eta)] / [B(eta --> 2gamma)] assuming B(eta^'(958) --> pi+ pi- eta) = 43.2+-0.7E-2,B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.31+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(eta^'(958) --> pi+ pi- eta) = 42.5+-0.5E-2, B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M070R89
text:
Interference with the J/psi(1S) radiative transition to the broad K Kbar pi pseudoscalar state around 1800 is 0.15+-0.01+-0.05E-3.


pdgid: M070R77
text:
Constructive interference between the X(1835) and eta(1405)/eta(1475) is assumed in a fit to the gamma phi invariant mass.


pdgid: M070R77
text:
Destructive interference between the X(1835) and eta(1405)/eta(1475) is assumed in a fit to the gamma phi invariant mass.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.744+-0.052+-0.122E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2006V reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.371+-0.010+-0.222E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2006V reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.200+-0.027+-0.174E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
Estimated using B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)=0.843+-0.012. The errors do not contain the uncertainty in the f_{{2}}(1270) decay.


pdgid: M070R88
text:
Obtained summing the sequential decay channels B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> pi pi pi pi ) = 1.44+-0.39+-0.27E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi, a_0(980) --> eta pi) = 3.90+-0.42+-0.87E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi, a_0(980) --> K Kbar) = 0.66+-0.26+-0.29E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> gamma rho0) = 0.25+-0.07+-0.03E-4.


pdgid: M070R88
text:
Using B(f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi) = 0.37, and including unknown branching ratio for a_0(980) --> eta pi.


pdgid: M070Q95
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AB measured J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285) --> gamma pi0 f_0(980) / **0**++ PHSP --> gamma pi0 pi0 pi0. Here gamma pi0 f_0(980) / **0**++ PHSP indicates an intermediate state which could be either gamma pi0 f_0(980) or gamma pi0 **0**++ phase space.


pdgid: M070Q97
text:
ABLIKIM 2025AB measured J/psi --> gamma f_1(1510) --> gamma pi0 f_0(980) / **0**++ PHSP --> gamma pi0 pi0 pi0. Here gamma pi0 f_0(980) / **0**++ PHSP indicates an intermediate state which could be either gamma pi0 f_0(980) or gamma pi0 **0**++ phase space. Evidence for the f_1(1510) is seen with a 5sigma significance in the partial wave analysis.


pdgid: M070R87
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2^'(1525))/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 7.09+-0.46+-0.67E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M070R91
text:
Includes unknown branching fraction to K+ K- or K0S K0S. We have multiplied K+ K- measurement by 2, and K0S K0S by 4 to obtain K Kbar result.


pdgid: M070B02
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for pi+ pi- and pi0 pi0 are 2.6/5.2E-5 and 1.3/1.9E-5, respectively.


pdgid: M070B03
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for K+ K- and K0S K0S are 1.7/3.1E-5 and 1.2/2.0E-5, respectively.


pdgid: M070R78
text:
From a fit of the measured pi+ pi- eta^' lineshape that accounts for the abrupt distortion observed at the p pbar threshold with a Flatte formula in addition to known backgrounds and contributors, as well as an ad hoc Breit-Wigner (M ~~ 1919 MeV; Gamma ~~ 51 MeV) that is required for a good fit. Another explanation for the distortion provided by ABLIKIM 2016J is that a second resonance near 1870 MeV interferes with the X(1835); fits to this possibility yield product branching fraction values compatible with that shown within the respective systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M070S71
text:
From the fit including final state interaction effects in isospin 0 S-wave according to SIBIRTSEV 2005A.


pdgid: M070P87
text:
Decaying via the intermediate f_0(980) eta^', fitted together with X(1835), a 600 MeV broad structure around 2.8 GeV, and the tail of the eta_{{c}}(1S).


pdgid: M070S68
text:
For a narrow state, A0, with mass mass(A0) < 1.2 GeV. The limit varies with mass(A0),  reaching its largest value of 1.7E-6 at 1.2 GeV and being 7.0E-7 for mass(A0) = 0.


pdgid: M070S68
text:
The limit varies with mass mass(A0) of a narrow state A0 and is 4.3E-6 for mass(A0) = 0 , reaches its largest value of 6.3E-6 at mass(A0) = 500 MeV, and is 3.6E-6 at mass(A0) = 960 MeV.


pdgid: M070Q68
text:
For a light pseudoscalar axion-like particle, A0, with a mass in the range 0.18 -- 2.85 GeV. The measured 95% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from 3.7E-8 to 4.85E-7.


pdgid: M070Q68
text:
For a light pseudoscalar axion-like particle, A0, with a mass in the range 0.165 -- 2.84 GeV. The measured 95% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from 8.3E-8 to 1.8E-6.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.212 -- 3.0 GeV. The measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) is in the range (1.2 -- 778.0)xE-9.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.212 -- 3 GeV. The measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) is in the range (2.8 -- 495.3)xE-8.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.21 -- 3.00 GeV. The measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from 4E-7 to 2.1E-5.


pdgid: M070S90
text:
Approximation of the transition form factor squared as an incoherent sum of the rho-meson and one-pole non-resonant amplitudes gives the pole mass m(Lambda) = 2.56+-0.04+-0.03 GeV. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2014I.


pdgid: M070Q22
text:
Assuming constructive interference. Destructive interference gives a value of 4.43+-0.23+-0.19E-6 for this branching fraction.


pdgid: M070P42
text:
For a dark photon U with mass between 10 and 2400 MeV. Obtained 90% C.L. limits as a function of mass(U) range from 1.9E-8 to 91.1E-8.


pdgid: M070P61
text:
For a dark photon U with mass between 100 and 2100 MeV. Obtained 90% C.L. limits as a function of mass(U) range from 1.8E-8 to 2.0E-7. The corresponding limits on the branching fraction J/psi --> eta^' U range from 5.7E-8 to 7.4E-7.


pdgid: M070R80
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] < 0.16E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.019E-3.


pdgid: M070Q69
text:
For a light scalar, X0, with a mass in the range 1 -- 1000 MeV. The measured limit at the 90% credibility level as a function of mass(X0) ranges from 6.2E-9 to 5.5E-7.


pdgid: M070Q69
text:
For a light vector, X0, with a mass in the range 1 -- 1000 MeV. The measured limit at the 90% credibility level as a function of mass(X0) ranges from 4.5E-9 to 9.6E-7.


pdgid: M070B19
text:
For an invisible particle X with a mass in the interval 0 -- 0.96 GeV, the measured 90% CL limit as a function of the mass ranges from 4E-9 to 4E-8.


pdgid: M056M
text:
From a measurement of M(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) - M(chi_{{c0}}(1P)) = 140.54+-0.07+-0.07 MeV and using M(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) = 3556.17+-0.07 MeV from PDG 2024.


pdgid: M056M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c0}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016 value.


pdgid: M056M
text:
Mass value shifted by us by amount appropriate for psi(2S) mass = 3686 MeV and J/psi(1S) mass = 3097 MeV.


pdgid: M056G3
text:
We multiplied the measurement by 3 to convert from pi0 pi0 to pi pi. Interference with the continuum included.


pdgid: M056P08
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 2.127+-0.002+-0.101 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2004G reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(980))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 6.5+-1.6+-1.3E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R62
text:
HE 2008B reports 3.54+-0.10+-0.43+-0.18 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R63
text:
HE 2008B reports 3.04+-0.18+-0.42+-0.16 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R63
text:
Calculated by us. We have added the values from HE 2008B for rho+ pi- pi0 and rho- pi+ pi0 decays assuming uncorrelated statistical and fully correlated systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M056R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A reports 3.34+-0.06+-0.44E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R36
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 10.44+-2.37+3.05-1.90E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_0^*(1430)0 Kbar_0^*(1430)0 --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R37
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 8.49+-1.66+1.32-1.99E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_0^*(1430)0 Kbar_2^*(1430)0 + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R38
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 6.66+-1.31+1.60-1.51E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_1(1270)+ K- + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. The measurement assumes B(K_1(1270) --> K rho(770)) = 42+-6%.


pdgid: M056R39
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <2.85E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_1(1400)+ K- + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2. The measurement assumes B(K_1(1400) --> K^*(892) pi) = 94+-6%.


pdgid: M056R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(980))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.59+-0.50+0.89-0.72E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. One of the f_{{0}}(980) mesons is identified via decay to pi+ pi- while the other via K+ K- decay.


pdgid: M056R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 8.42+-1.42+1.65-2.29E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(2200))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(980) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(2200) --> K+ K- decays.


pdgid: M056R30
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <2.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1370))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2. One of the f_{{0}}(1370) mesons is identified via decay to pi+ pi- while the other via K+ K- decay. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <1.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1370) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1500) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 7.12+-1.85+3.28-1.68E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1710))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1370) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1710) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1370))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1370) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <0.55E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2. One of the f_{{0}}(1500) is identified via decay to pi+ pi- while the other via K+ K- decay. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <0.73E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1710))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1710) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R85
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 8.61+-0.13+-0.94E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 4.22+-0.10+-0.43E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R64
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.59+-0.05+-0.08+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R66
text:
HE 2008B reports 2.64+-0.15+-0.31+-0.14 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R67
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.28+-0.16+-0.15+-0.07 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> rho+ K- K0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R68
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.49+-0.10+-0.07+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)- K+ pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R47
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.558+-0.051+-0.089E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R69
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.32+-0.05+-0.05+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q reports 2.080+-0.006+-0.068E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R4
text:
BAI 1999B reports 11.7+-1.0+-2.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.3+-0.8E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R4
text:
TANENBAUM 1978 reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.4+-0.5E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.168+-0.035+0.047-0.040E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2004H reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.53+-0.29+-0.26E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 8.92+-0.84+-0.65E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
ASNER 2009 reports <0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. ADAMS 2007 reports <0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 2.19+-0.03+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
ASNER 2009 reports 2.12+-0.13+-0.21E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. ADAMS 2007 reports 1.7+-0.4+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 0.0922+-0.0011+-0.0046, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2025K reports 10.66+-0.11+-0.57E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 0.95+-0.03+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2005N reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.212+-0.053+-0.037E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2025K reports 1.18+-0.03+-0.07E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 13.83+-0.70+-1.01E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 1.2+-0.1+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 1.94+-0.06+-0.20E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R08
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.21E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R51
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.38E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056P20
text:
ABLIKIM 2025CJ reports <2.59E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.77+-0.23E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R17
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <0.70E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R17
text:
Rescaled by us using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0())= (9.4+-0.4)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.6+-0.5)%.


pdgid: M056R05
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R09
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R48
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.138+-0.039+-0.025E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R95
text:
Using B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.20+-0.05)%. ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 5.64+-0.33+-0.37E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value..


pdgid: M056R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T reports 1.03+-0.22+-0.15E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 1.18+-0.07+-0.13E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> phi pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2023N reports 8.59+-0.27+-0.20E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B reports 8.41+-0.74+-0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R06
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 7.76+-0.37+-0.51+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R06
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.59+-0.10+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R50
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 3.73+-0.38+-0.28+-0.19E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R50
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.39+-0.11+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R70
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 5.57+-0.48+-0.42+-0.14E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R7
text:
BAI 1999B reports 1.57+-0.21+-0.54E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.3+-0.8E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R7
text:
TANENBAUM 1978 reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.7+-1.3E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R65
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.11+-0.02+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056P15
text:
ABLIKIM 2025L reports 2.42+-0.07+-0.19E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.77+-0.23E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056P18
text:
ABLIKIM 2025CE reports 5.75+-0.59+-0.42E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar eta eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.77+-0.23E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056P16
text:
ABLIKIM 2025V reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 2.49+-0.03+-0.15E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 1.24+-0.20+-0.18E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar K+ K- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R73
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 3.00+-0.58+-0.50E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R74
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 3.18+-1.11+-0.53E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R75
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 6.12+-1.18+-0.86E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R46
text:
ABLIKIM 2006D reports <8.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.5E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.26+-0.02+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2006I reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.10+-0.24+-0.18E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.34+-0.03+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 2.29+-0.08+-0.18E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R84
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 2.16+-0.07+-0.16E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 119.0+-6.4+-11.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <54E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <55E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R79
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <50E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D reports 1.32+-0.03+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R07
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 1.07+-0.17+-0.12E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.7+-0.7+-0.5E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 6.65+-0.26+-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 0.0979+-0.0020, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Also uses B( Lambdabar --> pbar pi+ ) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B( K0S --> pi+ pi- ) = (69.20+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.72+-0.18+-0.28E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 4.41+-0.56+-0.47E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports 4.78+-0.34+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.99+-0.24+-0.24E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 3.25+-0.57+-0.43E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports 4.54+-0.42+-0.30E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056P12
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 12.6+-2.0+-1.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056P00
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I reports 5.13+-0.24+-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R80
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 16.4+-5.7+-1.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 23.5+-6.2+-2.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.90+-0.30+-0.16E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 4.67+-0.19+-0.26E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R61
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 3.34+-0.70+-0.48E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 4.43+-0.08+-0.18E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R45
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 5.14+-0.60+-0.47E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056P04
text:
ABLIKIM 2023T reports 3.51+-0.54+-0.29E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Omega- Omegabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports <7E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta_c pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R56
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <9.6E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R56
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <10.5E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R57
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <8.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R57
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <12.9E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R58
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <6.4E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <16.2E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06E-2.


pdgid: M056R93
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 1.51+-0.30+-0.13E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M056R94
text:
Uses B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P) ) x B( chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) ) = 15.8+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M056R18
text:
The values of B(p pbar)B(gamma gamma) and B(gamma gamma)B(gamma J/psi) measured by ANDREOTTI 2004 are not independent. The latter is used in the fit because of smaller systematics.


pdgid: M056R19
text:
Values in (G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) * G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))/G(total)) and ([G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)/G(total) * G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))/G(total)]) are not independent. The latter is used in the fit since it is less correlated to the total width.


pdgid: M056B4
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in BAI 1999B is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B4
text:
The value B(psi(1S) --> gamma chi_c0())xB(chi_c0() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in TANENBAUM 1978 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)xB(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) =(4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M056P09
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c0() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.79+-0.20)% [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M056B19
text:
The reported value is derived using B(psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(J/psi --> lepton+ lepton-) = (4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using B(J/psi --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025CH reports B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) = 6.06+-0.02+-0.07E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.77+-0.23)%. We have multiplied the pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c0() --> pi0 pi0) = 3.23+-0.03+-0.23+-0.14E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.4+-0.4)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) = 6.37+-0.08+-0.31+-0.32E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%. We have multiplied the pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> pi0 pi0) = 2.94+-0.07+-0.32+-0.15E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B5
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi^' --> gamma chi_c0())= (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi^' --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D]. We have multiplied pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c0() --> eta eta) = 3.44+-0.10+-0.24+-0.13E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.4+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> eta eta) = 3.18+-0.13+-0.31+-0.16E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta) reported by ADAMS 2007 was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)% (ATHAR 2004).


pdgid: M056B23
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025CH reports B(chi_c0() --> K+ K-) = 6.36+-0.02+-0.08E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.77+-0.23)%.


pdgid: M056B23
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> K+ K-) = 6.47+-0.08+-0.35+-0.32E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B9
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> K+ K-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B12
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> K0S K0S) = 3.49+-0.08+-0.18+-0.17E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B13
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> K0S K0S) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056P14
text:
ABLIKIM 2024AY reports also a measurement B(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K+- pi-+) = 7.95+-0.50+-0.65E-5 from this product branching fraction using PDG 2024 B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) value.


pdgid: M056B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2023N was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.79+-0.20)%.


pdgid: M056B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2011K was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.62+-0.31)%.


pdgid: M056B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B6
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025H reports B(chi_c0() --> p pbar) = 2.51+-0.02+-0.08E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.79+-0.20)%.


pdgid: M056B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c0() --> p pbar) = 25.7+-1.5+-1.5+-1.3E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B1
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B20
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 33.8+-3.6+-2.2+-1.7E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B20
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 33.3+-2.0+-2.6E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.62+-0.31)%.


pdgid: M056B21
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] = (2.45+0.68-0.65+-0.46)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M056P19
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025BX reports B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar eta^') = 7.56+-1.42+-0.90E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar eta^') x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.77+-0.23)%.


pdgid: M056P07
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()).


pdgid: M056B24
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c0 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S + c.c.) = 3.52+-0.19+-0.21E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.79+-0.20)%  and other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M056P01
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c0 --> Sigma0 pbar K+ + c.c.) = 3.03+-0.12+-0.15E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.79+-0.20)% and other branching fractions from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M055M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c1}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016 value.


pdgid: M055R6
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q reports 1.092+-0.004+-0.035E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R6
text:
BAI 1999B reports 5.8+-0.7+-1.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.8E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R6
text:
TANENBAUM 1978 reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.9+-0.7E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 0.685+-0.001+-0.031E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R4
text:
BAI 1999B reports 0.49+-0.04+-0.12E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.8E-2,B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 32.4+-2.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) values B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M055R4
text:
TANENBAUM 1978 reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.4+-0.4E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R8
text:
Estimated using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.087. The errors do not contain the uncertainty in the psi(2S) decay.


pdgid: M055R35
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.28+-0.06+-0.15+-0.08 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R36
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.56+-0.13+-0.22+-0.10 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A reports 0.57+-0.03+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R5
text:
Rescaled by us using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (8.8+-0.4)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.6+-0.5)%.


pdgid: M055R37
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.12+-0.02+-0.02+-0.01E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R00
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 11.46+-0.12+-1.29E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 7.52+-0.11+-0.79E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R39
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.92+-0.09+-0.11+-0.06 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R40
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.54+-0.11+-0.07+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> rho- K+ Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R41
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.25+-0.06+-0.03+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R42
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.12+-0.03+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R05
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.67+-0.26+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R25
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.34+-0.10+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R09
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.04+-0.13+-0.04+-0.09E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 6.9+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 1.1+-0.4+-0.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R10
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.18+-0.17+-0.14+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 6.9+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R10
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 1.6+-0.7+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R12
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <0.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_J^*(1430)0 Kbar0 + c.c. --> K0S K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R13
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <2.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_J^*(1430)+ K- + c.c. --> K0S K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R20
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 1.95+-0.16+-0.23E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 4.67+-0.03+-0.23+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 5.0+-0.3+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 5.9+-0.7+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 3.40+-0.03+-0.19+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_0(980)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 2.0+-0.5+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_0(980)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 0.18+-0.01+-0.02+-0.01E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_2(1320)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R75
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 4.7+-0.4+-0.6+-0.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_2(1700)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R73
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 0.36+-0.01+-0.06+-0.01E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R74
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 2.6+-0.4+-0.8+-0.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_4(2050) eta --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports <4.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(1400)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports <1.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(1600)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports <8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(2015)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 6.4+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 3.0+-0.7+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R28
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 2.4+-0.4+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^'())/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R64
text:
ABLIKIM 2025I reports 8.48+-0.10+-0.47E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R64
text:
ABLIKIM 2014J reports 8.75+-0.87E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055P11
text:
From an overall fit to all the intermediate states of K+ K- eta^'(958) which yields B(chi_c1 --> K+ K- eta^'(958)) = 8.75+-0.87E-4.


pdgid: M055P08
text:
ABLIKIM 2025CJ reports 1.40+-0.13+-0.09E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R93
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.61+-0.19+-0.19+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 6.9+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R94
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.17+-0.16+-0.05+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_2^*(1430) Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 6.9+-0.6E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2011D reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi0 f_0(980) --> pi0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 6.0E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2004H reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.40+-0.27+-0.22E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 4.2E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R82
text:
Using B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.20+-0.05)%. ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 3.4+-0.9+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value..


pdgid: M055R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T reports 0.46+-0.16+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 0.75+-0.06+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2025K reports 6.43+-0.07+-0.31E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 6.0+-0.3+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 0.78+-0.04+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R50
text:
ABLIKIM 2025K reports 0.20+-0.02+-0.01E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R50
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 2.67+-0.31+-0.27E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R50
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 0.22+-0.06+-0.02E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2023N reports 4.26+-0.13+-0.15E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 4.4+-0.3+-0.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R85
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B reports 2.96+-0.43+-0.22E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R21
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 1.75+-0.16+-0.13+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R21
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 1.2+-0.5+-0.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R27
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 1.56+-0.22+-0.14+-0.10E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R27
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R43
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 2.28+-0.28+-0.16+-0.14E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R7
text:
BAI 1999B reports 0.49+-0.13+-0.17E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.8E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R7
text:
TANENBAUM 1978 reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.2+-0.8E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R38
text:
HE 2008B reports <0.05E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055P04
text:
ABLIKIM 2025L reports 1.95+-0.05+-0.12E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055P06
text:
ABLIKIM 2025CE reports 1.40+-0.33+-0.17E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar eta eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055P05
text:
ABLIKIM 2025V reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.83+-0.02+-0.11E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 1.35+-0.15+-0.19E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar K+ K- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R46
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 1.81+-0.38+-0.28E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R47
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports <1.00E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R48
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports <1.82E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2006D reports <4.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.1+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M055R56
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.37+-0.02+-0.04E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R57
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.38+-0.02+-0.04E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.00+-0.05+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.98+-0.05+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 31.1+-3.4+-3.9E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R19
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 26.2+-5.5+-3.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R52
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <14E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R53
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <14E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
LU 2019 reports 9.15+2.63-2.25+-0.86E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+) = 4.79+-0.23E-4, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+) = 4.74+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D reports 4.5+-0.2+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 3.3+-0.9+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 1.66+-0.12+-0.12E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0975+-0.0024, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Also uses B( Lambdabar --> pbar pi+ ) = (63.9+-0.5)%  and B( K0S --> pi+ pi- ) = (69.20+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M055R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 4.8+-0.5+-0.4E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.41+-0.05+-0.03E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports <0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.44E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.35+-0.06+-0.02E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports <0.87E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.65E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 5.10+-1.21+-0.67E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I reports 5.7+-1.4+-0.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R54
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <10E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R55
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <5.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.32+-0.20+-0.12E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 0.75+-0.11+-0.06E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R34
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.60E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 0.58+-0.04+-0.05E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R03
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 0.86+-0.22+-0.08E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R91
text:
ABLIKIM 2023T reports 1.49+-0.23+-0.10E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Omega- Omegabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R2
text:
FELDMAN 1977 reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- + K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 1.5E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 0.6E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2025BZ reports <3.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta_c pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports 228+-13+-22E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R29
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports 243+-19+-22E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R30
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports 69.7+-7.2+-6.6E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R30
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports 83+-15+-12E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports 25.8+-5.2+-2.3E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R31
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <26E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R3
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AE reports <6.3E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85E-2.


pdgid: M055R79
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 3.73+-0.09+-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M055R80
text:
Uses B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P) ) x B( chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) ) = 351.8+-1.0+-12.0E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M055R98
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c1() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.75+-0.24)% [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M055R98
text:
Not used since the same experimental measurement has been used in another related quantity elsewhere.


pdgid: M055B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> K0 K+ pi- + c.c.) reported by ATHAR 2007 was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B16
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2006R reports B(chi_c1() --> K0S K+ pi-) = 4.0+-0.3+-0.5E-3. We use B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = 8.7+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M055B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> K0S K+ pi-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)%.


pdgid: M055B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055P03
text:
ABLIKIM 2024AY reports also a measurement B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K+- pi-+) = 26.2+-0.8+-1.9E-5 from this product branching fraction using PDG 2024 B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1) value.


pdgid: M055B6
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025H reports B(chi_c1() --> p pbar) = 8.16+-0.09+-0.25E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.75+-0.24)%.


pdgid: M055B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c1() --> p pbar) = 9.0+-0.8+-0.4+-0.5E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B1
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c1() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055B10
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 11.6+-1.8+-0.7+-0.7E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B10
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 12.2+-1.1+-1.1E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M055B11
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] = (1.33+0.52-0.46+-0.25)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M055P07
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025BX reports B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar eta^') = 1.54+-0.51+-0.16E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar eta^') x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.75+-0.27)%.


pdgid: M055R97
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c1 --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1).


pdgid: M055B01
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c1 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S + c.c.) = 1.53+-0.10+-0.08E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1) = (9.75+-0.24)% and other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M055R88
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c1 --> Sigma0 pbar K+ + c.c.) = 1.46+-0.07+-0.07E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.75+-0.24)% and other branching fractions from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M055B3
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1())xB(chi_c1() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) quoted in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3)% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M055QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Not independent of a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()) and b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()) values from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M144M
text:
Combination of exclusive and inclusive analyses for the reaction psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c --> pi0 eta_c gamma. This result is the average of DOBBS 2008A and ROSNER 2005.


pdgid: M144R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2022N reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi0)/G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] / [B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0)] < 7.5E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 1/6 B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1/6 ().


pdgid: M144R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BY reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 6.7E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2018M reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.0E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R20
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 3.22E-8 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R22
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 5.67E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.49+-0.27+-0.28E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R10
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.4E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 3.30+-0.71+-0.59E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R21
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.51+-1.50+-0.46E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 1.36+-0.16+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.38+-0.35+-0.17E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ADAMS 2009 reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 0.19E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports <4.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R11
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.2+-1.6+-0.7E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.33+-1.10+-0.56E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.40+-0.81+-0.87E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R02
text:
ADAMS 2009 reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.88+0.48-0.45+0.47-0.30E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.53E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.79+-0.83+-0.56E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 7.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024R.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ADAMS 2009 reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.5E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.93+-0.63+-0.26E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 0.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R12
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.8+-0.5+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R13
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.0E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R14
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 3.26+-0.84+-0.36E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Significance 3.5sigma.


pdgid: M144R14
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.8E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 1.8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 3.13+-1.08+-0.38E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Significance 3.3sigma.


pdgid: M144R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 7.5E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2K+ 2K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.1E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2024Y reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.3+-1.3+-0.4E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.8E-7 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R19
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.4+-0.7+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports 3.77+-0.55+-0.29E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R00
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports 1.40+-0.11+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports <5.0E-5 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2022AQ reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.22+0.27-0.26+-0.19E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
Average of DOBBS 2008A and ROSNER 2005. DOBBS 2008A reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.16+-0.30+-0.37E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2010B reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.58+-0.40+-0.50E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
DOBBS 2008A reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.19+-0.32+-0.45E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ROSNER 2005 reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.0+-0.8+-0.7E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M144R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2025G reports 3.06+-0.54+-0.43E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2025G reports 3.52+-0.50+-0.38E-3 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2025G reports 2.19+-0.20+-0.22E-3 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma 2pi+ 2pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2025G reports 3.34+-0.53+-0.40E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2025G reports 1.81+-0.35+-0.22E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma f_2(1270) --> gamma pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M057M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c2}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016 value.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
Calculated from the measured Gamma(gamma gamma) x B(chi_c2(1S) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) x B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 14.8+-0.3+-0.7 eV, using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 11.93+-0.05%.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in ACCIARRI 1999E is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))xB(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.0162+-0.0014.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in ACKERSTAFF,K 1998 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.135+-0.011 and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1203+-0.0038.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in DOMINICK 1994 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))= 0.135+-0.011, B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.0627+-0.0020, and B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0597+-0.0025.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in BAUER 1993 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))= 0.135+-0.011, B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.0627+-0.0020, and B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0597+-0.0025.


pdgid: M057P07
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 1.153+-0.001+-0.063 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R46
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.87+-0.07+-0.22+-0.13 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R47
text:
HE 2008B reports 2.23+-0.11+-0.32+-0.16 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A reports 1.21+-0.05+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R48
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.21+-0.03+-0.03+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R50
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.41+-0.11+-0.16+-0.10 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R51
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.42+-0.11+-0.06+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho- K+ Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R57
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.30+-0.07+-0.04+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 K- pi+ --> K- pi+ K0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R52
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.39+-0.07+-0.05+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R53
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.38+-0.07+-0.04+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)- K+ pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R54
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.30+-0.07+-0.04+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+ Kbar0 pi- --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R55
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.13+-0.04+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R00
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 11.69+-0.13+-1.31E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R73
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 7.30+-0.11+-0.75E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q reports 1.565+-0.005+-0.048E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R4
text:
BAI 1999B reports 9.0+-1.0+-2.0E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 7.8+-0.8E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R4
text:
TANENBAUM 1978 reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.9+-0.6E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R20
text:
ABLIKIM 2023N reports 12.67+-0.28+-0.33E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R97
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B reports 5.33+-0.52+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2025K reports 8.75+-0.08+-0.42E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 8.9+-0.3+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2005N reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.165+-0.044+-0.032E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R74
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 0.73+-0.04+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2025K reports 0.10+-0.01+-0.01E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.91+-0.23+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports <2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R85
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 0.64+-0.39+-0.07E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho(770)+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R08
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.49+-0.12+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <1.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R35
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.51+-0.18+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.5+-0.1+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.8+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.4+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.3+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 15.5+-0.6+-1.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 18.2+-0.8+-1.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.6+-0.8+-1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.0+-1.0+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.4+-0.5+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.3+-0.5+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.9+-1.1+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R91
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.9+-1.6+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.5+-1.6+-3.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> a_2(1320)0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R93
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 18.4+-3.3+-5.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> a_2(1320)+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R05
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.31+-0.07+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R09
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.33E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2025I reports 1.53+-0.04+-0.08E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2014J reports 1.94+-0.34E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 2.27+-0.43+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
ASNER 2009 reports <0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. ADAMS 2007 reports <2.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0933+-0.0014+-0.0061, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 4.76+-0.56+-0.38E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
ASNER 2009 reports <1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. ADAMS 2007 reports <3.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0933+-0.0014+-0.0061, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057P18
text:
ABLIKIM 2025CJ reports 4.18+-0.84+-0.48E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.36+-0.23E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.207+-0.039+-0.033E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] < 3.5E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R94
text:
Using B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.20+-0.05)%. ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 10.8+-1.5+-0.8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value..


pdgid: M057R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T reports 1.67+-0.26+-0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R75
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports 0.93+-0.06+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> phi pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R06
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 4.83+-0.25+-0.35+-0.31E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R06
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.44+-0.08+-0.05E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R34
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 1.76+-0.23+-0.14+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R34
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.19+-0.07+-0.02E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R56
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 3.68+-0.35+-0.26+-0.24E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R6
text:
BAI 1999B reports 1.23+-0.20+-0.35E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 7.8+-0.8E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R6
text:
TANENBAUM 1978 reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.26+-0.10E-3 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R49
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.08+-0.02+-0.01+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057P14
text:
ABLIKIM 2025L reports 1.33+-0.05+-0.08E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.36+-0.23E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057P16
text:
ABLIKIM 2025CE reports 2.64+-0.40+-0.27E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar eta eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.36+-0.23E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057P15
text:
ABLIKIM 2025V reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 2.43+-0.02+-0.15E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 2.08+-0.19+-0.30E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar K+ K- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 3.06+-0.50+-0.54E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 5.05+-1.29+-0.93E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 3.04+-0.85+-0.43E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R30
text:
ABLIKIM 2006D reports <7.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.3+-0.6E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.80+-0.02+-0.09E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2006I reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.97+-0.20+-0.26E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R70
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.85+-0.02+-0.07E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 2.07+-0.06+-0.15E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 2.01+-0.06+-0.16E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 137.0+-7.6+-15.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R66
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <42E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R67
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <61E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D reports 8.4+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R07
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 8.5+-1.4+-1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 3.58+-0.16+-0.23E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0952+-0.0020, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Also uses B( Lambdabar --> pbar pi+ ) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B( K0S --> pi+ pi- ) = (69.20+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M057R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 7.8+-0.9+-0.6E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.35+-0.05+-0.02E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports <0.65E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.75E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.32+-0.06+-0.03E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports <0.88E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.67E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057P11
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 5.46+-1.18+-0.50E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I reports 4.4+-1.7+-0.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R68
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <17E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R69
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <8.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 1.68+-0.26+-0.15E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 1.83+-0.15+-0.16E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R45
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <1.06E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 1.44+-0.06+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R17
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 1.45+-0.30+-0.15E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057P03
text:
ABLIKIM 2023T reports 4.52+-0.24+-0.18E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Omega- Omegabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports <5.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta_c(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2013B reports <1.2E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta_c(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R40
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <20.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R40
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <50E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R41
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <6.1E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R41
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <7.0E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R42
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <8.1E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R42
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <13E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63E-2.


pdgid: M057R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 2.48+-0.08+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.63+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M057R83
text:
Uses B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P) ) x B( chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) ) = 199.6+-0.8+-7.0E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M057P08
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c2() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.52+-0.20)% [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M057B5
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in BAI 1999B is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B5
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2())xB(chi_c2() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in TANENBAUM 1978 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)xB(J/psi(1S) lepton+ lepton-) = (4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M057B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2 --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2023N was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (9.52+-0.20)%.


pdgid: M057B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2 --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2011K was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.74+-0.35)%.


pdgid: M057B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.1+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> phi phi) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025CH reports B(chi_c2() --> pi+ pi-) = 1.61+-0.01+-0.02E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.36+-0.23)%. We have multiplied the pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c2() --> pi0 pi0) = 0.88+-0.02+-0.06+-0.04E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.3+-0.4)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> pi+ pi-) = 1.59+-0.04+-0.07+-0.10E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%. We have multiplied the pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> pi0 pi0) = 0.68+-0.03+-0.07+-0.04E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B9
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> pi+ pi-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D]. We have multiplied pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B04
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c2() --> eta eta) = 0.65+-0.04+-0.05+-0.03E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.3+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B03
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025CH reports B(chi_c2() --> K+ K-) = 1.22+-0.01+-0.02E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.36+-0.23)%.


pdgid: M057B03
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> K+ K-) = 1.13+-0.03+-0.06+-0.07E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B8
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> K+ K-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B12
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> K0S K0S) = 0.53+-0.03+-0.03+-0.03E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B13
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> K0S K0S) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B05
text:
Calculated by us. ATHAR 2007 reports B(chi_c2() --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 1.3+-0.2+-0.1+-0.1E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B05
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2006R reports B(chi_c2() --> K0S K()+- pi()-+) = 0.6+-0.2+-0.1E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.1+-0.6)%. We have multiplied by 2 to obtain Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c. from K0S K()+- pi()-+.


pdgid: M057B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.1+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057P13
text:
ABLIKIM 2024AY reports also a measurement B(chi_c2(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K+- pi-+) = 17.2+-0.7+-1.5E-5 from this product branching fraction using PDG 2024 B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2) value.


pdgid: M057B1
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B6
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025H reports B(chi_c2() --> p pbar) = 8.33+-0.09+-0.22E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.52+-0.20)%.


pdgid: M057B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c2() --> p pbar) = 7.7+-0.8+-0.4+-0.5E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B10
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 17.0+-2.2+-1.1+-1.1E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B10
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 20.8+-1.6+-2.3E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.74+-0.35)%.


pdgid: M057B11
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] = (1.33+0.59-0.55+-0.25)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M057P17
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2025BX reports B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar eta^') = 3.03+-0.61+-0.29E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar eta^') x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.36+-0.23)%.


pdgid: M057P06
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c2 --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2).


pdgid: M057B07
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c2 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S + c.c.) = 8.25+-0.83+-0.49E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2) = (9.52+-0.20)%  and other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M057P00
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c2 --> Sigma0 pbar K+ + c.c.) = 0.91+-0.06+-0.05E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2) = (9.52+-0.20)% and other branching fractions from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M057B3
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2())xB(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) reported in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3)% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.1181+-0.0020).


pdgid: M057B4
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AE measures the ratio of two-photon partial widths for the helicity lambda = 0 and helicity lambda = 2 components to be f(0/2) = Gamma(gamma gamma)**lambda=0 / Gamma(gamma gamma)**lambda=2 = 0.000+-0.006+-0.012.


pdgid: M057B4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012A measures the ratio of two-photon partial widths for the helicity lambda = 0 and helicity lambda = 2 components to be f(0/2) = Gamma(gammagamma)**lambda=0/Gamma(gammagamma)**lambda=2 = 0.00+-0.02+-0.02. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2017AE.


pdgid: M057B06
text:
Not independent from the values of Gamma(chi_{{c0}}(), chi_{{c2}}()) and B(psi(2S) --> chi_c0(), chi_{{c2}}()).


pdgid: M057A1
text:
Correlated with a_{{3}}, b_{{2}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 a_3) = 0.733, rho(a_2 b_2) = -0.605, and rho(a_2 b_3) = -0.095.


pdgid: M057A2
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, b_{{2}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 a_3) = 0.733, rho(a_3 b_2) = -0.422, and rho(a_3 b_3) = -0.024.


pdgid: M057QB2
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, a_{{3}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 b_2) = -0.605, rho(a_3 b_2) = -0.422, and rho(b_2 b_3) = 0.384.


pdgid: M057QB3
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, a_{{3}}, and b_{{2}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 b_3) = -0.095, rho(a_3 b_3) = -0.024, and rho(b_2 b_3) = 0.384.


pdgid: M057QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. From a fit with floating M2 amplitudes a(2) and b(2), and fixed E3 amplitudes a(3)=b(3)=0. Not independent of values for a(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) and b(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M059M
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report mass(psi(2S))-mass(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 52.5+-1.7+-0.6 MeV. We use the current value mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097+-0.025 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M059M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of eta_{{c}}(2S) fixed to the PDG 2016 value.


pdgid: M059W1
text:
They measure Gamma(eta_c(2S) gamma gamma) B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = (0.18+-0.05+-0.02) Gamma(eta_c(1S) gamma gamma) B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi). The value for Gamma(eta_c(2S) --> gamma gamma) is derived assuming that the branching fractions for eta_{{c }}(2S) and eta_{{c }}(1S) decays to K_S K pi are equal and using Gamma(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma) = 7.4+-0.4+-2.3 keV.


pdgid: M059G04
text:
NAKAZAWA 2008 reports B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) x Gamma(gamma gamma) = 11.2+-2.4+-2.7 eV which we multiplied by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R3
text:
Derived from a measurement of [B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) x B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] / [B(B+ --> eta_c() K+) x B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi)] = (9.6+2.0-1.9+-2.5)% and using B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) = 3.4+-1.8E-4, and [B(B+ --> eta_c() K+) x B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi)] = 6.88+-0.77+0.55-0.66E-5.


pdgid: M059R26
text:
LEES 2014E reports B(eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta)/B(eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 0.82+-0.21+-0.27, which we divide by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R21
text:
Not independent from other measurements reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M. We have multiplied the value of Gamma(K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/Gamma(K0S K()+- pi()-+) reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M by a factor 1/3 to obtain.


pdgid: M059R04
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report a 6.4 standard deviation signal, with B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+ --> p pbar K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> p pbar K+) = 1.58+-0.33+-0.09E-2.


pdgid: M059R30
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports signals in B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+ and B0 --> eta_c(2S) K0S with 12.3 and 5.9 standard deviations, respectively.


pdgid: M059R2
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(eta_c(2S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+)] < 0.18E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) = 4.4E-4.


pdgid: M059R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BW reports a value of 2.39+-0.32+-0.34E-6 for the decay eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta which we multiply by 2 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R25
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 reports a limit of <5.9E-6 for the decay eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta which we multiply by 2 account for isospin symmetry. It assumes Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. It also gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M059R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2025I reports a value of 5.78+-2.43+-0.95E-7 for K+ K- eta^' which we multiply by 2 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R05
text:
Assuming Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M071M
text:
Mass central value and systematic error recalculated by us according to Eq. (16) in ARMSTRONG 1993B, using the value for the J/psi(1S) mass from AULCHENKO 2003.


pdgid: M071M
text:
From a fit of a relativistic S-wave Breit-Wigner convolved with the detector resolution. The width of psi(2S) is constrained to the PDG 2022 value. Systematic errors not evaluated.


pdgid: M071M
text:
From the scans in 2004 and 2006. ANASHIN 2012 reports the value 3686.114+-0.007+-0.011+0.002-0.012 MeV, where the third uncertainty is due to assumptions on the interference between the resonance and hadronic continuum. We combined the two systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M071W
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the hadronic and mu+ mu- cross section, assuming Gamma = Gamma(h) + Gamma(e) + Gamma(mu) + Gamma(tau) and lepton universality. Does not include vacuum polarization correction.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
ABLIKIM 2015V reports 2.213+-0.018+-0.099 keV from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.95+-0.45E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu-, and hadronic channel, assuming Gamma(e) = Gamma(mu) = Gamma(tau)/0.38847.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
Combining Gamma(e+ e-).B(mu+ mu-) from ANASHIN 2018 with Gamma(e+ e-).B(hadrons) from ANASHIN 2012 and assuming lepton universality.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
From the sum of Gamma(e+ e-).B(hadrons) from ANASHIN 2012, Gamma(e+ e-).B(e+ e-) and Gamma(e+ e-).B(mu+ mu-) from ANASHIN 2018, and Gamma(e+ e-).B(tau+ tau-) from ANASHIN 2007.


pdgid: M071G3
text:
ANASHIN 2012 reports the value 2.233+-0.015+-0.037+-0.020 keV, where the third uncertainty is due to assumptions on the interference between the resonance and hadronic continuum. We combined the two systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 4.14+-0.55+-0.29E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 5.3+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
LEES 2012E reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 49.9+-1.3+-1.0E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
The value of Gamma(e+ e-) quoted in BAI 1998E is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)= 32.4+-2.6E-2 and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-)= 0.1203+-0.0038. Recalculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-)= 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.0186+-0.0012+-0.0011 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 2.00+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
AUBERT 2005D reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.0450+-0.0018+-0.0022 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. Superseded by LEES 2012E.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K+ K- pi0)] = 1.31+-0.35+-0.13E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 2.88+-0.12E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 2.36+-0.59+-0.24E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 5.3+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2018E reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.0101+-0.0015+-0.0011 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 2.00+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G7
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> J/psi eta). B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-). B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 1.11+-0.33+-0.07 eV.


pdgid: M071G03
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 1.13+-0.55+-0.08 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G03
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] < 2.3 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56E-2.


pdgid: M071P40
text:
LEES 2021C reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta pi+ pi- 3pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] < 1.9 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36E-2.


pdgid: M071P33
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi- pi0)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] < 1.9 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36E-2.


pdgid: M071G02
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 2.69+-0.73+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071P32
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi- 2pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 18+-4+-3 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071P17
text:
LEES 2018E reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 2.3+-0.7+-0.2 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071P39
text:
LEES 2021C reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega 3pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] < 1.6 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2E-2.


pdgid: M071G10
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.27+-0.09+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G10
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT,BE 2006D reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.28+-0.11+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G13
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.17+-0.06+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G13
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.17+-0.08+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071G05
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- eta) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 1.2+-0.7+-0.1 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071R5
text:
Using B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.794+-0.017)% and R = 2.26+-0.01 determined by a fit to data from Mark-I, DM2, BESII, KEDR, and BESIII.


pdgid: M071R5
text:
Using B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.73+-0.04)% from RPP-2002 and R = 2.28+-0.04 determined by a fit to data from BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. Superseded by LIAO 2023.


pdgid: M071S43
text:
Calculated using Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.097+-0.026+-0.016 from LIBBY 2009, B(psi(2S) --> X J/psi) relative and absolute branching fractions from MENDEZ 2008, B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c) from MITCHELL 2009, and B(psi(2S) --> virtual gamma --> hadrons), B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_cJ()), and B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) from PDG 2008. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is largely uncorrelated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) LIBBY 2009 measurement.


pdgid: M071S44
text:
Calculated using Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.097+-0.026+-0.016 from LIBBY 2009. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is largely uncorrelated with that of Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) LIBBY 2009 measurement.


pdgid: M071S27
text:
Uses B(J/psi X) from ADAM 2005A, B(chi_cJ() gamma), B(eta_c gamma) from ATHAR 2004 and B(lepton+ lepton-) from PDG 2004. Superseded by MENDEZ 2008.


pdgid: M071R1
text:
From an overall fit assuming equal partial widths for e+ e- and mu+ mu-. For a measurement of the ratio see the entry G(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)/G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) below. Includes LUTH 1975, HILGER 1975, BURMESTER 1977.


pdgid: M071R75
text:
Computed using PDG 2002 value of B(psi(2S) --> hadrons) = 0.9810+-0.0030 to estimate the total number of psi(2S) events.


pdgid: M071R10
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> J/psi X cross section between 3.645 and 3.891 GeV, with Gamma(ee) and Gamma fixed to the PDG 2020 values of the cross particle fit which are correlated to "OUR FIT" value for B(psi(2S) --> J/psi X).


pdgid: M071R71
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1s) eta) reported in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S)) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3))% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.1181+-0.0020).


pdgid: M071R20
text:
Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration. Using psi(3770) --> pi+ pi- for continuum subtraction.


pdgid: M071R36
text:
From psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 events directly. The quoted systematic error includes a contribution of 4% (added in quadrature) from the uncertainty on the number of psi(2S) events.


pdgid: M071R22
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> 2(pi+ pi-) pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 297+-22+-18E-4 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071R93
text:
Destructive-interference solution of a partial wave analysis of the decay psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- eta^'.


pdgid: M071R93
text:
Constructive-interference solution of a partial wave analysis of the decay psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- eta^'.


pdgid: M071R77
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi-). B(omega --> 3pi) = 2.69+-0.73+-0.16 eV.


pdgid: M071R80
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 0.57+-0.22+-0.04E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071R83
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 0.34+-0.16+-0.04E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071P68
text:
The continuum is subtracted using data at 3.773 GeV. No interference between the psi(2S) and continuum amplitudes is assumed.


pdgid: M071P60
text:
Data at 3.773 GeV assumed to be e+ e- (3.773) --> 3 phi events yield an estimate for the continuum amplitude at the psi(2S). No interference between the psi(2S) and continuum amplitudes is assumed.


pdgid: M071P22
text:
ABLIKIM 2019BA reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-)] = 1.03+-0.10+-0.09E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-) = 35+-15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071R24
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 2.56+-0.42+-0.16E-3 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071S10
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 44+-13+-3E-4 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071S39
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> 2(pi+ pi) eta).B(eta --> gamma gamma) = 1.2+-0.7+-0.1 eV.


pdgid: M071P57
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta K+ K-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] < 0.2 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56E-2.


pdgid: M071S73
text:
Statistical signficance 4.5 sigma. This measurement is equivalent to a limit of <0.478E-5 at 90% C.L.


pdgid: M071S74
text:
Statistical signficance 3.2 sigma. This measurement is equivalent to a limit of <0.221E-5 at 90% C.L.


pdgid: M071S56
text:
From a fit of pi0 p pbar data to eight distinct intermediate N pbar resonant states.  Superseded by ABLIKIM 2025M.


pdgid: M071S50
text:
From a fit of the p pbar and p pi0 mass distributions to a combination of N(1440) pbar, a broad p pbar enhancement around 2100 MeV, and two other broad, unestablished resonances.


pdgid: M071S59
text:
From a fit (PWA) of pi0 p pbar data to ten distinct intermediate N pbar resonant states.  Superseded by ABLIKIM 2025M.


pdgid: M071S53
text:
From a fit of the p pbar and p eta distributions to a combination of N^*(1535) pbar and a broad p pbar enhancement around 2100 MeV.


pdgid: M071R28
text:
AUBERT 2007BD reports [G(psi(2S) --> Lambda Lambdabar)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 15+-4+-1E-4 keV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071P65
text:
Using B(Lambda --> p K-), B(Sigma0 --> Lambda gamma) and B(pi0 --> gamma gamma) from PDG 2022, together with a partial wave analysis of the intermediate Lambda pi0 and Sigma0 pi0 resonances, Lambda(1405, 1520, 1600, 1670, 1690, 1800, 1890, 2325) and Sigma0(1385, 1660, 1670, 1750, 1910).


pdgid: M071S42
text:
Assuming a width Gamma(h_{{c}}(1P)) = 0.86 MeV == Gamma_{{0}}(), a measured dependence of the central value of B = (7.6 +1.4 x Gamma(h_{{c}}(1P)/Gamma_{{0}}()) x E-4, and with a systematic error that accounts for the width variation range 0.43 -- 1.29 MeV.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2024J reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.97+-0.06+-0.09E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9+1.2-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2012G reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 1.30+-0.20+-0.30E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9+1.2-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] < 14.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9E-2. This measurement assumes Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M071R42
text:
Taking into account interference between psi(2S) and continuum amplitudes. Range of the 1sigma contour in the plane of B(psi(2S) --> gamma pi0) versus phi, the relative phase of the amplitudes. The fit provides two solutions for B(psi(2S) --> gamma pi0): 3.74E-7 (phi = 3.93 rad) and 7.87E-7 (phi = 2.08 rad).


pdgid: M071R84
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 2.39+-0.09+-0.09E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071S76
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)] = 3.2+-0.6+-0.2E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = 34.5+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071S77
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_2^'(1525))/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 2.9+-0.6+-0.3E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071R86
text:
Includes unknown branching fractions to K+ K- or K0S K0S. We have multiplied the K+ K- result by a factor of 2 and the K0S K0S result by a factor of 4 to obtain the K Kbar result.


pdgid: M071S80
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for pi+ pi- and pi0 pi0 are 3.2/4.3E-6 and 2.6/4.0E-6, respectively.


pdgid: M071S81
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for K+ K- and K0S K0S are 2.1/4.3E-6 and 3.7/5.5E-6, respectively.


pdgid: M071S33
text:
From a fit of the p pbar mass distribution to a combination of gamma f_2(1950), gamma f_2(2150), and gamma p pbar phase space, for M(p pbar < 2.85 GeV, and accounting for backgrounds from psi(2S) --> pi0 p pbar and continuum.


pdgid: M071S55
text:
Uses B( J/psi --> e+ e- ) = (5.971+-0.032)% and B( J/psi --> mu+ mu- ) = (5.961+-0.033)%. No systematic error estimation.


pdgid: M071P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 11.7+-2.5+-1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c0(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.27+-0.06E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.35+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 8.6+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c1(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2.


pdgid: M071P03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 6.9+-0.5+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c2(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.2+-0.7E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.0+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M071QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Using values from fits with floating M2 amplitudes a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), a(2)(chi_{{c2}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c2}}()) and fixed E3 amplitudes of a(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = b(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = 0. Not independent of values for a(2)(chi_{{c1}}(1P)) and a(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M071QBR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Derived from the reported measurement of b_{{2}}(chi_{{c1}})/b_{{2}}(chi_{{c2}}) = 1.35+-0.72.


pdgid: M071QBR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Using values from fits with floating M2 amplitudes a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), a(2)(chi_{{c2}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c2}}()) and fixed E3 amplitudes of a(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = b(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = 0. Not independent of values for b(2)(chi_{{c1}}(1P)) and b(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M053M
text:
Real part of pole location extracted using K-matrix formalism that includes two resonance poles, psi(2S) and psi(3770).


pdgid: M053M
text:
From the joint analysis of the data on the D Dbar and inclusive hadronic cross sections in the psi(3770) region from BaBar, Belle, BES-II, CLEO and KEDR.


pdgid: M053M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region 3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances. Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = 0degree.


pdgid: M053W
text:
-2 x imaginary part of pole location extracted using K-matrix formalism that includes two resonance poles, psi(2S) and psi(3770).


pdgid: M053W1
text:
BESSON 2006 (as corrected in BESSON 2010) measure CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770) --> hadrons) = 6.36+-0.08+0.41-0.30 nb at sqrt(s) = 3773+-1 MeV, and obtain Gamma(e e) from the Born-level cross section calculated using psi(3770) mass and width from our 2004 edition, PDG 2004.


pdgid: M053P03
text:
Interference effect between resonance and continuum amplitudes is considered. Two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053P07
text:
Interference effect between resonance and continuum amplitudes is considered. Upper limit is for the larger of the two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053P04
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Lambda Xibar+ K- + c.c. including interference with the continuum. Two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053P05
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Sigma0 Xibar+ K- + c.c. including interference with the continuum. Two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053R1
text:
Obtained by comparing a measurement of the total cross section (corrected in BESSON 2010) with that of D Dbar reported by CLEO in DOBBS 2007.


pdgid: M053R1
text:
From a measurement of CS(e+ e- --> D Dbar) at sqrt(s) = 3773 MeV, using the psi(3770) resonance parameters measured by ABLIKIM 2006L.


pdgid: M053P00
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> J/psi X cross section between 3.645 and 3.891 GeV, with psi(2S) and psi(3770) masses, total widths and leptonic widths fixed to the values from the PDG 2020. An alternative fit with an improved chi^2, corresponding to a significance of 5.3 sigma, uses an additional resonance with a mass of 3766.2+-3.8+-0.4 MeV/c**2, a total width of 22.2+-5.9+-1.4 MeV, and Gamma(e e).B(J/psi X) = 79.4+-85.5+-11.7 eV, possibly compatible with the results of ABLIKIM 2008H.


pdgid: M053R8
text:
Incoherent fit. Alternate fits that include interference with background yield results between 11.2+-5.8+-1.1E-4 and 11.6+-6.0+-1.1E-4.


pdgid: M053R82
text:
Comparing cross sections at sqrt(s) = 3.773 GeV and sqrt(s) = 3.671 GeV, neglecting interference, and using CS(psi(3770) --> D Dbar) = 6.39+-0.20 nb.


pdgid: M053R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2023BC fit to e+ e- --> phi eta^' cross sections between 3.508 and 4.951 GeV considering interference between continuum and psi(3770) amplitudes.


pdgid: M053R83
text:
ADAMS 2006 compare cross sections at sqrt(s) = 3.773 GeV and sqrt(s) = 3.671 GeV, neglecting interference, and using CS(psi(3770) --> D Dbar) = 6.39+-0.20 nb.


pdgid: M053R6
text:
Assuming that interference effects between resonance and continuum can be neglected and using sigma**obs(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) = 7.15+-0.38 nb.


pdgid: M053R00
text:
DRUZHININ 2015 uses BABAR and CLEO data takitaking into account interference of the processes e+ e- --> K+ K- and e+ e- --> K0S K0L.


pdgid: M053R3
text:
From the 1sigma contour in the B.R. versus phi (relative phase between the continuum and psi(3770) amplitudes) likelihood scan. Mass, total width and electronic width of psi(3770) fixed at PDG 2022 values.


pdgid: M053R3
text:
Using CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770) --> hadrons) = (6.38+-0.08+0.41-0.30) nb from BESSON 2006 and B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = 0.6895+-0.0014.


pdgid: M053R98
text:
AAIJ 2017AD reports B(B+ --> psi(3770) K+ --> p pbar K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> p pbar K+) < 0.09 (0.10) at 90% (95%) CL.


pdgid: M053R09
text:
Calculated by the authors using CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770) --> hadrons) = 6.36+-0.08+0.41-0.30 nb from BESSON 2010.


pdgid: M053R42
text:
From a measurement of the e+ e- --> Lambda Lambdabar cross section between 3.5 and 4.6 GeV. At a 90% CL the lower bound is >2.4E-6.


pdgid: M053R03
text:
Uses B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46 % from ATHAR 2004, psi(2S) mass and width from PDG 2004, and (psi(2S)) = 2.54+-0.03+-0.11 keV from ADAM 2006.


pdgid: M053R03
text:
Using (psi(2S)) = (2.54+-0.03+-0.11) keV from ADAM 2006 and taking CS(e+ e- --> D Dbar) from HE 2005 for CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770)).


pdgid: M053R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2016B reports 1.94+-0.42+-0.64E-3 from a measurement of [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c1())/G(total)] / [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M053R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c1())/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 8.51+-2.39+-1.42E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 0.00346+-0.00030. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. We have calculated the best value of B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/2 of B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) =.


pdgid: M053R02
text:
Uses B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54 % from ATHAR 2004, psi(2S) mass and width from PDG 2004, and (psi(2S)) = 2.54+-0.03+-0.11 keV from ADAM 2006.


pdgid: M053R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2016B reports 6.88+-0.28+-0.67E-3 from a measurement of [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c0())/G(total)] / [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 10.06+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M053R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma eta_c())/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] < 16E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 1.97E-2. We have calculated the best value of B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/3 of B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) =.


pdgid: M053R20
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] < 5.6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 6.3E-3. We have calculated the best value of B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/3 of B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) =.


pdgid: M212M
text:
Using the measured mass(psi_{{2}}(3823))-mass(psi(2S)) and assuming mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097 MeV from PDG 2022.


pdgid: M212M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to B+- --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K+- and B0 --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K0S with significance 4.0sigma including systematics. Corrected for the measured psi(2S) mass using B --> psi(2S) K --> ( gamma chi_c1() ) K decays.


pdgid: M212M
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1() gamma data (the  pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to  simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c1() gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1() gamma  together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), floating psi_{{2}}(3823) mass, and zero  psi_{{2}}(3823) width, resulting in a significance of 5.9sigma when including systematic  uncertainties. Superseded by ABLIKIM 22R.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi0 pi0 chi_c1 gamma data at sqrt(s) values from 4.23 to 4.70 GeV to a  Breit-Wigner function with floating width, using the Bayesian approach.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1 gamma data (the pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to a Breit-Wigner function with the mass fixed from the likelihood fit above, Gaussian resolution smearing, and floating width.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a simultaneous fit to B+- --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K+- and B0 --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K0S with significance 4.0sigma including systematics.


pdgid: M212R00
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X.


pdgid: M212R09
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of  seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X.


pdgid: M212R10
text:
Using the branching ratio for B+ --> psi_2(3823) K+ with psi_2(3823) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi- from AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3823) cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two coherent Breit-Wigner resonances. The data is also consistent with a single peak R with mass 4417.5+-26.2+-3.5 MeV and width 245+-48+-13 MeV, which leads to Gamma(e+ e-) B(R --> pi+ pi- psi_2(3823)) B(psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1 gamma) = 0.57+-0.08 eV.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X. Signal has a 11.8 sigma  significance.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports B(B+- --> psi_2(3823) K+-) x B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c1()) =  9.7+-2.8+-1.1E-6 with statistical significance 3.8 sigma.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X. Signal has a 3.2 sigma significance.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c2 gamma data (the pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c2 gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c2 gamma together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), psi_{{2}}(3823) mass floating (fixed to that above), and zero psi_{{2}}(3823) width.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports B(B+- --> psi_2(3823) K+-) x B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c2()) < 3.6E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M212R03
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1(2)() gamma data (the pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c1(2)() gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1(2)() gamma together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), psi_{{2}}(3823) mass floating (fixed to that above), and zero psi_{{2}}(3823) width.


pdgid: M176TMP
text:
From simultaneous line shape fits of e+ e- --> gamma chi_c1(3872) --> gamma [ D0 Dbar0 pi0 ] and gamma [ J/psi pi+ pi- ]. The most prominent pole is reported at 7.04+-0.15+0.07-0.08 MeV above the D0 Dbar0 pi0 threshold of 3864.66 MeV on the first sheet with respect to the D^*()0 Dbar0 channel. The uncertainty in the D0 width is included in the uncertainty of the pole mass.


pdgid: M176TMP
text:
The final uncertainty on the real part of the pole location comes from the uncertainty in the D- and D^*()0 meson masses.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) = 185.54+-0.06 MeV obtained by combining the data with chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in B+ decays from AAIJ 2020S and inclusive b-hadron decays from AAIJ 2020AD and using mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097 MeV. Breit-Wigner parametrization.


pdgid: M176M
text:
The mass difference for the chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in B+ and B0 decays is (-0.71+-0.96+-0.19) MeV.


pdgid: M176M
text:
A possible equal mixture of two states with a mass difference greater than 3.6 MeV/c**2 is excluded at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872)) - mass(J/psi) using mass(J/psi)=3096.916 MeV.


pdgid: M176M
text:
From a fit of a relativistic S-wave Breit-Wigner convolved with the detector resolution. The width of chi_{{c1}}(3872) is constrained to the PDG 2022 value. Systematic errors not evaluated.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Using chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in inclusive b-hadron decays and mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097+-0.010 MeV. Breit-Wigner parametrization. Superseded by the combined value in AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) using mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.093 MeV. Superseded by AUBERT 2008Y.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) using mass(psi(2S)) = 3685.96MeV. Superseded by AUBERT 2006.


pdgid: M176MD0
text:
Calculated from the measured mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(D^*()0)-mass(Dbar0) = 1.1+0.6-0.4+0.1-0.3 MeV.


pdgid: M176MD0
text:
Experiments report D^*()0 Dbar0 invariant mass above D^*()0 Dbar0 threshold because D^*()0 decay products are kinematically constrained to the D^*()0 mass, even though the D^*()0 may decay off-shell.


pdgid: M176DM2
text:
Using chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in inclusive b-hadron decays. Breit-Wigner parametrization. Superseded by the combined value in AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M176DM2
text:
Combining mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) = 185.49+-0.06+-0.03 MeV from AAIJ 2020S and the measured mass difference from AAIJ 2020AD. Breit-Wigner parametrization.


pdgid: M176WD0
text:
With a measured value of B(B --> chi_c1(3872) K) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> D^*()0 Dbar0) = 0.80+-0.20+-0.10E-4, assumed to be equal for both charged and neutral modes.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
Fit to cross section using a total width value of 1.19+-0.21 MeV and B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S) ) = (3.8+-1.2)% from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
ABLIKIM 2015V reports this limit from the measurement of Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))xGamma(chi_c1(3872) --> e+ e-)/Gamma < 0.13 eV using Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/Gamma = 3%.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
Using BAI 1998E data on e+ e- --> pi+ pi- lepton+ lepton-. Assuming that Gamma(pi+ pi- J/psi) of chi_{{c1}}(3872) is the same as that of psi(2S) (85.4 keV).


pdgid: M176G1
text:
Using B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi pi+ pi-). B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-). Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> e+ e-) < 0.37 eV from AUBERT 2005D and B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0588+-0.0010 from the PDG 2004.


pdgid: M176G1
text:
Using BAI 1998E data on e+ e- --> pi+ pi- lepton+ lepton-. From theoretical calculation of the production cross section and using B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = (5.88+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M176H1
text:
Measured in single-tag two-photon production assuming Q^2 dependence of a c cbar meson model. Here, Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma gamma) is the reduced two-photon decay width, Gammatilde(gamma gamma).


pdgid: M176R30
text:
YIN 2023 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.9E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R30
text:
Assuming the decay products, pi+ pi- pi0, are uniformly distributed in phase space.  The limit is the 90% "credible" upper limit (i.e. Bayesian).


pdgid: M176R30
text:
YIN 2023 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0) = 1.1E-4.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
AAIJ 2020S reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 7.95+-0.15+-0.33E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
CHOI 2011 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 8.63+-0.82+-0.52E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
AUBERT 2008Y reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 8.4+-1.5+-0.7E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
BALA 2015 reports B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K+ pi-) =  7.9+-1.3+-0.4E-6 and B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K0 pi+) =  10.6+-3.0+-0.9E-6.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
Superseded by AUBERT 2008Y. AUBERT 2005R reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.28+-0.41E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
CHOI 2003 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] / [B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 0.063+-0.012+-0.007 which we multiply or divide by our best (shown rounded) values B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4, B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+) = 6.25+-0.21E-4, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.78+-0.33E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) values.


pdgid: M176R25
text:
WANG 2011B reports B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872)) x B(chi_c1 --> pi+ pi- pi0 J/psi) < 2.4E-6 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R25
text:
SHEN 2010A reports B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872)) x B(chi_c1 --> pi+ pi- pi0 J/psi) < 2.8E-6 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R24
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6.9E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R33
text:
Assuming pure rho contribution only, i.e. excluding the contribution from rho-omega interference. Using B( rho0 --> pi+ pi- ) = 100%.


pdgid: M176R14
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 6+-2+-1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B also reports B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi omega) = 6+-3+-1E-6.


pdgid: M176R15
text:
AAIJ 2023S reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))/G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 1.9+-0.4+-0.3E-2 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R15
text:
Statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. Uses the values of B(B --> chi_c1(3872) K) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) reported in AUBERT 2008Y, taking into account the common systematics.


pdgid: M176R26
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports B(b --> chi_c1(3872) anything) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> phi phi) < 4.5E-7 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R12
text:
GOKHROO 2006 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.02+-0.31+0.21-0.29E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R12
text:
CHISTOV 2004 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 0.6E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
HIRATA 2023 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.97+0.21-0.18+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
AUSHEV 2010 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.77+-0.16+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
AUBERT 2008B reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.67+-0.36+-0.47E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R09
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 2.4E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R3
text:
CHISTOV 2004 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R4
text:
CHISTOV 2004 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 4E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R23
text:
BHARDWAJ 2019 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi0 chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 8.1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R22
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 3.0E-5 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R00
text:
BHARDWAJ 2016 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R03
text:
AAIJ 2017AD reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 0.5E-8 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R03
text:
AAIJ 2013S reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.7E-8 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
BHARDWAJ 2011 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.78+0.48-0.44+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 2.8+-0.8+-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
Superseded by AUBERT 2009B. AUBERT,BE 2006M reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 3.3+-1.0+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R08
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.9E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R01
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma chi_c2)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6.7E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R10
text:
From 36.4+-9.0 events of chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi gamma decays with a statistical significance of 4.4sigma.


pdgid: M176R10
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 9.5+-2.7+-0.6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M176R11
text:
AAIJ 2024AD reports this ratio as 1.67+-0.21+-0.12+-0.04 where the last uncertainty is due to the uncertainties of the branching fractions of psi(2S) and J/psi mesons. We have added the last two uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: M176R11
text:
From 36.4+-9.0 events of chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi gamma decays with a statistical significance of 4.4sigma. Superseded by AAIJ 2024AD.


pdgid: M176R36
text:
Using B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.343+-0.010. We have assumed that B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c1) = 1.


pdgid: M176R2
text:
IWASHITA 2014 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> eta J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 3.8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R2
text:
IWASHITA 2014 also scans the eta J/psi mass range 3.8 -- 4.75 GeV and sets upper limits for B(B+- --> chi_c1(3872) K+-)xB(chi_c1(3872) --> eta J/psi) in 5 MeV intervals.


pdgid: M176R2
text:
AUBERT 2004Y reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> eta J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 7.7E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M159M
text:
Obtained from the full amplitude analysis. Parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner line shape.


pdgid: M159M
text:
From a simultaneous chi^2 fit to the distributions of the omega J/psi invariant mass measured by BaBar and Belle in the processes gamma gamma --> omega J/psi and B --> omega J/psi K. LHCb results also taken into account as an additional constraint in the chi^2 calculation.


pdgid: M159M
text:
Could also be X(3940). Significance 3.1sigma. Fit with additional resonance at 3963.7+-5.7 MeV, significance 3.4sigma.


pdgid: M159R03
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B reports B(B+- --> chi_c0(3915) K+-) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> J/psi omega) = 3.0+0.7-0.6+0.5-0.3E-5 and B(B0 --> chi_c0(3915) K0) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> J/psi omega) = 2.1+-0.9+-0.3E-5.


pdgid: M159R02
text:
By combining the upper limit B(B --> chi_c0(3915) K) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> D^*()0 Dbar0) < 0.67E-4 from AUSHEV 2010 with the average of CHOI 2005 and AUBERT 2008W measurements B(B --> chi_c0(3915) K) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> omega J/psi) = 0.51+-0.11E-4.


pdgid: M159R08
text:
Assuming that AAIJ 2020AI reporting on B+ --> D+ D- K+ also refers to chi_{{c0}}(3915). The last uncertainty is due to the values of B(D+ --> K- pi+ pi+) and B(D_s()+ --> K- K+ pi+) from PDG 2022.


pdgid: M159R00
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports B(B+ --> K+ chi_c0(3915)) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> eta_c eta) < 4.7E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M159R04
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports B(B+ --> K+ chi_c0(3915)0) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> eta_c pi0) < 1.7E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M159R05
text:
BHARDWAJ 2019 reports B(B+ --> K+ chi_c0(3915)) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> chi_c1 pi0) < 3.8E-5 at 90% CL. A signal significance 2.3 standard deviations.


pdgid: M050M
text:
Obtained from the full amplitude analysis. Parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner line shape. Previous measurements assumed a single state in this region. This analysis revealed the presence of chi_{{c0}}(3930) with the same mass.


pdgid: M072M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region 3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances. Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = (130+-46)degree.


pdgid: M072M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy 3.8-4.8 GeV covering the psi(4040), psi(4160) and psi(4415) resonances and including interference effects.


pdgid: M072W5
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy 3.8-4.8 GeV covering the psi(4040), psi(4160) and psi(4415) resonances and including interference effects. Four sets of solutions are obtained with the same fit quality, mass and total width, but with different e+ e- partial widths. We quote only the range of values.


pdgid: M072W2
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> mu+ mu- cross section between 3.8 and 4.6 GeV to the coherent sum of four resonant amplitudes assuming Gamma(mu+ mu-) = Gamma(e+ e-).


pdgid: M072W2
text:
From solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality. Other solutions range from 0.58+-0.52+-0.10 to 0.80+-0.48+-0.13 keV.


pdgid: M072R25
text:
Solution I of two equivalent solutions in a fit using two interfering resonances. Mass and width fixed at 4039 MeV and 80 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M072R25
text:
Solution II of two equivalent solutions in a fit using two interfering resonances. Mass and width fixed at 4039 MeV and 80 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M072R14
text:
A precision measurement of the e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 cross section shows complex structure in this mass region.


pdgid: M072R15
text:
A precision measurement of the e+ e- --> D+ D- cross section shows complex structure in this mass region.


pdgid: M072R34
text:
Solution 1 of two solutions with equal fit quality.  The significance of the psi(4040) signal is 3.6 sigma.


pdgid: M072R34
text:
Solution 2 of two solutions with equal fit quality.  The significance of the psi(4040) signal is 3.6 sigma.


pdgid: M072R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2012K measure CS(e+ e- --> J/psi eta) = 32.1+-2.8+-1.3 pb. They assume the eta J/psi fully originates from psi(4040) decays. Also see ABLIKIM 2024T.


pdgid: M072R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2012K measure CS(e+ e- --> J/psi pi0) <1.6 pb. They assume the eta J/psi fully originates from psi(4040) decays.


pdgid: M072R24
text:
From several values of sqrt(s) near the peak of the psi(4040), PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi+ pi-) = 1.0+-8.0+-5.4+-0.2 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M193M
text:
From a fit assuming an S-wave relativistic Breit-Wigner shape above a three-body phase-space non-resonant component with statistical significance of more than 5 sigma.


pdgid: M193R01
text:
ABAZOV 2014A reports B(B+ --> chi_c1(4140) K+ --> J/psi phi K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi phi K+)  = (19+-7+-4)% with 3.1 sigma signficance.


pdgid: M193R01
text:
Reported CS(e+ e- --> gamma chi_c1(4140)).B(chi_c1(4140) --> J/psi phi) < 0.35,  0.28, and 0.33 pb at 4.23, 4.26, and 4.36 GeV, respectively, at 90% CL.


pdgid: M193R01
text:
Reported B(B+ --> chi_c1(4140) K+).B(chi_c1(4140) --> J/psi phi)/B(B+ --> J/psi phi K+) < 0.07 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M025M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region 3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances. Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = (293+-57)degree.


pdgid: M025W2
text:
From solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality. Other solutions range from 2.08+-0.99+-0.80 to 2.45+-1.24+-0.94 keV.


pdgid: M025R42
text:
Based on a fit to CS(e+ e- --> eta^' J/psi) from sqrt(s) = 4.18 to 4.60 GeV assuming interfering psi(4160) and psi(4260) contributions. At sqrt(s) = 4.18 GeV, CS(e+ e- --> eta^' J/psi) = 2.4+-0.3+-0.2 pb.


pdgid: M025R48
text:
From a fit to e+ e- --> omega pi+ pi- cross sections between 4 and 4.6 GeV. Recalculated from 12 pi Gamma(e+ e-) B(psi(4230) --> omega pi+ pi-). First uncertainty is from statistical and uncommon systematic uncertainties, and the second is a 6.2% common systematic uncertainty quoted in the paper.


pdgid: M025R00
text:
Solution I of the fit including the psi(4160) with mass 4191+-5 MeV and width 70+-10 MeV from PDG 2016 and the psi(4230) with mass 4219.6+-3.3+-5.1 MeV and width 56.0+-3.6+-6.9 MeV from GAO 2017.


pdgid: M025R00
text:
Solution II of the fit including the psi(4160) with mass 4191+-5 MeV and width 70+-10 MeV from PDG 2016 and the psi(4230) with mass 4219.6+-3.3+-5.1 MeV and width 56.0+-3.6+-6.9 MeV from GAO 2017.


pdgid: M025R53
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Lambda Xibar+ K- + c.c. including interference with the continuum. Significance is 4.4sigma. Solution 1 of 2.


pdgid: M025R53
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Lambda Xibar+ K- + c.c. including interference with the continuum. Significance is 4.4sigma. Solution 2 of 2.


pdgid: M025R32
text:
Solution I of two equivalent solutions in a fit using two interfering resonances. Mass and width fixed at 4153 MeV and 103 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M025R32
text:
Solution II of two equivalent solutions in a fit using two interfering resonances. Mass and width fixed at 4153 MeV and 103 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M025R27
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4170 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi+ pi-) = 15.6+-2.3+-1.9+-3.0 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M025R28
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4170 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi0 pi0) = 3.0+-3.3+-1.1+-0.6 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M025R29
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4170 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) eta) = 4.7+-1.7+-1.0+-0.9 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M025R30
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4170 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi0) = -0.7+-1.8+-0.7+-0.1 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M025R43
text:
XIAO 2013 reports [G(psi(4160) --> gamma chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 0.68E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: M025R43
text:
XIAO 2013 reports [G(psi(4160) --> gamma chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 1.05E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: M025R33
text:
DRUZHININ 2015 uses BABAR and CLEO data taking into account interference of the processes e+ e- --> K+ K- and e+ e- --> K0S K0L.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a three-resonance fit to the Born cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 3.808 -- 4.951 GeV.  Supersedes ABLIKIM 2020O.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. The two other resonances have masses (widths) 4675.3+-29.7 (218.3+-73.5) MeV and 4469.1+-26.4 (246.3+-37.9) MeV.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a two-resonance fit to the dressed cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 4.127 -- 4.600  GeV. The second resonance has a mass of 4484.7+-13.3+-24.1 MeV and a total width of  111.1+-30.1+-15.2 MeV.


pdgid: M074M
text:
Solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality to the e+ e- --> mu+ mu- cross section between 3.8 and 4.6 GeV to the coherent sum of four resonant amplitudes. Other solutions range from 4212.8+-7.2+-4.0 to 4219.4+-11.2+-4.1 MeV.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a fit of the measured cross section from sqrt(s) = 4.178 -- 4.278 GeV. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2015C.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a fit to the cross section for e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(2S) --> 2 ( pi+ pi- ) lepton+ lepton-  obtained from 16 center-of-mass energies between 4.008 and 4.600 GeV and comprising 5.1 fb**-1.  Superseded by ABLIKIM 2021AJ.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a combined fit of BELLE, BABAR and BES3 e+ e- --> pi+ pi- J/psi and e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(2S) data.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a 3-parameter fit of measured cross sections from sqrt(s) = 4.21 -- 4.42 GeV to a phase-space modified Breit-Wigner function, using the decays chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-, chi_c0() --> K+ K-, and omega --> pi+ pi- pi0.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a single-resonance fit. Two interfering resonances are not excluded. Superseded by LEES 2012AC.


pdgid: M074W
text:
Solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality to the e+ e- --> mu+ mu- cross section between 3.8 and 4.6 GeV to the coherent sum of four resonant amplitudes. Other solutions range from 36.4+-16.8+-8.1 to 49.6+-22.6+-11.0 MeV.


pdgid: M074W01
text:
From solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality. Other solutions range from 1.09+-0.84+-0.39 to 1.53+-1.26+-0.54 keV.


pdgid: M074G3
text:
Solution I from a two-resonance fit to the dressed cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 4.127 -- 4.600 GeV. The second resonance has a mass of 4484.7+-13.3+-24.1 MeV, a total width of 111.1+-30.1+-15.2 MeV, and width(ee).B = 1.35+-0.14+-0.07 eV. The phase difference is 1.72+-0.09+-0.52 rad.


pdgid: M074G3
text:
Solution II from a two-resonance fit to the dressed cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 4.127 -- 4.600 GeV. The second resonance has a mass of 4484.7+-13.3+-24.1 MeV, a total width of 111.1+-30.1+-15.2 MeV, and width(ee).B = 0.41+-0.08+-0.13 eV. The phase difference is 5.49+-0.35+-0.58 rad.


pdgid: M074G3
text:
From a fit of the broad K+ K- J/psi enhancement including a coherent psi(4260) amplitude with mass and width from LIU 2013B. Supersedes YUAN 2008. The shape of the cross section observed by ABLIKIM 2018N between 4.2 and 4.3 GeV is incompatible with that of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- J/psi in ABLIKIM 2013T and ABLIKIM 2017B. They also observe a broad enhancement around 4.5 GeV.


pdgid: M074G3
text:
From a fit of the broad K+ K- J/psi enhancement including a coherent psi(4260) amplitude with mass and width from YUAN 2007.


pdgid: M074G02
text:
From a fit of the K0S K0S J/psi mass range from 4.4 to 5.5 GeV including a coherent psi(4260) amplitude with mass and width from LIU 2013B.


pdgid: M074R34
text:
Based on a fit to CS(e+ e- --> eta^' J/psi) from sqrt(s) = 4.18 to 4.60 GeV assuming interfering psi(4160) and psi(4260) contributions. At sqrt(s) = 4.23 GeV, CS(e+ e- --> eta^' J/psi) = 3.6+-0.6+-0.3 pb.


pdgid: M074G7
text:
For constructive interference with the psi(4360) in a combined fit of AUBERT 2007S and WANG 2007D data with three resonances.


pdgid: M074G7
text:
For destructive interference with the psi(4360) in a combined fit of AUBERT 2007S and WANG 2007D data with three resonances.


pdgid: M074R47
text:
Using three coherent Breit-Wigner functions between 4.009 and 4.950 GeV. Second solution: 0.9+-0.5 eV.


pdgid: M074G6
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(4230) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(psi(4230) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] < 0.14 eV which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 50.1E-2.


pdgid: M074R65
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV,  assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. Depending on  solutions I - VIII with the same fit qualities.


pdgid: M074R56
text:
Not seen in e+ e- --> pi+ pi- eta_c at sqrt(s) = 4.226 GeV with a 90% C.L. upper limit on the cross section of 16.8 pb.


pdgid: M074R55
text:
Seen as a peak in the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- pi0 eta_c cross section with a peak value of 46.1+9.5-9.4+-6.6 pb at sqrt(s) = 4.226 GeV.


pdgid: M074R50
text:
From a fit to the cross section $e^+ e^- rightarrow pi^0 pi^0 J/psi$ at center-of-mass energies between 3.808 and 4.600 GeV.


pdgid: M074R53
text:
From a fit to the cross section for e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(2S) --> 2 ( pi+ pi- ) lepton+ lepton- obtained from 16 center-of-mass energies between 4.008 and 4.600 GeV and comprising 5.1 fb**-1.


pdgid: M074R25
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4260 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi+ pi-) = 32+-17+-6+-6 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M074R33
text:
Results from a measurement of CS(e+ e- --> D_1(2420) Dbar + c.c.) between sqrt(s) = 4.3 and 4.6 GeV.


pdgid: M074R29
text:
Significance ranges from 4.2 sigma to as low as 1.5 sigma for a flat component plus psi(4260) spectrum. Needs confirmation.


pdgid: M074R57
text:
Not seen in e+ e- --> gamma pi0 eta_c at sqrt(s) = 4.226 GeV with a 90% C.L. upper limit on the cross section of 11.2 pb.


pdgid: M074R73
text:
Not seen in e+ e- --> gamma eta eta_c at sqrt(s) = 4.258 GeV with a 90% C.L. upper limit on the cross section of 27.3 pb.


pdgid: M074R74
text:
Not seen in e+ e- --> gamma eta^' eta_c at sqrt(s) = 4.258 GeV with a 90% C.L. upper limit on the cross section of 51.2 pb.


pdgid: M233M
text:
From a fit using the five resonances reported in AAIJ 2021E, described by relativistic Breit-Wigner distributions.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a three-resonance fit to the Born cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 3.808 -- 4.951 GeV. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2020O.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a fit to the cross section for e+ e- --> D+ D- pi+ pi- in the range sqrt(s) = 4.190 -- 4.946 GeV.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a three-resonance fit to the Born cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 3.7730 -- 4.7008 GeV.  Parameters depend on the existence or non-existence of a state near 4.5 GeV.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a five-resonance fit to the cross section for e+ e- --> gamma gamma J/psi --> gamma gamma lepton+ lepton-.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3823) cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two coherent Breit-Wigner resonances. The data is also consistent with a single peak with mass 4417.5+-26.2+-3.5 MeV and width 245+-48+-13 MeV.


pdgid: M181R11
text:
Using three coherent Breit-Wigner functions between 4.009 and 4.950 GeV. Second solution: 10.8+3.1-2.3 eV.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution I of four equivalent solutions in a fit using three interfering resonances. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2019K.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution II of four equivalent solutions in a fit using three interfering resonances. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2019K.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution III of four equivalent solutions in a fit using three interfering resonances. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2019K.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution IV of four equivalent solutions in a fit using three interfering resonances. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2019K.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution I of two equivalent solutions from a fit using two interfering resonances. Supersedes WANG 2007D.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution II of two equivalent solutions from a fit using two interfering resonances. Supersedes WANG 2007D.


pdgid: M181R06
text:
Observe e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3770) at sqrt(s) = 4.26, 4.36, and 4.42 GeV but cannot establish if continuum or resonant.


pdgid: M181R03
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3823) cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two coherent Breit-Wigner resonances.


pdgid: M181R03
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi_2(3823), psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1() gamma cross sections taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to the psi(4360) line shape.


pdgid: M181R05
text:
Evidence for e+ e- --> D_1(2420) Dbar + c.c. between sqrt(s) = 4.3 and 4.6 GeV, not necessarily resonant.


pdgid: M073M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region 3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances. Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = (234+-88)degree.


pdgid: M073W2
text:
From solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality. Other solutions range from 1.24+-0.28+-0.35 to 1.27+-0.41+-0.36 keV.


pdgid: M073R13
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi_2(3823), psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1() gamma cross sections taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to the psi(4415) line shape.


pdgid: M189M
text:
Extracted in a fit that employs two BW resonances. The second one at about 4720 MeV shows low statistical significance of 2.7 sigma.


pdgid: M189M
text:
Extracted from a fit with two BW functions. The second one located at about 4750 MeV show a low statistical significance of 4.3 sigma.


pdgid: M189M
text:
Seen as a peak in the c.m. energy dependence of the e+ e- --> K+ K- J/psi cross section using 5.85 fb^{-1} of data at c.m. energies 4.61 -- 4.95 GeV. Statistical significance is over 5sigma.


pdgid: M189M
text:
Fit model parameterized as the coherent sum of a Breit-Wigner resonance and a continuum amplitude term.


pdgid: M189M
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV,  assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. The two other  resonances have masses (widths) 4209.6+-7.5 (81.6+-19.9) MeV and 4469.1+-26.4 (246.3+-37.9) MeV.


pdgid: M189W
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. The two other resonances have masses (widths) 4209.6+-7.5 (81.6+-19.9) MeV and 4469.1+-26.4 (246.3+-37.9) MeV.


pdgid: M189R10
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. Depending on solutions I - VIII with same fit qualities.


pdgid: M189R09
text:
Fit model parameterized as the coherent sum of a Breit-Wigner resonance and a continuum amplitude term. Constructive solution of the interference. Destructive solution gives 0.66+-0.41 eV.


pdgid: M235M
text:
From a 1D fit to the J/psi phi mass distribution with a significance of 5.3 sigma. The  identification of this structure as the chi_{{c0}}(4700) needs confirmation.


pdgid: M235W
text:
From a 1D fit to the J/psi phi mass distribution with a significance of 5.3 sigma. The identification of this structure as the chi_{{c0}}(4700) needs confirmation.


pdgid: M171M
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(1S)) = 10 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding gamma energy or mass difference measurements.


pdgid: M171M2
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(1S)) = 10 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding gamma energy or mass measurements.


pdgid: M171DM
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(1S)) = 10 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding mass or mass difference measurements.


pdgid: M171R01
text:
Obtained using B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma eta_b) = 4.2+1.1-1.0+-0.9E-4 and B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma eta_b) = 4.8+-0.5+-0.6E-4. This limit is equivalent to B(eta_b --> mu+ mu-) = (-0.25+-0.51+-0.33)% measurement.


pdgid: M049M
text:
Reanalysis of MD1 data using the electron mass from COHEN 1987, the radiative corrections from KURAEV 1985 and interference effects.


pdgid: M049R3
text:
BESSON 2007 reports [G(Upsilon(1S) --> tau+ tau-)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.02+-0.02+-0.05 which we multiply by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.48+-0.04E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M049R35
text:
Calculated using the value Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (2.70+-0.01+-0.13+-0.24)% from BESSON 2006A and PDG 2008 values of B(mu+ mu-) = (2.48+-0.05)% and R(hadrons) = 3.51. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2006A.


pdgid: M049R36
text:
Calculated using BESSON 2006A values of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (2.70+-0.01+-0.13+-0.24)% and Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2006A.


pdgid: M049P38
text:
21+-5 corresponds to the number of P_{{{c cbar s}}}(4459) events in the combined Upsilon(1S) and Upsilon(2S) samples.


pdgid: M049P15
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 4.4E-6 to 37.8E-6.


pdgid: M049P31
text:
SHEN 2016 reports [G(Upsilon(1S) --> chi_c1(3872) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 9.5E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: M049P16
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 4.6E-6 to 62.4E-6.


pdgid: M049R02
text:
DOBBS 2012A presents individual exclusive branching fractions or upper limits for 100 modes of four to ten pions, kaons, or protons.


pdgid: M049R52
text:
BESSON 2011 reports 4.0+-1.3+-0.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma f_2^'(1525))/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] assuming B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-3.1E-2, which we rescale to our best (shown rounded) value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value. The result also assumes B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.20+-0.05)% and B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 4 B(f_2^'(1525) --> K0S K0S).


pdgid: M049R51
text:
Using B(f_2(1270) --> pi0 pi0) = 1/3 B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) and B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = (84.2+2.9-0.9)%.


pdgid: M049R51
text:
Using B(f_2(1270) --> pi0 pi0) = B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)/3 and B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = (84.7+2.5-1.2)%.


pdgid: M049R44
text:
Using B(f_0(1500) --> pi0 pi0) = B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)/3 and B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = (0.349+-0.023)%.


pdgid: M049P29
text:
LEES 2018A quotes B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma f_0(1500) --> gamma K Kbar) = 2.08+-0.27+-0.65E-5 assuming B(K0 Kbar0) = 1/2 B(K Kbar).


pdgid: M049R50
text:
LEES 2018A quotes B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma f_0(1710) --> gamma K Kbar) = 2.02+-0.51+-0.35E-5 assuming B(K0 Kbar0) = 1/2 B(K Kbar).


pdgid: M049P28
text:
LEES 2018A quotes B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma f_0(1710) --> gamma pi pi) = 0.79+-0.26+-0.17E-5 assuming B( pi0 pi0) = 1/3 B( pi pi).


pdgid: M049P32
text:
SHEN 2010A reports [G(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 1.6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: M049R60
text:
For a non-interacting scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with mass mass(A0) < 8.0 GeV. 90% CL upper limits range from 1.9E-6 to 4.5E-6.


pdgid: M049R65
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 201 < M(mu+ mu-) < 3565 MeV,   excluding J/psi. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of M(mu+ mu-) range from   1 -- 9E-6.


pdgid: M049R65
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 0.22 < M(A0) < 9.2 GeV, resulting  in 90% CL upper limits ranging from 3.1E-7 at M(A0) = 0.22 GeV to 1.6E-5 at  M(A0) = 9.2 GeV.


pdgid: M049R65
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with mass in the range 0.212 -- 9.2 GeV,  excluding J/psi and psi(2S). Measured 90% CL limits as a function of mass(A0) are  in the range 0.28 -- 9.7E-6.


pdgid: M049R66
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 2mass(tau) < M(A0) < 9.2 GeV, resulting in 90% CL upper limits of 0.9E-5 at M(A0) = 2mass(tau), ~~1.5E-5 at  M(A0) = 7.5 GeV, and 13E-5 at M(A0) = 9.2 GeV.


pdgid: M049R66
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 2mass(tau) < M(A0) < 9.2 GeV,  resulting in 90% CL upper limits ranging from 3.8E-6 at M(A0) = 2mass(tau) to 1.5E-4 at M(A0) = 9.2 GeV.


pdgid: M049R66
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 2mass(tau) < M(A0) < 7.5 GeV,  resulting in 90% CL limits ranging from 1E-5 at M(A0)=2mass(tau) to 5E-5 at  M(A0)=7.5 GeV.


pdgid: M049R03
text:
For a narrow, CP-odd pseudoscalar, A0, searched for in 26 hadronic decay modes with  invariant mass 0.5 GeV < mass(A0) < 9.0 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a  function of mass(A0) range from 10**-6 to 10**-2.


pdgid: M049R04
text:
For a narrow, CP-odd pseudoscalar, A0, searched for in 14 hadronic decay modes with  invariant mass 1.5 GeV < mass(A0) < 9.0 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a  function of mass(A0) range from 10**-5 to 10**-3.


pdgid: M076R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))/G(total) = 7.75+-0.91E-4 combining the results from samples of Upsilon(2S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons. Assumes B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.48+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M076R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] = 7.75+-0.91E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M076R1
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] = 6.59+-0.96+-0.60E-4 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M076R1
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))/G(total) = 8.3+-5.6+3.7-2.6E-4.


pdgid: M076R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 6E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 2E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 18E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 8E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] = 4+-2+-1E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best (shown rounded) value.


pdgid: M076R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 10E-6 which we divide by our best (shown rounded) value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


